ken ware: Like I said...we lost! We lost 58,000 people that should not have been fighting over there to begin with. We taxpayers lost. The MIC won. Massive drug use by those US troops, suicides, mass disillusionment of those troops. Vietnam War was a shameful episode in US history just as our shame is being multiplied over in the Middle East. The US needs to keep it's nose and butt out of other countries business. It's all about control and money. Our country is, and always has been, run by greedy, selfish old men (and some young ones) that go to Ivy League schools and think they can push their weight around to satisfy their sense of entitlement, xenophobic arrogance, and warped jingoistic creeds.
Yes, we murdered over 2 million Vietnamese most of them civilians. But as we now celebrate the Tet offensive and with images of frightened US diplomats and supporters from the South trying to escape onto helicopters from roof tops (and we now know that the whole trigger that suckered us into that mess was a lie...the Gulf of Tonkin incident)...we can look forward to the day when those Middle Eastern countries can have their own celebrations commemorating the "good-riddance" to criminal scoundrels who illegally invaded and murdered their families.
There's really never going to be an end to this farce...the US is now moving into Africa...to wreak havoc and mayhem there as well. Always an excuse to bleed all of us dry.
Just remember, it was largely the overwhelming anti-Vietnam-War attitude among civilians in this country and many of the troops in Vietnam, along with not "winning the hearts and minds" of those we were occupying in Vietnam that led to our defeat. Despite the fact that we murdered more of them than they did of us, we lost the war in Vietnam just as we are losing the war in the Middle East. We are getting out...thank goodness...and it is about time we retreated...you can't fight a population where you have failed to "win hearts and minds". And you can't do that by murdering their families...which is what the US was quite good at. "Kill them all...let God sort 'em out!" Isn't that right?
David Abbot: Wow! That's quite a story! Way to go...if more people did the things you did we wouldn't have the problems we have now. Most people won't take the time or effort like that....they just shrug their shoulders and continue to make these criminals wealthier and us sicker and poorer. I'll remember all you said the next time I go into a Whole Foods store...which is not very often...but occasionally. Next time I use their bathrooms...I'll try not to breathe! Back in Bush's day, I went to a public bathroom and was surprised and most amused that in the back side of a urinal was a picture of Bush and the caption said..."Go ahead...He's pissing on you!"
Many learn with age and maturity a special discernment reveals the overt journalism propagating from Fox News. To me it is shown openly plainly or readily apparent their talking points are not conservative at all. Rather a secret or hidden agenda, very Wahhabi, that is loaded with prejudice teaming in opinions, flash innuendos that constantly refer to President Obama as not being a leader.
That’s funny, with one war over in Iraq, and another winding down in Afghanistan America’s automatic weapons industry is blunted. Or, those who really know, and I say this just in speculation, how much of America’s military weapons have been lost or unaccounted for. No report but the media knows. As a Vietnam vet I know there where a lot of lost stuff.
Another can be said, from particular authors that investigated stories of the Carlyle Group, One of those Canary Island deals, a private investment firm of “Bush One” as a prominent member of the board of directors did sell weapons on the open market. Yikes, with partnerships with the Bin Laden Family. This was written in Gerald Posners Book “Secrets of the Kingdom” 2005 what a gig; the Son makes war the old man sell weapons. Profiteering and treason are the mix that the media is trying to hold the lid on a political pressure crook pot that is busting at the seams.
It is my opinion it is crazy for the average American to run around with a basic training military weapon such as an M16, or even the M14 which I think is tougher. Somebody is selling this stuff in the market place. The concept of a military weapon is just that you can be part of that weapon only if you join the military. That’s the idea to defend the country in the regular army with any advance weapons. This thing about dealerships is not looked at deep enough. Sort of like who let the dogs out. Or this is a WTF moment the military is way too loose to just stand by a watch military grade weapons used in basic training flaunted in the media, and over the counter sales is a total breach of American military security.
Lastly insurance for fire arms is central to the solution. Actually one the NRA will certainly back away from fast.
Reading all the posts and now know Republicans belong to the NRA and Dems don't.
Wonder how Harry got a B+ from the NRA? Harry will never bring a gun grab to the floor! This is not a Republican only issue. High taxes and over spending is!
No one is proposing that your guns will be taken away. That will not happen. Even if you own one of those huge killing machines. They want you to register, to know how to use a gun, and to keep you from passing it on to someone else, without registration--that sort of thing.
I get so tired of hearing -- -they're taking away our guns! Maybe you should read the proposals.
And you might listen to that guy, Thom Hartmann is his name, who has been explaining how the wording of the second amendment got into the constitution and its specific intent. You aren't going to take over the government or stop the government from taking you over. Government weapons outgun you at every step.
Don't let fear of whatever it is you're afraid you lead you around by the nose. Nobody thinks straight when they are afraid. There are other options if you don't like things as they are. We still have a democracy. Use it--but think first and know what you want changed.
Dishing out Executive Orders to help keep assault weapons out of the hands of dangerous people as fast as McDonald's dishes out French Fries is fine and dandy with me. President Obama has my full blessing and support.
However, If he fails to do the exact same thing to raise the debt limit and demand no cuts to social programs, I'll definitely jump the fence and hop onto the radical Conservative Bandwagon faster than you can say, "Would you like fries with that order, Sir!"
I might even take over the reigns of that Bandwagon myself! "Yipikiyaahh!!"
Palindromedary - You may or may not have served in Vietnam or the Nam' as we called it. Your statement that they kicked our butt shows you have not studied or are aware of how that war was ended. We bombed Hanoi into the stone ages with our B'52's or Big Buffs as that was what most Air Force personell called them. Along with our F-4 Phantoms and F-5's Thunder Chiefs and various other aircraft literally had the Hanoi begging for peace at the at the Paris peace negotiations with Kissinger. The North was completely supplied by the Red Chinese and the Red Russians. At first we did not bomb the harbors where these two countries unloaded the weapons the North used against our Air Force, Army, Navy and Marines. Everything from fuel, tanks and SAM’s (Soviet Land to Air Missiles) were unloaded in Haiphong harbor. As the War progressed we bombed anything that moved on the ground or in the harbors in the North, starving the North Vietnamese of crucial war goods. After the Christmas bombings of 1973 they asked us to restart the piece negotiations. By 1973 the American Army and Marines owned South Vietnam and the Air Force and Naval pilots owned the skies, even with the cowardly South Vietnamese soldiers deserting their posts on a daily basis. We destroyed the insurgents known as the V.C, and literally dismantled the North Vietnamese troops that entered from the North. The people from the United States that marched on Washington and those cowards that refused to serve and ran off to Canada to hide were the second front of enemies we had to deal with during the Vietnam War. The North Vietnamese violated the truce that was signed in Paris and attacked the South after the U.S. Military had left South Vietnam. In 1975 you civilians watched as the North Vietnamese over ran the South after we had removed all our combat troops in the Nam. You probably only remember the U.S. Embassy being overrun with Russian tanks. Sir, to say the North whipped our Butts is a statement of your ignorance when it comes to a War that took 58,000+ American lives who served their country with bravery and honor and 2,000,000 North Vietnamese lives were lost. I would love to continue in depth of how the South Vietnamese lost their civil war because of cowardly politicians in Washington cut off all funding for the South in early 1975, while the North continued to receive war goods from Red China and Russia. The Russians and Red Chinese had thousands of advisors on the ground and Russian and Chinese pilots manned manner of the aircraft that battled U.S. Airmen over the North. Only a civilian who did not serve in our War would make a disrespectful statement like you have made. It was not the rebellious people in the North that fought in the South; it was highly trained North Vietnamese soldiers that fought against us in the South. And with all due respect for those soldiers, they were one hell of a well-trained and disciplined army, not a bunch of civilians from the North with AK-47's as you have wrongly noted. Get your facts straight, especially when you are making statements with someone who has served and studied the War in Vietnam. This war was fought in the air,rivers and on the ground by our brave troops of the United States Military.
The REAL reason is the 40% increase in bus routes just since 2002. From 5,000 routes to 7,000.
Consolidating and privatizing of schools under Mayor Bloomberg led to more buses carrying the same number of students farther to more destinations. That is the tradeoff for closing neigborhood schools and trying charter schools.
"The fraud of failed schools and the "need" for school choice is behind this dilemma. Each day, thousands of children are needlessly sent out of their neighborhood in a con game that carries the premise that schools are notably better a few miles away."
I know this is happening in the criminal conspiracy called Wisconsin state government under Scott Walker; huge tax breaks were larded out to billionaire business owners, leading to cuts in tax breaks for poor families and to schools. Closed schools require more and longer bus routes to the consolated schools, but fewer teachers now needed, paid at the shocking astronomical wasteful rate of exactly the median teacher pay for the United States.
The bus drivers AVERAGE about $38,000 a year, said Michael Cordiello, president of Local 1181. The agreement Bloomberg is tearing up has been in place for 47 years.
Today you used the word rational in speaking of people other than the crazies who want to be able to march down the street with their AK47 tucked up under their arms. I wonder if the rational people who are acquainted with those people could even confince them to be realistic. I certianly hope they don't go hunting deer with the assault weapons so I guess the only reason for them to have them is kill, kill, kill.
Perhaps we will end up with war in the streets, it is oh so scary today.
Hmmm, So now the whack job Republicans want to impeach Obama for passing laws that he is legally entitled, and morally compelled to do? Yeah that sounds about right for the current crop of Right-Wing extremists that passes itself off as a political party. So let me get this straight:When we ELECT a Democrat as prez, we can expect the Republicans to attempt to impeach him on whatever flimsy pretexts they can dream up. So if he has a littl dalliance, thay'll impeach him. If he tries to pass laws, they'll impeach him. If he blows his nose or farts they'll impeach him.
The Republicans spend so much time trying to BLOCK the government from governing, they should be deemed a terrorist organisation and outlawed.
Great message, Thom. I will use it as I go around the halls of Congress tomorrow to lobby for the issues you care about. I especially like the "repeal the Reagan tax cuts", the root of all our evils today. (I'd even go back to Eisenhower tax rates, but I'll cool it for now -- we don't want "Les Miz" in the streets of Washington, D.C.)
Thanks Ken, a great explanation of reality. We need to make changes in our culture and that takes years. Raise our children to respect their family, friends, country and it's citizens. The golden rule, which is unfortnately missing in our government for the most part. Thanks again for a well written response to over the top reactive ideology.
The corporate party's Democrats don't get anything done that its Republicans don't want done too... same team, same strategic goals. Their disputes are just theater of distraction.
It's the Democrats that Republicans rely upon to get whatever greater evil done that Republicans can't accomplish.
The corporate party provides two brands of criminal complicity — (R) and (D) — so one can fool half the fools all the time, and the other can fool the other half of the fools all the time.
What? President Obama dares to exercise his constitutionally-mandated powers as president? That's outrageous. (Of course, it's only outrageous when a black democrat does it; when a white republican does it, it's just fine.)
Here's a review I posted about John Mackey's book, "Conscious Capitalism":
John Mackey is a hypocrite.
On the back cover of his book you will see that it is recommended by 5 people, all of whom are billionaires or multi-millionaires. All dedicated members of the 1%. Mackey's brand of "conscious capitalism" is conscious, alright, so in that sense he's telling the truth. But look at his actual business practices and you'll see what kind of consciousness he promotes.
His book says, "You tell the truth to the people you love." Ok, if he's telling the truth about that, he doesn't love his customers and he doesn't want his employees to love customers, either. Let's look at how Mackey's conscious capitalism works out in his actual business practices:
1. A whole Foods butcher told me, "Grass fed beef means that the cattle are fed soy, corn, and other grasses."
I said, "Soy and corn are not grasses, they are grains,"
He said, "Oh no, soy and corn are grasses, all of our meat is grass fed. We don't sell any grain-fed meats."
2. The Whole Foods store in Seattle's University district had a hockey puck-shaped odor control product in the men's room urinals. Specifically, paradichlorobenzene- a cancer-causing brain and nervous system poison. Being chemically sensitive, I got a one-week headache every time I used the bathroom. And toxicologically speaking, the people who are most vulnerable to toxins like paradichlorobenzene are infants, young children, pregnant women, sick people and people with compromised immune systems, and old people. I emailed John Mackey the Conscious Capitalist, and it's been about five years, and he hasn't consciously replied to me. A week after I emailed Mackey, I talked with to the manager of the store, proving everything I said. He said, "Ok, I'll have to look into that." A month later he had not done anything and hadn't contacted me. So I called him again. He didn't call back. I talked with a department manager, who said she would look into it and get back to me. She didn't. I talked with another department manager who said he would get back to me. He didn't. After a year and a half, I told a Whole Foods employee about the situation and told him I was thinking about suing Whole Foods. He said, "I think you should, because if you don't sue them, they won't do anything."
I put a sign on the bathroom door that said, "Danger: Paradichlorobenzene in use. Cancer-causing brain toxin." A Whole Foods security guy came up to me a few minutes later and said, "Did you put that sign on the bathroom door?"
I said, "That depends. Do you use paradichlorobenzene in that bathroom?"
He said, "No, we do not."
I said, "Then I did not put the sign on the door."
He said, "Someone saw you put the sign on the door. I am going to ask you again: did you put that sign on the door?"
I said, "And I am going to ask you again: do you use paradichlorobenzene in that bathroom?"
He said, "No, we do not."
I said, "Then I did not put that sign on the door."
He said, "We do not want you putting signs in our store."
I said, "We do not want you exposing us to that highly toxic chemical."
He said, "You could be arrested for putting that sign on the door."
I said, "That would be an interesting court case: man arrested for informing customers that they are being poisoned."
He said, "We're going to let you go this time, but don't put any more sign on that door."
I said, "I'm going to let you go this time, but quit using that chemical."
A month later, they were still using the chemical.
So I notified Whole Foods of my intention to sue them, and said I would also take the case to the court of public opinion. Within a week they stopped using paradichlorobenzene in their bathrooms.
3. About five months ago I was getting a plastic bag off the roll in the produce department at a Whole Foods store, and realized that all of their plastic bags had a toxic solvent in them. The smell was unmistakeable. I asked an employee, who looked uncomfortable and said, "I don't know anything about that." I asked the store manager, who also looked uncomfortable and said, "Oh yes, we've known about that for over a month."
I said, "Then why are you still letting your customers use those toxic bags?"
He said, "Well, we have to use our remaining stock of bags, and then we'll see if we can get bags from another supplier."
I said, "Why don't you remove those bags right now, and let your customers use paper bags?"
He said, "I don't have the authority to do that."
I said, "So you're telling me that the Whole Foods corporation won't let you stop exposing your customers to that toxic chemical?"
He said, "Yes, that's what I am saying."
4. I have asked three Whole Foods employees if Whole Foods sells grass fed butter. All three of them handed me a butter whose label says, "Summer Butter." The label does not say "Grass Fed," it just says, "Summer Butter." When I pointed out this obvious fact, they all insisted that the butter was grass fed. I said, "If it's grass fed, why doesn't the label say grass fed?" One of them kept insisting that the butter is grass fed.
5. I pointed out to a Whole Foods employee that the grape juice under the "Organic Grape Juice" sign, was not organic. He said, "Sure it is, see the sign?"
I handed him a bottle of the juice and said, "This bottle that was under that sign, does not say organic."
He said, "But it is organic, the sign says it's organic."
I asked him to get a manager. The manager took me around the corner from the "Organic Grape Juice" sign, and showed me the organic grape juice. I said, "Why do you have the 'Organic' sign over the non-organic grape juice?"
She said, "The sign is right by the organic grape juice."
I said, "The organic sign is around the corner from the organic grape juice. The sign is right above the non-organic grape juice. That is deceptive advertising."
She said she would move the sign. An hour later, she had still not moved the sign. I borrowed a magic marker from an employee, and wrote on the sign, "This grape juice is NOT organic. Look at the bottles."
Within two minutes, the sign was taken down.
6. I asked a Whole Foods employee if the food in their salad bar and hot bar was organic. He said, "Yes, it is."
I said, "Why isn't there a sign saying organic?"
He said, "The thing is, if you even touch organic food with a spoon that touched non-organic food, you can't call it organic."
I said, "So, you're telling me that all of the food in these food bars is organic food that has been maybe touched with a spoon that touched non-organic food?"
He said, "Yes, mostly. I mean, there's some food that isn't organic, but almost all of it is."
I said, "Would you tell me which of these foods are organic?"
He said, "Most of it is organic."
I said, "Please be specific. I want to eat organic food. Which of these foods are organic?"
He said, "Almost all of them,"
Looking him very carefully right in the eyes, I very loudly said, "Read my lips! I want you to tell me which of these foods ARE organic."
He said, "Well, most of it's organic. No one knows exactly which ones, but you can eat any of this food, it's mostly organic."
7. I know an organic farmer. Well, he used to be an organic farmer before Whole Foods corporation drove him out of business. Here's what happened: Whole Foods and this farmer signed a contract that the farmer would plant almost his entire farm in pumpkins, and promised to buy all of the pumpkins. Then, a few weeks before harvest time, Whole Foods told him, "We found some cheaper pumpkins, we're not going to buy yours."
The farmer told them, "You signed a legally-binding contract to buy my pumpkins."
Whole Foods said, "Well, you can sue us if you want to, but we will drag the case out for years. It will be very expensive."
Because he could not afford to sue Whole Foods, the farmer's pumpkins rotted in the fields, he could not make his mortgage payments, and he lost his farm.
These are the instances of Mackey's conscious capitalism that I can personally verify. Many other people around the country have other, equally-damning evidence that John Mackey has consciously told his employees to harm customers and lie to customers so that John Mackey can make more hundreds of millions of dollars.
All of the feel-good words in Mackey's book are sound bytes from a guy who is just another lying, destructive republican hypocrite. Oh, excuse me, I should have said that John Mackey is a VEGETARIAN lying, destructive republican hypocrite. Which makes it strange, because usually vegetarians are MORE ethical, not less.
Seriously, can the President by way of executive order put a law into order without getting aproval from the congress and the senate? If so isn't that a little to much like being a King. Didn't you throw the tea in the ocean and fight to get away from that? Or am I misunderstanding what Thom said.
REPUBLICANS believe the government should help the rich live long and prosper.
REPUBLICANS believe the government should let the rich exploit the working classes until they die from hard work and exhaustion.
REPUBLICANS believe the government should let the poor die off from disease and starvation because they never will amount to anything anyway , and are just a drain on the rich.
FACE WALL STREET and say this prayer at the opening and closing of the NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE.
I agree, to an extent, that a bunch of civilians with weapons could not stand up to the might of the government forces..but they have done so successfully in other countries...Vietnam (eventually kicked our butts out where it didn't belong in the first place). Iran and Afghanistan (are outlasting us as they have every other time a foreign invader and occupier thought they'd bully their way into these countries). I do hope that we will never have to resort to violence here in America. I most whole-brainedly prefer peace over violence. But the very potential would be enough to prevent it in the first place.
Yes, those foreign populations took a big hit...tragic...for sure. But he who leaves first is really the loser. The American taxpayer and those who lost loved ones and those in the other country who lost loved ones were all the losers. The ones who aspire to impose tyranny on the world got rich off of the backs of the taxpayers...I guess you could say..."they" won. What did the MIC really accomplish except a lot of death and mayhem...even to their own.
As in Vietnam..and now in the Middle East...soldiers are not as gung-ho. The propaganda and lies they get drilled into their heads in training eventually subsides, when they actually experience the horrors, making way for the cruel and mental anguish of the reality of war. More veterans are committing suicide to stop the pain. 346 last year. More of our soldiers died by suicide than on the battlefield against the enemy.
So, how would an armed forces last if they were turned against their own people? Killing the so-called "subhumans" that they were propagandized and trained to kill abroad would have been much easier than killing your own people...perhaps relatives. Even that tank in Tiananmen Square in China, a country known for it's human right abuses, wouldn't run over that protestor standing in the way. Of course, Israel doesn't seem to have that "problem".
I believe that just "having" all of these weapons that "could" be used in our defense is enough of a deterrent to a potential tyrannical government that they would not risk sending their troops out against the people. Sure, they will send them out against small, isolated, groups. But, if there were a lot of well armed groups all over the place...our military would be overwhelmed. The troops would be disheartened and, as in Vietnam, "fragging" would commence at a rapid pace.
If all of those protesters at that Chicago National Convention were all armed...I think those National Guard that shot those unarmed protesters would have been searching for their balls in the street that day and crying for their mommies.
There is the concept of mutually ensured destruction that kept us from turning the world into an incinerator. When one power gets to be too strong...they can't help but push the limits of their exploitation and oppression. With a well armed citizenry we would have that mutually ensured destruction. The ruling elite, and their toady government officials, sure wouldn't want to confront a massively armed defense. And just like our forefathers, and the rag tag bands in countries we've invaded and occupied, fighting guerrilla wars in the streets are the worst the military has to fight.
I've heard people use examples of David Koresh and others who were small groups of well armed people going up against the government...but those were just small groups. If all American citizens were well armed...that's a very large mass of people that a potentially tyrannical government would have to worry about. And the tactic of being holed up in any one isolated place is like just asking to be wiped out.
And just where would our government come up with all the money it would take to squash millions of people with guns? And all our military does is waste $Trillions on murdering people but never really wins hearts and minds or the conflict. Today's police forces can't even handle the crime that is taking place in American streets...if all American citizens were well armed we really wouldn't need all those crooked and dirty cops that like to shoot 20-30 rounds into some crazy man or woman's body. They never get there in time to save people from getting shot or raped anyway...mostly always after the person is dead. And the criminals know it...they know that they are more likely to succeed in getting away without being killed because they know that most people don't carry their own guns. But they sure have them. We need to have the means to protect ourselves...not rely on the police.
From Jan. 16th. comment; The labels you do not like are a method of identifying those with political beliefs that are completely different from each other. Perhaps you ladies should ask Hartmann to stop using these labels. As far as hostility, I watched a program yesterday on PBS/Frontline, where the first four years of Obama's Presidency where shown. Believe me he was seen as a man that was angry and name calling when it came to the constant blocking tactics the Republicans were using to cripple his attempt to pass healthcare and the Banksters were even more disrespectful when they refused to come to his speech on Wall St. after Obama had given them what they asked for. He was pissed beyond words and he had no trouble being forceful in his expressions and words. The comments made here are not for finding solutions to our problems, we are here to make our separate points! The remarks made here have less affect than blowing into the wind when it comes to policy changes in Washington. If you want to change Washington, go march, nobody but the few people that comment here ever reads this blog! Or you could go on the international web blogs that discuss world problems. I doubt that Hartmann reads the comments made here. As far as not being lady like while making comments, that is one thing I will not apologize for. If you think I am overly offensive contact the webmaster for this blog. As NoFraud stated in his last comment before signing off permanently, this blog and the comments made here by nitwits are irrelevant and actually accomplishes nothing. This comment section is a group of people saying what they feel, Women in general are less confrontational due to the hormonal difference between the female and male human. That is just a fact of life that you see as sexist, on the contrary I am just pointing out the difference between different people and how they express themselves. No one person or persons has the right to tell another how to express themselves. What one person calls hostile another sees it as just being straight and forceful. And calling Obama, Ms. Obama is not a sexist comment, it is meant to imply he is not aggressive as he should be when dealing with the Republicans and the fact they have no problem being aggressive when it comes to dealing with the President
The labels you do not like are a method of identifying those with political beliefs that are completely different from each other. Perhaps you ladies should ask Hartmann to stop using these labels. As far as hostility, I watched a program yesterday on PBS/Frontline, where the first four years of Obama's Presidency where shown. Believe me he was seen as a man that was angry and name calling when it came to the constant blocking tactics the Republicans were using to cripple his attempt to pass healthcare and the Banksters were even more disrespectful when they refused to come to his speech on Wall St. after Obama had given them what they asked for. He was pissed beyond words and he had no trouble being forceful in his expressions and words. The comments made here are not for finding solutions to our problems, we are here to make our separate points! The remarks made here have less affect than blowing into the wind when it comes to policy changes in Washington. If you want to change Washington, go march, nobody but the few people that comment here ever reads this blog! Or you could go on the international web blogs that discuss world problems. I doubt that Hartmann reads the comments made here. As far as not being lady like while making comments, that is one thing I will not apologize for. If you think I am overly offensive contact the webmaster for this blog. As NoFraud stated in his last comment before signing off permanently, this blog and the comments made here by nitwits are irrelevant and actually accomplishes nothing. This comment section is a group of people saying what they feel, Women in general are less confrontational due to the hormonal difference between the female and male human. That is just a fact of life that you see as sexist, on the contrary I am just pointing out the difference between different people and how they express themselves. No one person or persons has the right to tell another how to express themselves. What one person calls hostile another sees it as just being straight and forceful. And calling Obama, Ms. Obama is not a sexist comment, it is meant to imply he is not aggressive as he should be when dealing with the Republicans and the fact they have no problem being aggressive when it comes to dealing with the President.
ken ware: Like I said...we lost! We lost 58,000 people that should not have been fighting over there to begin with. We taxpayers lost. The MIC won. Massive drug use by those US troops, suicides, mass disillusionment of those troops. Vietnam War was a shameful episode in US history just as our shame is being multiplied over in the Middle East. The US needs to keep it's nose and butt out of other countries business. It's all about control and money. Our country is, and always has been, run by greedy, selfish old men (and some young ones) that go to Ivy League schools and think they can push their weight around to satisfy their sense of entitlement, xenophobic arrogance, and warped jingoistic creeds.
Yes, we murdered over 2 million Vietnamese most of them civilians. But as we now celebrate the Tet offensive and with images of frightened US diplomats and supporters from the South trying to escape onto helicopters from roof tops (and we now know that the whole trigger that suckered us into that mess was a lie...the Gulf of Tonkin incident)...we can look forward to the day when those Middle Eastern countries can have their own celebrations commemorating the "good-riddance" to criminal scoundrels who illegally invaded and murdered their families.
There's really never going to be an end to this farce...the US is now moving into Africa...to wreak havoc and mayhem there as well. Always an excuse to bleed all of us dry.
Just remember, it was largely the overwhelming anti-Vietnam-War attitude among civilians in this country and many of the troops in Vietnam, along with not "winning the hearts and minds" of those we were occupying in Vietnam that led to our defeat. Despite the fact that we murdered more of them than they did of us, we lost the war in Vietnam just as we are losing the war in the Middle East. We are getting out...thank goodness...and it is about time we retreated...you can't fight a population where you have failed to "win hearts and minds". And you can't do that by murdering their families...which is what the US was quite good at. "Kill them all...let God sort 'em out!" Isn't that right?
Oh Palindromedary, that's hilarious! I hope you just chugged a couple for Fourtie's when you saw that urinal. LOL
David Abbot: Wow! That's quite a story! Way to go...if more people did the things you did we wouldn't have the problems we have now. Most people won't take the time or effort like that....they just shrug their shoulders and continue to make these criminals wealthier and us sicker and poorer. I'll remember all you said the next time I go into a Whole Foods store...which is not very often...but occasionally. Next time I use their bathrooms...I'll try not to breathe! Back in Bush's day, I went to a public bathroom and was surprised and most amused that in the back side of a urinal was a picture of Bush and the caption said..."Go ahead...He's pissing on you!"
Many learn with age and maturity a special discernment reveals the overt journalism propagating from Fox News. To me it is shown openly plainly or readily apparent their talking points are not conservative at all. Rather a secret or hidden agenda, very Wahhabi, that is loaded with prejudice teaming in opinions, flash innuendos that constantly refer to President Obama as not being a leader.
That’s funny, with one war over in Iraq, and another winding down in Afghanistan America’s automatic weapons industry is blunted. Or, those who really know, and I say this just in speculation, how much of America’s military weapons have been lost or unaccounted for. No report but the media knows. As a Vietnam vet I know there where a lot of lost stuff.
Another can be said, from particular authors that investigated stories of the Carlyle Group, One of those Canary Island deals, a private investment firm of “Bush One” as a prominent member of the board of directors did sell weapons on the open market. Yikes, with partnerships with the Bin Laden Family. This was written in Gerald Posners Book “Secrets of the Kingdom” 2005 what a gig; the Son makes war the old man sell weapons. Profiteering and treason are the mix that the media is trying to hold the lid on a political pressure crook pot that is busting at the seams.
It is my opinion it is crazy for the average American to run around with a basic training military weapon such as an M16, or even the M14 which I think is tougher. Somebody is selling this stuff in the market place. The concept of a military weapon is just that you can be part of that weapon only if you join the military. That’s the idea to defend the country in the regular army with any advance weapons. This thing about dealerships is not looked at deep enough. Sort of like who let the dogs out. Or this is a WTF moment the military is way too loose to just stand by a watch military grade weapons used in basic training flaunted in the media, and over the counter sales is a total breach of American military security.
Lastly insurance for fire arms is central to the solution. Actually one the NRA will certainly back away from fast.
Reading all the posts and now know Republicans belong to the NRA and Dems don't.
Wonder how Harry got a B+ from the NRA? Harry will never bring a gun grab to the floor! This is not a Republican only issue. High taxes and over spending is!
Ken, thanks for that great advice. I really appreciate the effort blowing all that wind back in my direction.
I would never suggest you change any thing you do. I love your comments the way they are!
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go powder my nose and polish my nails.
LOL
PS I did ask Hartmann to stop exactly like you suggested. Please read comment #25
No one is proposing that your guns will be taken away. That will not happen. Even if you own one of those huge killing machines. They want you to register, to know how to use a gun, and to keep you from passing it on to someone else, without registration--that sort of thing.
I get so tired of hearing -- -they're taking away our guns! Maybe you should read the proposals.
And you might listen to that guy, Thom Hartmann is his name, who has been explaining how the wording of the second amendment got into the constitution and its specific intent. You aren't going to take over the government or stop the government from taking you over. Government weapons outgun you at every step.
Don't let fear of whatever it is you're afraid you lead you around by the nose. Nobody thinks straight when they are afraid. There are other options if you don't like things as they are. We still have a democracy. Use it--but think first and know what you want changed.
What kind of world do you want?
1
1
Well Thom,
Dishing out Executive Orders to help keep assault weapons out of the hands of dangerous people as fast as McDonald's dishes out French Fries is fine and dandy with me. President Obama has my full blessing and support.
However, If he fails to do the exact same thing to raise the debt limit and demand no cuts to social programs, I'll definitely jump the fence and hop onto the radical Conservative Bandwagon faster than you can say, "Would you like fries with that order, Sir!"
I might even take over the reigns of that Bandwagon myself! "Yipikiyaahh!!"
Palindromedary - You may or may not have served in Vietnam or the Nam' as we called it. Your statement that they kicked our butt shows you have not studied or are aware of how that war was ended. We bombed Hanoi into the stone ages with our B'52's or Big Buffs as that was what most Air Force personell called them. Along with our F-4 Phantoms and F-5's Thunder Chiefs and various other aircraft literally had the Hanoi begging for peace at the at the Paris peace negotiations with Kissinger. The North was completely supplied by the Red Chinese and the Red Russians. At first we did not bomb the harbors where these two countries unloaded the weapons the North used against our Air Force, Army, Navy and Marines. Everything from fuel, tanks and SAM’s (Soviet Land to Air Missiles) were unloaded in Haiphong harbor. As the War progressed we bombed anything that moved on the ground or in the harbors in the North, starving the North Vietnamese of crucial war goods. After the Christmas bombings of 1973 they asked us to restart the piece negotiations. By 1973 the American Army and Marines owned South Vietnam and the Air Force and Naval pilots owned the skies, even with the cowardly South Vietnamese soldiers deserting their posts on a daily basis. We destroyed the insurgents known as the V.C, and literally dismantled the North Vietnamese troops that entered from the North. The people from the United States that marched on Washington and those cowards that refused to serve and ran off to Canada to hide were the second front of enemies we had to deal with during the Vietnam War. The North Vietnamese violated the truce that was signed in Paris and attacked the South after the U.S. Military had left South Vietnam. In 1975 you civilians watched as the North Vietnamese over ran the South after we had removed all our combat troops in the Nam. You probably only remember the U.S. Embassy being overrun with Russian tanks. Sir, to say the North whipped our Butts is a statement of your ignorance when it comes to a War that took 58,000+ American lives who served their country with bravery and honor and 2,000,000 North Vietnamese lives were lost. I would love to continue in depth of how the South Vietnamese lost their civil war because of cowardly politicians in Washington cut off all funding for the South in early 1975, while the North continued to receive war goods from Red China and Russia. The Russians and Red Chinese had thousands of advisors on the ground and Russian and Chinese pilots manned manner of the aircraft that battled U.S. Airmen over the North. Only a civilian who did not serve in our War would make a disrespectful statement like you have made. It was not the rebellious people in the North that fought in the South; it was highly trained North Vietnamese soldiers that fought against us in the South. And with all due respect for those soldiers, they were one hell of a well-trained and disciplined army, not a bunch of civilians from the North with AK-47's as you have wrongly noted. Get your facts straight, especially when you are making statements with someone who has served and studied the War in Vietnam. This war was fought in the air,rivers and on the ground by our brave troops of the United States Military.
BACK to the Topic:
The REAL reason is the 40% increase in bus routes just since 2002. From 5,000 routes to 7,000.
Consolidating and privatizing of schools under Mayor Bloomberg led to more buses carrying the same number of students farther to more destinations. That is the tradeoff for closing neigborhood schools and trying charter schools.
"The fraud of failed schools and the "need" for school choice is behind this dilemma. Each day, thousands of children are needlessly sent out of their neighborhood in a con game that carries the premise that schools are notably better a few miles away."
http://nycityeye.blogspot.com/2013/01/bloomberg-school-choice-policies.html
I know this is happening in the criminal conspiracy called Wisconsin state government under Scott Walker; huge tax breaks were larded out to billionaire business owners, leading to cuts in tax breaks for poor families and to schools. Closed schools require more and longer bus routes to the consolated schools, but fewer teachers now needed, paid at the shocking astronomical wasteful rate of exactly the median teacher pay for the United States.
The bus drivers AVERAGE about $38,000 a year, said Michael Cordiello, president of Local 1181. The agreement Bloomberg is tearing up has been in place for 47 years.
Thank you, tfs6755 !
Today you used the word rational in speaking of people other than the crazies who want to be able to march down the street with their AK47 tucked up under their arms. I wonder if the rational people who are acquainted with those people could even confince them to be realistic. I certianly hope they don't go hunting deer with the assault weapons so I guess the only reason for them to have them is kill, kill, kill.
Perhaps we will end up with war in the streets, it is oh so scary today.
Hmmm, So now the whack job Republicans want to impeach Obama for passing laws that he is legally entitled, and morally compelled to do? Yeah that sounds about right for the current crop of Right-Wing extremists that passes itself off as a political party. So let me get this straight:When we ELECT a Democrat as prez, we can expect the Republicans to attempt to impeach him on whatever flimsy pretexts they can dream up. So if he has a littl dalliance, thay'll impeach him. If he tries to pass laws, they'll impeach him. If he blows his nose or farts they'll impeach him.
The Republicans spend so much time trying to BLOCK the government from governing, they should be deemed a terrorist organisation and outlawed.
You can bet the Republicans would be screaming for gun controls if THEY became the primary targets of the gun nuts out there.
Great message, Thom. I will use it as I go around the halls of Congress tomorrow to lobby for the issues you care about. I especially like the "repeal the Reagan tax cuts", the root of all our evils today. (I'd even go back to Eisenhower tax rates, but I'll cool it for now -- we don't want "Les Miz" in the streets of Washington, D.C.)
Thanks Ken, a great explanation of reality. We need to make changes in our culture and that takes years. Raise our children to respect their family, friends, country and it's citizens. The golden rule, which is unfortnately missing in our government for the most part. Thanks again for a well written response to over the top reactive ideology.
The corporate party's Democrats don't get anything done that its Republicans don't want done too... same team, same strategic goals. Their disputes are just theater of distraction.
It's the Democrats that Republicans rely upon to get whatever greater evil done that Republicans can't accomplish.
The corporate party provides two brands of criminal complicity — (R) and (D) — so one can fool half the fools all the time, and the other can fool the other half of the fools all the time.
The Devolution of Liberalism:
http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id...
What? President Obama dares to exercise his constitutionally-mandated powers as president? That's outrageous. (Of course, it's only outrageous when a black democrat does it; when a white republican does it, it's just fine.)
Here's a review I posted about John Mackey's book, "Conscious Capitalism":
John Mackey is a hypocrite.
On the back cover of his book you will see that it is recommended by 5 people, all of whom are billionaires or multi-millionaires. All dedicated members of the 1%. Mackey's brand of "conscious capitalism" is conscious, alright, so in that sense he's telling the truth. But look at his actual business practices and you'll see what kind of consciousness he promotes.
His book says, "You tell the truth to the people you love." Ok, if he's telling the truth about that, he doesn't love his customers and he doesn't want his employees to love customers, either. Let's look at how Mackey's conscious capitalism works out in his actual business practices:
1. A whole Foods butcher told me, "Grass fed beef means that the cattle are fed soy, corn, and other grasses."
I said, "Soy and corn are not grasses, they are grains,"
He said, "Oh no, soy and corn are grasses, all of our meat is grass fed. We don't sell any grain-fed meats."
2. The Whole Foods store in Seattle's University district had a hockey puck-shaped odor control product in the men's room urinals. Specifically, paradichlorobenzene- a cancer-causing brain and nervous system poison. Being chemically sensitive, I got a one-week headache every time I used the bathroom. And toxicologically speaking, the people who are most vulnerable to toxins like paradichlorobenzene are infants, young children, pregnant women, sick people and people with compromised immune systems, and old people. I emailed John Mackey the Conscious Capitalist, and it's been about five years, and he hasn't consciously replied to me. A week after I emailed Mackey, I talked with to the manager of the store, proving everything I said. He said, "Ok, I'll have to look into that." A month later he had not done anything and hadn't contacted me. So I called him again. He didn't call back. I talked with a department manager, who said she would look into it and get back to me. She didn't. I talked with another department manager who said he would get back to me. He didn't. After a year and a half, I told a Whole Foods employee about the situation and told him I was thinking about suing Whole Foods. He said, "I think you should, because if you don't sue them, they won't do anything."
I put a sign on the bathroom door that said, "Danger: Paradichlorobenzene in use. Cancer-causing brain toxin." A Whole Foods security guy came up to me a few minutes later and said, "Did you put that sign on the bathroom door?"
I said, "That depends. Do you use paradichlorobenzene in that bathroom?"
He said, "No, we do not."
I said, "Then I did not put the sign on the door."
He said, "Someone saw you put the sign on the door. I am going to ask you again: did you put that sign on the door?"
I said, "And I am going to ask you again: do you use paradichlorobenzene in that bathroom?"
He said, "No, we do not."
I said, "Then I did not put that sign on the door."
He said, "We do not want you putting signs in our store."
I said, "We do not want you exposing us to that highly toxic chemical."
He said, "You could be arrested for putting that sign on the door."
I said, "That would be an interesting court case: man arrested for informing customers that they are being poisoned."
He said, "We're going to let you go this time, but don't put any more sign on that door."
I said, "I'm going to let you go this time, but quit using that chemical."
A month later, they were still using the chemical.
So I notified Whole Foods of my intention to sue them, and said I would also take the case to the court of public opinion. Within a week they stopped using paradichlorobenzene in their bathrooms.
3. About five months ago I was getting a plastic bag off the roll in the produce department at a Whole Foods store, and realized that all of their plastic bags had a toxic solvent in them. The smell was unmistakeable. I asked an employee, who looked uncomfortable and said, "I don't know anything about that." I asked the store manager, who also looked uncomfortable and said, "Oh yes, we've known about that for over a month."
I said, "Then why are you still letting your customers use those toxic bags?"
He said, "Well, we have to use our remaining stock of bags, and then we'll see if we can get bags from another supplier."
I said, "Why don't you remove those bags right now, and let your customers use paper bags?"
He said, "I don't have the authority to do that."
I said, "So you're telling me that the Whole Foods corporation won't let you stop exposing your customers to that toxic chemical?"
He said, "Yes, that's what I am saying."
4. I have asked three Whole Foods employees if Whole Foods sells grass fed butter. All three of them handed me a butter whose label says, "Summer Butter." The label does not say "Grass Fed," it just says, "Summer Butter." When I pointed out this obvious fact, they all insisted that the butter was grass fed. I said, "If it's grass fed, why doesn't the label say grass fed?" One of them kept insisting that the butter is grass fed.
5. I pointed out to a Whole Foods employee that the grape juice under the "Organic Grape Juice" sign, was not organic. He said, "Sure it is, see the sign?"
I handed him a bottle of the juice and said, "This bottle that was under that sign, does not say organic."
He said, "But it is organic, the sign says it's organic."
I asked him to get a manager. The manager took me around the corner from the "Organic Grape Juice" sign, and showed me the organic grape juice. I said, "Why do you have the 'Organic' sign over the non-organic grape juice?"
She said, "The sign is right by the organic grape juice."
I said, "The organic sign is around the corner from the organic grape juice. The sign is right above the non-organic grape juice. That is deceptive advertising."
She said she would move the sign. An hour later, she had still not moved the sign. I borrowed a magic marker from an employee, and wrote on the sign, "This grape juice is NOT organic. Look at the bottles."
Within two minutes, the sign was taken down.
6. I asked a Whole Foods employee if the food in their salad bar and hot bar was organic. He said, "Yes, it is."
I said, "Why isn't there a sign saying organic?"
He said, "The thing is, if you even touch organic food with a spoon that touched non-organic food, you can't call it organic."
I said, "So, you're telling me that all of the food in these food bars is organic food that has been maybe touched with a spoon that touched non-organic food?"
He said, "Yes, mostly. I mean, there's some food that isn't organic, but almost all of it is."
I said, "Would you tell me which of these foods are organic?"
He said, "Most of it is organic."
I said, "Please be specific. I want to eat organic food. Which of these foods are organic?"
He said, "Almost all of them,"
Looking him very carefully right in the eyes, I very loudly said, "Read my lips! I want you to tell me which of these foods ARE organic."
He said, "Well, most of it's organic. No one knows exactly which ones, but you can eat any of this food, it's mostly organic."
7. I know an organic farmer. Well, he used to be an organic farmer before Whole Foods corporation drove him out of business. Here's what happened: Whole Foods and this farmer signed a contract that the farmer would plant almost his entire farm in pumpkins, and promised to buy all of the pumpkins. Then, a few weeks before harvest time, Whole Foods told him, "We found some cheaper pumpkins, we're not going to buy yours."
The farmer told them, "You signed a legally-binding contract to buy my pumpkins."
Whole Foods said, "Well, you can sue us if you want to, but we will drag the case out for years. It will be very expensive."
Because he could not afford to sue Whole Foods, the farmer's pumpkins rotted in the fields, he could not make his mortgage payments, and he lost his farm.
These are the instances of Mackey's conscious capitalism that I can personally verify. Many other people around the country have other, equally-damning evidence that John Mackey has consciously told his employees to harm customers and lie to customers so that John Mackey can make more hundreds of millions of dollars.
All of the feel-good words in Mackey's book are sound bytes from a guy who is just another lying, destructive republican hypocrite. Oh, excuse me, I should have said that John Mackey is a VEGETARIAN lying, destructive republican hypocrite. Which makes it strange, because usually vegetarians are MORE ethical, not less.
Seriously, can the President by way of executive order put a law into order without getting aproval from the congress and the senate? If so isn't that a little to much like being a King. Didn't you throw the tea in the ocean and fight to get away from that? Or am I misunderstanding what Thom said.
It's all silliness. Every president uses his executive authority. The only difference, Obama uses it less than any recent GOP president.
Thank you for calling them (R) insane.
THE REPUBLICAN CREED
REPUBLICANS believe the government should help the rich live long and prosper.
REPUBLICANS believe the government should let the rich exploit the working classes until they die from hard work and exhaustion.
REPUBLICANS believe the government should let the poor die off from disease and starvation because they never will amount to anything anyway , and are just a drain on the rich.
FACE WALL STREET and say this prayer at the opening and closing of the NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE.
I agree, to an extent, that a bunch of civilians with weapons could not stand up to the might of the government forces..but they have done so successfully in other countries...Vietnam (eventually kicked our butts out where it didn't belong in the first place). Iran and Afghanistan (are outlasting us as they have every other time a foreign invader and occupier thought they'd bully their way into these countries). I do hope that we will never have to resort to violence here in America. I most whole-brainedly prefer peace over violence. But the very potential would be enough to prevent it in the first place.
Yes, those foreign populations took a big hit...tragic...for sure. But he who leaves first is really the loser. The American taxpayer and those who lost loved ones and those in the other country who lost loved ones were all the losers. The ones who aspire to impose tyranny on the world got rich off of the backs of the taxpayers...I guess you could say..."they" won. What did the MIC really accomplish except a lot of death and mayhem...even to their own.
As in Vietnam..and now in the Middle East...soldiers are not as gung-ho. The propaganda and lies they get drilled into their heads in training eventually subsides, when they actually experience the horrors, making way for the cruel and mental anguish of the reality of war. More veterans are committing suicide to stop the pain. 346 last year. More of our soldiers died by suicide than on the battlefield against the enemy.
So, how would an armed forces last if they were turned against their own people? Killing the so-called "subhumans" that they were propagandized and trained to kill abroad would have been much easier than killing your own people...perhaps relatives. Even that tank in Tiananmen Square in China, a country known for it's human right abuses, wouldn't run over that protestor standing in the way. Of course, Israel doesn't seem to have that "problem".
I believe that just "having" all of these weapons that "could" be used in our defense is enough of a deterrent to a potential tyrannical government that they would not risk sending their troops out against the people. Sure, they will send them out against small, isolated, groups. But, if there were a lot of well armed groups all over the place...our military would be overwhelmed. The troops would be disheartened and, as in Vietnam, "fragging" would commence at a rapid pace.
If all of those protesters at that Chicago National Convention were all armed...I think those National Guard that shot those unarmed protesters would have been searching for their balls in the street that day and crying for their mommies.
There is the concept of mutually ensured destruction that kept us from turning the world into an incinerator. When one power gets to be too strong...they can't help but push the limits of their exploitation and oppression. With a well armed citizenry we would have that mutually ensured destruction. The ruling elite, and their toady government officials, sure wouldn't want to confront a massively armed defense. And just like our forefathers, and the rag tag bands in countries we've invaded and occupied, fighting guerrilla wars in the streets are the worst the military has to fight.
I've heard people use examples of David Koresh and others who were small groups of well armed people going up against the government...but those were just small groups. If all American citizens were well armed...that's a very large mass of people that a potentially tyrannical government would have to worry about. And the tactic of being holed up in any one isolated place is like just asking to be wiped out.
And just where would our government come up with all the money it would take to squash millions of people with guns? And all our military does is waste $Trillions on murdering people but never really wins hearts and minds or the conflict. Today's police forces can't even handle the crime that is taking place in American streets...if all American citizens were well armed we really wouldn't need all those crooked and dirty cops that like to shoot 20-30 rounds into some crazy man or woman's body. They never get there in time to save people from getting shot or raped anyway...mostly always after the person is dead. And the criminals know it...they know that they are more likely to succeed in getting away without being killed because they know that most people don't carry their own guns. But they sure have them. We need to have the means to protect ourselves...not rely on the police.
From Jan. 16th. comment; The labels you do not like are a method of identifying those with political beliefs that are completely different from each other. Perhaps you ladies should ask Hartmann to stop using these labels. As far as hostility, I watched a program yesterday on PBS/Frontline, where the first four years of Obama's Presidency where shown. Believe me he was seen as a man that was angry and name calling when it came to the constant blocking tactics the Republicans were using to cripple his attempt to pass healthcare and the Banksters were even more disrespectful when they refused to come to his speech on Wall St. after Obama had given them what they asked for. He was pissed beyond words and he had no trouble being forceful in his expressions and words. The comments made here are not for finding solutions to our problems, we are here to make our separate points! The remarks made here have less affect than blowing into the wind when it comes to policy changes in Washington. If you want to change Washington, go march, nobody but the few people that comment here ever reads this blog! Or you could go on the international web blogs that discuss world problems. I doubt that Hartmann reads the comments made here. As far as not being lady like while making comments, that is one thing I will not apologize for. If you think I am overly offensive contact the webmaster for this blog. As NoFraud stated in his last comment before signing off permanently, this blog and the comments made here by nitwits are irrelevant and actually accomplishes nothing. This comment section is a group of people saying what they feel, Women in general are less confrontational due to the hormonal difference between the female and male human. That is just a fact of life that you see as sexist, on the contrary I am just pointing out the difference between different people and how they express themselves. No one person or persons has the right to tell another how to express themselves. What one person calls hostile another sees it as just being straight and forceful. And calling Obama, Ms. Obama is not a sexist comment, it is meant to imply he is not aggressive as he should be when dealing with the Republicans and the fact they have no problem being aggressive when it comes to dealing with the President
The labels you do not like are a method of identifying those with political beliefs that are completely different from each other. Perhaps you ladies should ask Hartmann to stop using these labels. As far as hostility, I watched a program yesterday on PBS/Frontline, where the first four years of Obama's Presidency where shown. Believe me he was seen as a man that was angry and name calling when it came to the constant blocking tactics the Republicans were using to cripple his attempt to pass healthcare and the Banksters were even more disrespectful when they refused to come to his speech on Wall St. after Obama had given them what they asked for. He was pissed beyond words and he had no trouble being forceful in his expressions and words. The comments made here are not for finding solutions to our problems, we are here to make our separate points! The remarks made here have less affect than blowing into the wind when it comes to policy changes in Washington. If you want to change Washington, go march, nobody but the few people that comment here ever reads this blog! Or you could go on the international web blogs that discuss world problems. I doubt that Hartmann reads the comments made here. As far as not being lady like while making comments, that is one thing I will not apologize for. If you think I am overly offensive contact the webmaster for this blog. As NoFraud stated in his last comment before signing off permanently, this blog and the comments made here by nitwits are irrelevant and actually accomplishes nothing. This comment section is a group of people saying what they feel, Women in general are less confrontational due to the hormonal difference between the female and male human. That is just a fact of life that you see as sexist, on the contrary I am just pointing out the difference between different people and how they express themselves. No one person or persons has the right to tell another how to express themselves. What one person calls hostile another sees it as just being straight and forceful. And calling Obama, Ms. Obama is not a sexist comment, it is meant to imply he is not aggressive as he should be when dealing with the Republicans and the fact they have no problem being aggressive when it comes to dealing with the President.