The Flat-Earth Society Has Arisen Again
Ever heard of geocentrism? It’s the belief that the Earth is at the center of the universe and that the sun - and everything else in creation - revolves around the Earth. It’s considered pretty stupid right now, given that Galileo, Copernicus and Kepler debunked it over 500 years ago. Nevertheless, stupid ideas can take on a new life if some idiot puts enough money behind them.
Case in point: what happened earlier this month to former “Star Trek” actress Kate Mulgrew. A couple of geocentrist whackjobs with a little bit of money hired her to narrate a documentary called The Principle without telling her what that documentary was about. That documentary claimed, in defiance of all modern science, that the sun revolves around the Earth, although Mulgrew didn’t realize this from the words that she read and what the producers told her about the movie.
As news of her role in the documentary started to make the rounds on the internet, Mulgrew decided to take action. In a statement posted to Facebook just a few days after new broke about the documentary she wrote that she was “not a geocentrist… nor in any way a proponent of geocentrism.” Mulgrew then clarified her reasons for helping out with the film, saying that she was a “voice for her hire, and a misinformed one.”
It really doesn’t take too much thinking to understand why Kate Mulgrew was so quick to separate herself from the documentary and its producers. Geocentrism was disproven 500 years ago, and the only people who still believe in it are fringe nuts and religious fundamentalists. Really, when it comes down to it, believing that the sun revolves around the Earth is about as sensible as believing in Bigfoot or the reptile Illuminati, and anyone, like Kate Mulgrew, who wants to be taken seriously as a modern, thinking person should reject the idea outright.
The same really is true of climate change denial. Over 97 percent of scientists agree that global warming is real and that human beings are causing it by burning fossil fuels. There is no debate. Climate change is a fact, just like the Earth revolving around the sun is a fact, and anyone who says otherwise should be treated like a crazy person.
But the opposite is true: in some circles, denying climate change is about as mainstream as it gets, and for Republicans it’s the default position. According to some estimates, around 58 percent of Congressional Republicans deny the existence of man-made climate change including 100 percent of last year’s freshman Republicans in the House of Representatives. That leads to some crazy things. Just yesterday, for example, all four Republican candidates for North Carolina’s Senate seat said “no” when asked by a debate moderator if climate change was a fact. One of them even went so far as to say “God controls the climate.”
That’s right. While people in the scientific community are debating whether or not human beings will go extinct within this century as a result of climate change, the only answer some people in the Republican Party have to the question of climate change is “God controls the climate.” This is ridiculous. Can you imagine what the reaction would be if all four Republican candidates for North Carolina’s senate seat said the sun revolves around the earth?
Of course, climate denialism in the Republican Party would be ridiculed without the help of the right wing media, led by Fox So-Called News. Not a day goes by without some Fox host laughing off climate change like it’s some kind of joke. This is exactly what happened on yesterday’s episode of The Five. When host Bob Beckel brought up a graph put together by NASA showing the sharp rise in carbon dioxide emissions over the past few decades, he was ridiculed by Eric Bolling and the rest of The Five team.
Comments


Quote Palindromedary:Are you equally as turned off by what Hartmann said?
Why would you think I would be offended by what Thom said? Thom and I acually think very similarly. Thom is not without belief or, at least, stays open minded about the subject.
Science is studying the natural world. When it's time to do that it's not time to study the supernatural.
I would, in fact, like to apologize for what I said, not to PD but to Jesse, and really only because Alice said it for me before I did - which I didn't see before writing it - and therefore it was redundant, excessive and tantamount to being gratuitous.
Yes, Palindromedary, my user name has for some reason been blocked. The last time that happened I thought it was because I was too rough on a right winger on the member blogs but it turned out my choice of wording triggered the spam guard. This time I thought you lodged a complaint but it seems like you hadn't.
It does, in fact, seem that it's okay to attack some people, I mean, we beat up on Kend a lot worse than this all day long. Whatever else we think of Kend we gotta give him credit for being a good sport.

Quote AIW:I think your general intolerance of other beliefs systems is what triggered him, not your atheism.I believe I am just as tolerant of other belief systems as they are of mine. Mine includes that reincarnation and supernatural beliefs are in error. There is no scientific evidence that they are real except in the minds of people who choose to believe in them. And you don't think that I should have a say when others have theirs?
Quote AIW: It's an ideology that has permeated our society and its institutions, that has left tens of thousands of us literally in ruins, destitute or dead.I could also say the same thing about charlatans who bilk people out of their money by convincing them in some ridiculous superstition or supernatural contrivance. And I could say the same thing about religion which has left millions literally in ruins...dead even..tortured even. And just because Stalin (who some argue was atheist)..even though he studied to be a priest...murdered many. Or Hitler, who wasn't without some irrational, superstitious beliefs himself (a big follower of Nostradamus, I think, and Valhalla nonsense), who murdered millions (all with the Catholic churches blessing...or at least without strong objection). And tis true Scientists created the atomic and hydrogen bombs but it was non-scientists who had them do it and non-scientists who actually used them to kill people. And it was the scientists, including Einstein and Oppenheimer, et al, who tried to talk Truman out of using it against people. Truman was just a silly Baptist Haberdasher and not very good at that!
It has largely been irrational people with irrational ideas that has been behind the mass murders of many millions of people. So, you may have a passion against certain right wing groups but so do I and those right wing groups largely wear their religions on their sleeves and have been trying to force everyone else into their camps. You have your beliefs about the dangers of these groups and I have my beliefs about the dangers of the groups that knowingly, or unknowingly, try to proselytize others into their irrational beliefs. They can be very dangerous. From Muslims who want to turn everyone into Muslims and dead if you are an atheist to Christians who would if they still could burn people to the stake for heresy against their particular brand of religion....irrational beliefs are dangerous. And one irrational belief gives birth to others.
Quote AIW: Mark may have stepped over the line, questioning your mental stability. But I still think he was making a good point about religious intolerance, about atheists being as prone to this as anyone else.I am as tolerant of religion as religion is tolerant of me. They think I will burn in hell. I think they will just turn to worm food once they die with no "soul" to go anywhere..it will just disappear when they are pronounced brain dead and it won't go up to heaven or down to hell because those are all just-pretend ideas that exist in the minds (ie: live brains) of people who believe in them.
Quote AIW:While I detect no personal attacks launched by you on this particular thread, I've previously observed you making judgmental remarks about people who you perceive to be gullible or delusional. You've even accused me of being "unquestioning" or "uncritical" (or something like that), just for my refusal to dismiss the possibility of reincarnation. I couldn't even make a joke about being "psychic" without you taking it literally!
Thank you for noticing! Yes, we all are judgmental about a lot of things aren't we all? But I don't think I have actually "accused" you of anything like that...asking a question that if you think you are is not the same thing as "accusing" you of it. And I am certainly not alone in being guilty of not detecting when someone is trying to be funny am I?
Quote AIW: I think you and I both are "Type A" personalities, intense and high strung and easily provoked.Type A personalities, intense and high strung, are the people who lose their temper and fly off the handle and make direct personal affronts to those they are addressing. I don't think I fit any of those descriptions.

Mark: No, I would never Flag you as offensive no matter what you called me nor would I ever intentionally flag anyone...except maybe someone who was actually trying to advertize...selling something...but the spam filters do a good job of catching those....I suppose. Actually, I mostly think you are very inoffensive, for the most part, and I agree with about 99% of everything you have ever said. So, I'm for giving this a rest...if you're game.

Palin, "Type A" personalities are simply more aggressive, more driven and high-strung; "Type B's", more laid-back. It's an old concept that has nothing to do with "losing your temper" or "personal affronts".
There's just no reconciling with you, Palin. I give up.
Have a nice weekend. - AIW

AIW: I stand corrected. Thank you! And I give up too! I hope you also have a nice weekend.

Thank you, Palin. It's always good to end a debate with a "handshake". We may never meet face-to-face, but I still consider you a good friend, one of several on this blog. (I think y'all know who you are…) - Aliceinwonderland

☮
Palin -- This has nothing to do with what has been in any blog. Last night we had a power outage for 3 hours. In our home we have 4 VCRs that we use. Since they are VCRs, they probably can be registered as antiques. Two of the VCRs are Sony, one is a panasonic, and the other is a Mitshiubushi. When the power came back on, the Mitshibushi and the Panasonic came back on. However, neither Sony would even power up. This is so strange that I have been blaming it on ghosts. I have had VCRs fail in so many ways, but never have I had a VCR not power up. One of Sony's is making a strange thumping sound but no other sign of life. Help. Do you have any suggestions?

Quote Palindromedary:"... I'm for giving this a rest...if you're game."
Deal.
Nice weekend to you and yours.

chuckle8: Sounds like you might have some blown fuses in the VCRs that won't power up. If you don't have external fuses that are easily replaceable then there might be some internal ones..they often label them (on the board) F1 for Fuse 1.
Note: You shouldn't remove the cover on the VCR when it is still plugged in to the outlet....nor plug it into a wall socket receptacle when you have the cover off unless you know what you are doing.
Note: You should never try to measure resistance (multimeter on the ohms scale) when you have power connected to the circuit you are working on.
I don't know how much experience you have with electronics or electricity but I wouldn't want you to get shocked. I've been shocked a number of times and it's not very much fun.
It could also be that the electronics got zapped. If you have a multimeter, and know how to use it, you could try checking the resistance across the electrical cord..after unplugging the device measure ohms across the small and large rectangular prongs of the unplugged power cord and hit the on/off switch of the VCR to see if you have infinite resistance or some small ohm reading when the switch is in the on position. It would be normal to have some small resistance when the switch is on and infinite (open circuit) or a very high resistance reading when the switch is off. Usually, if you have a blown fuse you won't see a low resistance when the on/off switch is set to on position.
But before you do any of that, you might want to check if you have power coming from the wall sockets that the VCRs are plugged into by plugging in a lamp or something that you know works into that wall socket. Maybe the fuse or circuit breaker for that wall socket (receptacle) is blown or tripped. Sometimes these receptacles can be wired wrong and the polarity is backwards. Hopefully, you have a 3 prong receptacle. The old two prong receptacles don't have a ground and that ground helps protect your equipment from when you get power surges or spikes when the power goes out or comes back on. It also helps protect against static electricity which can sometimes cause damage to equipment...especially sensitive equipment like computers.
If you have a polarity checker, that you can buy at most hardware or electronics stores, that makes it easy to tell if the polarity is correct and that you have voltage there without having to poke any multimeter probes into the holes of the wall socket. It's also the safest way. You just plug the polarity checker in and if the LEDS(Light Emitting Diodes) on the checker are lit in the correct way (there's a legend on the checker usually) then you have the correct polarity.
You might suspect that your outlet has incorrect polarity just from the fact that your VCRs were affected in this way. Having the correct polarity and proper grounding helps keep these devices from being so adversely affected by power outages.
You could also try to take your VCRs to another known good receptacle to see if it works there.
I think most of those old VCRs have a solidly attached cord to the VCR but others might have a cord that plugs into them. If a cord plugs into the back of the VCR you can check the resistance of the cord..(with the cord not plugged in to the wall socket) each of the conductors from one end to the corresponding one on the other end. Sometimes, if you open up the case, with power off of-course, and look around you might see a burned component. But sometimes you may have a bad component that doesn't show any damage. Look for the internal fuse, if the VCR has one, and check the resistance of it with the multimeter on the resistance (ohms) scale. With the cover off, you can also check the resistance of the cord, if it happens to be a solidly attached one (ie: soldered to components on the board or attached with connector lugs). There may be some big cylindrical shaped components called capacitors. There are big one and really tiny ones. The big ones hold an electrical charge for a period of time, even with the power off and unplugged, and it wouldn't be a good idea to touch the contacts where they are soldered to the board. But since those traces can go just about anywhere it's best not to touch any component or contact or trace with your fingers...just to be safe. When I used to work on Radar systems that had really big capacitors, and even when I worked on TVs, I would discharge those big capacitors with a shorting bar. Screw drivers work on TVs. Of course this was done when there was no power applied at the time.
It's been quite a while since I've worked on VCRs.
The thumping on the one VCR sounds like there is a solenoid inside repeatedly energizing. It could be a zapped component on the electronics board that is energizing a solenoid or the mechanism is stuck in a certain position that is not allowing certain switches to be energized that would allow the mechanism to complete it's cycle. There is at least one solenoid and a mechanism for cartridge transport into and out of the unit, motors that turn the tape transport from one reel to the other. And there is a solenoid to energize the idle roller against the capstan which helps transport the tape firmly across the head which is a tilted rotating shiny wheel. Old audio tape heads were just stationary little things.
Palin -- Thank you very much. I have a multi-meter (I still call it a voltmeter). My power cords are attached firmly to the back of the VCRs. I worked for Delco Radio during the summers back in the 60's. I have been shocked occasionally while working there. I'll let you know how it turns out.

Delco Radio...cool!



Yeah, Palindromedary, make sure you don't show any of your immaturity. I certainly wouldn't descibe you as not losing your cool although you're careful to always "speak in generalities". That's a technicallity, of course, you don't really think you're fooling anybody do you?
Just look at your behavior! You don't think you're being just a little psycho?
How come you don't quote my statements in their entirety? I called you "a man obsessed".