Isn't Your Body More Important Than Your Home?
Last night was the third Republican presidential primary debate, and the 10 candidates spent the majority of the time demonizing the federal government and social services.
Medicare is near the top of services that the Republican candidates want to cut or privatize, with candidates like Ted Cruz also taking aim at doing away with Obamacare completely.
The conservative ideology is clear, their logic is simply that anything that can be done for the public good must also represent an opportunity for capitalists to make a buck .
But strangely enough, those very same conservatives drive on public roads, rely on public police departments, and would call the public fire department if their house ever caught fire.
Not all of those services have always been publicly provided though, in fact, fire departments were privately run in America up until around the time of the Civil War.
Before that time, private citizens paid fire companies for fire insurance, and then hung a medallion for that fire company on the front of their building.
If and when a fire broke out, the different fire brigades would all race to put the fire out, if the building had the medallion of a fire insurance company.
And if it didn't, then the blaze would simply be allowed to burn until it threatened a building that did have a medallion on display.
But around the time of the Civil War, big cities like New York started abolishing their for-profit fire departments and created their own city and state run fire departments.
Which just makes sense, because a fire doesn't just threaten the individual property owner.
Just look at the Great Chicago Fire in 1871 for a prime example of how a fire on a single property can threaten an entire city.
And even though the super-rich in this country are known to hire their own security teams, just think about how dysfunctional our country would be if we privatized all of our police forces.
If someone were to get robbed or if your identity were stolen, you could hire the police to investigate, if you still have money to pay.
Or, if someone was kidnapped, their family could choose between paying the ransom or paying the cops to try to bring them back home safe and sound.
Unlike fire departments, police forces have always been public in this country, because keeping the public safe and making sure that citizens obey the laws of the land is a necessary public good.
And the whole point of government is to provide necessary public services that promote the "general welfare," as they refer to it repeatedly in the Constitution.
So if we care so much about our buildings, why don't we protect our bodies the same way.
When a person is sick, their body is literally inflamed as a result of their body's immune response.
And depending on why their sick, that inflammation can spread quickly across a community.
Take the example of Typhoid Mary, who infected 51 people, three of whom died, over the course of her career as a cook.
The outbreak was so bad and so persistent that she was forcibly quarantined several times in the early 20th century.
That was while the study of how diseases spread was still nascent, but it served as an early American example of why health care is fundamentally a public concern.
And then there was the Ebola outbreak last year in Texas.
Texas refused Medicaid expansion under Obamacare and it also doesn't guarantee paid sick leave for workers.
And the early signs for Ebola are similar to that of a common cold, sneezing, coughing, and a scratchy throat.
Those factors made the potential threat of Ebola spreading in Texas much, much greater than in a state where low-income workers can get free healthcare and can take off work when they're sick without losing pay.
What low-wage worker in the fast food industry is going to forfeit an entire day's wages because of the sniffles.
And what person wants to spend an entire day in an emergency room because they might have the sniffles, or they might have Ebola.
But those actions would be in the best interest of the society as a whole.
Because on the off chance that the worker doesn't just have the sniffles, and does actually have Ebola, everyone in that community would want the worker to take time off work and seek medical attention.
As Paul Krugman points out, health insurance shouldn't be bought and sold in private exchanges like bread or TVs.
It should be treated like the police department and the fire department as part of a collective responsibility and a collective good.
It's not something anybody wants to have to use, but it should be available to everyone just in case.
Because it's in the public interest that fires are put out, that robbers are arrested, and that sick people get treatment.
It's time to shut down all this insane Republican talk about how to restrict access to Medicare or how Medicare can be transformed into a profit center for some billionaire.
Instead, we should extend Medicare coverage to everyone, and start treating health care as a right and a public good, and not as a privilege for those few who can afford it.
Spelling error(!)--"..why THEIR sick..." Otherwise, D'Accord!! Great stuff!
Our politicians would rather watch us go bankrupt in our retirement years rather than have sensible health coverage. They run the show. What they want, or who ever bribes them, is what we get. The only candidate that would try to change things for the better is Senator Sanders, and big money will do whatever it takes to stop him. Can't help but be cynical these days.
Would extend the same arguments for making banks a public utitlity.
Credit is too important for the "commons" to let scumbag bankers
make decisions for private profit.
I still don't understand it! The rest of the world has some kind of National Health. It mostly works, and assuming the situation is not critical, or a person is willing to wait for a reasonable time, or they are not fastidious about the "accomodations" of the hospital where they stay, it's usually okay.
I guess Corporate Capitalism has taken over the mind and hearts of the media to the point if it's not private, it must be broken and no good. So . . . that's why the US has rated so low on the charts for health issues for so long, in spite of supposedly being the "richest nation in the world".
The psychopaths are in power.
Paraphrasing Thom (Robert Reich might have said it first;) too many people in power are psychopaths who couldn't care less about anything besides their own selfish interests. While too many Americans have been asleep at the switch, the psychopaths have rigged the game to where they get to have their cake and eat yours too. Adding insult to injury; too much of the game is not value-added activity consisting mostly of middlemen and paper. Even when endeavors are value-added, goals are shortsighted and not long-term; essentially killing the goose that lays the golden eggs to get the eggs right now. But no worries, the taxpayers will buy them more geese.
Quote DFMM:The psychopaths are in power.
You are SSSOOOO RIGHT!!!!
What this country needs is a good old fashioned cholera outbreak; or Typhoid; or tuberculosis (that one may be about to happen).
Human memory is much too short.
As a wide eyed democrat, I see how the republican party fools average working people into voting republican with their talk about about abortion, gun rights, gay rights, and their constant fear mongering. The average republican voter can't see that their republican office holders side with business instead of siding with both workers and business and in doing so cost the workers wages, healthcare, retirement, and rights. The republican office holder will vote the workers way on guns, gays, and abortion if anything comes up about those issues but their wealthy campaign donors may not care one way or the other about those things but they understand that their bought and paid for politician must take a certain stand on those issues to get the votes to get in office so they can do the work that benefits the wealthy campaign donors' business.
This irrational fear of universal health care in america is stone cold barking mad