What's a flag but what it comes to symbolize? Just what does America stand for...any more? World wide, the American flag stands for terrorism and empire building, death and destruction. The American flag drips with the blood of millions of innocent victims that rich people have murdered all for greed and power. Unless the American people can regain control from these few rich people in power and restore the original meaning of our flag then it would be just too embarrassing to fly one or wear the flag symbol as so many right-wing, greedy, death mongers do. Whenever you see some guy in a business suit wearing a US flag on their lapel....without knowing anything about him..don't you immediately think...ah ha! He's a Republican! They've hijacked the flag and the flag symbolizes arrogant, greedy, bullies who will likely steal your natural resources and/or try to kill you.

Sorry folks GW Bush 2 is at fault here, the middle east were all afraid of Iraq and we went there for WHAT? It didn't matter if we stayed there for 20 years, the Sunies and Sheites where going to get it on as soon as we left. Romney/McCain/Ryan will take us into more wars, but after they give Trillions more in tax breaks to the wealthy/corporations. If 12/21/2012 is the end of earth, it surly will only be because Romney won in November. hankk MI

Aired on Fox on March 4th, 2001..6 months before 911 this pilot episode of The Lone Gunman is very eerie to watch! It depicts an airliner hijacked remotely by electronic means. If you haven't seen it yet...you should watch it. Of course it means nothing, really, in supporting the electronic hijack hypothesis. But it is really very odd coincidence just the same.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3WW6eoLcLI

I haven't watched the Fox channel since way before 911 so I missed this series. Never even heard of it before finding it just now. As a matter of fact, I thought of the idea of the possibility that the airliners on 911 were remotely, electronically, hijacked all by myself. I had not read about it or seen it anywhere and was very surprised that, when I started searching the subject, that this was believed by others to have been possible as well.

I believe that my previous links help prove that the technology has been around for a long time and that certain individuals have an uncanny link to high places relating to the equipment and the Pentagon...along with the mysterious disappearance, according to Rumsfeld just prior to 911, of trillions of dollars from the Pentagon's account.

Could it be that by creating a "fictional" account of an electronically hijacked airliner crashing into the WTC towers 6 months before it actually happened...that it was designed to create a relationship to "fiction" if anyone ever did make the connection. If people, after 911, started saying that they believed the airliners were electronically hijacked then the fictional program would trigger the response in some people that believing in such things is non-sense...they are just getting it from a fictional TV program.

Some useful idiot, taking the position of defending the "official conspiracy theory" with the predilection of hating Muslims anyway...because "they beat and rape their wives and children" but who may have subsequently thought better of those remarks and removed their comments...but I saw them early in the morning...may think he/she could use this in an attempt to debunk the truth of what happened...ie: they really did electronically hijack and guide the airliners into the WTC buildings and Pentagon.

Except, the Pentagon crash had all of the characteristics of a military craft..or missile. No way an Arab terrorist, who couldn't even fly a small plane, could do the elaborate maneuver or even fly that close to the ground going at 500 MPH. Expert pilots said this couldn't be done with the large airliner..because the density of the air that close to the ground would prohibit those speeds.

And the initial hole in the Pentagon was tiny..windows unbroken all around...no holes from the Titanium engines or wings or tail...just a round hole not even as large as the diameter of the fuselage...almost...but not quite. The larger hole...photographed later..was a result of the structure giving way and collapsing.

And what was Rumsfeld doing helping carry people at the crash site...the Joints Chief of Staff was on the other side, the River Entrance, of the Pentagon? You walk into the River Entrance and the Joint Chiefs of Staff is to the left. I entered there many times, myself.

The Flags of Mutiny, What stands out to me is the size of some American flags that appear to be readied for flame. Emotionally spread out in vengeance with fever, set to burn in time marking dishonor to America’s “Phantom”. But what is this phantom? The mainstream media knows. The opera plays out commercial after commercial in the marketing mill of American politics like a time America not too long ago, a fire cross in some yard or Public Square set fire by horseman vigilantes serving justice. Now someplace in Islam the phantom appears again. Some perhaps cover their heads with a scarf or Burqa, a full body and head cloak worn by some Muslim, perhaps a franchise of the Clan, only the cut outs of the eyes we see. The distinct past of terrorism and present far right group openly sling weapons across the backs openly carry weapons to political rallies here, then burn flags there.

Have you noticed new the American flags in Islam readied to burn, how bright, how gleaming the colors are, fresh clean and a size better nicer and bigger than mine. I have flag, and hang it proudly every day in front of my house. These flags don’t come cheap. The Islamic red white and blue is at least twice the size my flag is. Beautiful those flags appear. Then stream into smoke and dust. This phantom is doing a very good political marketing job at just the right time. No, it is only possible to accomplish such action dishonor across many cities simultaneously through the force of big money. The probability function all that can happen at once just screams out. There is big money behind this stuff. It appears as though crafted from a losing party. Who is has lost their way? Somehow these flags knew the way there.

Who buys them who supplies them? I don’t think they are made in Kansas do you? The news did say that Islam has hundreds of Christians jailed for their believes. Imagine America once modeled modern art with the cross of Jesus Christ in a jar of urine. It was called “Piss Christ”. Absolutely disgusting but did not result in massive mob murder. Perhaps some wild dissonance. Big difference in our social ways. Islam needs maturity and time to evolve. But our foreign policies may very well stink like a jar of urine.

In 1997, Zbigniew Brzezinski's new book 'The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and It's Geostrategic Imperatives' portrayed "Central Asia, with it's vast oil reserves, as the key to world power, which would mean establishing sevreral military bases there." He went on to say that "America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad.This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. . . . The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization."

Then he went on to suggest a way to overcome this obstacle."The American people would be willing to make the economic and human sacrifices needed for 'imperial mobilization,' he suggested, if there were 'a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat'.”

"It is possible that Brzezinski’s discussion here inspired the statement about a “new Pearl Harbor” in PNAC’s 2000 document, which can be read as a call for a false-flag operation that would provide a pretext for turning PNAC’s agenda into official policy."

"Be that as it may, a more specific motivation for the post-9/11 attack on Afghanistan was provided by the “pipeline war” that was going on.111 The Bush-Cheney administration supported--as had the Clinton-Gore administration until 1999--UNOCAL’s plan to build an oil-and-gas pipeline through Afghanistan, which was in competition with plans from oil companies based in other countries. What happened in 1999 was that UNOCAL, having become convinced that Afghanistan under the Taliban would never have the peace and stability needed for the pipeline project, decided to withdraw. Ahmed Rashid, finishing his book on the Taliban in mid-1999, wrote that the Clinton administration had shifted its support to the pipeline route from Azerbaijan through Georgia to Turkey, adding that “by now nobody wanted to touch Afghanistan and the Taliban.”112

When the Bush administration came to power, however, it decided to give the Taliban one last chance. This last chance occurred at a four-day meeting in Berlin in July 2001. Representatives of the Bush-Cheney administration, trying to persuade the Taliban to share power with US-friendly factions in a “unity government,” reportedly gave the Taliban an ultimatum: “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”113 When the Taliban refused, the Americans reportedly said that “military action against Afghanistan would go ahead . . . before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest.”

"The crucial precondition for the war in Iraq was a psychological state of mind in the American public---one of fear and anxiety combined with a desire for revenge---that would countenance the new doctrine of preemptive-preventive war. This state of mind was abundantly created by 9/11. Then, just as the ensuing propaganda offensive against Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban created almost unanimous acceptance of the war in Afghanistan, the propaganda offensive directed at Saddam Hussein was rather easily able to channel this fear, anxiety, and desire for revenge into a widespread feeling that a war to bring about regime change in Iraq was justified."

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17194.htm

Actually it's the Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama legacy .

The up side of 9/11 2000 banksters killed.

There is no such thing as a sacred book in US law. One of the great things about this country. Putting up a funny tralier on some 8th century religious nut is hardly a high crime , like say looting the US treasury is.

Is this the same Gerald Posner, a well known plagerist. Who wrote a book for the repubs claiming Oswald shot Kennedy ? A dubious, and unfortunate source. Most of us who were around at the time know that was the original big lie that led us to where we are today. An Allen Dulles faction of The CIA did that job. The CIA is now the largest drug cartel on Earth, War in the middle east would hurt business. A little chaos on the other hand is always good for business. I don't disagree with the rest of your post however.

Islam like Christo-Capitalism are cancers Islam is just slightly less virulent. In the west we see cruise missle and drone strikes without blood in the middle east they present the carnage which is a more honest depiction. We are in an asymmetrical war with Islam . The sooner people alibiing the Islamists recognize this sooner ths converstion can become coherent. You can't destroy countries and expect to be loved for it . The Hubris of the American Empire has been exposed here and it does not compute for most Americans . Their response is to limit their own free speech. Jail the Egyptian Coptic who triggered the latest waves of Anti-US violence. Every year on or around 9/11, in case no one has noticed, celibrations and/or riots happen across the middle east . Why would this year be different Thousands blown to pieces in Libya , thousands more in Syria most with US weapons and logistical support . What's not to love.

I hear your theory about the protests being blowback. There sure is a reservoir of hatred there. But stop and ask: Why now? Why anti-American protests? My theory is that al queda engineered the outrage to cover for attacks on US embassies in retaliation for Obama taking out so much of their leadership, particularly the latest one. They wanted to attack on or around 9/11 and they're hoping to affect the election.

Why would they prefer Romney over Obama? Because, as opposed to just using al queda as a justification for US imperialism as Bush did, Obama has actually been eliminating al queda. They want Romney in as a GW Bush do-over to perpetuate the "Ugly American" behavior that serves them well by leaving them free to operate with a demon to attack, the US.

They are so eroded that the only US facilities they can attack are our vulnerable embassies in unstable countries with Muslim citizens. And they needed the cover of generalized protest in which to act.

And this leads also to a possibility that behind al queda and perhaps encouraging them in this effort are the neocons and the M-I Complex. They have exactly the same goals. The anti-Muslim video had been sitting around basically ignored for month. Who discovered it and translated it and spread it around, whipping up the anger? Who benefits and how? And again, why now?

Romney took the bait. But I think President Obama is too smart to do so.

And BTW in case you right wingers didn't watch any real news reporting last week, last week's muslim uprising isn't necessarily over a video. The actual militant killings were considered to be a retaliation over the killing of a high Al Qaeda target. Should the USA stop doing that sort of thing? How would that protect our free speech?