DAM -- "Youth in Asia will kill your grandmother". I thought that meant education in Asia was so good that their economy would kill grandmothers in the US (LOL).
Quote Palindromedary:You mean that they "overturn the money changer's tables" or "go down into the land of Canaan, kill every man and man-child...take the women and girls as sex slaves...steal their property" or "offer their young females to be ravaged by the deviates who want to bugger their male guests" or "generally treat women as chattel" or "sacrificing one's son at the alter on on a cross?" That kind of thing?
Palindromedary ~ No! Perhaps I should have said "Christian" principles of the Bible. However, it is true when you get down to it that any church that reveres the Bible as the word of God is going to be cherry picking the verses and books that it wants to believe. It has to because so much in the Bible clearly contradicts itself. Yet most of my dealings with the Baptist church of the ghetto has been in an official capacity servicing their office equipment. It is quite amazing the difference between a Baptist church in the ghetto and one in a white affluent neighborhood. You might get a kick out of this. When dealing with the black magistrates of the very same church I find them to be honest, appreciative, generous, humble, and very friendly. When dealing with the white magistrates of a very wealthy Baptist church I found them to be deceptive, cheap, bitter, arrogant, and vindictive. One call in the rich church I'll never forget. I did everything I could to help them and keep the costs down. It was a miracle I got their equipment back up at all considering how neglected it was. However, they needed about $2K of parts to really fix it. I told them what I did was temporary and that was it--a day or two, two weeks at best at minimum use. They never approved the estimate. Six months later we get the call that the machine is down again and they want immediate service because we were just there. Come on. Give me a break. Luckily I keep copies of all my paperwork. When I got there I was both blown away by how much they used the machine that I told them only had a bandaid on it. (Actually, I was also quite impressed by my own handiwork--almost as much as I was shocked by the Deacon's lack of faith in my advice.) He wanted me to bandage the machine for another 6 months. When I told him that was impossible he became furious and threatened to sue us. Not wanting to--not being able to--continue the conversation without saying anything nasty I excused myself. I had to laugh on the way to the car because the guy totally screwed himself by not believing anything I told him. (I kinda suspected he might be like that when I first met him which is why I took the time to put it all in writing and have him sign it the first time I went there. His threatened lawsuit was dead in the water from the word go and he was completely SOL.
Whenever I've gone to poor churches in my business capacity I'm always inspired to see these poor people volunteering for food drives, running homeless kitchens, participating in out reach programs, or even serving the homeless who are waiting in line as I arrive. I have yet to stumble upon any rich churches doing the same with the same enthusiasm.
That's just my business experience. Between you and me I hate servicing churches. I just don't feel comfortable in them for many reasons. I also have a conflict of interests charging them. It seems like something I should be willing to do for free in many instances; yet, contributing to the obvious sham some of these churches are is equally abhorrent to me. I'd prefer just not dealing with them all together. They give me the creeps. However, that is not my decision.
Quote Palindromedary:With all those slaves, who willingly accept their lowly condition while letting others trample all over them, why should the ruling elite, or their wannabes, try to deviate from this easy exploitation-of-others path?
Palindromedary ~ You make a very good and sad point. I thoroughly agree.
By the way, I'm sorry I even brought this up. No hard feelings I hope.
Chi Matt -- Democracy does not imply respecting the choices of others. I think democracy means accepting the choices of the majority and then try to convince the majority that you have a better idea.
ChicagoMatt: Yes, I agree that these things get pretty messy and it's too bad that the riled up crowds don't go after the ones at the top. They lash out at those who are closest and most visibly wealthy. But often, they do such stupid things like destroying their own downtrodden neighborhoods.
I agree that it is a very good thing to be armed. You have to protect you and yours when the cops can't..or won't. I am afraid that I might be just as much a victim as anyone else in such an unstable situation.
Let somebody else have some success too, or, at least, an equal shot at it!
How does my success stop anyone else? And asking a parent like myself to NOT give every advantage to my own biological children, to try some pipe-dream Progressive social experiment, goes against my basic parenting instinct.
I wish we could apply your logic to dating. Back when I was single, I didn't think it was fair that I didn't have a real shot at Megan Fox. Those rich Hollywood types were keeping her all to themselves.
Quote ChicagoMatt:Are we going to try to bring everyone to the average? Do you see how half of the people - the above average half - might get a little angry about that?
So, they get angry...so what? What about all of the angry people at the bottom that greatly outnumber those far fewer people at the top? It is high time our government cracks down on those who have rigged the game in their favor leaving everyone else their victims. We had strong and good government regulations and progressive taxes that created a world of much less poverty in the Eisenhower years up until St. Raygun. And some people still managed to amass great fortunes, despite the greater taxes they had to pay, that they, or their children's children, could never manage to spend in their lifetimes. But since...it has gotten out of hand. The aristocrats in prerevolutionary France thought they were too good to pay their fair share of the taxes and so they used their influence to put the taxes off on the people who could least afford it. The people rebelled and some of those aristocrats lost their heads along with the royalty.
Didn't they stop using the term "global warming" awhile ago, in exchange for "climate change" or, lately, "climate wierding"?
The fact that it's May 4th, and I am still wearing my coat here in Chicago concerns me.
I have faith that someone, maybe some evil corporation that wants to make a lot of money, will figure out a way to get the pollution OUT of the atmosphere. It will be difficult though - the really bad stuff is right on the edge of space. I'm thinking weather balloon-mounted scrubbers of some sort.
Perhaps those egocentric and narcissistic bombastions (I made it up...like palindromedary) of capitalism need to have their bubbles burst in the interest of saving the world from themselves. The Czars and French Kings, and all of those wealthy dandies of the times, saw what could happen when the people, the masses, finally have had enough.
Do you see how someone like me, a newly-upper-middle-class white guy in Chicago might be just a little worried about talk like that? The really downtrodden people in Chicago, if and when this "revolution" comes, will look for people within reach to lash out at. Good thing I'm allowed to own a handgun now in Chicago.
I stick by my theory that things aren't nearly as bad as the Progressive talkers make them seem. Although I respect them and enjoy listening to them, they, like the Conversative talkers, know what their audience wants to hear, and style their shows accordingly. (For example, Ring of Fire just spent the first 20 minutes talking about Donald Sterling, because it fits the Progressive "Rich white guys are racist" narrative. I'll bet they were actually happy when this story broke, like the Conservatives are when they catch a real-life welfare queen.
ChicagoMatt: But, on the Titanic, the rich people were more free to jump ship, ie: save themselves, than the poor ones shut up in the below decks. I think that the world is a sinking Titanic, and all the rich people may survive just a little bit longer than the poor people but even they will not be able to survive much longer than the rest.
The Titanic was a monstrous waste of resources and had all that steel been used in making smaller, more maneuverable ships, the death toll would have been much smaller if one of them had hit an iceberg and perhaps, being more maneuverable, might have even avoided hitting an iceberg in the first place.
Perhaps those egocentric and narcissistic bombastions (I made it up...like palindromedary) of capitalism need to have their bubbles burst in the interest of saving the world from themselves. The Czars and French Kings, and all of those wealthy dandies of the times, saw what could happen when the people, the masses, finally have had enough.
The Titanic (touted to be unsinkable) was such an ego deflator (however temporary). As the world becomes more uninhabitable and the costs of just being able to eat and breathe becomes much more difficult, the world's populations may very well explode with desperation and rip those arrogant, selfish, capitalist criminals apart. Some of those arrogant capitalists know what's coming and some are even trying to prepare for it by building palatial underground bunkers.
I believe that teachers are way underpaid for their education level and importance to us. I believe they deserve far more in compensation than some of the scum bag CEOs or Wall Street flim-flammers.
Who decides which CEOs are scumbags, and which ones actually earned their position? I think you'll find scumbags up and down the chain of command. I've worked with some myself.
There needs to be a leveling out of our school systems...no more "ivy league" or private "proselytizing institutions" or expensive colleges or universities. There needs to be a leveling out of those who have managed to get extremely wealthy by screwing everyone else out of their money.
This is something I've heard before, and I always wonder, where would that level be? What income is too much? Like, an actual number. Are we going to try to bring everyone to the average? Do you see how half of the people - the above average half - might get a little angry about that?
Even Thom says on his show that the wealthy will always find a way to separate themselves from the institutions the rest of us share. Wasn't one result of the ACA a rise in consierge doctors? I've looked into buying into one myself, but now isn't the time. Maybe when I am older. Why shouldn't I have that option, if I want it and can afford it? Why shouldn't I be able to save money for my children to go to a nice, private university? Because you don't like what they teach? Or not everyone can go, so nobody gets to go.
Here comes my English teacher analogy of the day: I feel like, if we were all on the Titanic, the Progressives would be complaining that the captain hit the iceberg, telling people how things were before the iceberg, blaming the iceberg on the Koch brothers, complaining that some lifeboats were nicer than others, and drilling holes in all of the lifeboats, since there wasn't enough room for everyone on them. But the whole time making no effort to save themselves.
Sorry cop out. I have freinds that work in the Arctic your science is wrong. The last 3 years have been some of the coldest on record. Maybe world wide temps averages are warmer I am just whining about where I live. You do know temps havn't even gone up two degrees on average we have only recorded temps for about 150 years out of hundreds of millions. Maybe that is normal. In Canada we have reduced our green house gases. Not that it matters we are only responsible for about 1.6 % of the worlds emissions. It is China and India we have to worry about. i think they should have to clean it up or everything from there gets a huge import tax. Our problem is we focus too much on n. America where the problem isnt as bad. I am not panicIng yet Though. Sorry I didn't want to start a climate change debate. I have given up long ago. Keystone is a perfect example how stupid it has become. There is no logical reason why it hasn't been approved if it wasn't good for the US Trans Canada would have been told to piss off long ago. Obama can't say no as he knows the would come back to haunt him when gas prices sky rocket after Canada is forced to sell its oil offshore. I am told by my oil buddies they have been told it will get approved next January. After the mid terms.
You can see race based affirmative action as reverse racism but I think that's a kinda short sighted, "small picture" view of it. Its purpose, of course, is to make up for unjust disadvantages that are found in the structure of our society resulting from more active past and current injustices when dealing out a limited number of opportunities..
It is possible to take that victim stuff too far and play the race, gender or whatever of victim card but I don't think it happens as often as you might think. In any case, it doesn't change the fact of genuine victimization.
I just have to mention to all my global warming freinds. We are in May and we just received a foot of snow and going to have a high tempature of zero today (32 US) our average temps have dropped severally over the last 5 years. I know I am being selfish but can global warming please come back I can't take it any more. I feel like I am in one of those little glass bubbles you shake and it snows and someone just keeps shaking the $&@#ing thing
Kend, the last 15-20 years have all been the hottest on record almost in ascending, consecutive order. This winter was anomolous. From what I understand, we in the U.S. got below normal temperatures while the Arctic had 20 degrees above normal temps because the warm air displaced their cold air and sent it down here. Anyway, that's the science of it so it'll be back, no doubt.
A poor laborer I knew once said, "The harder you work in this country the less you get paid and the more money you steal the less time you do in jail." That was around the time Conrad Black, CEO of Hollinger International, the newspaper firm which published the Chicago Sun Times, The London Daily Telegraph and The Jerusalem Post, among others, was in the news for sealing $80 million from the firm. It was expected that he would do no time in jail - he eventually served 5 years.
The poor work harder than anyone else They work hard, shitty, most repulsive, detestable and dangerous jobs - often two or three at once - for nickels and no insurance or benefits. The poor are so poor, or so underpaid, not because they don't work hard but because, unlike the rich and better off, they lack power.
A very stark example illustrating this would be that of the undocumened worker. Undocumented workers are famous for their untiring dilligence and brilliant competence - and also for their extreme poverty (or undercompensation). Their undocumented status gives them a severe disadvantage in negotiaing with an employer as to make their negotiating strentgh practically nil.
Any individual laborer lacks the power to negotiate a free and fair contract with an employer of almost any size or potency but does when combining and uniting with other workers and laborers and bargaining collectively.
Nowadays, the point system is based on the income level of the block you live on. So my daughter, who starts high school next year, did not get into one any of the selective enrollment schools with her score (890 on a 900 scale). Our block is classified as "high income". If we lived in a "low income" block, she would have gotten in to any of the four selective enrollment schools with her score. They've just replaced the racist policies with classist policies. In essence, I put more into the Chicago Public School "pot", because my property taxes are higher than most, but my own children can't get into the nicest schools. Do you see how someone in my position might feel like they are being punished for being successful, even if it is an overused term?
Let somebody else have some success too, or, at least, an equal shot at it! I don't accept that affirmative action is racist and applaud affirmative action on the basis of class or family income level. It's less fair, I would hold, to deny a child opportuniy because their parents are not wealthy, putting aside, for the moment, whether or not they are "deserving" of their poverty.
Sorry for my earlier comments - before I edited them out - I thought I had to address the issue of the unfair funding system but couldn't find a nice way of saying it without inadequately stating the case. I tried several before this last version.
Just like illegal immigrants and the wealthy, depending on which side of an issue you're on.
... or racial miorities and the poor, etc.. Although, wealthy people are, in fact, responsible for the state of society as they have greatly disproportionate power and influence and generally don't hesitate to exercise it - usually to create and maintain more power and privilege for themselves, commonly at the expense of all other societal values. Some, like the Kochs, do that on a massive scale affecting not only our society but the entire world as well.
It was actually a ruse of the neocon PR machine at the early stages of the "conservative revolution", the late '70s to early '80s, to riff on the current lefty political narratives of the time and try to characterize the rich and powerful as "victims of society".
They are one of the few churches who actually adhere to the principles of the Bible.
You mean that they "overturn the money changer's tables" or "go down into the land of Canaan, kill every man and man-child...take the women and girls as sex slaves...steal their property" or "offer their young females to be ravaged by the deviates who want to bugger their male guests" or "generally treat women as chattel" or "sacrificing one's son at the alter on on a cross?" That kind of thing?
If I may jump in, I think what Marc meant was that they follow the principles of the Gospels. The Bible is such an amalgam of stuff that has so many contradictions that you can justify just about anything you want from the Bible. I may believe in God - and I don't know yet what form it takes or what nature it has - but of one thing I am sure and that is that the Bible is not the word of God, at least, not one, anyway, that would have my allegiance - or my credulity.
Whatsa matter with overturning money changers' tables? You got a thing for private property rights?
kend: Yes, I know that Flagstaff is not really half way from Phoenix to Canada...I was just trying to kid you about your idea of half way or middle. If Phoenix is Conservative and Canada is liberal (just hypothetical, mind you) then the current Democrat Party is Flagstaff. If the current Democrat party was really middle, they'd be in Pocatello, Idaho right now. But they aren't they are stuck in Flagstaff...very close to Phoenix (about 120 miles).
I've been to all four places (but not politically) a number of times.
I do tend to agree with you, though, that we shouldn't be taxed to pay for poor people's cell phones and cable TV. But we should be taxed to pay for everyone's healthcare and education. Remember that it is the "successful" business person who can "wheedle" blood out of turnips. All they have to do is use psychology in their TV and Movie and billboard commercials to spend what little they have....make them want what they shouldn't buy...and make them use credit so that they will be forever enslaved by those who screwed them out of their money to begin with and then condemn them for being so stupid. Make them feel like a Prince, in order to get their money, then treat them like the paupers that they are...right?
I believe that teachers are way underpaid for their education level and importance to us. I believe they deserve far more in compensation than some of the scum bag CEOs or Wall Street flim-flammers. But I also think that the school system should be totally public and heavily financed (to pay for top quality teachers not burdened with trying to make ends meet all the time..paying for their own teaching materials, etc). We need universal healthcare so people won't be put on the auction block and sold as slaves to the highest bidders. We need to get rid of the elitism in educational systems. There needs to be a leveling out of our school systems...no more "ivy league" or private "proselytizing institutions" or expensive colleges or universities. There needs to be a leveling out of those who have managed to get extremely wealthy by screwing everyone else out of their money. We need a system where no rapacious wolves could manage to get filthy rich while leaving everyone else in poverty. Such people don't play fair and use their greedy talents to wheedle people out of the little they have. We could have a better chance of coexisting more peacefully with much less stress over monetary worries.
After experiencing capitalism, is it any wonder many Russians want to go back to the way it was before capitalism? All it did was produce a few extremely wealthy people and a lot more extremely poor people....just like is happening here in the US.
The correlation between school funding and academic results is indeed undeniable. Are the wealthier students supposed to feel guilty for living in a wealthier area? Should residents in wealthier areas be forced to pay for both their children's education, AND subsidize a high-quality education for those that live in poorer areas? Aren't better schools one thing that attracts people to better suburbs? I'm not saying we call all live in Highland Park (or the wealthier suburb of whatever city you are in.) But does that mean we should look at those people with contempt?
If you're going to do that with education, why stop there? Why not charge wealthy people extra for stamps? Why not charge them extra if they want to take public transportation?
What a sorry assed argument against progressive taxation and equitable school funding! Government social programs are an attempt to make up or the undercompensation of working people - particularly the working poor - and the fluctuating economic activity of business cycles. That all children should have equal opportunity is so basic a human right that I have to ask what reptilian species you belong to if you don't support it. I would have to ask this of all conservatives as that's the very issue that set off the conservative revolution in 1978 as the Proposition 13 tax revolt in California seeking to make greed into a virtue.
Quote ChicagoMatt:
There is also a direct correlation between single-parent households and academic success. I've seen this firsthand with my students. Why not force parents to live together until their child is 18, for the child's sake? Or, why not have one parent from a wealthy family spend two or three days per week with a single-parent family, to "even the playing field".
To focus on educational funding alone as the key factor in the failure of public education sounds just as silly as what I just said.
Wealthier single parent households commonly manage okay, in less wealthy or poor ones the already existing problems are compounded by the absence of a second parent. Some archaic welfare laws encourage this, or, rather, they penalize parents staying together. The presence of a man in the house can get a household cut off as he is, ostensiby, a "bread winner" and thus makes welfare benefits to that household "unnecessary". As late as the '90s such laws were in effect in Illinois and may still be today, I don't know, can't say.
There are, in fact, many factors coming from poverty that influence the academic success of children and a wholistic approach addressing all the injustices surrounding and resulting from it must be taken. Progressive taxation and equitable - and even compensatory, extra - funding for schools of the disadvantaged would be an essential part of that.
Palin you have me confused with Mexicans. Canadians respect your laws and borders. I can't move Down there Without the proper paper work and what I do would take a job from a American. By the way Pocatella Idaho would be half way For me. Nice place though.
Conseratives don't want to tell someone how wealthy they can be, or tell us what health care system we can have. They don't think they should limit how big a company can be. conservatives want to limit the amount of taxes to just paying for basic needs not taxing so everybody can have cable TV and cell phones. I think you might get my point, so no conservatives don't have running my life on the agenda.
DAM -- "Youth in Asia will kill your grandmother". I thought that meant education in Asia was so good that their economy would kill grandmothers in the US (LOL).
Palindromedary ~ No! Perhaps I should have said "Christian" principles of the Bible. However, it is true when you get down to it that any church that reveres the Bible as the word of God is going to be cherry picking the verses and books that it wants to believe. It has to because so much in the Bible clearly contradicts itself. Yet most of my dealings with the Baptist church of the ghetto has been in an official capacity servicing their office equipment. It is quite amazing the difference between a Baptist church in the ghetto and one in a white affluent neighborhood. You might get a kick out of this. When dealing with the black magistrates of the very same church I find them to be honest, appreciative, generous, humble, and very friendly. When dealing with the white magistrates of a very wealthy Baptist church I found them to be deceptive, cheap, bitter, arrogant, and vindictive. One call in the rich church I'll never forget. I did everything I could to help them and keep the costs down. It was a miracle I got their equipment back up at all considering how neglected it was. However, they needed about $2K of parts to really fix it. I told them what I did was temporary and that was it--a day or two, two weeks at best at minimum use. They never approved the estimate. Six months later we get the call that the machine is down again and they want immediate service because we were just there. Come on. Give me a break. Luckily I keep copies of all my paperwork. When I got there I was both blown away by how much they used the machine that I told them only had a bandaid on it. (Actually, I was also quite impressed by my own handiwork--almost as much as I was shocked by the Deacon's lack of faith in my advice.) He wanted me to bandage the machine for another 6 months. When I told him that was impossible he became furious and threatened to sue us. Not wanting to--not being able to--continue the conversation without saying anything nasty I excused myself. I had to laugh on the way to the car because the guy totally screwed himself by not believing anything I told him. (I kinda suspected he might be like that when I first met him which is why I took the time to put it all in writing and have him sign it the first time I went there. His threatened lawsuit was dead in the water from the word go and he was completely SOL.
Whenever I've gone to poor churches in my business capacity I'm always inspired to see these poor people volunteering for food drives, running homeless kitchens, participating in out reach programs, or even serving the homeless who are waiting in line as I arrive. I have yet to stumble upon any rich churches doing the same with the same enthusiasm.
That's just my business experience. Between you and me I hate servicing churches. I just don't feel comfortable in them for many reasons. I also have a conflict of interests charging them. It seems like something I should be willing to do for free in many instances; yet, contributing to the obvious sham some of these churches are is equally abhorrent to me. I'd prefer just not dealing with them all together. They give me the creeps. However, that is not my decision.
Palindromedary ~ You make a very good and sad point. I thoroughly agree.
By the way, I'm sorry I even brought this up. No hard feelings I hope.
Chi Matt -- Democracy does not imply respecting the choices of others. I think democracy means accepting the choices of the majority and then try to convince the majority that you have a better idea.
ChicagoMatt: Yes, I agree that these things get pretty messy and it's too bad that the riled up crowds don't go after the ones at the top. They lash out at those who are closest and most visibly wealthy. But often, they do such stupid things like destroying their own downtrodden neighborhoods.
I agree that it is a very good thing to be armed. You have to protect you and yours when the cops can't..or won't. I am afraid that I might be just as much a victim as anyone else in such an unstable situation.
How does my success stop anyone else? And asking a parent like myself to NOT give every advantage to my own biological children, to try some pipe-dream Progressive social experiment, goes against my basic parenting instinct.
I wish we could apply your logic to dating. Back when I was single, I didn't think it was fair that I didn't have a real shot at Megan Fox. Those rich Hollywood types were keeping her all to themselves.
Didn't they stop using the term "global warming" awhile ago, in exchange for "climate change" or, lately, "climate wierding"?
The fact that it's May 4th, and I am still wearing my coat here in Chicago concerns me.
I have faith that someone, maybe some evil corporation that wants to make a lot of money, will figure out a way to get the pollution OUT of the atmosphere. It will be difficult though - the really bad stuff is right on the edge of space. I'm thinking weather balloon-mounted scrubbers of some sort.
Do you see how someone like me, a newly-upper-middle-class white guy in Chicago might be just a little worried about talk like that? The really downtrodden people in Chicago, if and when this "revolution" comes, will look for people within reach to lash out at. Good thing I'm allowed to own a handgun now in Chicago.
I stick by my theory that things aren't nearly as bad as the Progressive talkers make them seem. Although I respect them and enjoy listening to them, they, like the Conversative talkers, know what their audience wants to hear, and style their shows accordingly. (For example, Ring of Fire just spent the first 20 minutes talking about Donald Sterling, because it fits the Progressive "Rich white guys are racist" narrative. I'll bet they were actually happy when this story broke, like the Conservatives are when they catch a real-life welfare queen.
ChicagoMatt: But, on the Titanic, the rich people were more free to jump ship, ie: save themselves, than the poor ones shut up in the below decks. I think that the world is a sinking Titanic, and all the rich people may survive just a little bit longer than the poor people but even they will not be able to survive much longer than the rest.
The Titanic was a monstrous waste of resources and had all that steel been used in making smaller, more maneuverable ships, the death toll would have been much smaller if one of them had hit an iceberg and perhaps, being more maneuverable, might have even avoided hitting an iceberg in the first place.
Perhaps those egocentric and narcissistic bombastions (I made it up...like palindromedary) of capitalism need to have their bubbles burst in the interest of saving the world from themselves. The Czars and French Kings, and all of those wealthy dandies of the times, saw what could happen when the people, the masses, finally have had enough.
The Titanic (touted to be unsinkable) was such an ego deflator (however temporary). As the world becomes more uninhabitable and the costs of just being able to eat and breathe becomes much more difficult, the world's populations may very well explode with desperation and rip those arrogant, selfish, capitalist criminals apart. Some of those arrogant capitalists know what's coming and some are even trying to prepare for it by building palatial underground bunkers.
This is something I've heard before, and I always wonder, where would that level be? What income is too much? Like, an actual number. Are we going to try to bring everyone to the average? Do you see how half of the people - the above average half - might get a little angry about that?
Even Thom says on his show that the wealthy will always find a way to separate themselves from the institutions the rest of us share. Wasn't one result of the ACA a rise in consierge doctors? I've looked into buying into one myself, but now isn't the time. Maybe when I am older. Why shouldn't I have that option, if I want it and can afford it? Why shouldn't I be able to save money for my children to go to a nice, private university? Because you don't like what they teach? Or not everyone can go, so nobody gets to go.
Here comes my English teacher analogy of the day: I feel like, if we were all on the Titanic, the Progressives would be complaining that the captain hit the iceberg, telling people how things were before the iceberg, blaming the iceberg on the Koch brothers, complaining that some lifeboats were nicer than others, and drilling holes in all of the lifeboats, since there wasn't enough room for everyone on them. But the whole time making no effort to save themselves.
anarchist cop out: Actually overturning money changers tables is a very good idea. I have nothing against it.
Sorry cop out. I have freinds that work in the Arctic your science is wrong. The last 3 years have been some of the coldest on record. Maybe world wide temps averages are warmer I am just whining about where I live. You do know temps havn't even gone up two degrees on average we have only recorded temps for about 150 years out of hundreds of millions. Maybe that is normal. In Canada we have reduced our green house gases. Not that it matters we are only responsible for about 1.6 % of the worlds emissions. It is China and India we have to worry about. i think they should have to clean it up or everything from there gets a huge import tax. Our problem is we focus too much on n. America where the problem isnt as bad. I am not panicIng yet Though. Sorry I didn't want to start a climate change debate. I have given up long ago. Keystone is a perfect example how stupid it has become. There is no logical reason why it hasn't been approved if it wasn't good for the US Trans Canada would have been told to piss off long ago. Obama can't say no as he knows the would come back to haunt him when gas prices sky rocket after Canada is forced to sell its oil offshore. I am told by my oil buddies they have been told it will get approved next January. After the mid terms.
You can see race based affirmative action as reverse racism but I think that's a kinda short sighted, "small picture" view of it. Its purpose, of course, is to make up for unjust disadvantages that are found in the structure of our society resulting from more active past and current injustices when dealing out a limited number of opportunities..
It is possible to take that victim stuff too far and play the race, gender or whatever of victim card but I don't think it happens as often as you might think. In any case, it doesn't change the fact of genuine victimization.
Kend, the last 15-20 years have all been the hottest on record almost in ascending, consecutive order. This winter was anomolous. From what I understand, we in the U.S. got below normal temperatures while the Arctic had 20 degrees above normal temps because the warm air displaced their cold air and sent it down here. Anyway, that's the science of it so it'll be back, no doubt.
A poor laborer I knew once said, "The harder you work in this country the less you get paid and the more money you steal the less time you do in jail." That was around the time Conrad Black, CEO of Hollinger International, the newspaper firm which published the Chicago Sun Times, The London Daily Telegraph and The Jerusalem Post, among others, was in the news for sealing $80 million from the firm. It was expected that he would do no time in jail - he eventually served 5 years.
The poor work harder than anyone else They work hard, shitty, most repulsive, detestable and dangerous jobs - often two or three at once - for nickels and no insurance or benefits. The poor are so poor, or so underpaid, not because they don't work hard but because, unlike the rich and better off, they lack power.
A very stark example illustrating this would be that of the undocumened worker. Undocumented workers are famous for their untiring dilligence and brilliant competence - and also for their extreme poverty (or undercompensation). Their undocumented status gives them a severe disadvantage in negotiaing with an employer as to make their negotiating strentgh practically nil.
Any individual laborer lacks the power to negotiate a free and fair contract with an employer of almost any size or potency but does when combining and uniting with other workers and laborers and bargaining collectively.
Let somebody else have some success too, or, at least, an equal shot at it! I don't accept that affirmative action is racist and applaud affirmative action on the basis of class or family income level. It's less fair, I would hold, to deny a child opportuniy because their parents are not wealthy, putting aside, for the moment, whether or not they are "deserving" of their poverty.
Sorry for my earlier comments - before I edited them out - I thought I had to address the issue of the unfair funding system but couldn't find a nice way of saying it without inadequately stating the case. I tried several before this last version.
... or racial miorities and the poor, etc.. Although, wealthy people are, in fact, responsible for the state of society as they have greatly disproportionate power and influence and generally don't hesitate to exercise it - usually to create and maintain more power and privilege for themselves, commonly at the expense of all other societal values. Some, like the Kochs, do that on a massive scale affecting not only our society but the entire world as well.
It was actually a ruse of the neocon PR machine at the early stages of the "conservative revolution", the late '70s to early '80s, to riff on the current lefty political narratives of the time and try to characterize the rich and powerful as "victims of society".
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
long time passing
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
long time ago
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
jobs are export number one
WHEN will they ever learn?
WHEN will we ever learn?
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
long time passing
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
long time ago
WHERE have all the good jobs gone?
corporations ship them every one
WHEN will they ever learn?
WHEN will we ever learn?
If I may jump in, I think what Marc meant was that they follow the principles of the Gospels. The Bible is such an amalgam of stuff that has so many contradictions that you can justify just about anything you want from the Bible. I may believe in God - and I don't know yet what form it takes or what nature it has - but of one thing I am sure and that is that the Bible is not the word of God, at least, not one, anyway, that would have my allegiance - or my credulity.
Whatsa matter with overturning money changers' tables? You got a thing for private property rights?
kend: Yes, I know that Flagstaff is not really half way from Phoenix to Canada...I was just trying to kid you about your idea of half way or middle. If Phoenix is Conservative and Canada is liberal (just hypothetical, mind you) then the current Democrat Party is Flagstaff. If the current Democrat party was really middle, they'd be in Pocatello, Idaho right now. But they aren't they are stuck in Flagstaff...very close to Phoenix (about 120 miles).
I've been to all four places (but not politically) a number of times.
I do tend to agree with you, though, that we shouldn't be taxed to pay for poor people's cell phones and cable TV. But we should be taxed to pay for everyone's healthcare and education. Remember that it is the "successful" business person who can "wheedle" blood out of turnips. All they have to do is use psychology in their TV and Movie and billboard commercials to spend what little they have....make them want what they shouldn't buy...and make them use credit so that they will be forever enslaved by those who screwed them out of their money to begin with and then condemn them for being so stupid. Make them feel like a Prince, in order to get their money, then treat them like the paupers that they are...right?
I believe that teachers are way underpaid for their education level and importance to us. I believe they deserve far more in compensation than some of the scum bag CEOs or Wall Street flim-flammers. But I also think that the school system should be totally public and heavily financed (to pay for top quality teachers not burdened with trying to make ends meet all the time..paying for their own teaching materials, etc). We need universal healthcare so people won't be put on the auction block and sold as slaves to the highest bidders. We need to get rid of the elitism in educational systems. There needs to be a leveling out of our school systems...no more "ivy league" or private "proselytizing institutions" or expensive colleges or universities. There needs to be a leveling out of those who have managed to get extremely wealthy by screwing everyone else out of their money. We need a system where no rapacious wolves could manage to get filthy rich while leaving everyone else in poverty. Such people don't play fair and use their greedy talents to wheedle people out of the little they have. We could have a better chance of coexisting more peacefully with much less stress over monetary worries.
After experiencing capitalism, is it any wonder many Russians want to go back to the way it was before capitalism? All it did was produce a few extremely wealthy people and a lot more extremely poor people....just like is happening here in the US.
What a sorry assed argument against progressive taxation and equitable school funding! Government social programs are an attempt to make up or the undercompensation of working people - particularly the working poor - and the fluctuating economic activity of business cycles. That all children should have equal opportunity is so basic a human right that I have to ask what reptilian species you belong to if you don't support it. I would have to ask this of all conservatives as that's the very issue that set off the conservative revolution in 1978 as the Proposition 13 tax revolt in California seeking to make greed into a virtue.
Wealthier single parent households commonly manage okay, in less wealthy or poor ones the already existing problems are compounded by the absence of a second parent. Some archaic welfare laws encourage this, or, rather, they penalize parents staying together. The presence of a man in the house can get a household cut off as he is, ostensiby, a "bread winner" and thus makes welfare benefits to that household "unnecessary". As late as the '90s such laws were in effect in Illinois and may still be today, I don't know, can't say.
There are, in fact, many factors coming from poverty that influence the academic success of children and a wholistic approach addressing all the injustices surrounding and resulting from it must be taken. Progressive taxation and equitable - and even compensatory, extra - funding for schools of the disadvantaged would be an essential part of that.
Palin you have me confused with Mexicans. Canadians respect your laws and borders. I can't move Down there Without the proper paper work and what I do would take a job from a American. By the way Pocatella Idaho would be half way For me. Nice place though.
Conseratives don't want to tell someone how wealthy they can be, or tell us what health care system we can have. They don't think they should limit how big a company can be. conservatives want to limit the amount of taxes to just paying for basic needs not taxing so everybody can have cable TV and cell phones. I think you might get my point, so no conservatives don't have running my life on the agenda.
kend: " They want there nose in everyone's business as they know how to run your life better then you do."
And that is not also the agenda of Conservatives?