Recent comments

  • No One or Company Should Have that Much Media Power   14 years 4 weeks ago

    The question posed was, what should be done about Murdoch's media empire.

    It would seem obvious that all of the media conglomerates, including Murdoch's, should be broken up. That would require an FCC and a Justice Department committed to that goal. The old rules against media consolidation, and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the Robinson-Patman Act, would have to be reinvigorated. That seems unlikely, with Obama going hat in hand to Wall Street for bribes in the form of campaign contributions, and members of Congress doing the same; and all trying to get favorable coverage as well as money from the media companies.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    From Guns and butter july 20, 2011 Graeme MacQueen

    Robert Stevens was the first Anthrax victim who worked as a photo editor for a tabloid called The Sun in Boca Rattan, Florida. The wife of the editor in chief of The Sun, Mike Irish, was a real estate agent that found apartments for two of the alleged 911 hijackers. And the alleged leader, Atta, cosigned for the leases.

    So these 19 hijackers were in the US for about a year and a half expressing interest in crop dusting planes, taking flight lessons, and one even tried to get a loan from the Department of Agriculture. They are being very upfront and blatant about what they are doing. They make sure they are not forgotten..having a fight with someone..making bizarre threats....etc.

    This is a story that was circulated right after 911 that was then trying to tie both the 911 and anthrax group terrorism together...trying to convince the public...that both 911 and anthrax were obviously done by a group of Muslim terrorists, is as follows:

    Mohammed Atta supposedly asked for a $650,000 loan in the Spring of 2000...goes to a loan office of Janelle Bryant at the Department of Agriculture, says he's from Afghanistan (he was really from Egypt so easy to check on so why did he use his real name and a fake origin...the origin of where Osama Bin Laden was then known to be?)...he was making himself look very suspect. Says he wants to spray US crops. He acts very belligerent and arrogant saying he really doesn't want to do business with a woman. Then when she says that she could not loan him the money because he was not an American citizen. He says "What would you do if I just come around behind you and cut your throat?" Does this sound like someone who is trying to secretive and covert in order to pull off a big operation like 911. It sounds like he might be planning something but not smart enough to do 911? It sounds like maybe they were planning on, maybe, doing the crop duster thing but I believe, beyond that, they were set up as patsies and did not actually hijack those airliners. Some may have been passengers on those planes but does not mean they actively forced themselves on taking over the plane. They may even not have known that the planes were going to be crashed into the buildings.

    I believe the airliners were electronically hijacked and electronically guided to their targets. Some of those Arabs were on the planes..others it is now known...was later wondering why their names were listed as dead hijackers when they were still alive. Then after Atta made that statement Jannelle said "Well, I know karate"...so it sounds like they were joking around. They kept talking amicably. Atta noticed a picture on the wall and Atta said he wanted to buy the picture of Wash DC monuments and took out a big wad of cash. She said "no, the picture was a gift"! Atta said "well, what if someone just destroyed all those monuments in Washington DC ?" Then he starts talking about the World Trade Center saying he'd like to visit it and he asks her if she knew how good the security is. Then he mentions Osama Bin Laden. He said "One day he will be famous".

    This was the narrative that was spun early on just after the anthrax attacks...making the hijackers responsible for both the 911 attacks and the anthrax attacks...of course, now we know that the anthrax was not done by Arabs but was an inside job. This may have even been a fabricated story by Janelle...maybe even was put up to it by those who wanted to ensure everyone was convinced that "the hijackers" were responsible for both 911 and the anthrax attacks.

    So they tried to spin one on us connecting the anthrax and 911 saying it was a group of hijacker terrorists. Then after it became absolutely clear that it wasn't the Arabs behind the anthrax attacks but an inside job...the spin becomes...that it wasn't a group of terrorists but a lone nut. No one looks at the possibility that it was a cabal or group of inside job terrorists...it is spun as a lone nut. just like Oswald. and others.

    So, the pattern is that the authorities tried to spin this as a group conspiracy of TERRORISTS using Muslim subjects. And when it was proven that the anthrax attacks were not done by Muslim Terrorists but by someone not Muslim..but someone who was obviously trying to make look like it was Muslim terrorists...an INSIDE JOB...then it was no longer touted as an act of TERRORISM or that of a GROUP. They then begin coloring it as another act of a lone disguntled crazy. A pattern exists here going back to McVey, Oswald and probably before...Booth? People are much more willing to believe in an organized Muslim TERRORIST organization or a LONE NUT as being responsible for attacks than an INSIDE GROUP or ORGANIZATION....members of our own establishment...our government...businesses...etc.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Here are the bed partners – Michelle, Barack, and Monsanto!!!!!

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-First-Lady-and-The-Mon-by-Lenore-Daniels-110723-957.html

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    I call upon my fellow Americans to start lubricating their behinds to ease the shock and awe and the never ending BOHICA DAYS.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Obama is totally out of the loop and he readies to ride out his presidency castrated and ineffective.

    http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-gop-ready-act-alone-debt-deal-184236181.html

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago
  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    MY HEART YOUR HEART!

    http://www.myheartyourheart.org/

    The parts are starting to come together! As more data is gathered from my medical records and the donation of my pacemaker, my life may be able to help another human being to live. I believe that it is better for me to give life than to take life in these awful Middle East wars.I cannot stop the wars but I can give new life to another person. Thank you dear God for letting me live long enough to help another person in this world!

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    I am starting to prepare myself for a debt deal by lubricating my behind. Hopefully, the lubrication will ease the ongoing BOHICA Days that we will experience.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Geithner says a debt deal will go through!!! Now I am really worried!!!!! For the debt deal to go through Obama will have to cave into the demands of the Reichstag!!!!!

    http://news.yahoo.com/dispute-threatens-debt-limit-negotiations-014542201.html

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Obama ran his presidential campaign on the slogan "Change we can believe in." Clearly, this is not a radical statement. In fact, it is a slap in the face of those who put forth the unfulfilled promises of the 1960's "revolution". Because of that slogan, I never expeted that Obama would be anything other than conservative - but conservative in the root sense of the word - meaning that he would probably be working to conserve SOMETHING that he thought was worth continuing in America. Exactly what that would be, was never clear. But with respect to Republicans. Republicans would have no power if people didn't elect them. We really do not have to elect them, if we don't want to have them but we do. And I would suggest that this is continuation of the after effects of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Sad to say, but if "promoting the general welfare" - a phrase that comes out of the US Constitution preamble, I think - actually helps people of color at the same time as it helps the general nonwhite population, I believe many white Americans would rather abandon it. I don't know how else to explain people voting for policies that are against their own interest. The PATCO strike under Reagan was interesting. Because it was clear from the beginning that he would oppose the union. But these people (PATCO) thought that Reagan was one of us. They voted him into office. And he disbanded their union.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Here are some statistics that may startle you. These statistics will reinforce why the gay, lesbian, and bisexual issue will never go away. Are ready, really ready for these statistics? Nineteen percent of the American male population is gay. Another twenty-one percent of the American population is lesbian and/or bisexual. Forty percent of the American population gravitates to some form of homosexuality.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    A Super Secretive Weapon

    I am presently doing research on a super secretive weapon. I do not mind people fainting from my breaking wind exploits with only a marinated four bean salad but my hope is to develop a super secretive weapon that will give a knockout punch with one smell. I am doing research on the perfect recipe for such a knockout punch. I am willing to share with you the ingredients for such a weapon. The recipe needs the perfect blend for such a weapon!

    Here are the ingredients. You are welcome to do some research as well. The ingredients for the recipe are to make a meal from a marinated four bean salad with marinated Brussels sprouts and broccoli, from Kim Chi, from a homemade marinated red cabbage, and from a homemade lentil soup added. What is important about the lentil soup is that the breaking wind exploits come out like the rattling of a machine gun. In about fifteen seconds two dozen farts can be released from the human body. Lentil soup farts are not as noisy as regular farts. Hopefully, a more silent fart will not draw as much attention to the culprit. Remember, what is needed in this recipe is a perfect blend of the ingredients!

    My hope is also to start a third party movement, known as the “Stench Party and to raise a huge stink centering on the conservative crazies and the lunatic politicians for inhumane policies and practices in their treatment of all of God’s children in America and to all the corners of our planet.” Hopefully, members of the Stench Party will piss off the conservative crazies and their bed partners, the lunatic politicians, in Washington, D.C. Maybe at some point most Americans will come to realize how much the conservative crazies and the lunatic politicians have hurt America and Americans.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Catholic Church History and Sharia Law

    What I will share with you truly saddens me. These words are my perceptions of Church history. My Church has made mistakes and now I see my Church on the road to maturity.

    I have relatives who believe that a person cannot be saved unless they are Catholics. This view is similar to several Islamic sects who have a similar viewpoint. Prior to the Crusades, an aide or an assistant to Mohammad sought to meet with the Pope and carrying on dialogue about the two religions. The Pope would not meet with the aide or assistant to Mohammad. The Catholics won the First Crusade and than lost the next four or five Crusades. The rest is history. At the time of the Crusades the Catholic hierarchy was seeking to convert all the people. Plus, the Catholic Church before the Crusades had domination as a religion. With a feeling of religious domination will bring stagnation and a false sense of superiority! Each religion has a set of principles that offer ideas and thoughts to better our world. We need to blend in these principles so we can live in a better world. Certain sects of Muslims also seek to convert the world to Islam in order to save the infidels. Both great religions, Christianity and Islam, have sects that seek conversion of another person. Yes, the Early Church did practice her form of Sharia Law. What goes around comes around! Many souls can be saved through the practice of the “Golden Rule.”

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    I may have mentioned these words in previous comments but they are worth repeating. I have said that I pray 24/7, 365 days a year. Yes, you are reading these words correctly. For each breath that I inhale I consider it God’s gift to me and for each breath I exhale it is my way of saying thank you to God for His gift to me.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    @Palindromedary, what the conservative crazies really seek is to bring down the Big Enchilada on MSNBC - Rachel Maddow!!!!!

    Leo Buscaglia, the late Love Doctor and professor at the University of Southern California, taught a Love class. He said that we need to see with our heart. Solomon, the son of King David, wanted from a young age to understand with his heart. If we had more persons seeing with their heart and understanding with their heart, we would have more justice and peace in the world. Let us try to see and understand with our hearts! The heart is very important for a better world.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    This is from the Guns and Butter program of July 20, 2011 with Bonnie Falkner interviewing Dr. Graeme MacQueen:

    Dr. Graeme MacQueen-taught in the religious studies department in the McMaster University in Ontario for 30 years. In 1981 he became founding director of The Center For Peace Studies at McMaster after which he helped develop the VA program in Peace Studies and oversaw the development of peace building projects in Sri Lanka, Gaza, Croatia, and Afghanistan..then taking early retirement from McMaster. Most of his research has taken place surrounding the events of 911. He currently serves on the board of directors of The International Center For 911 Studies which has secured the release of numerous photographs and videos from the US Government.

    The program is mostly about the Anthrax attacks at about that time of 911..which MacQueen says is connected as was originally believed by everyone but they were only in error in that it was not the Muslim Terrorists who did it ....both the anthrax attacks (now known to be an inside job and admitted as such by our government) and the 911 attacks were in fact done by the same people...an inside job. But, I won't get into that here. But a statement was made by MacQueen that I wanted to display here that I believe helps to put things into perspective about who did 911 and the anthrax attacks.

    In February of 2001 Dr. MacQueen attended a conference (actually an extended workshop) in Peshawar, Pakistan. This was 7 months before September 11, 2001. The workshop had to do with trying to solve health problems in poor countries. He had been going to these places for this reason since 1995. The workshops were 5 days a week 9 to 5 and 100 Afghans were there chosen in advance...about 30 were former Afghanistan cabinet ministers, others university people, and others. MacQueen and his group were in Peshawar, Pakistan because the US Government discouraged them from going into Afghanistan at that time.

    This was at an Afghan University made up of Afghan refugees. So in the workshops, people were generating ideas about what could be done about Afghanistan health problems....and one old bearded Afghan dressed in western clothing, a nice suit, stood up and said "You're coming up with good ideas...but...the US will soon be creating a war in Afghanistan. They want the oil and they also want a permanent base which they intend to build there...so everything we are doing is to no avail."

    MacQueen thought that it was not very likely that the US could have cooked up a good reason to invade Afghanistan...why, after the history of foreign invaders failing...most of the world believed that the Soviets had not only done a very unjust thing but a very stupid thing earning a world-wide hatred in invading Afghanistan...so what possible excuse could the US find for invading Afghanistan? Was the US government stupid enough to do the same thing? Other people at the workshop told MacQueen that US forces could already be seen on the ground in Afghanistan. MacQueen just sort of dismissed these remarks because he just didn't believe then that there was any merit to the remarks. Remember, this was about 7 months before 911. MacQueen believes that the man was a well connected man with Pakistani intelligence. And even the Asia Times had printed that the US would be invading Afghanistan sometime in the Summer.

    The US needed an excuse to invade Afghanistan to secure a future pipeline through Afghanistan. The Taliban was going to be a problem in that regard and the US engineered a way to do it...and in doing this they also laid a path to scare people out of their freedoms which allowed for the already happening economic collapse.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Does anyone find the timing of current events just a little bit odd?
    I had mentioned the july 20 TheYoungTurks show where Cenk Uygur spent a good portion of the 41 minute program talking about how the management at MSNBC was pressured by Washington insiders to get Cenk to tone things down in his MSNBC talk show. Even though his ratings were stellar, very important to networks, MSNBC management offered Cenk double his salary to take a less visible job replacing his prime time spot with Jessie Jackson. Cenk is going on many other talk shows as a hero who stood up to political pressure and refusing to be bought off. So then the NYTimes put out a story saying that a Muslim terrorist group was responsible for the bombing and massacre in Norway. What I heard was that it was the work of a Norwegian man who was an ultra right wing Fundamentalist Christian who was extremely anti-muslim. He owned a big farm...or something that gave him the access to lots of fertilizer (remember OKCity Federal building..Tim McVey...exposive fertilizer?). So in watching yesterdays The Young Turks...Cenk goes off on this tirade about how the bombing was done by that Muslim terrorist group and chastizing Muslims for being so touchy about people making fun of Mohammed or Allah (and then he condescended to refer to any other religious group..if they were as touchy). I tend to agree with this of course but I couldn't believe he was saying that it was a Muslim terrorist group that did it.

    So why is this all happening now...when our debt ceiling controversy is up in the air? Is there a connection..another false flag attempt to steer people away from thinking about the real terrorists? The real terrorists are economic terrorists in our own government. I am wondering when these economic terrorists will strike again in the US this time...maybe they will engineer these strikes in other countries...for now...but we might be in for a big shock later on...right here in the US...and it won't be done by Muslim terrorists!

    I wonder, does our economic terrorists have an army of "Manchurian candidates" stationed around the world to carry out extremist operations that could be blamed on "Muslim terrorists" at will? Unknowing, psychotropically-induced, perhaps, patsies to carry out upon the activation of code words? You think MKULTRA was only a temporary experiment of the 50s and 60s? I highly doubt it! ....... ROSEBUD......CRUSADER

    "But now it turns out that the alleged perpetrator wasn't from an international Muslim extremist group at all, but was rather a right-wing Norwegian nationalist with a history of anti-Muslim commentary and an affection for Muslim-hating blogs such as Pam Geller's Atlas Shrugged, Daniel Pipes, and Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch. Despite that, The New York Times is still working hard to pin some form of blame, even ultimate blame, on Muslim radicals"

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07/23/nyt/index.html

    How a clueless "terrorism expert" set media suspicion on Muslims after Oslo horror
    Submitted by Benjamin Doherty on Sat, 07/23/2011 - 00:27

    http://electronicintifada.net/blog/benjamin-doherty/how-clueless-terrori...

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    There is a good article in The Nation concerning the American Legislative Exchange Council explaining how they are using Milton Friedman's call for conservatives to " develop alternatives to existing policies and keep them alive and available with long term goals to downsize government, remove regulations on corporations and make it harder to hold the economically and politically powerful to account." The reason they could get away with it is that the Democrats lack leadership enough to recognize they are in a war and explain to the American public how the only solution to prevent Corporations from completely taking over the government is through the Democrats. What Americans are desperately looking for today is leadership and someone to stand up and fight for them the same way Republicans fight for Corporate America and the wealthy. Democrats can no longer afford the blue dog Democrats who are really Republicans. Only Obama and a few Senators such as Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown have taken on the fight to constantly explain to us the real difference between Democrats and Republicans. We need to encourage everyone to call their Democratic Senators and Congressmen and demand they become part of the fight or we will replace them with someone else. If people don't get the message that if the Republicans get control we will see 12% unemployment for the next 20 years, seniors will lose the chance for dignity when they retire and will be required to move in with their children, we will become a Third World Economy, thousands will die due no access to health care, we will fall further behind in the world economy due our children not being properly educated and provided reasonable access to college, minimum wage will become the standard for wages, etc. If people don't wake up and get involved, if minorities and young voters don't show up to vote as occurred in 2010, that is what we will get. The Democrats do a terrible job selling their position versus the Republicans and this is no longer acceptable. If they don't represent us, get rid of them. This is war. We need leadership. We need the average citizen to get off their asses and get involved. It is Corporate America versus the middle classs. Corporate America won't sit on their asses.

  • Thom Hartmann: Are the Republicans Committing Treason?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    i don't like everything Obama is doing be he's forced to make deals with a radical Conservative element in government. and that's pulling him towards the center

  • Thom Hartmann: To Hell with Abused Children!   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Massacheussetts always has an unemployment rate half of the rest of the country's through all the U.S. recessions since the '70s.

    We must recognize the dishonest language of the Republicans. They push the agenda of the owners of business not the majority of us who work for someone else. When they say, "We are going to help the working people by letting them keep more of their money." they willfully ignore the fact that those of us who work for someone else don't have any money that doesn't come from the owners of businesses - their employers. It comes in two forms - wages and taxes. What employers don't pay in wages they pay in taxes.

    Republicans charecterize benefits and programs for the poor and working people as charitable handouts w hen in fact they are part of their just compensation. Tax policy analyst David Cay Johnstone expressed it well when he exammined the language used to describe the pension cuts and health benefit cuts of Wisconsin stae employees. The Republicans said, "They are going to have to pay more of their own pensions." or, "They are going to have to pay more of their own health benefits." as though they were charitable donations from their employer when, in fact they are part of their compensation, part of their pay. That is like saying, "They are going to have to pay more of their own salary."

    Perhaps if you are an owner of a business such a patently absurd statement might seem to make sense. Owners of business do, in fact, pay their own salaries but for someone who works for someone else that is just silliness itself.

    Every benefit cut and program cut to the poor is a tax upon them. There should be no such thing as the "working poor". If someone works full time and is poor it means they are grossly underpaid. That difference is going to be made up by foodstamps, Medicaid or some other government program funded by taxes.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    It is always someone else's fault. This is all the progressive Obama drones out of control agenda of spending with never submitting a budget of accountability. Oh I think I remember Obama submitting his budget of fiscal leadership and it was shot down by his senate 97 to zero. What a guy of hope a change. It is so easy and moral to spend other people's money. I think the heat of the spotlight is exposing the real Obama.

  • Is wealth inequality in America hurdling our nation toward civil unrest?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Thom i dont see people protesting saying "thats not cool" is going to change any of their hearts, case and point "The battle in Seattle"! Our founding fathers revolted over less then whats going on now! To call it "radical" or "extreamist" to consider a revolution at this point is not right! I wonder what that makes our founding fathers then? The people should not be afraid of their governments the governments should be afraid of their people! When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty! I could go on and on with quotes, but to not stand up and fight back, well we would end up like those Nazis who did not like what was happening at all, but out of some crazy sence of morality or just cowardice they did not fight back against Hitler! With the exeption of a few like "Operation Valkyrie"!

  • The American people have spoken – and it’s time Republicans AND Democrats listen   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Palindromedary: You are correct. I was simply saying that we can't think that boycott is going to be enough. It is one of the best ways to start a movement, and that is what this country needs. The Civil Rights movement began to erupt partly because of boycotting the bus systems. I say that decentralizing the corporate landscape by localizing 1st: food production; 2nd: energy production and use; 3rd: miscellaneous consumption. The situation we face with this debt is a result of long-standing policies that exist only to preserve the power structure and oppress the workers who produce the wealth. By going local and producing some of your own food and electricity, you not only boycott powerful national and transnational corporations, you become self sufficient and provide a working example to your family, friends, and neighbors. We have to mention oil, as its production has most likely peaked by now (if not, very soon), because oil runs everything in our modern system...and with it becoming more and more expensive...and with our crippling debt...we won't be able to afford to run farms (or factories, or wars, etc.) on the petro-model. We will be stuck in neutral and have to figure out how to feed ourselves, find fresh water, and how to survive the people who will panic when things hit the fan. This is not going to be an easy task but I don't see many other choices.

    – The problems of this world will not be solved by warriors—it will be those with an open heart and mind; those who let compassion and love influence their life; those who serve the creation instead of the destruction.

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    Vote out not just the Republicans but the Republicans who pretend to be Democrats! How much like a Democrat has Obama been? Not very much, that's for sure! We need to Primary him out of the office of the Presidency...and put in a real progressive Democrat. But the problem is...we thought Obama was a progressive Democrat...sure sounded like it when he was campaigning. Maybe we need to impeach Obama!

  • Are we seeing the “shock doctrine” at work in the debt-limit debate?   14 years 4 weeks ago

    What is a default? A default is when you cannot pay your bills and your creditors don't get paid. If you buy a house and you cannot make payments on it...you go into default and lose the house to the bank. A default is when you can't pay your electric and/or gas bills....etc...etc.

    So why is our government going to default on it's obligation to pay it's creditors....all those who put into the social security program and all the other programs that people spent their lives paying taxes for?

    Our government is more worried about not defaulting on China, or Saudi Arabia, or the banksters who stacked the decks and others that they borrowed heavily from to fund idiotic and illegal wars than they are about defaulting on their own people...the recipients of their obligations to their own people...the majority in the US who paid their taxes.

    Maybe we taxpayers need to default on our obligations to pay our taxes? There is strength in numbers and if no one paid their taxes...what are they going to do then? They have, for many years, planned to completely trash the social programs one way or another. And one way was going to be to do another smoke-and-mirrors prestidigitation on our social security contributions by throwing them into the black hole/slot machine casinos of Wall Street. These people are salivating at the big sucking sound of our dollars from our government run social security program into their pockets in the form of huge bonuses after they mismanage and gamble away most of it. Then they'll manufacture more smoke-and-mirrors and linguistic legerdemain to keep us deluded into thinking all is "swell" ("swell"...an often used term just before the big one hit in 1929)

    Aside from the initial IPOs to fund startups..Wall Street really has nothing to do with being necessary for business except to be a roll-the-dice gambling casino...where for a few people to win...others have to lose. Sure, it helps be an incentive to maximize profits (and that is ok up to a point but we are no longer a production economy but a FIRE economy..where maximizing profits usually means screwing someone to do it) but that would exist even if Wall Street didn't exist. Wall Street is a cesspool of greedy capitalist maggots.

    There are numbers and indicators, if you are savvy enough, that help put the odds in your favor....but since the computer-driven derivatives and all the other creations of powerful entities to put the odds in their favor..the odds against the little guy...the ones with their investments, their 401ks, individual portfolios will often lose their shirt. They are gambling against a stacked deck.

    Since our government will be soon be in default to it's own citizens who are owed the obligatory (definitely not discretionary) ENTITLEMENTS from the INSURANCE payments that are OWED them, our government will become a DEADBEAT DELINQUENT FREELOADER incapable of handling it's own finances. Maybe we need a debtor's prison to put all of those politicians who can't properly handle other people's money...better yet...a criminal's prison to put all those politicians who knowingly, and deliberately absconded with our money or conspired with their buddies in that action.

ADHD: Hunter in a Farmer's World

Thom Hartmann has written a dozen books covering ADD / ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder.

Join Thom for his new twice-weekly email newsletters on ADHD, whether it affects you or a member of your family.

Thom's Blog Is On the Move

Hello All

Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.

Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.