Thom, trying to figure out where you are coming from. The United States has not had a president in decades that is pushing for more products to be made in America. Even you who rely on an Apple phone should understand how vulnerable we have become to the hacking of your security by allowing the Chinese to know our every movement. The CCP is not the world's friend. Everything should be done to reduce our imports from one source, especially those that could be sensitive to our security.

Hopefully, you recognize President Trump is well aware that administrations both democrat and republican have allowed the US to become even more and more dependent on Chinese technology and he is trying to take the necessary steps to slow their access to our security.

Also re-evaluate your position NAFTA that you try to dump on republicans. William Jefferson Clinton was president and he had every opportunity to veto that as it crossed his desk.

@hankgagnon Peace brother. It felt like you were roaring and i almost missed your point.

The DNC made its mistake (presumably not the first one) in 2016. The "good" thing was that this opened my eyes (and definetely a lot of others'. Most probably yours were already open, which justifies your anger). It was evident even to an idiot/naive like me, that strong forces inside DNC did not like the appeal of Sanders, especially among YOUNG voters (our immediate future). Retrospectively, it was not a matter of like or dislike. It was actual fear. Instead of thinking rationally and letting Sanders win the nomination, they succumbed to Hillary's hubris, revealing exactly what (i think) you are accusing them of, namely an opposition to what the majority of USA-ians need and are trying to express it politically (respectable education, health, income, UBI, free-time (play-time) for ALL, equal treatment by the Law forALL, i.e. re-enforcing that part of our Constitution (our (social) contract, as I heard from Tevor Noah recently),which implicitly or explicitly guarantees the above). Strategically, what you call the corrupt part of DNC, made (because of their panick) a stupid mistake. Sanders would have ,most probably, lost and the so called "left" (one of the shortest jokes for those of us who know Europe or Asia) would go on to hibernation for quite sometime. Hillary got what she deserved (Ok to lose, but by whom?)and despite her support by Sanders!!! Do you remember that till a few months ago, Hillary was hoping that DNC would officially beg her to join the nomination race? Remember how she paid back Sanders by opposing him? DNC again stepped in to stop Sanders, interfering once more with a people's process. Sanders wisely stopped his campaign early enough because he learned from 2016. This early acceptence, most probably, has already given him more leverage behind the scenes. Very smart move. On the inside he will have a better chance to pass some of his ideas to some extent, without taking credit. On the outside, people like us will see that DNC once more goes against its principles. Sanders may be physically too old to continue (that is what the corrupt part of DNC wanted to achieve). But will his ideas go away? Of course not. Mainly because these are not only his ideas. Sanders for decades has been the voice of an increasing number of USA-ians with the same or similar ideas. There are many other younger "Sanderss" carrying the torch, Andew Young and the personification-of-adrenaline AOC! Sanders (as a carrier of ideas) is much younger that what DNC believes. DNC will keep finding many "Sanderss" in front of it, till it either follows them or till it disintegrates in one or more pieces. Any guess which will be the largest one?