Clintons: amongst other odious acts, one would collect the remuneration while the other conducted government affairs with the very same entities.
This from page 14 and 15 of the new book “Clinton Cash” by author Peter Schweizer:
Ultimately the right wing Neo Con government of George W bush / Dick Cheney are responsible for the rise of ISIS, they illegally destroyed a once modern secular country , bombed Iraq into the 'stone age' as they liked to say. Iraq under Saddam, as terrible as he was, would never have been ground zero for the very brutal ISIS.
Crime is the expression of internal social tensions within the civic environment.
The importance of understanding crime as producing social contexts where individuals' self-interest has a relation to the function of the social form. This form develops over time as the isolating the phenomenon of crime as a type of behavior only examines the logical function of existing within or without of the strictures applied by the justice system. The motivation and means for criminal behavior relates to the wider situatedness of the phenomenon in its many expressions.
I bet you're asking why I'm asking this question. I know that all these progressive organizations that I donate to, including Freespeech, operate on a very limited budget, and that most of their funds go to lobbying congressional leaders and other state and local politicians. I'm well aware of that. But aren't ads on the local and multi-media networks a form of lobbying?
Our failure to have adequate vaccines for Ebola is due to the failure for private pharmaceuticals to develop these vaccines because it is not profitable. So far it has mainly hit very poor countries so the profit motive does not incentivize this research and development. We also see that this can pose a danger to all of us since we are global community. Human need should always trump profit.
When you take a broad overview of foreign-policy military buildup economic developments such as disabling Glass-Steagall and allowing changes to Dodd Frank(allowing banks to gamble on derivatives) at the taxpayers expense with FDIC insured funds.
Egyptian leader, Hosni Mubarak, warned Bush against invading Iraq, saying that such an invasion would "open the gates of hell."
But Bush invaded on lies, the gates of hell are open, and the Republicans clearly want to kick gates of hell open.
The real value to the Republicans of the so-called suckers is their commitment / zealousness to vote in every election to keep the shills in office to protect their various "single issues." Quite simply, these folks are the Republicans' MISLED VOTERS. Stronger but not always useful could be the phrase DECEIVED VOTERS. They could also be called the Repubs' DECEIVED PUBLIC or MISLED VOTING BLOCS.
Oooh, just thought of a good one: