Comments

millerengel's picture
millerengel 15 years 43 weeks ago
#1

Hi,

I believe the discussion with the heritage foundation idiot included Thom citing GDP growth by decade in support of his argument that the tax cuts hurt....

I have googled around and cannot find supporting data and would like to very much for my own arguments..

can you please help

thanks David Miller-Engel

charlottelightrail's picture
charlottelightrail 15 years 42 weeks ago
#2

Was anyone else as lost as I was with Curtis Dubay's argument from October 25? Here's a Heritage Foundation, "tax cuts are the solution to everything" conservative who says near the end of the interview: "Well, there are, there, tax, I mean, there are tax cuts that, um, encourage economic growth and there are tax cuts that do not. Obama's tax cuts did not change the incentives to work, save, and invest; the activities that encourage economic growth." So he is definitely admitting that not all tax cuts work, and it sounds like he's saying that tax cuts on the lower to middle classes do not work (because, per Dubay,those classes do not save, invest, or make work with the extra money). So, by method of deduction, Dubay is saying that only tax cuts on the upper classes work. But when Thom asks him the question directly, Curtis DENIES that he wants only tax cuts for the rich. Figure that one out.

There's also the earlier discussion about the French and their retirement age. Dubay seems to think that people over 60 having the option to retire with government benefits is a BAD thing for the young people entering the more opened-up job market. You see, here in the US, young people don't have to WORRY about the elderly retiring at age 60, because they have the knowledge that the job or promotion that they (maybe) get in the tighter job market will NOT be because some old guy got to retire early, leaving his position open to to someone younger. So all you American twenty-somethings, don't worry, you may be unemployed, but at least you don't suffer the guilt of having a job where you replaced some retiree!

Dubay's analysis of the current economy versus that of the 50's, 60's and 70's: the strong economic growth of the past decade (huh?) is a RESULT of the top rate tax cuts, but the sustained economic growth of the 50's, 60's and 70's? It had nothing to do with the high (74 - 91%) tax rates on the rich; it was OTHER FACTORS (which Dubay does not name) driving the healthy economy. And that economy wou have been even stronger had tax rates been lower. Got it!

Dubay also thinks that Americans should "aspire" to be like John Paulson; we should ALL go out with our $25 million dollars and make $25 billion by betting that mass quantities of split-up and rebundled mortgages will fail. What a wonderful thing to aspire to; making huge sums of money by betting on the failure of the US housing market! But you see, Paulson is creating wealth (for himself, as Dubay admits) as well as jobs (like his own, I presume).

Become a Thom Supporter



Thom's Latest Book





Thom Hartmann Program

Live: Mon-Fri
Noon - 3pm Eastern
Live TV | Podcast

Syndicated by Pacifica, and simulcast on Free Speech TV Network on Dish Network and DirectTV, on radio stations, and Sirius/XM, more people listen to or watch the Thom Hartmann program than any other progressive talk show in the world.


Thom On Your Mobile Device