Please Marc do not apologize to me (or anyone else) for who you are. I have never condemned a person for being a pacifist and in fact admire their (your) courage. I am a fervent advocate of nonviolence, though I am also aware that sometimes the violence of an oppressor will not allow nonviolence to succeed.
For example -- and apropos physical force and the will of the people -- think what happens when one is conquered, as in Europe by the fascists of Berlin and Rome, as in Asia by the fascists of Tokyo, or as in today's Latin America by the fascists of Washington D.C..
Think of the French Resistance, in which Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus and Juliette Greco all served valiantly. (Greco was the only movie star on whom I ever had a teenage crush, this in 1958 after seeing her breathtaking performance as Mina in The Roots of Heaven, a film that was decades ahead of its time.)
More poignantly, think of the Soviet partizanska. Because the Nazis had defined all Slavs as untermenschen -- people fit only for enslavenent and extermination -- theirs was a much more desperate struggle than anything that occurred in Western Europe. Soviet teens, especially young women, showed themselves to be the most defiantly courageous freedom fighters the modern world has ever known. Here are the stories of two such people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinaida_Portnova and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoya_Kosmodemyanskaya
Pacifism is wonderful when it works. But sometimes -- when the enemy is as savage as the Nazis were -- other responses are required.
Apropos to #42 Nelson Mandela. Here we have the case of a man who lived the life of pure pacifism with spectacular results. No army the world has ever seen will ever match the results of Nelson Mandela; and, this does not even begin to account for the future of the results of the life works of Nelson Mandela. How do you respond to the inquiry that perhaps there is a third level of inequality that hasn't yet been addressed by the current world paradigm? A third level of inequality that indeed can be addressed by the asset of the common good and universal reason? A third level of human rights that equites with human beings far beyond any state of human rights or equality? A third level of human rights that equates with human spiritual equality? Imagination is only limited by creativity; and, creativity is only limited by imagination, Perhaps it is time to abandon our perception of reality for a more preferable one. We are only limited by our imagination, therefore, we are only limited by our creativity. Let our creativity define who we are and our ambition define who we aspire to be.
Loren ~ I thank you deeply for that observation. Pardon my lack of experience; but, I will have to reserve comment until I have time to absorb all that you have offered; as, it is quite a mouth full
As far as Kucinich is concerned; you will have to pardon me because quite frankly I myself consider myself a pacifist. I see no gain from proceeding along any agenda of conquest or aggression from any perspective available. From my perspective the only thing we have to gain is objective within a course of action. Anything else is failure.
Having said that, I am most interested in any idea as to how any other agenda has a potential of success in today's world paradigm? To me the best hope of success depends upon many factors--first and foremost the factors of common will. To me the best hope of achieving this ends is through the technique of pacifism.
Please correct me if I am wrong; but, the way I understand it, the will of the people must take precedence over the will of the minority. How is physical force ever going to replace the will of the people?
Palin -- Would you venture to say that locally owned businesses are offshoring jobs and putting their profits in offshore accounts? I find it very difficult to think that. The loss of jobs after a few years when Walmart comes to town would tend to suggest what you venture to say would be invalid for locally owned businesses.
Palindromedary:Hey I just caught up with your replys from a couple days ago. Wow you blew me away with all the tech talk. In regard to being watched and followed while online.... I have to confess, I've never been to a pot cultivation site. To be honest I spend most of my time on ancient history related sites and a little youtube rockabilly. I'd be pretty boring to track.
Anyway I think Thom's point was that tracking could lead to potential for defamation of character, not arrest or something. Despite all of your tech talk, which made me a little paranoid, I still think it's next to impossible without a camera image to lawfully prove who's behind the keyboard.
RT tv did a balanced story on Mandela, the only one I've seen so far.
How does equality come to speak only of money and poverty? When will consideration of equal political representation of both men and women happen? With a percentage of one woman to four men the world is preventing a whole social group from contributing to the management of their own issues let alone the planets. Surely equality means that the views and rights of a generally honest and peaceable three and a half billion are valid.
Marc...this has turned out be an overwhelmingly busy day that's running far into the evening. Hence my short answer on Kucinich: accoirding to some very credible sources, among them Gore Vidal, he's a pacifist. The last pacifist in a position of global power was Neville Chamberlain. Need I say more?
Apropos pacifism itself, its ultimate irony is that it only works when the threat of violence is implicit if pacifist options are rejected. Two examples: one is Martin Luther King Jr., whose demands for racial justice were underscored by the implied threat that violence was sure to follow if pacifist solutions were rejected by the Ruling Class (which of course they were, but the rejection was so gradual it fooled the nation into submission, exactly as intended); two is Mohandas K. Gandhi, whose paficist movement liberated India from the British only because the Brits recognized the alternative -- a violent revolution agitated and armed by what was then the NKVD (later the KGB) and more importantly by GRU (the Red Army intelligence organization founded by Leon Trotsky, the most formidably effective cadre of professional revolutionaries in human history, as proven not only in the old Russian Empire, but in China, Vietnam. Cuba, etc.). Had India thus joined the Soviet Bloc, the national anthem of the People's Republic of China -- The East Is Red -- would have become literally true.
Without such backing as was provided by the Soviet Union, pacifists are either ignored or liquidated, precisely as is occurring with ever greater frequency today.
Particularly in a socialist context, pacifism is in fact suicidal. It is rendered so by the fact the capitalists will always seek the overthrow of any socialist government, and unless there is effective resistance -- as there was not, for example, in Allende's Chile or Franco's Spain -- the capitalists will always win.
Ugly truth, yes, but that's realpolitik -- and, thanks to five thiousand years of patriarchy, the nature of the world in which we live.
Loren Bliss: in reply to yesterdays #19.......You referred to President Obama as Barack the Betrayer, the most brazen liar, and tyrannical president in U.S. history. We all share your frustration but mine has a little different focus, and it's not President Obama.
The biggest betrayal in U.S. history: Citizens United and the five Supreme Court public servants who made it possible.
The biggest liar in U.S. history: hands down, Fox News and the corpse media in general.
The most tyrannical: The current Fascist Oligarchs who with their wealth have purchased the souls of most of our politicians, notably Republican.
So far--and most disturbingly--everything I have found has supported this most "unusual" documentary. I am most interested in hearing anything you--or anyone else--might want to share. Thank you!!!
The first protest I ever attended was back in the mid-seventies, it was an on campus protest demanding University divestment in South Africa.
"Like slavery and apartied, poverty is not natural. It is man-made and it can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings."............. Well said Nelson.
Anyone who wants to communicate with, and have a chance to influence, a large cross-section of folks, some of whom seem to know very little, and some who are mainly versed in Fox News talking points can join "Yahoo Answers." They feature a large number of topics, from Buying a Car to Dating Advice to Medical Questions, which are pretty straightforward, but also "Religion and Spirituality" in which the atheists war with the fundamentalist Christians (and a lot of other sections of believers in this or that, as well) and Governmental and Political subjects.
What I'm talking about here is their Government and Politics section.There are a few threads connected to governmental issues, but I THINK that the one that gets the most participation is the "POLITICS" one or "Government and Politics" (You want to post in threads that get a lot of traffic.)
*I* think there is a chance for Progressives to get on there, and with kindness, wisdom, patience and knowledge, get OUR talking points, and points of view, and the history behind what's going on and what we suggest would be best done about it, modeling our approach after Thom's (wisdom, patience, etc). (You'll see nastiness and rudeness on there, which can be "reported," as it against their guidlines, but not enough attention is paid to it. But WE don't have to join in the rudeness.)
So, from what I've read of the folks that contribute here, in this part and in the blog, I think there are a good number of you who are skilled, talented and knowledgable enough to make a difference!
I get on there and do what I can, but I'm only one person, and some of you guys know a lot more than I do. Two other groups which has been effective in spreading their agendae are the Fundamentalist Christians and the Jehovah's Witnesses, in the Religion and Spirituality section. Not that I'm suggesting you get into discussing Religion etc, but the example of what those two religious groups have done, taking advantage of the exposure to the large number of folks who visit Yahoo Answers, I thought it would be a good idea for us. However, I'm trying to keep it "undercover" so that the administrators don't zero in on us and start deleting our posts using this or that excuse—in other words, I'm not posting anything about this on there.
I don't remember exactly how to join Yahoo (maybe some of you already are members,) but I don't think it's that difficult. Also, know that they have a few important guidelines—most of them are about having "real" questions and "real" answers. It's not a chat room, but you can sort of use it like that if you utilize their format.
Fox News bought their own TV station and boy, has it made a difference for them. Not having our own TV station, we can use stuff that's already out there. I know y'all like to blog together here, so you'd probably like to preach to those other than folks "in the choir!!" It is a fun challenge which stimulates further learning in a participant, that is, it that's what they are drawn towards!! But watch out, it can be addictive!!
The use of "homeland" is very interesting. I just watched the live "Sound of Music" performance on NBC last night, having never seen the movie with Julie Andrews. The edelweiss song refers to Austria as the homeland, and in this context it was anti-Nazi. On the other hand, the show was clearly written by an English speaker well after World War II.
Vegasman56 ~ Thanks for those stories. Most compelling. He was indeed a Superhero. One side note--a bit of a silver lining in a dark cloud... It sure is refreshing seeing such a great man and leader die in old age of natural causes. Hopefully, it is the beginning of a future trend. I'm sick and tired of seeing them murdered young.
I listened to the caller who mentioned Fidel Castro's involvement with Nelson Mandela with considerable interest.
There is a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) documentary series, called "The Passionate Eye". One of the documentaries that was featured on that program was titled, "Fidel". (An alternate title was "Fidel Castro: The Untold Story".
One of the more moving scenes in that 90 minute film was a meeting between Fidel and Nelson Mandela. Mandela kept telling Fidel, "You must come to South Africa. You must come to South Africa."
A later scene shows Fidel being welcomed in the South African Parliament, where he received a hero's welcome.
This documentary is avaiable for viewing on YouTube, at the following URL:
If Mandela were in prison today, I fear that western media coverage of him would have embraced Reagan’s ‘He’s a terrorist’ Attitude at best and would have ignored him at worst. Would we know who he was? God Speed, Nelson...
Thom, You asked Bernie, today, if the T-party & Boner would crash the Gov. in Jan/Feb. While I haven’t Bernie’s experience; If sCrotus rules in favor of McCucheon, the answer is yes, because the ease of buying elections combined with DIE!-bold and voter suppression bills will make it possible for them to completely disregard public opinion. The kRoches and the like have already spent billions through organizations to back candidates and create a gov. that will destabilize the US in order for them to bring about disaster capitalism. Default on our debt is a perfect solution for them. They see a combination of austerity designed to deny access to resources, pollution and climate change as the perfect storm that will finely rid them those whom they see as dependents who have grown far too numerous and unnecessary...and who serve as nothing more than a threat to their security in terms of access to resources.
Loren ~ Thanks. I look forward to hearing your perspective. Perhaps while you are at it you could mention those members of Congress you do approve of. I would be most interested to hear your insights.
Marc...Can't address the Kucinich matter now as I have a very full day that's already started. But I'll return to the question this evening it you're interested. My objections to him include not just his positions on certain critical issues but his allegedly less-than-admirable conduct as a mayor.
Loren ~ I respect that you have many reasons; however, the only thing that article expressed was his flipping over the vote that passed the ACA. Quite frankly, if Sen. Ted Kennedy was that flexible back in the seventies we might just have a single payer system today instead of a for profit insurance system on steroids that is posing as a major obstacle to progress. I'm sure that fact weighed in heavily on the Senator's decision. In retrospect I support Dennis's decision; although at the time--like you--I did not.
I'm not arguing that Dennis is a better choice than Bernie. All I wish to say is that if Bernie declines the offer, Dennis would be my close second choice to run with Elizabeth. Remember, we are merely discussing idealistic goals. What the future deals us may fall painfully short. A bit of compromise now may indeed seem like a pipe dream then. Let us not allow our hopes to get so high now that we become hopelessly discouraged by the events in the near future. I truly believe that one objective in the current ulterior motives previously discussed that is being sought is simple mass discouragement from participation in government. First we are fed a bill of lofty promises. Then that bill is torn to threads in front of our eyes like a shipwrecked boat on a pile of rocks. That is a goal we must all be determined to not allow to see the light of day.
Here's 3 articles that I found I thought that it was very interesting, how far of any reasonable intelligence will the radical right go, do they not know that there is a Internet, and the truth is out there. I think that Rick Santorum believes that Americans are idiots. Fox News should be proud of themselves.
Rick Santorum, the erstwhile Republican presidential candidate with a penchant for controversy, appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor on Thursday night and memorialized the passing of South African leader and global visionary Nelson Mandela by equating Obamacare with apartheid.
Praising Mandela for standing up to a “great injustice,” the former Pennsylvania senator continued by ascribing his own conservative principles to the civil rights pioneer:
Six Things Nelson Mandela Believed That Most People Won’t Talk About
In the desire to celebrate Nelson Mandela’s life — an iconic figure who triumphed over South Africa’s brutal apartheid regime — it’s tempting to homogenize his views into something everyone can support. This is not, however, an accurate representation of the man.
Mandela was a political activist and agitator. He did not shy away from controversy and he did not seek — or obtain — universal approval. Before and after his release from prison, he embraced an unabashedly progressive and provocative platform. As one commentator put it shortly after the announcement of the freedom fighter’s death, “Mandela will never, ever be your minstrel. Over the next few days you will try so, so hard to make him something he was not, and you will fail. You will try to smooth him, to sandblast him, to take away his Malcolm X. You will try to hide his anger from view.”
As the world remembers Mandela, here are some of the things he believed that many will gloss over.
1. Mandela blasted the Iraq War and American imperialism. Mandela called Bush “a president who has no foresight, who cannot think properly,” and accused him of “wanting to plunge the world into a holocaust” by going to war in Iraq. “All that (Mr. Bush) wants is Iraqi oil,” he said. Mandela even speculated that then-Secretary-General Kofi Annan was being undermined in the process because he was black. “They never did that when secretary-generals were white,” he said. He saw the Iraq War as a greater problem of American imperialism around the world. “If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don’t care,” he said.
2. Mandela called freedom from poverty a “fundamental human right.” Mandela considered poverty one of the greatest evils in the world, and spoke out against inequality everywhere. “Massive poverty and obscene inequality are such terrible scourges of our times — times in which the world boasts breathtaking advances in science, technology, industry and wealth accumulation — that they have to rank alongside slavery and apartheid as social evils,” he said. He considered ending poverty a basic human duty: “Overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity. It is an act of justice. It is the protection of a fundamental human right, the right to dignity and a decent life,” he said. “While poverty persists, there is no true freedom.”
3. Mandela criticized the “War on Terror” and the labeling of individuals as terrorists, even Osama Bin Laden, without due process. On the U.S. terrorist watch list until 2008 himself, Mandela was an outspoken critic of President George W. Bush’s war on terror. He warned against rushing to label terrorists without due process. While calling for Osama bin Laden to be brought to justice, Mandela said, “The labeling of Osama bin Laden as the terrorist responsible for those acts before he had been tried and convicted could also be seen as undermining some of the basic tenets of the rule of law.”
4. Mandela called out racism in America. On a trip to New York City in 1990, Mandela made a point of visiting Harlem and praising African Americans’ struggles against “the injustices of racist discrimination and economic equality.” He reminded a larger crowd at Yankee Stadium that racism was not exclusively a South African phenomenon. “As we enter the last decade of the 20th century, it is intolerable, unacceptable, that the cancer of racism is still eating away at the fabric of societies in different parts of our planet,” he said. “All of us, black and white, should spare no effort in our struggle against all forms and manifestations of racism, wherever and whenever it rears its ugly head.”
5. Mandela embraced some of America’s biggest political enemies. Mandela incited shock and anger in many American communities for refusing to denounce Cuban dictator Fidel Castro or Libyan Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who had lent their support to Mandela against South African apartheid. “One of the mistakes the Western world makes is to think that their enemies should be our enemies,” he explained to an American TV audience. “We have our own struggle.” He added that those leaders “are placing resources at our disposal to win the struggle.” He also called the controversial Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat “a comrade in arms.”
6. Mandela was a die-hard supporter of labor unions. Mandela visited the Detroit auto workers union when touring the U.S., immediately claiming kinship with them. “Sisters and brothers, friends and comrades, the man who is speaking is not a stranger here,” he said. “The man who is speaking is a member of the UAW. I am your flesh and blood.”
BY IGOR VOLSKY AND ZACK BEAUCHAMPON DECEMBER 6, 2013 AT 11:04 AM
The world is celebrating Nelson Mandela as a selfless visionary who led his country out of the grips of apartheid into democracy and freedom. But some of the very people lavishing praise on South Africa’s first black president worked tirelessly to undermine his cause and portray the African National Congress he lead as pawns of the Soviet Union.
In fact, American conservatives have long been willing to overlook South Africa’s racist apartheid government in service of fighting communism abroad. you can click here for more information
Alice...I'm a night person also. Spent years working at morning newspapers, where the hours used to become more nocturnal as one was promoted. First newspaper job, copy boy, age 16, my shift was 5 p.m. to 1 a.m. or 4 p.m. to midnight (The Grand Rapids Herald, 1956-1957). As the news editor, second in command to the managing editor (The Daily Record, Morristown N.J., 1967-1969), my hours were 7 p.m. to 3 a.m. I've worked day-side jobs (ugh!), but since my formative years in journalism (1956-1959 and 1962-1969), I've never been happily diurnal. (The missing three years went to the active duty portion of a six-year U.S. Army enlistment. Did my overseas service in Korea; luck of the draw, was honorably discharged just before the Vietnam reserve call-up.)
Aliceinwonderland ~ Same here. I'll never forget how the Democratic Party in 2008 extricated him from the primaries here in California before I even had an opportunity to vote for him. As far as I was concerned he was the number one candidate. I almost lost interest in the election after he was railroaded. I almost resigned from the party myself. Reluctantly I cast a vote for John Edwards just one day before his scandal nullified that vote. I was very PO'd and felt both thoroughly screwed and betrayed. As far as I was concerned Hillary and Barack weren't even worth considering. Bottom of the barrel. That should be the name of the Democratic party--"The Bottom Of The Barrel Party!"
Of course when it comes to seeking out the least qualified people for the job of POTUS, both parties exceed at that task.
I've voted for Kucinich in past presidential elections, without embarrassment or regret. I would have picked him over Obama, even before Obama's first term. - AIW
Nelson Mandela was a great man who lived far ahead of his time. He was a beacon of light in a world clouded with darkness. His example has inspired and given hope to a mere fraction of the multitude that it will touch in future generations. It is a rare privilege to live during the same time as a living legend. He is one of the few leaders who come along and change the whole world for the better. May he rest in eternal peace knowing that he will be sorely missed but fondly remembered always. May we all be fortunate enough to leave the world a better place then we found it in our life times.
Please Marc do not apologize to me (or anyone else) for who you are. I have never condemned a person for being a pacifist and in fact admire their (your) courage. I am a fervent advocate of nonviolence, though I am also aware that sometimes the violence of an oppressor will not allow nonviolence to succeed.
For example -- and apropos physical force and the will of the people -- think what happens when one is conquered, as in Europe by the fascists of Berlin and Rome, as in Asia by the fascists of Tokyo, or as in today's Latin America by the fascists of Washington D.C..
Think of the French Resistance, in which Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus and Juliette Greco all served valiantly. (Greco was the only movie star on whom I ever had a teenage crush, this in 1958 after seeing her breathtaking performance as Mina in The Roots of Heaven, a film that was decades ahead of its time.)
More poignantly, think of the Soviet partizanska. Because the Nazis had defined all Slavs as untermenschen -- people fit only for enslavenent and extermination -- theirs was a much more desperate struggle than anything that occurred in Western Europe. Soviet teens, especially young women, showed themselves to be the most defiantly courageous freedom fighters the modern world has ever known. Here are the stories of two such people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinaida_Portnova and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoya_Kosmodemyanskaya
Pacifism is wonderful when it works. But sometimes -- when the enemy is as savage as the Nazis were -- other responses are required.
Apropos to #42 Nelson Mandela. Here we have the case of a man who lived the life of pure pacifism with spectacular results. No army the world has ever seen will ever match the results of Nelson Mandela; and, this does not even begin to account for the future of the results of the life works of Nelson Mandela. How do you respond to the inquiry that perhaps there is a third level of inequality that hasn't yet been addressed by the current world paradigm? A third level of inequality that indeed can be addressed by the asset of the common good and universal reason? A third level of human rights that equites with human beings far beyond any state of human rights or equality? A third level of human rights that equates with human spiritual equality? Imagination is only limited by creativity; and, creativity is only limited by imagination, Perhaps it is time to abandon our perception of reality for a more preferable one. We are only limited by our imagination, therefore, we are only limited by our creativity. Let our creativity define who we are and our ambition define who we aspire to be.
Loren ~ I thank you deeply for that observation. Pardon my lack of experience; but, I will have to reserve comment until I have time to absorb all that you have offered; as, it is quite a mouth full
As far as Kucinich is concerned; you will have to pardon me because quite frankly I myself consider myself a pacifist. I see no gain from proceeding along any agenda of conquest or aggression from any perspective available. From my perspective the only thing we have to gain is objective within a course of action. Anything else is failure.
Having said that, I am most interested in any idea as to how any other agenda has a potential of success in today's world paradigm? To me the best hope of success depends upon many factors--first and foremost the factors of common will. To me the best hope of achieving this ends is through the technique of pacifism.
Please correct me if I am wrong; but, the way I understand it, the will of the people must take precedence over the will of the minority. How is physical force ever going to replace the will of the people?
Palin -- Would you venture to say that locally owned businesses are offshoring jobs and putting their profits in offshore accounts? I find it very difficult to think that. The loss of jobs after a few years when Walmart comes to town would tend to suggest what you venture to say would be invalid for locally owned businesses.
Palindromedary:Hey I just caught up with your replys from a couple days ago. Wow you blew me away with all the tech talk. In regard to being watched and followed while online.... I have to confess, I've never been to a pot cultivation site. To be honest I spend most of my time on ancient history related sites and a little youtube rockabilly. I'd be pretty boring to track.
Anyway I think Thom's point was that tracking could lead to potential for defamation of character, not arrest or something. Despite all of your tech talk, which made me a little paranoid, I still think it's next to impossible without a camera image to lawfully prove who's behind the keyboard.
RT tv did a balanced story on Mandela, the only one I've seen so far.
How does equality come to speak only of money and poverty? When will consideration of equal political representation of both men and women happen? With a percentage of one woman to four men the world is preventing a whole social group from contributing to the management of their own issues let alone the planets. Surely equality means that the views and rights of a generally honest and peaceable three and a half billion are valid.
Marc...this has turned out be an overwhelmingly busy day that's running far into the evening. Hence my short answer on Kucinich: accoirding to some very credible sources, among them Gore Vidal, he's a pacifist. The last pacifist in a position of global power was Neville Chamberlain. Need I say more?
Apropos pacifism itself, its ultimate irony is that it only works when the threat of violence is implicit if pacifist options are rejected. Two examples: one is Martin Luther King Jr., whose demands for racial justice were underscored by the implied threat that violence was sure to follow if pacifist solutions were rejected by the Ruling Class (which of course they were, but the rejection was so gradual it fooled the nation into submission, exactly as intended); two is Mohandas K. Gandhi, whose paficist movement liberated India from the British only because the Brits recognized the alternative -- a violent revolution agitated and armed by what was then the NKVD (later the KGB) and more importantly by GRU (the Red Army intelligence organization founded by Leon Trotsky, the most formidably effective cadre of professional revolutionaries in human history, as proven not only in the old Russian Empire, but in China, Vietnam. Cuba, etc.). Had India thus joined the Soviet Bloc, the national anthem of the People's Republic of China -- The East Is Red -- would have become literally true.
Without such backing as was provided by the Soviet Union, pacifists are either ignored or liquidated, precisely as is occurring with ever greater frequency today.
Particularly in a socialist context, pacifism is in fact suicidal. It is rendered so by the fact the capitalists will always seek the overthrow of any socialist government, and unless there is effective resistance -- as there was not, for example, in Allende's Chile or Franco's Spain -- the capitalists will always win.
Ugly truth, yes, but that's realpolitik -- and, thanks to five thiousand years of patriarchy, the nature of the world in which we live.
Loren Bliss: in reply to yesterdays #19.......You referred to President Obama as Barack the Betrayer, the most brazen liar, and tyrannical president in U.S. history. We all share your frustration but mine has a little different focus, and it's not President Obama.
The biggest betrayal in U.S. history: Citizens United and the five Supreme Court public servants who made it possible.
The biggest liar in U.S. history: hands down, Fox News and the corpse media in general.
The most tyrannical: The current Fascist Oligarchs who with their wealth have purchased the souls of most of our politicians, notably Republican.
Palindromedary and Aliceinwonderland (or anyone else) ~ I have been pondering the significance of this video for some time now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ReHCCCdWgU
So far--and most disturbingly--everything I have found has supported this most "unusual" documentary. I am most interested in hearing anything you--or anyone else--might want to share. Thank you!!!
The first protest I ever attended was back in the mid-seventies, it was an on campus protest demanding University divestment in South Africa.
"Like slavery and apartied, poverty is not natural. It is man-made and it can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings."............. Well said Nelson.
Want to spread the Progressive word?
Anyone who wants to communicate with, and have a chance to influence, a large cross-section of folks, some of whom seem to know very little, and some who are mainly versed in Fox News talking points can join "Yahoo Answers." They feature a large number of topics, from Buying a Car to Dating Advice to Medical Questions, which are pretty straightforward, but also "Religion and Spirituality" in which the atheists war with the fundamentalist Christians (and a lot of other sections of believers in this or that, as well) and Governmental and Political subjects.
What I'm talking about here is their Government and Politics section.There are a few threads connected to governmental issues, but I THINK that the one that gets the most participation is the "POLITICS" one or "Government and Politics" (You want to post in threads that get a lot of traffic.)
*I* think there is a chance for Progressives to get on there, and with kindness, wisdom, patience and knowledge, get OUR talking points, and points of view, and the history behind what's going on and what we suggest would be best done about it, modeling our approach after Thom's (wisdom, patience, etc). (You'll see nastiness and rudeness on there, which can be "reported," as it against their guidlines, but not enough attention is paid to it. But WE don't have to join in the rudeness.)
So, from what I've read of the folks that contribute here, in this part and in the blog, I think there are a good number of you who are skilled, talented and knowledgable enough to make a difference!
I get on there and do what I can, but I'm only one person, and some of you guys know a lot more than I do. Two other groups which has been effective in spreading their agendae are the Fundamentalist Christians and the Jehovah's Witnesses, in the Religion and Spirituality section. Not that I'm suggesting you get into discussing Religion etc, but the example of what those two religious groups have done, taking advantage of the exposure to the large number of folks who visit Yahoo Answers, I thought it would be a good idea for us. However, I'm trying to keep it "undercover" so that the administrators don't zero in on us and start deleting our posts using this or that excuse—in other words, I'm not posting anything about this on there.
I don't remember exactly how to join Yahoo (maybe some of you already are members,) but I don't think it's that difficult. Also, know that they have a few important guidelines—most of them are about having "real" questions and "real" answers. It's not a chat room, but you can sort of use it like that if you utilize their format.
Fox News bought their own TV station and boy, has it made a difference for them. Not having our own TV station, we can use stuff that's already out there. I know y'all like to blog together here, so you'd probably like to preach to those other than folks "in the choir!!" It is a fun challenge which stimulates further learning in a participant, that is, it that's what they are drawn towards!! But watch out, it can be addictive!!
The use of "homeland" is very interesting. I just watched the live "Sound of Music" performance on NBC last night, having never seen the movie with Julie Andrews. The edelweiss song refers to Austria as the homeland, and in this context it was anti-Nazi. On the other hand, the show was clearly written by an English speaker well after World War II.
Vegasman56 ~ Thanks for those stories. Most compelling. He was indeed a Superhero. One side note--a bit of a silver lining in a dark cloud... It sure is refreshing seeing such a great man and leader die in old age of natural causes. Hopefully, it is the beginning of a future trend. I'm sick and tired of seeing them murdered young.
I listened to the caller who mentioned Fidel Castro's involvement with Nelson Mandela with considerable interest.
There is a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) documentary series, called "The Passionate Eye". One of the documentaries that was featured on that program was titled, "Fidel". (An alternate title was "Fidel Castro: The Untold Story".
One of the more moving scenes in that 90 minute film was a meeting between Fidel and Nelson Mandela. Mandela kept telling Fidel, "You must come to South Africa. You must come to South Africa."
A later scene shows Fidel being welcomed in the South African Parliament, where he received a hero's welcome.
This documentary is avaiable for viewing on YouTube, at the following URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52efX1FQTzY
p.s. GW Bush's grandfathe, Prescott Bush was a huge supporter of Hitler and the Nazzis, thus ..."homeland"
If Mandela were in prison today, I fear that western media coverage of him would have embraced Reagan’s ‘He’s a terrorist’ Attitude at best and would have ignored him at worst. Would we know who he was? God Speed, Nelson...
Thom, You asked Bernie, today, if the T-party & Boner would crash the Gov. in Jan/Feb. While I haven’t Bernie’s experience; If sCrotus rules in favor of McCucheon, the answer is yes, because the ease of buying elections combined with DIE!-bold and voter suppression bills will make it possible for them to completely disregard public opinion. The kRoches and the like have already spent billions through organizations to back candidates and create a gov. that will destabilize the US in order for them to bring about disaster capitalism. Default on our debt is a perfect solution for them. They see a combination of austerity designed to deny access to resources, pollution and climate change as the perfect storm that will finely rid them those whom they see as dependents who have grown far too numerous and unnecessary...and who serve as nothing more than a threat to their security in terms of access to resources.
Loren ~ Thanks. I look forward to hearing your perspective. Perhaps while you are at it you could mention those members of Congress you do approve of. I would be most interested to hear your insights.
Marc...Can't address the Kucinich matter now as I have a very full day that's already started. But I'll return to the question this evening it you're interested. My objections to him include not just his positions on certain critical issues but his allegedly less-than-admirable conduct as a mayor.
Loren ~ I respect that you have many reasons; however, the only thing that article expressed was his flipping over the vote that passed the ACA. Quite frankly, if Sen. Ted Kennedy was that flexible back in the seventies we might just have a single payer system today instead of a for profit insurance system on steroids that is posing as a major obstacle to progress. I'm sure that fact weighed in heavily on the Senator's decision. In retrospect I support Dennis's decision; although at the time--like you--I did not.
I'm not arguing that Dennis is a better choice than Bernie. All I wish to say is that if Bernie declines the offer, Dennis would be my close second choice to run with Elizabeth. Remember, we are merely discussing idealistic goals. What the future deals us may fall painfully short. A bit of compromise now may indeed seem like a pipe dream then. Let us not allow our hopes to get so high now that we become hopelessly discouraged by the events in the near future. I truly believe that one objective in the current ulterior motives previously discussed that is being sought is simple mass discouragement from participation in government. First we are fed a bill of lofty promises. Then that bill is torn to threads in front of our eyes like a shipwrecked boat on a pile of rocks. That is a goal we must all be determined to not allow to see the light of day.
Here's 3 articles that I found I thought that it was very interesting, how far of any reasonable intelligence will the radical right go, do they not know that there is a Internet, and the truth is out there. I think that Rick Santorum believes that Americans are idiots. Fox News should be proud of themselves.
I personally believe the man was a superhero
Rick Santorum Compares Obamacare To Apartheid
Rick SBY ADAM PECK ON DECEMBER 6, 2013 AT 9:44 AM
Rick Santorum, the erstwhile Republican presidential candidate with a penchant for controversy, appeared on Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor on Thursday night and memorialized the passing of South African leader and global visionary Nelson Mandela by equating Obamacare with apartheid.
Praising Mandela for standing up to a “great injustice,” the former Pennsylvania senator continued by ascribing his own conservative principles to the civil rights pioneer:
Six Things Nelson Mandela Believed That Most People Won’t Talk About
BY AVIVA SHEN AND JUDD LEGUMON DECEMBER 6, 2013 AT 10:11 AM
In the desire to celebrate Nelson Mandela’s life — an iconic figure who triumphed over South Africa’s brutal apartheid regime — it’s tempting to homogenize his views into something everyone can support. This is not, however, an accurate representation of the man.
Mandela was a political activist and agitator. He did not shy away from controversy and he did not seek — or obtain — universal approval. Before and after his release from prison, he embraced an unabashedly progressive and provocative platform. As one commentator put it shortly after the announcement of the freedom fighter’s death, “Mandela will never, ever be your minstrel. Over the next few days you will try so, so hard to make him something he was not, and you will fail. You will try to smooth him, to sandblast him, to take away his Malcolm X. You will try to hide his anger from view.”
As the world remembers Mandela, here are some of the things he believed that many will gloss over.
1. Mandela blasted the Iraq War and American imperialism. Mandela called Bush “a president who has no foresight, who cannot think properly,” and accused him of “wanting to plunge the world into a holocaust” by going to war in Iraq. “All that (Mr. Bush) wants is Iraqi oil,” he said. Mandela even speculated that then-Secretary-General Kofi Annan was being undermined in the process because he was black. “They never did that when secretary-generals were white,” he said. He saw the Iraq War as a greater problem of American imperialism around the world. “If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don’t care,” he said.
2. Mandela called freedom from poverty a “fundamental human right.” Mandela considered poverty one of the greatest evils in the world, and spoke out against inequality everywhere. “Massive poverty and obscene inequality are such terrible scourges of our times — times in which the world boasts breathtaking advances in science, technology, industry and wealth accumulation — that they have to rank alongside slavery and apartheid as social evils,” he said. He considered ending poverty a basic human duty: “Overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity. It is an act of justice. It is the protection of a fundamental human right, the right to dignity and a decent life,” he said. “While poverty persists, there is no true freedom.”
3. Mandela criticized the “War on Terror” and the labeling of individuals as terrorists, even Osama Bin Laden, without due process. On the U.S. terrorist watch list until 2008 himself, Mandela was an outspoken critic of President George W. Bush’s war on terror. He warned against rushing to label terrorists without due process. While calling for Osama bin Laden to be brought to justice, Mandela said, “The labeling of Osama bin Laden as the terrorist responsible for those acts before he had been tried and convicted could also be seen as undermining some of the basic tenets of the rule of law.”
4. Mandela called out racism in America. On a trip to New York City in 1990, Mandela made a point of visiting Harlem and praising African Americans’ struggles against “the injustices of racist discrimination and economic equality.” He reminded a larger crowd at Yankee Stadium that racism was not exclusively a South African phenomenon. “As we enter the last decade of the 20th century, it is intolerable, unacceptable, that the cancer of racism is still eating away at the fabric of societies in different parts of our planet,” he said. “All of us, black and white, should spare no effort in our struggle against all forms and manifestations of racism, wherever and whenever it rears its ugly head.”
5. Mandela embraced some of America’s biggest political enemies. Mandela incited shock and anger in many American communities for refusing to denounce Cuban dictator Fidel Castro or Libyan Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who had lent their support to Mandela against South African apartheid. “One of the mistakes the Western world makes is to think that their enemies should be our enemies,” he explained to an American TV audience. “We have our own struggle.” He added that those leaders “are placing resources at our disposal to win the struggle.” He also called the controversial Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat “a comrade in arms.”
6. Mandela was a die-hard supporter of labor unions. Mandela visited the Detroit auto workers union when touring the U.S., immediately claiming kinship with them. “Sisters and brothers, friends and comrades, the man who is speaking is not a stranger here,” he said. “The man who is speaking is a member of the UAW. I am your flesh and blood.”
The Right Wing’s Campaign To Discredit And Undermine Mandela, In One Timeline
BY IGOR VOLSKY AND ZACK BEAUCHAMPON DECEMBER 6, 2013 AT 11:04 AM
The world is celebrating Nelson Mandela as a selfless visionary who led his country out of the grips of apartheid into democracy and freedom. But some of the very people lavishing praise on South Africa’s first black president worked tirelessly to undermine his cause and portray the African National Congress he lead as pawns of the Soviet Union.
In fact, American conservatives have long been willing to overlook South Africa’s racist apartheid government in service of fighting communism abroad. you can click here for more information
Alice and Marc...For many reasons, I couldn't support Kucinich. Here's one reason: http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/kucinich-switches-vote...
Alice...I'm a night person also. Spent years working at morning newspapers, where the hours used to become more nocturnal as one was promoted. First newspaper job, copy boy, age 16, my shift was 5 p.m. to 1 a.m. or 4 p.m. to midnight (The Grand Rapids Herald, 1956-1957). As the news editor, second in command to the managing editor (The Daily Record, Morristown N.J., 1967-1969), my hours were 7 p.m. to 3 a.m. I've worked day-side jobs (ugh!), but since my formative years in journalism (1956-1959 and 1962-1969), I've never been happily diurnal. (The missing three years went to the active duty portion of a six-year U.S. Army enlistment. Did my overseas service in Korea; luck of the draw, was honorably discharged just before the Vietnam reserve call-up.)
Aliceinwonderland ~ Same here. I'll never forget how the Democratic Party in 2008 extricated him from the primaries here in California before I even had an opportunity to vote for him. As far as I was concerned he was the number one candidate. I almost lost interest in the election after he was railroaded. I almost resigned from the party myself. Reluctantly I cast a vote for John Edwards just one day before his scandal nullified that vote. I was very PO'd and felt both thoroughly screwed and betrayed. As far as I was concerned Hillary and Barack weren't even worth considering. Bottom of the barrel. That should be the name of the Democratic party--"The Bottom Of The Barrel Party!"
Of course when it comes to seeking out the least qualified people for the job of POTUS, both parties exceed at that task.
I've voted for Kucinich in past presidential elections, without embarrassment or regret. I would have picked him over Obama, even before Obama's first term. - AIW
very well said, sir
Nelson Mandela was a great man who lived far ahead of his time. He was a beacon of light in a world clouded with darkness. His example has inspired and given hope to a mere fraction of the multitude that it will touch in future generations. It is a rare privilege to live during the same time as a living legend. He is one of the few leaders who come along and change the whole world for the better. May he rest in eternal peace knowing that he will be sorely missed but fondly remembered always. May we all be fortunate enough to leave the world a better place then we found it in our life times.