The DNC Junta Is Continuing The DLC Coup

With just three weeks to go before the Iowa caucus, Bernie Sanders is now in a statistical dead heat with Hillary Clinton.

According to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, he trails her by just 3 points in Iowa, well within the margin of error.

In other words, it’s a tie.

A dead heat.

This is really, really, really big news.

Sanders is already beating Clinton in New Hampshire, and if he can pull-off a two-state sweep of the early primaries, that would completely change the dynamic of the race.

And I mean completely.

At this point, national polls don’t really matter; what matters is momentum, and if Bernie can win Iowa and New Hampshire, he would suck up pretty much all of the momentum.

Now, considering the fact that Bernie Sanders does better than Hillary Clinton in a hypothetical matchup with Republican frontrunner Donald Trump, you’d think that the establishment Democrats would be thrilled with these developments.

You’d think that the people who talk so much about “electability” and how important it is would be overjoyed that Bernie Sanders, a popular and electable candidate, is moving towards the Democratic nomination.

Apparently not.

Instead of celebrating the rise of a new star, establishment Democrats are freaking out about the possibility of Bernie Sanders winning both Iowa and New Hampshire.

Case in point: former Tennessee Senator Harold Ford, Jr., who on MSNBC this morning floated the idea of a Joe Biden or John Kerry run if Bernie sweeps both early primary states.

Pretty weird, right?

Here Bernie Sanders is inspiring millions of young people to get involved in politics, and establishment Democrats think it might be a good idea to draft two guys who’ve already lost presidential races.

Go figure.

But here’s the thing: establishment Democrats aren’t stupid -- they should be scared of Bernie Sanders.

And that’s because he represents a direct threat to the centrists who have ruled the Democratic Party for the past few decades.

Although he’s not as well-known as someone like Karl Rove or Frank Luntz, Al From is one of the most important political operatives of the past few decades.

A veteran Democratic staffer, he thought his party moved “too far to the left” during the 1970s, and so, in 1985, he founded a group known as the Democratic Leadership Council, or DLC, whose stated goals were “to expand the party's base and appeal to moderates and liberals.”

That obviously sounds nice in theory, but in practice it meant the destruction of the thing that made the Democratic Party America’s governing party for most of the 20th century: the progressive values of the New Deal and FDR.

Under From’s leadership, the DLC staged a bloodless coup of the Democratic Party, and swapped out the progressivism of FDR, Truman, and Johnson for the corporatism of the Clintons.

Instead of talking about ways to make America a more just and equal society, Democrats now talked about things like "welfare reform,” so-called "free-trade," and so-called "school choice,” which were really just corporate plans to privatize the commons.

The final victory in the DLC’s takeover of the Democratic Party came when Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992.

Al From had personally recruited Bill to run for president, and the DLC’s ideas were the basis for most of his policies.

Over the next 20 years, the DLC consolidated its stranglehold over the Democratic Party.

And even though it no longer actually exists (it folded in 2011) the DLC and its supporters still control the Democratic establishment, especially Hillary Clinton -- Bill Clinton’s wife.

Which brings us back to Bernie Sanders.

If his wildly successful campaign has told us anything, it’s that Democratic voters are sick and tired of the DLC-Clintonites running the show.

The base of the Democratic Party is still progressive even if the party bigwigs have sold-out to the corporatists.

They want to go back to the values that made the Democratic Party America’s governing party from the New Deal until the 1990s.

They want real change, not Republican-lite policies pretending to be progressive.

And so, they’re siding with Bernie Sanders in the 2016 presidential election.

As I said earlier, establishment Democrats should be scared.

Bernie’s campaign is showing cracks in their junta and the coup that Al From staged more than two decades ago is on the verge of collapsing.

We are on the cusp of a real political revolution.

Comments

Vegasman56 3 years 36 weeks ago
#1

https://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow/videos/1050071191704559/?theater#

Thom this is some David Pakman best work, take a look at it

Kend's picture
Kend 3 years 36 weeks ago
#2

I think Thom might be on to something here. We just had a election in Canada and the Liberil Party won with a very left candidate, to a party that was always middle of the road. (we have more than two parties). He won by promising to out spend the other parties. Watching Bernie promise to spend, spend, spend I think you may have a winner in him. With the younger generation that grew up in a world of entitlement this is what they want and expect. I am very lucky I grew up at a time when the government let you keep most of your money. I sincerely believe those days are over.

Legend 3 years 36 weeks ago
#3

We have to change the system where such a nowhere state has so much pull. I was working on the Illinois side but staying on the Iowa side in 2008 and it was madness.

Mark J. Saulys's picture
Mark J. Saulys 3 years 36 weeks ago
#4

Clinton ran as a lefty and, once elected, ignored that and governed as a moderate Republican. Hillary's not as slick, not as artful. She's very obvious in her flim flam.
I think they'll go so far as do like Mexico did, ignore the primary results and declare who they want the winner.

Aliceinwonderland's picture
Aliceinwonderland 3 years 36 weeks ago
#5

Thom, you’re surprised that establishment Democrats are less than thrilled with Bernie’s success?! You apparently don’t need me to tell you that establishment Democrats = CORPORATE Democrats!! I could have predicted these dynamics eons ago. And Al From is obviously a sell-out like the rest of these establishment hacks.

You’re damn right we’re sick and tired of “Clinronite” corporatists running the country! I would think you would be tired of that bullshit too. Yet you’ve continued cutting off anyone who calls into your show, criticizing Hillary Clinton. Do you want a political revolution or not?!

cccccttttt 3 years 36 weeks ago
#6

While the US voting system has in practice made viable third parties unlikely, one can see the US electorate cries for four parties!

Bernie

Hillary

Trump

Cruise, Rubio, etc.

As we must have two candidates, it begs the big question:

if the mainstream choice does become the party nominee,

how many of the Bernie or Trump supporters will be too disgusted to

transfer their support?

ct

Hephaestus's picture
Hephaestus 3 years 36 weeks ago
#7

Sorry! Sadly! Any one that tried to change american politics got assasinated

What does that tell us all???

Who rules?

2950-10K's picture
2950-10K 3 years 36 weeks ago
#8

The corpse media won't mention it, but this needs to be said again and again. Polls indicate that a majority of citizens support almost all of Bernie's platform if you break it down item by item. Things like: strengthen social security, get money out of politics, a living wage, single payer health insurance, care for veterans, create decent jobs, etc. The vast majority want Democratic Socialism, they just don't realize it thanks to the Fascist demonization of the label/word Socialist.

Trump, the Fascist owned media, Teapublicans, even Clinton supporters, are smug about the ignorance surrounding this label, and are convinced all they need to do to defeat Bernie is call him a Socialist. We need to disarm this bomb now. Maybe it's time to normalize the label "Democratic Socialist" by attaching it to all of the popular items that poll so well. I've said it before, Bernie wins hands down if his message of economic and social justice reaches the masses.

mathboy's picture
mathboy 3 years 36 weeks ago
#9

In Doris Kearns Goodwin's biography "No Ordinary Time", FDR actually states free trade to be one of his goals for after the war. There's a little more overlap with him and the DLC than Thom realizes.

Mark J. Saulys's picture
Mark J. Saulys 3 years 36 weeks ago
#10

Kend! What kind of bullshit are you on? It's the Republicans who spend us into bankruptcy, and they only do that to force privatization so they can put the people's resources into their own and their cronies' pockets.

Old_Curmudgeon 3 years 36 weeks ago
#11

Recall that Progressives opposed Bill Clinton’s “centrism” in the DLC’s early days {mid-‘80s}. A Wikipedia-page about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Leadership_Council .

Willie W's picture
Willie W 3 years 36 weeks ago
#12

I think Bernie is going to spend more money, but he's going to spend it on us for a change. The money will simply be taken from our rich masters and returned to it's rightful owners.

Ken Duerksen's picture
Ken Duerksen 3 years 36 weeks ago
#13

Thom, your show suffers from painful cognitive dissonnance in this regard. Sit back and try to reconcile the forceful language you use in your blog above, with the "omerta" you recognize in regard to criticisms of Clinton, the crony of the DNC hucksters. We have to nominate Bernie Sanders, and that requires tough talk.

Ken Duerksen's picture
Ken Duerksen 3 years 36 weeks ago
#14

Clinton is nothing but "Good Cop" for the plutocrats - notice that her strong preferrence for campaigning in opposition to the "Bad Cops", with as little discussion of actual policy as possible. Thom Hartmann - keep on attacking Mrs Clinton; Bernie HAS TO WIN.

Do not be afraid of criticizing CLinton - no valid criticism from a Progressive will ever be used against Clinton by a RepUblican, should the unthinkable happen. BERNIE MUST WIN THE NOMINATION!!!

RLTOWNSLEY's picture
RLTOWNSLEY 3 years 36 weeks ago
#15

Finally the Progressive Wing of the party is waking up and taking action to regain control of their party. I accessed the DLC's website ten years ago, before it was taken down, and found a list of it's charter members that included Hillary and Bill ! There was some evidence at the time that Billionaire George Soros was directly involved with this group. As a long time progressive Democrat, I've been writing and posting on this situation for years but long time Democrat voters continued to have a single image of the party that is directly tied to the New Deal. You would have thought that the average Democrat voter would have woken up after over twenty years of majority Neoliberal influence over their party !

To give a short, oversimplified definition: Neoliberalism is a small-state economic ideology based on promoting "rational self-interest" through policies such as privatization, deregulation, globalization and significant tax cuts for the wealthy.

Obama has proven to be just an extension of that influence. I would have thought that the Liberal Wing of the party would have responded by now but they remain fixated on their specific agendas that have had little to no real support from the moneyed interests who own Washington unless it can be manipulated and altered to directly benefit them. We've ignored the problem of private money controlling our government for way too long, surely someone had to be concerned over the rapidly declining standard of living that has been accelerating for over twenty five years ! Bernie is the first Democrat to risk his political career by pointing out that it's way past time to stop digging the hole we find ourselves in today !

Steven D.'s picture
Steven D. 3 years 35 weeks ago
#16

Responding to mathboy, in FDR's day, Wall Street was against free trade because they thought trade barriers protected American capitalism. Now the tables are turned. Democrats' support for free trade was an artifact of the 19th Century, when their historically agrarian base would have benefited from cheaper foreign manufactured goods and access to foreign markets.

stecoop01's picture
stecoop01 3 years 35 weeks ago
#17

Before everyone starts cheering for the coming political revolution, it should be remembered that many political revolutions are quickly followed by violent and bloody revolutions. Let us hope and pray that it doesn't come to that, but I, personally, fear that, with the political tension and divisiveness that has gripped this country, it won't take much of a spark to turn political to violent and bloody.

Hephaestus's picture
Hephaestus 3 years 35 weeks ago
#18

Historically, at the end of the day... that's the only way things change!

Mark J. Saulys's picture
Mark J. Saulys 3 years 35 weeks ago
#19

Stecoop, many revolutions in a democratic society are non violent, Reagan's, FDR's, etc.. Even Marxists in 19th century Germany believed that Britain and the U.S. had sufficiently developed Democratic institutions and processes for the socialist revolution to be effected peacefully, by ballot rather than by bullet.

Mark J. Saulys's picture
Mark J. Saulys 3 years 35 weeks ago
#20

Stecoop, many revolutions in a democratic society are non violent, Reagan's, FDR's, etc.. Even Marxists in 19th century Germany believed that Britain and the U.S. had sufficiently developed democratic institutions and processes for the socialist revolution to be effected peacefully, by ballot rather than by bullet.

Aliceinwonderland's picture
Aliceinwonderland 3 years 35 weeks ago
#21

Reply to posts #13 & #14: Ken Duerksen — BRAVO.

Reply to #15: Right on, RLTOWNSFLY!

Did Trump Commit Treason?

Thom plus logo News reports increasingly are suggesting that Donald Trump has committed treason in making a promise to a foreign leader. The question is, who is the foreign leader and what was the promise?

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict
From Screwed:
"Once again, Thom Hartmann hits the bull’s eye with a much needed exposé of the so-called ‘free market.’ Anyone concerned about the future of our nation needs to read Screwed now."
Michael Toms, Founding President, New Dimensions World Broadcasting Network and author of A Time For Choices: Deep Dialogues for Deep Democracy
From Screwed:
"The powers that be are running roughshod over the powers that OUGHT to be. Hartmann tells us what went wrong — and what you and I can do to help set American right again."
Jim Hightower, National Radio Commentator, Writer, Public Speaker, and author of the bestselling Thieves in High Places
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen