Republicans, Proudly Serving the 1% Since the Gilded Age
By Thom Hartmann A...
On Wednesday night, Donald Trump did something that sounded downright progressive.
At an event outside of Philadelphia, he proposed a national child care plan under which child care expenses would be tax deductible and all American mothers would get six weeks of paid maternity leave.
Trump said this is something his daughter Ivanka, herself a new mother, has been begging him to do for a long time.
This is pretty blatant attempt to win over women voters, and critics have been quick to point out that Trump's plan has a bunch of problems, not the least of which is the fact that its tax credits wouldn't actually help the people who need child care help the most.
As Simon Maloy, points out over at Salon: "[T]he centerpiece of [Trump's] plan is a provision letting parents deduct the costs of child care from their taxes. The problem is that people who need the most help affording child care - poor and low-income families - frequently don't have any federal income tax burden. If they're already paying zero dollars in federal income tax, an extra deduction won't do them any good; they'll still be paying zero dollars."
There's also a problem of funding.
Trump plans to pay for his six week maternity leave plan by ending unemployment fraud.
Now, if that sounds like a Republican gimmick, that's because it is a Republican gimmick.
What estimates that we do have about the extent of unemployment say it costs the government about $3 billion every year, which sounds like a lot but is pennies in the big scheme of things and hardly enough to pay for a new benefit program that would supposedly cover all American moms
Just out of comparison, Hillary Clinton's child care plan, which would offer 12 weeks of paid family leave for new moms and dads, costs about $300 billion.
So yeah, Trump is totally full of it if he thinks ending unemployment fraud is going to be the basis for an effective maternity leave plan.
But anyways even with all these problems, Trump's plan is still a big it's still a big deal, if only because it's being proposed by a Republican nominee for president and because it's way more than the government currently offers new mothers (zero).
The Republican establishment knows this, and they're freaking out.
For example, during an appearance on Fox So-Called News Wednesday, arch-neocon Charles Krauthammer accused Trump of trying to "out-Democrat the Democrats".
Amazing, right?
Trump has put forward a very, very barebones childcare plan that has very real holes in it and would really only help wealthier families, and Republicans can't even handle that.
Even the hint of a new social program to help someone, ANYONE, other than fossil fuel barons has them in a tizzy.
And remember, this is supposedly the party of ideas!
That's what Paul Ryan has been saying ever since he took over the Speaker's job from John Boehner.
But the Republican Party doesn't have any ideas.
It's still the same-old neo-feudal billionaire cartel it's always been and it cares about one thing and one thing alone: preserving the power and wealth of the 1 percent at all costs.
Its reaction to Donald Trump's childcare plan makes that as obvious as ever.
Comments
#2
Trump is most of all ...lies, smears, bluster, erratic, self aggrandizing, has to have his way or he gets angry / defensive One of the original ' birthers' made a fool of himself then and now. Vague non answers Weak profit driven corp Media refuses to challenge Trumps BS and he knows it . Trumps a Master manipulator Smoke n Mirrors Who's the real man behind the curtin ?
#3
I haven't heard much lately about trade policy. Have the handlers told him to quiet down about tariffs? The oligarchs don't want it shouted around about how sick our trade policy is and Trump has let the cat out of the bag.
Now the question is, will Hillary out the fact that our trade policies are only tailored to the top 1%? She indicated that she eschews TPP but really hasn't blasted it as a giveaway to the oligarchs as Bernie has. A smidgen of the common touch would be refreshing.
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
From Screwed:
"The powers that be are running roughshod over the powers that OUGHT to be. Hartmann tells us what went wrong — and what you and I can do to help set American right again."
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Through compelling personal stories, Hartmann presents a dramatic and deeply disturbing picture of humans as a profoundly troubled species. Hope lies in his inspiring vision of our enormous unrealized potential and his description of the path to its realization."
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
In the 'sixties most moderate to large companies gave 6 weeks maternity leave to employees, and their health insurance through the employer also paid for the pregnancy, the birth and medical visits for the first year... IF the mothers were "married." If the mothers were unfortunate enough to be "unwed," oh, well...
But not a cent for any kind of child care, baby sitter, etc.
But don't hold your breath for this to become a reality, even if Trump does get elected. Most elected Republicans don't respect him. Lots of them don't even really like him. And the one who will vote for him out of Party Loyalty will be pissed as hell. He won't get many easy passes, in any case.