it comes down to the spineless liars, like thom hartman, who counsel the sheep to get to the back of the bus by, ever so slowly, changing the democrats from the bottom. real men don't put their shoulders to a corrupt wheel!!!
there are no real MEN on the left to stand and make a call to honesty and honor. as a society we've been corrupted by thinking that political connivery is a substitute for legitimate anger and disgust. the milktoasts of the left are advising that you should take your outrage and sublimate it by running for dog catcher or library board.
the left has been betrayed by it's own weakness. claiming as thom does that at the mid-terms republicans won because the progressives thought nothing more was needed is just another liliy livered lie. the progressives didn't vote because they realized they were betrayed. and they continue to betrayed by the hartmans and shultz' ---weaklings that won't call a spade a spade!
Kucinich: We’re trapped in a system where we somehow believe that all we have to do is change the players and we’re going to get a different outcome. Maybe not. Because within the logic of this system, now supported or buttressed by Citizens United and Buckley v. Valeo, is a system of corporate governance which impresses itself upon the people of the United States for its own benefit, to the people’s detriment, and has helped to create in government very efficient mechanisms to accelerate the wealth of the nation upward.
Interview of Dennis Kucinich by Peter Scheer on on Truthdig...8/04/11
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I think that this idea that somehow the White House was forced into a bad deal is politically naive. When we saw the White House signal early on that it was ready for cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid by actually setting aside bedrock principles that the Democratic Party has stood on for generations, that signal indicated that they were ready for a deal that would involve massive cutting of social spending, and increasing or locking in increases for war, and helping further the ambitions of the Defense Department, not touching the Bush tax cuts. And that’s exactly what happened.
The Pentagon can continue to load money into wars which we are told are winding down, and at the same time as they do that, money that is not spent on those wars can be backfilled into the Defense Department budget. So they’re going to benefit twice. Not only are they getting $50 billion more than they had been expecting over a decade, but they’re going to be able to plus their base budget by an accounting trick that lets spending for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or any overseas contingency operations, continue beyond any discretionary caps in the budget.
...the American people are having impressed upon them an IMF-type structural adjustment in the guise of a deficit-cutting initiative. This is being done, quote, “voluntarily,” unquote. If you look at what’s happening all around the world, the IMF is using a punishing structural-adjustment regimen that is creating a backlash in countries like Greece, where people are facing sharp reductions in their standard of living—reductions in social spending for health care and retirement security, among other things. And why is this being done? In order to further the interests of an investor class. And frankly, I think this same … you know, the bottom line with respect to the United States of America—the bottom line is: Protect the investment class to the detriment of the rest of the country.....
Peter Scheer:....what you’re suggesting seems to be that he wants to give away the store, that he …
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I don’t think the president of the United States ever accepted a deal he didn’t want.
Peter Scheer: Right.
Dennis Kucinich: And in this case, I think that the telltale sign was when he put Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid on the table—which, by the way, when the commission, the super Congress commission comes into effect, will become extremely vulnerable. So the idea of President Obama somehow being incapable of negotiating—excuse me. He knows exactly what he’s doing. If he had been in a political trap here, he would have immediately, as a constitutional scholar, resorted to the 14th Amendment. It says in section 4, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” And it goes on. But the 14th Amendment, section 4, basically empowered the president, if he had been put in a box by the Republicans, to play a trump card. He didn’t do that, and he never intended to do that. He got the deal he wanted. And that’s something that people need to think about, what the implications are of that.
On another happy note. I am so glad to hear the millionaires got off cheap. I too did not pay any taxes last year or the year before. Because my small construction business has lost money for the last three years and I have survived by cashing in all my retirement accounts and borrowing from my life insurance. I am now as they say in poker ALL IN. I guess that happens to most people at some point before they become homeless.
What puzzels me is how the republicans (The party of the very rich) get the support of so many middle class working men and women. Many of these people that I have encounterd are well .educated. Leading me to wonder? Is the entire education system designed to favor people who are easyly trained and used to create good republicans.
Sure, and these 1,400 millionairs just love the "All Volunteer Military". The volunteer service is one of the worst things to come about in this country; the power brokers have no "Skin" in the game.
The Constitution also does not prescribe "capitalism" as the sole economic form as well. In fact a brief history of American economics from the Colonial Period to the freak monster capitalism has taken today would be welcomed.
911 was an inside job!!
And although Thom does not come out and say this he does seem to indicate that he is not totally convinced of the "official conspiracy theory" either.
Here's what he is said to have said On-air comment 6/18/07: Regarding 9/11:
"I'm calling for serious investigation of this and I'm really pleased to see a community forming trying to find out, not just what happened with buildings 1 and 2, but why did this happen? Who was asleep at the switch? How many warnings did Bush get? Why did he ignore them?
There are these weird coincidences, Bush's oil company was funded by Osama bin Laden's brother, another one of his [Osama's] brothers was having breakfast with his [Bush's] father the morning of 9/11, and these things just make you scratch your head... you know, "what is going on?"
Getting back to more basics, the Oil Pipeline plan and the related wars - extolled and indulged by both Republicans and Democrats, presently and significantly by Mr. Obama continuing where Mr. Bush left off - corporate-manufactured for Afghanistan, or take your pick for the next imperial frontier - is driving the whole US economy and its latest downturn. Other then ALEC, massive unemployment feeds “slave-shop-wages” for-profit private prisons and of course the armed forces that feature well-fed bodies and other perks for indigents and starvelings that will help to perpetuate the fight waged by the oil and gas and pure water magnates and their minions who will not stop killing tribes, men, women, and children, in order to accomplish pivotal land grabs for the sake of business driven by the greed of those among them who must have the most expensive conversation piece, perhaps a famous Monet painting making an elaborate living room, or an imprisoned (showcased) guitar once owned and played by Stevie Ray Vaughan, or a Bentley once occupied by Jack Benny, to impress their guests, in party chats, who will then top them in the brag department the next time everyone is invited to a party at their house. Some protoplasm is horribly wasted.
An aside to those of you who may take Thom’s advice to attend Democratic meetings to influence those meetings of your local Democratic party: You had best gather forces organized en masse to attend meetings or you will be, in all probability and in typical fashion of traditional town and county meetings, plagued and thwarted with the many faces of indifference and avoidance and treated as “should be” gagged and ostracized individuals, by the top dogs and mucky mucks of the party and the Chamber of Commerce. These long-standing members linked in personal purpose, guarding their hard-won territory, can make it very difficult for individuals as well as groups especially if you are speaking against the Corporatocracy (remember the US Chamber of Commerce is a lobbyist organization).
Be organized enough so that the above inhabitants and their pets will have a hard time pushing the buttons of your group which is usually a very easy thing to do. With the help of influenced government institutions and influenced media they can distract, disrupt, divide and conquer easily especially if government agencies and offices, police institutions, legislators, courts and the media are on their side which seems to be mostly the case these days and has been the case for instance in Nye County, including the Democratic Party especially during the fight to stop the precarious location of the for-profit private prison in Pahrump. Think unified, organized grass roots with rules of decorum to follow or it may turn into a big free for all slanderous mob-like mockery with pointing wagging trigger fingers. Seek advice from seasoned community organizers and research.
In the early seventies if you happened to be an individual hitchhiking through South Dakota in the rural vicinity of Rapid City and a car stopped and before you attempted to get in, one of the armed several riding in the car asked whether you were for the Traditionals or for Dickey Wilson (the infamous, and purportedly dubiously elected chairman of the Pine Ridge Rez), your fate might have been dire if you answered for either one side or the other.
I’m not saying that an individual can not effect change through knowledge of and reporting of the facts, and through cleverness and a heart of gold. Just remember, those you are trying to influence think the same of themselves and their friends even if they do bend the truth for their cause. Numbers generally speak louder than just the words – especially large numbers.
Be careful of what you say and do out there. If you spread your common sense where people are having fun you may have the best success. Informing bliss just may help to eradicate ignorance. In the meantime, as Thom advocates, becoming a precinct captain in the Democratic Party, if they’ll let you, appears to be the advantageous move.
AMY GOODMAN: Bill Hartung, your response to that, and also, the whole issue of how—the kind of lobbying power the Pentagon itself has, not just the military contractors, and when there are cuts, where those cuts go, who is hurt most?
WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, first of all, I think on the issue of war spending driving the debt, that’s absolutely true. If you look at Korea, you look at Vietnam, you look at the Bush administration, along with the tax cuts, that’s been the huge driver of the deficit. So it’s ironic now we’re dealing with that deficit without touching the Pentagon, essentially.
In terms of the distribution of cuts, if you’re giving more money to Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, it’s going to come from feeding programs, from housing programs, from administration of justice, from environmental protection. The whole rest of the budget, other than Social Security and a few entitlement programs, is discretionary. The Pentagon gets 56 cents on the dollar out of that already. And if they suffer almost no cuts, they’ll be a bigger part of the discretionary budget when this is all over.
Hudson:....ever since the Vietnam War, the military spending has been deindustrializing the American economy. If you have a Pentagon contract—a Pentagon contract is cost-plus. The higher they spend on airplanes, on armaments, the more money they get. So you have them engineering not to cut costs, but to maximize costs, because that’s how they make their profit. So you have a warping of American engineering, American technology, towards the military, and that’s why the industrial core has been shifting to Asia, because they don’t have this military. The economy is being sacrificed to the military.
Amy Goodwin:.....Now, let’s be clear on what this commission is and what’s going to happen to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. Michael Hudson?
MICHAEL HUDSON: The commission is going to be composed of three people, suggested by the House leader, Republican and Democratic leaders each, and the Senate Republican and Democratic leaders. The Republican—six Republican appointees to the commission are already pledged no taxes, and especially no closing of loopholes, nothing that will increase the money paid by their campaign contributors to the Republican Party. We don’t know who the Democratic appointees are going to be. But in the last commission that Mr. Obama appointed, the deficit reduction commission, they were all Democrats who were in favor of cutting Social Security. They were Wall Street Democrats, or what used to be called the Democratic Leadership Council. So the worry is that the Democrats are going to push their own tax cutters and that really there’s not going to be very much difference between the Democrats and the Republicans in what they propose for Social Security and Medicare. Mr. Obama had threatened that there wouldn’t be enough money to send out Social Security checks, and that simply isn’t true. The Social Security Administration has its own holdings of Treasury bills, just like an individual would hold their own savings. Of course they could have cashed in the Treasury bills.
AMY GOODMAN: What about the credit agencies, the rating agencies?
MICHAEL HUDSON: They have played a very bad role in this. Here’s what happened. Under the Frank—the bank reform—
AMY GOODMAN: With Congress Member Frank.
MICHAEL HUDSON: —the credit rating agencies were changed. The government was very angry at them for giving AAA ratings on junk, and their defense in courts saying, "Well, yes, we gave AAA ratings on junk mortgages, but they’re legally only opinions." So the Dodd-Frank bill said, "You rating agencies are liable for your opinions." Well, that—the rating agencies said, "We want to make money on selling our opinions, and we don’t want to have to take any responsibility for them, so we’re going to get you. We’re going to threaten to downgrade the U.S. government, until you say, 'OK, we don't want to hear your risk assessments anymore, because you’re hurting us.’"
But the proper response is to say, look, the rating agencies are just out to make money selling their opinions that are up for sale. The rating agencies are trying to get brownie points with Wall Street for opposing Social Security, for essentially yelling fire when there isn’t any fire. And at the same time, they want to weaken the Dodd-Frank bill so that they don’t have to ever be liable for making a warning about a country and they can continue to go back to giving AAA ratings for junk, which is how they make their money.
As an American, you are also entitled to the pursuit of happiness. This makes us a great country. Consider why we give horses and beasts of burden off on Sunday. Ayn Rand does not think we have a right to command you to give your beast one day off a week.
Gambling used to be considered very "dirty", a sin, and even illegal in many states. It wrecked homes and bankrupted a lot of people. Only a couple of places in the US were held as gambling reservations that were tolerated..mostly in Nevada...Reno...Las Vegas. These "sin cities" were created and run largely by gangsters. As it spread...Atlantic City...and Indian reservations around the US...silly people could go around and lose their shirts.
The stock market has always been a sanctified way of gambling...oh, excuse me..."investing"! And they were bestowed with the pseudo religious moniker of "capitalists". All bow down to Mammon the god of money and wealth! And the "evil" communists, looking through their TJ Ekleberg glasses, dared to besmirch, criticize, and complain of the hypocritical money maggots who exploited the working classes.
When there were government controls it might have been more like investing...but without government controls...more like gambling...reckless gambling. And the worst part is gambling with other people's money and losing it all.
Wall Street is a one-armed bandit run by crime-world figures that we used to find filthy and disgusting. When they invented and started using "creative tools" like derivatives...that not many people really understands...and use super computers to get the advantage...most smaller players, who are trying to use the traditional way of analyzing the markets..if even that, are easily victimized.
When the government, "bought off" by these financial behemoths, make the rules that favor them and creates money out of thin air to dump into the market in order to make the average investor, or just those who watch the market, think that all is well with the "economy", then it is all smoke and mirrors, voodoo, or junk economics. In fact it is not really economics at all just a one-sided casino that is raking in all the wealth of the nation from a gullible and withering population of losers who chose to play the game and lost.
I heard one talking head on CNBC make an incredibly stupid remark...something to the effect that we need to ease up on banking regulation even more....yeah, right, let them throw all our savings into the grand slot machine. These capitalist gambling addicts need to put into straight-jackets.
@ Gene --- you nailed it! Besides the fleecing - has Pres Obama changed the way the contracts are given or are these ongoing? The Bush Administration bypassed normal procedures and put the contracts through the Secretary of State so that these CONTRACTORS do not report to the MILITARY! Have they fixed this? Did I miss it? Can we get legislation to prevent this in the future?
Michigan does not have a progressive tax rate, so an increase in taxes in Michigan hit those who make the least hardest. I guess that shows support for the millionaires too! The SBT (Small Business Tax) was recinded and a tax increase passed on to residents to cover that loss. In addition, Snyder decided that a Pension is an asset and needs to be taxed! So retired people will see an increase in taxes!
This all makes it seem like Republicans have decided not to represent those who make too little or have retired. Punishing those that don't fit the Republican idea of 'deserving Americans'!
This week, Sirota appeared on the Canadian Broadcast Company'sConnect with Mark Kelley to discuss the larger implications of President Obama's debt celing deal with Republicans. In the Q&A, Sirota argues that President Obama didn't get forced into the deal - rather, he engineered the deal to deliberately put Social Security and Medicare cuts on the table. Click here to watch the clip (it starts about 4 minutes in).
The use of Geothermal energy makes me nervous. Where there are sites suitable for this energy, there are uncontrollable volcanic possibilities. The Yellowstone Caldera has a violent history.
If we can grab that energy without putting people at risk (i.e. get the energy without having people living too closely) the potential balances well.
Iceland has been fortunate in its use of Geothermal Energy, so far.
And look at that stock market "dip". And those talking head idiots on CNBC sound like they are trying to blame everyone else but the greedsters in the US. It was the advice from US neoliberal firms like Goldman Sacks and many in the Bush and Obama administrations that Greece and Russia and many other European countries relied on to model their economic decisions on that helped lead them to their economic problems. Greece wanted to join the EU but couldn't unless their economy was proven to be "good enough" and the neoliberals showed them how to "work the books" to make them look better than they were...just the way they did it back home in the US.
A group of seals banded together long ago on a distant sea at place called Seagull Bay. The Seals of Seagull Bay had decided to get together to solve the shark problem lurking in their feeding grounds. The sharks were killing off a lot of their friends and family and making life in general pretty miserable for the seal population. The Seals of Seagull Bay decided to start a Safety Committee to gather ideas and resources to combat the shark problem.
The safety officials who would sit on the committee were elected by the democratic process of popular vote and would be given the responsibility of protecting the Seals of Seagull Bay. The committee was set and after period of deliberation and debate the committed come up with the solution to the shark problems. The Safety Committee decided some members of the seal population would become security officers and do nothing but lookout for sharks while the rest of the seals of Seagull Bay would fish. Since the security officer seals wouldn’t have time to fish while their brethren hunted for food the other seals would provide the security seals with six fish a day to pay for a secure hunting ground.
This was so successful in cutting down shark fatalities and injuries at Seagull Bay other groups of seals started to copy the Seagull Bay model of security. Meanwhile, a group of supply side economic seals got together at an exclusive summer retreat called K Street Island. They suggested that The seals of Seagull Bay hire a private company to take over the security for Seagull Bay to take care of the shark problem that already been solved.
The K Street Seals claimed their client Seal Safe LLC could cut the cost of fish down to half the amount they paid now and provide even better security. The Seals of Seagull Bay couldn’t believe their ears. They were doing well with their current security but there was still some injuries and occasional unfortunate death. The K Street Seals guaranteed that no Seal would be killed if they hired their private company to secure the feeding grounds.
A lot of the Seals of Seagull Bay said this was a “No Brainer” a term that the K Street Seals kept repeating during their presentation to the Safety Committee. But other Seals of Seagull Bay suggested they should just stay with their current arrangement and try to improve upon what they already done. The committee of twelve members was deadlocked in a 6 to 6 tie. One of the K Street Seals visited the house of one of the Safety Committee members who was opposed to the hiring of their private company. The next day the committee member sporting a new gold Rolex fin watch that was visited by the K Street Seal changed his vote giving the K Street Seals private company a two year contract to handle the security for Seagull Bay.
Soon after taking over the security at Seagull Bay Seal Safe laid-off half of the security force and cut the remaining security officers pay by two thirds. The security officers complained that they could not feed their families on two fish a day. The company suggested they ask the Safety Committee to subsidize their fish payment because the company had to downsize to run more efficiently. As a result of cutting the security force shark attacks increased.
The Seals of Seagull Bay outraged by the increase shark attacks under the security of Seal Safe LLC demanded answers. Seal Safe sent a company Executive to help smooth over and explain the new security policies. The angry seals listen to the company Exec explain “The Company did not adjust for the recent fish inflation. The value of fish has fallen by 60% in last quarter. We have to wait for the invisible fin of the Free Market to correct itself.” The Exec continued “The bottom line is we’ve come to secure these hunting grounds at all cost. We realize that each seal life is important and need to be protected. We have asked the Safety Committee to give Seal Safe a slight revenue adjust of 40% to help cover the cost of increased security measures.”
The committee members now all wearing golden Rolex fin watches unanimously agreed to the revenue increase. Seal Safe in addition to receiving an increase in revenue started offering three protection packages for the Seals of Seagull Bay. The three different packages called tiers offered different levels of protection Tier 1 the economy pack offered limited protection against shark attacks offering an one hour course on “Individual Responsibility” and a Seal Safe whistle with the company logo costing a mere eight fish a day. Tier 2 the Seal Safe Enhanced Protection Pack offers both the course on “Individual Responsibility” and the Seal Safe Whistle with company logo, but also Seal Safe’s patented Shark Alert Flash Light with company logo for the middle of the road cost of 14 fish a day. Tier 3 the Cadillac package combines all the safety measures of the other packages with state of the art anti-shark swim suit with company logo. Made out of a hundred percent titanium steel guaranteed to protect against shark attacks but not drowning for the cost of 100 fish a day.
The Seals of Seagull Bay now furious with Seal Safe demand that the Safety Committee end their agreement with Seal Safe for breach of contract. The Safety Committee said their fins were tied because the contract agreement they signed gave Seal Safe the exclusive right to take all the fish out of Seagull Bay if the agreement wasn’t satisfactory to the Seals of Seagull Bay. The Seals of Seagull Bay were clearly not satisfied with their agreement with Seal Safe. The Seals of Seagull Bay refused to accept the terms of the contract with Seal Safe and decided to boycott the company.
Seal Safe board of directors enraged that the Seals of Seagull Bay were not honoring their contract hired Killer Whales to break the boycott and to protect all the fish they owned in the hunting grounds of Seagull Bay. The Safety Committee with their golden Rolex fin watches called for the two sides to negotiate, but it was too late the Seal Safe LLC had sold its fish rights of Seagull Bay to the K Street Seals new client a company owned by sharks called Seal Killers Inc. THE END
it comes down to the spineless liars, like thom hartman, who counsel the sheep to get to the back of the bus by, ever so slowly, changing the democrats from the bottom. real men don't put their shoulders to a corrupt wheel!!!
there are no real MEN on the left to stand and make a call to honesty and honor. as a society we've been corrupted by thinking that political connivery is a substitute for legitimate anger and disgust. the milktoasts of the left are advising that you should take your outrage and sublimate it by running for dog catcher or library board.
the left has been betrayed by it's own weakness. claiming as thom does that at the mid-terms republicans won because the progressives thought nothing more was needed is just another liliy livered lie. the progressives didn't vote because they realized they were betrayed. and they continue to betrayed by the hartmans and shultz' ---weaklings that won't call a spade a spade!
Kucinich: We’re trapped in a system where we somehow believe that all we have to do is change the players and we’re going to get a different outcome. Maybe not. Because within the logic of this system, now supported or buttressed by Citizens United and Buckley v. Valeo, is a system of corporate governance which impresses itself upon the people of the United States for its own benefit, to the people’s detriment, and has helped to create in government very efficient mechanisms to accelerate the wealth of the nation upward.
Interview of Dennis Kucinich by Peter Scheer on on Truthdig...8/04/11
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I think that this idea that somehow the White House was forced into a bad deal is politically naive. When we saw the White House signal early on that it was ready for cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid by actually setting aside bedrock principles that the Democratic Party has stood on for generations, that signal indicated that they were ready for a deal that would involve massive cutting of social spending, and increasing or locking in increases for war, and helping further the ambitions of the Defense Department, not touching the Bush tax cuts. And that’s exactly what happened.
The Pentagon can continue to load money into wars which we are told are winding down, and at the same time as they do that, money that is not spent on those wars can be backfilled into the Defense Department budget. So they’re going to benefit twice. Not only are they getting $50 billion more than they had been expecting over a decade, but they’re going to be able to plus their base budget by an accounting trick that lets spending for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or any overseas contingency operations, continue beyond any discretionary caps in the budget.
...the American people are having impressed upon them an IMF-type structural adjustment in the guise of a deficit-cutting initiative. This is being done, quote, “voluntarily,” unquote. If you look at what’s happening all around the world, the IMF is using a punishing structural-adjustment regimen that is creating a backlash in countries like Greece, where people are facing sharp reductions in their standard of living—reductions in social spending for health care and retirement security, among other things. And why is this being done? In order to further the interests of an investor class. And frankly, I think this same … you know, the bottom line with respect to the United States of America—the bottom line is: Protect the investment class to the detriment of the rest of the country.....
Peter Scheer:....what you’re suggesting seems to be that he wants to give away the store, that he …
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I don’t think the president of the United States ever accepted a deal he didn’t want.
Peter Scheer: Right.
Dennis Kucinich: And in this case, I think that the telltale sign was when he put Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid on the table—which, by the way, when the commission, the super Congress commission comes into effect, will become extremely vulnerable. So the idea of President Obama somehow being incapable of negotiating—excuse me. He knows exactly what he’s doing. If he had been in a political trap here, he would have immediately, as a constitutional scholar, resorted to the 14th Amendment. It says in section 4, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” And it goes on. But the 14th Amendment, section 4, basically empowered the president, if he had been put in a box by the Republicans, to play a trump card. He didn’t do that, and he never intended to do that. He got the deal he wanted. And that’s something that people need to think about, what the implications are of that.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/page4/kucinich_says_obama_got_the_deal_he...
On another happy note. I am so glad to hear the millionaires got off cheap. I too did not pay any taxes last year or the year before. Because my small construction business has lost money for the last three years and I have survived by cashing in all my retirement accounts and borrowing from my life insurance. I am now as they say in poker ALL IN. I guess that happens to most people at some point before they become homeless.
What puzzels me is how the republicans (The party of the very rich) get the support of so many middle class working men and women. Many of these people that I have encounterd are well .educated. Leading me to wonder? Is the entire education system designed to favor people who are easyly trained and used to create good republicans.
Sure, and these 1,400 millionairs just love the "All Volunteer Military". The volunteer service is one of the worst things to come about in this country; the power brokers have no "Skin" in the game.
The Constitution also does not prescribe "capitalism" as the sole economic form as well. In fact a brief history of American economics from the Colonial Period to the freak monster capitalism has taken today would be welcomed.
911 was an inside job!!
And although Thom does not come out and say this he does seem to indicate that he is not totally convinced of the "official conspiracy theory" either.
Here's what he is said to have said On-air comment 6/18/07: Regarding 9/11:
"I'm calling for serious investigation of this and I'm really pleased to see a community forming trying to find out, not just what happened with buildings 1 and 2, but why did this happen? Who was asleep at the switch? How many warnings did Bush get? Why did he ignore them?
There are these weird coincidences, Bush's oil company was funded by Osama bin Laden's brother, another one of his [Osama's] brothers was having breakfast with his [Bush's] father the morning of 9/11, and these things just make you scratch your head... you know, "what is going on?"
http://patriotsquestion911.com/media.html#Hartmann
Enigmaramously Ugly
Getting back to more basics, the Oil Pipeline plan and the related wars - extolled and indulged by both Republicans and Democrats, presently and significantly by Mr. Obama continuing where Mr. Bush left off - corporate-manufactured for Afghanistan, or take your pick for the next imperial frontier - is driving the whole US economy and its latest downturn. Other then ALEC, massive unemployment feeds “slave-shop-wages” for-profit private prisons and of course the armed forces that feature well-fed bodies and other perks for indigents and starvelings that will help to perpetuate the fight waged by the oil and gas and pure water magnates and their minions who will not stop killing tribes, men, women, and children, in order to accomplish pivotal land grabs for the sake of business driven by the greed of those among them who must have the most expensive conversation piece, perhaps a famous Monet painting making an elaborate living room, or an imprisoned (showcased) guitar once owned and played by Stevie Ray Vaughan, or a Bentley once occupied by Jack Benny, to impress their guests, in party chats, who will then top them in the brag department the next time everyone is invited to a party at their house. Some protoplasm is horribly wasted.
An aside to those of you who may take Thom’s advice to attend Democratic meetings to influence those meetings of your local Democratic party: You had best gather forces organized en masse to attend meetings or you will be, in all probability and in typical fashion of traditional town and county meetings, plagued and thwarted with the many faces of indifference and avoidance and treated as “should be” gagged and ostracized individuals, by the top dogs and mucky mucks of the party and the Chamber of Commerce. These long-standing members linked in personal purpose, guarding their hard-won territory, can make it very difficult for individuals as well as groups especially if you are speaking against the Corporatocracy (remember the US Chamber of Commerce is a lobbyist organization).
Be organized enough so that the above inhabitants and their pets will have a hard time pushing the buttons of your group which is usually a very easy thing to do. With the help of influenced government institutions and influenced media they can distract, disrupt, divide and conquer easily especially if government agencies and offices, police institutions, legislators, courts and the media are on their side which seems to be mostly the case these days and has been the case for instance in Nye County, including the Democratic Party especially during the fight to stop the precarious location of the for-profit private prison in Pahrump. Think unified, organized grass roots with rules of decorum to follow or it may turn into a big free for all slanderous mob-like mockery with pointing wagging trigger fingers. Seek advice from seasoned community organizers and research.
In the early seventies if you happened to be an individual hitchhiking through South Dakota in the rural vicinity of Rapid City and a car stopped and before you attempted to get in, one of the armed several riding in the car asked whether you were for the Traditionals or for Dickey Wilson (the infamous, and purportedly dubiously elected chairman of the Pine Ridge Rez), your fate might have been dire if you answered for either one side or the other.
I’m not saying that an individual can not effect change through knowledge of and reporting of the facts, and through cleverness and a heart of gold. Just remember, those you are trying to influence think the same of themselves and their friends even if they do bend the truth for their cause. Numbers generally speak louder than just the words – especially large numbers.
Be careful of what you say and do out there. If you spread your common sense where people are having fun you may have the best success. Informing bliss just may help to eradicate ignorance. In the meantime, as Thom advocates, becoming a precinct captain in the Democratic Party, if they’ll let you, appears to be the advantageous move.
AMY GOODMAN: Bill Hartung, your response to that, and also, the whole issue of how—the kind of lobbying power the Pentagon itself has, not just the military contractors, and when there are cuts, where those cuts go, who is hurt most?
WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, first of all, I think on the issue of war spending driving the debt, that’s absolutely true. If you look at Korea, you look at Vietnam, you look at the Bush administration, along with the tax cuts, that’s been the huge driver of the deficit. So it’s ironic now we’re dealing with that deficit without touching the Pentagon, essentially.
In terms of the distribution of cuts, if you’re giving more money to Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, it’s going to come from feeding programs, from housing programs, from administration of justice, from environmental protection. The whole rest of the budget, other than Social Security and a few entitlement programs, is discretionary. The Pentagon gets 56 cents on the dollar out of that already. And if they suffer almost no cuts, they’ll be a bigger part of the discretionary budget when this is all over.
Hudson:....ever since the Vietnam War, the military spending has been deindustrializing the American economy. If you have a Pentagon contract—a Pentagon contract is cost-plus. The higher they spend on airplanes, on armaments, the more money they get. So you have them engineering not to cut costs, but to maximize costs, because that’s how they make their profit. So you have a warping of American engineering, American technology, towards the military, and that’s why the industrial core has been shifting to Asia, because they don’t have this military. The economy is being sacrificed to the military.
Amy Goodwin:.....Now, let’s be clear on what this commission is and what’s going to happen to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. Michael Hudson?
MICHAEL HUDSON: The commission is going to be composed of three people, suggested by the House leader, Republican and Democratic leaders each, and the Senate Republican and Democratic leaders. The Republican—six Republican appointees to the commission are already pledged no taxes, and especially no closing of loopholes, nothing that will increase the money paid by their campaign contributors to the Republican Party. We don’t know who the Democratic appointees are going to be. But in the last commission that Mr. Obama appointed, the deficit reduction commission, they were all Democrats who were in favor of cutting Social Security. They were Wall Street Democrats, or what used to be called the Democratic Leadership Council. So the worry is that the Democrats are going to push their own tax cutters and that really there’s not going to be very much difference between the Democrats and the Republicans in what they propose for Social Security and Medicare. Mr. Obama had threatened that there wouldn’t be enough money to send out Social Security checks, and that simply isn’t true. The Social Security Administration has its own holdings of Treasury bills, just like an individual would hold their own savings. Of course they could have cashed in the Treasury bills.
AMY GOODMAN: What about the credit agencies, the rating agencies?
MICHAEL HUDSON: They have played a very bad role in this. Here’s what happened. Under the Frank—the bank reform—
AMY GOODMAN: With Congress Member Frank.
MICHAEL HUDSON: —the credit rating agencies were changed. The government was very angry at them for giving AAA ratings on junk, and their defense in courts saying, "Well, yes, we gave AAA ratings on junk mortgages, but they’re legally only opinions." So the Dodd-Frank bill said, "You rating agencies are liable for your opinions." Well, that—the rating agencies said, "We want to make money on selling our opinions, and we don’t want to have to take any responsibility for them, so we’re going to get you. We’re going to threaten to downgrade the U.S. government, until you say, 'OK, we don't want to hear your risk assessments anymore, because you’re hurting us.’"
But the proper response is to say, look, the rating agencies are just out to make money selling their opinions that are up for sale. The rating agencies are trying to get brownie points with Wall Street for opposing Social Security, for essentially yelling fire when there isn’t any fire. And at the same time, they want to weaken the Dodd-Frank bill so that they don’t have to ever be liable for making a warning about a country and they can continue to go back to giving AAA ratings for junk, which is how they make their money.
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/2/after_months_of_partisan_wrangling_...
It's long past time to get even with the Koch suckers...vote them out of office.
Re: Consider why we give horses and beasts of burden off on Sunday.
Because Old Testament Jewish Law prohibits working on the Sabath?
As an American, you are also entitled to the pursuit of happiness.
This makes us a great country.
Consider why we give horses and beasts of burden off on Sunday.
Ayn Rand does not think we have a right to command you to give your beast one day off a week.
These are the two kinds of people in the world.
Gambling used to be considered very "dirty", a sin, and even illegal in many states. It wrecked homes and bankrupted a lot of people. Only a couple of places in the US were held as gambling reservations that were tolerated..mostly in Nevada...Reno...Las Vegas. These "sin cities" were created and run largely by gangsters. As it spread...Atlantic City...and Indian reservations around the US...silly people could go around and lose their shirts.
The stock market has always been a sanctified way of gambling...oh, excuse me..."investing"! And they were bestowed with the pseudo religious moniker of "capitalists". All bow down to Mammon the god of money and wealth! And the "evil" communists, looking through their TJ Ekleberg glasses, dared to besmirch, criticize, and complain of the hypocritical money maggots who exploited the working classes.
When there were government controls it might have been more like investing...but without government controls...more like gambling...reckless gambling. And the worst part is gambling with other people's money and losing it all.
Wall Street is a one-armed bandit run by crime-world figures that we used to find filthy and disgusting. When they invented and started using "creative tools" like derivatives...that not many people really understands...and use super computers to get the advantage...most smaller players, who are trying to use the traditional way of analyzing the markets..if even that, are easily victimized.
When the government, "bought off" by these financial behemoths, make the rules that favor them and creates money out of thin air to dump into the market in order to make the average investor, or just those who watch the market, think that all is well with the "economy", then it is all smoke and mirrors, voodoo, or junk economics. In fact it is not really economics at all just a one-sided casino that is raking in all the wealth of the nation from a gullible and withering population of losers who chose to play the game and lost.
I heard one talking head on CNBC make an incredibly stupid remark...something to the effect that we need to ease up on banking regulation even more....yeah, right, let them throw all our savings into the grand slot machine. These capitalist gambling addicts need to put into straight-jackets.
@ Gene --- you nailed it! Besides the fleecing - has Pres Obama changed the way the contracts are given or are these ongoing? The Bush Administration bypassed normal procedures and put the contracts through the Secretary of State so that these CONTRACTORS do not report to the MILITARY! Have they fixed this? Did I miss it? Can we get legislation to prevent this in the future?
Michigan does not have a progressive tax rate, so an increase in taxes in Michigan hit those who make the least hardest. I guess that shows support for the millionaires too! The SBT (Small Business Tax) was recinded and a tax increase passed on to residents to cover that loss. In addition, Snyder decided that a Pension is an asset and needs to be taxed! So retired people will see an increase in taxes!
This all makes it seem like Republicans have decided not to represent those who make too little or have retired. Punishing those that don't fit the Republican idea of 'deserving Americans'!
This week, Sirota appeared on the Canadian Broadcast Company'sConnect with Mark Kelley to discuss the larger implications of President Obama's debt celing deal with Republicans. In the Q&A, Sirota argues that President Obama didn't get forced into the deal - rather, he engineered the deal to deliberately put Social Security and Medicare cuts on the table. Click here to watch the clip (it starts about 4 minutes in).
The use of Geothermal energy makes me nervous. Where there are sites suitable for this energy, there are uncontrollable volcanic possibilities. The Yellowstone Caldera has a violent history.
If we can grab that energy without putting people at risk (i.e. get the energy without having people living too closely) the potential balances well.
Iceland has been fortunate in its use of Geothermal Energy, so far.
And look at that stock market "dip". And those talking head idiots on CNBC sound like they are trying to blame everyone else but the greedsters in the US. It was the advice from US neoliberal firms like Goldman Sacks and many in the Bush and Obama administrations that Greece and Russia and many other European countries relied on to model their economic decisions on that helped lead them to their economic problems. Greece wanted to join the EU but couldn't unless their economy was proven to be "good enough" and the neoliberals showed them how to "work the books" to make them look better than they were...just the way they did it back home in the US.
Bernie or Thom,
What do you say to people that respond if you raise taxes to the wealthy and corporations they will move their businesses out of the US?
Thanks,
Elyse
The military doesn't use "Private Contractors." They are using "Pirate Contractors."
Rawesome Food Raid > for a laugh Colbert Report > Rawesome food raid >> http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/361307/october-06-2010/rawesome-foods-raid
The Seals of Seagull Bay !
A group of seals banded together long ago on a distant sea at place called Seagull Bay. The Seals of Seagull Bay had decided to get together to solve the shark problem lurking in their feeding grounds. The sharks were killing off a lot of their friends and family and making life in general pretty miserable for the seal population. The Seals of Seagull Bay decided to start a Safety Committee to gather ideas and resources to combat the shark problem.
The safety officials who would sit on the committee were elected by the democratic process of popular vote and would be given the responsibility of protecting the Seals of Seagull Bay. The committee was set and after period of deliberation and debate the committed come up with the solution to the shark problems. The Safety Committee decided some members of the seal population would become security officers and do nothing but lookout for sharks while the rest of the seals of Seagull Bay would fish. Since the security officer seals wouldn’t have time to fish while their brethren hunted for food the other seals would provide the security seals with six fish a day to pay for a secure hunting ground.
This was so successful in cutting down shark fatalities and injuries at Seagull Bay other groups of seals started to copy the Seagull Bay model of security. Meanwhile, a group of supply side economic seals got together at an exclusive summer retreat called K Street Island. They suggested that The seals of Seagull Bay hire a private company to take over the security for Seagull Bay to take care of the shark problem that already been solved.
The K Street Seals claimed their client Seal Safe LLC could cut the cost of fish down to half the amount they paid now and provide even better security. The Seals of Seagull Bay couldn’t believe their ears. They were doing well with their current security but there was still some injuries and occasional unfortunate death. The K Street Seals guaranteed that no Seal would be killed if they hired their private company to secure the feeding grounds.
A lot of the Seals of Seagull Bay said this was a “No Brainer” a term that the K Street Seals kept repeating during their presentation to the Safety Committee. But other Seals of Seagull Bay suggested they should just stay with their current arrangement and try to improve upon what they already done. The committee of twelve members was deadlocked in a 6 to 6 tie. One of the K Street Seals visited the house of one of the Safety Committee members who was opposed to the hiring of their private company. The next day the committee member sporting a new gold Rolex fin watch that was visited by the K Street Seal changed his vote giving the K Street Seals private company a two year contract to handle the security for Seagull Bay.
Soon after taking over the security at Seagull Bay Seal Safe laid-off half of the security force and cut the remaining security officers pay by two thirds. The security officers complained that they could not feed their families on two fish a day. The company suggested they ask the Safety Committee to subsidize their fish payment because the company had to downsize to run more efficiently. As a result of cutting the security force shark attacks increased.
The Seals of Seagull Bay outraged by the increase shark attacks under the security of Seal Safe LLC demanded answers. Seal Safe sent a company Executive to help smooth over and explain the new security policies. The angry seals listen to the company Exec explain “The Company did not adjust for the recent fish inflation. The value of fish has fallen by 60% in last quarter. We have to wait for the invisible fin of the Free Market to correct itself.” The Exec continued “The bottom line is we’ve come to secure these hunting grounds at all cost. We realize that each seal life is important and need to be protected. We have asked the Safety Committee to give Seal Safe a slight revenue adjust of 40% to help cover the cost of increased security measures.”
The committee members now all wearing golden Rolex fin watches unanimously agreed to the revenue increase. Seal Safe in addition to receiving an increase in revenue started offering three protection packages for the Seals of Seagull Bay. The three different packages called tiers offered different levels of protection Tier 1 the economy pack offered limited protection against shark attacks offering an one hour course on “Individual Responsibility” and a Seal Safe whistle with the company logo costing a mere eight fish a day. Tier 2 the Seal Safe Enhanced Protection Pack offers both the course on “Individual Responsibility” and the Seal Safe Whistle with company logo, but also Seal Safe’s patented Shark Alert Flash Light with company logo for the middle of the road cost of 14 fish a day. Tier 3 the Cadillac package combines all the safety measures of the other packages with state of the art anti-shark swim suit with company logo. Made out of a hundred percent titanium steel guaranteed to protect against shark attacks but not drowning for the cost of 100 fish a day.
The Seals of Seagull Bay now furious with Seal Safe demand that the Safety Committee end their agreement with Seal Safe for breach of contract. The Safety Committee said their fins were tied because the contract agreement they signed gave Seal Safe the exclusive right to take all the fish out of Seagull Bay if the agreement wasn’t satisfactory to the Seals of Seagull Bay. The Seals of Seagull Bay were clearly not satisfied with their agreement with Seal Safe. The Seals of Seagull Bay refused to accept the terms of the contract with Seal Safe and decided to boycott the company.
Seal Safe board of directors enraged that the Seals of Seagull Bay were not honoring their contract hired Killer Whales to break the boycott and to protect all the fish they owned in the hunting grounds of Seagull Bay. The Safety Committee with their golden Rolex fin watches called for the two sides to negotiate, but it was too late the Seal Safe LLC had sold its fish rights of Seagull Bay to the K Street Seals new client a company owned by sharks called Seal Killers Inc. THE END
What do I think? I think FDR was deliberately infected with Polio-