Today is Jan. 27, 2013. The 113 Congress started January 3, 2013. It has now been in session for 390 days without passing a GOOD WAGE, JOBS BILL to help our economy. This is the 17th repeat and update of this post.
You will see this same, GIVE A DAMN SPAM flyer sent from this FB site every day, (if possible) until it does.
This video documents the vast wealth of the 1%. However, a little research on the people in the video revealed that Tim Dunham was called "the Bernie Madoff of the Midwest."
Thom spoke on one of his show's last week that Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani took the homeless off the streets of New York and deposit them in Brooklyn and in Queens. But Thom failed to mention that Mayor Richard M Daley (the son of Richard J) did the same and much more. He tore down public housing; did away with Missions and homeless shelters in the downtown area and parts of the City of the Chicago. So, Giuliani did some but the liberal in Chicago (Daley) did much worst!
Mayor de Blasio would be able to keep all of his campaign promises by requiring Tax Stamps to be placed on certain legal filings. That is to say, in order to bring a lawsuit in the Big Apple and the boroughs, plaintiffs should be required to buy and affix a "special tax stamp" to their legal complaints.
I hate to be a conspiracy theorist but I will be anyways. I still feel to this day the only reason Obama had been "elected" was the US was in a tailspin. The world viewed the United States as a bully and that's putting it nicely. There was so much turmoil within the US it was heading towards a civil upheaval. We did still have a civil uprising but it didn't go to far. Would the Occupy Wall Street Movement have actually turned into something more then it was if McCain had been in power?
Industrial espionage ain't worth shit unless you relay it to the industry, and that includes the financial sector/Wall Street. New patents, products, investments, etc. the NSA data collection program has been a banksters/1%'rs bonanza!
Taxpayers paid for it all. And what kind of assistance did the WH/NSA offer the 99%? Trickle down?
The current case in the Supreme Court has me pondering an important question that seems quite pertinent these days.
"Who has less of a right to free speech?"
The case is about buffer zones around abortion clinics. If the Pro-Life side wins: none. If the Pro-Choice side wins: some. I have a different take on this: apparently the oxymoron, "free speech zone," is perfectly acceptable during political conventions. "Perfectly acceptable" even if that zone is miles away, not just 30 some odd feet. So why do the protesters at Pro-life events have a "right" to be right in the face of those who enter, but during conventions protesters don't?