Bob Hearns you wrote simply understanding greed intellectully is no understanding at all. I guess you mean knowing the definition is not a solution to ones own greed. Indeed seeing greed arise as a reaction to ones emotion is the mechanism to dissolve it within oneself. You wish to explore what happens when all negative emotions, envy, jealousy anger, saddness etc., cease within oneself. Ummmm you become The Budda, Jesus, Lao Tzu? Seriouslly I don't know, guess I've not arrived. I do find it hard to belive greed can manifest, thrive and persist within a person without them knowing it,observing it,living with it, hideing it. Unlike momentary saddness or anger or even fear, true greed seems to be an addiction.
I've read and understand greed to arrise from fear, specifically fear of scarcity. Scarcity being a relative and sometimes even abstract thing, we often find the wealthy to be the most afaid of scarcity. Afraid of losing,afraid of becoming common, afraid of loss of control etc. I have personally observed the seeds of greed arise in myself and in animals when wealth is suddenly introduced.
Here on my little homestead I have horses, goats and chickens, and dogs of course. What I have noticed especially with goats and and horses is contentment is the normal state when forage is abundant. But even when forage is sparse (winter etc.) they seem to go on as if abundance remained, nibbling what they can find where they can find it, occasionally engaging in playful conflict. Now introduce grain. Suddenly the most aggresive (maybe not stongest or largest) attemps to take it and with whatever level of violence it takes to gain control. If the portion was concentrated to a single small area the most aggresive would take all. Even if portions of hay or grain are separated by a hundred feet or more the aggresive one will atempt to control even if it causes them to get the least. In spring and the grass is knee high and two horses are suddenly turned out on common pasture the most aggresive will try to dominate all of the space. I'm not exactlly sure how this relates to the Koch brothers or you or me or global climate change.
A Native American Proverb I found here on the internet goes.; A grandfather talking to his young grandson tells the boy he has two wolves inside him struggling with each other. The first is the wolf of peace, love and kindness. The other wolf is fear,greed, and hatred. Which wolf will win grandfather? ask the young boy. Whichever one I feed replys the grandfather.
I think that proverb speaks well to where our culture is as well as how we are move it to a better place.
On a side note, many of you are wondering where Thom And Louise are while I'm wondering which of you is secretly Thom and which is Louise
DAnneMarc, so from your response, the solution is to grow hemp. Over time the industrialized world will revert to agricultural, the tipping point will never be reached and all the ills of the world will disappear. Really?
As far as your statement about exploring the issue enough. I'm not sure what issue you are referring to - problem solving? symptom solving in general? or the specific symptom of melting permafrost? As I said earlier, I have no interest in symptom solving. If you are referring to problem solving we have only scratched the surface, at best.
It appears to me that as far as problem solving goes, you and I have not connected at all so far.
Kend, ahem... in response to your remark about Europeans' frugal ways: "Why would we want to bring that culture here?" my answer is: Who the hell needs more than one home for chrissakes?! Plus RVs, boats and other big-ass expensive toys. That's what life's supposed to be about, eh; more-and-more-and-more STUFF... Oh yeah? Gimmie a break. This lifestyle you describe is friggin' unsustainable, and ya know what Kend? Like Thom put it so succinctly, it's gonna destroy all life forms bigger than cockroaches inhabiting this planet. Oh and by the way, that includes us.
Now, while I'm not in the habit of using Biblical references, what comes to mind is that golden calf we were warned about in the story of Moses; you know, one of those false gods we'd better not worship unless we want all hell to cut loose... Remember that? Secular though I am, the power of such metaphor hasn't escaped me. And look where we are today. It hasn't all cut loose quite yet; not full tilt boogie - but that's where we're headed. You fossil fuel defenders who like to deny what climate scientists keep warning us about-- hey, you guys can keep denying it all you want. Pardon me pal, I hate to break it to ya but you're barking up the wrong tree with that bull crap.
I'm talking about climate deniers' false claim that ice is increasing on the Arctic, for example. And how many times have we heard some doofus proclaim: "The planet isn't warming 'cuz it's cold up here!"... I swear, if I hear that one more time I think I'll scream. But seriously, when it comes to matters of geology and climate science (which, incidently, Kend and I know nothing about), I'd prefer to listen to real experts; actual scientists who've spent a lifetime studying and learning about this stuff. And the fact is, dear Kend, about 95% of these experts are telling us to wake up, that we're blowing it for our grandkids and later generations. Earth will no longer be able to sustain life a couple centuries from now, unless we get our priorities straight and learn to live in harmony with nature.
Thom Hartmann happens to be no slouch when it comes to matters of science, possessing enough of a knowledge base to be capable of intelligently discussing subjects that are scientific by nature. Thom has reminded us repeatedly how our way of life will have awful consequences if it continues unchanged for much longer. He warns us (and I'm paraphrasing) that the damage inflicted on the structural integrity of this planet - since the 1850s, when the industrial revolution began - has been accelerating the very process that caused five previous mass extinctions scientists have identified, dating back millions upon millions of years. Now, who's got your ear; climate experts with no profit motive behind their message, who are only trying to prevent or diffuse a looming disaster by educating the public? Or do you listen instead to fossil fuel industry's schills who have a vested interest in the status quo and don't know doodily-do about climate science, who are only brainwashing the public with psuedo-scientific hogwash to serve a private agenda? Who seems most credible to you, Kend? Duh, hello...
Now if my memory serves me, didn't you draw a paycheck from a fossil fuel company for a few years? Is that who feathered your nest? I rest my case. - Aliceinwonderland
DAnneMarc & Aliceinwonderland: That link in DAnneMarc's #76 was from last year. So, unless anyone has heard anything recently about this we may be jumping to conclusions. Maybe they just went on a vacation? I hope that's all it is. By the way AIW...nice hat! I also play trumpet...but not in a while. Just for the fun of it ...no bands. I guess I should get it out and see if I can still play it.
Kend: I have nothing against people who actually do work hard and take risks and even get rich from their labors. They really do deserve what they have earned. But I believe that even you would agree that there are some people who have become very wealthy by screwing other people...and I'm not talking about bordellos here. Many of those people may have inherited much of what they now have and they, and other opportunists, have just schemed and rigged the system to cheat others out of their money. They are not all as magnanimous as you are because they have consistently worked to squeeze workers out of benefits and wages. I'm glad that you are setting the example for being a good employer. But these other selfish parasites have frequently committed illegal acts just to get a slap-on-the-wrist fine that they consider the cost-of-doing-business and end up making the consumers pay those fines by increasing prices. The top execs make out like bandits...because they are bandits.
Roland369: I went to Slovakia back a few years ago. Piestany. Nice Place! Was there for a couple of weeks on business but had plenty of time to enjoy walking around town and across the bridge to the Spa area. I enjoyed the accordion music one old guy was playing on that bridge. In fact, I grew up in a town in the US whose population was mostly Czech and Slovak..back then, of course, ..it was called Czechoslovakia.
DAnne there is a difference between greed and motivation. Yet you look at them the same. Culture is created by desire. Desire do to the best for your family. Whatever you believe that is.
Because I worked endless hours and took massive risks to accumulate the lifestyle I have you call me selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, and short sided.
Are you suggesting I should have just took a government just and been content with that. That if I did that I would be a better person.
DAnne I agree, I think your right. Just think of all the nights I could of slept all night because I didn't have to worry how I could bring in enough business to keep those great Employiees I have in a job when the economy went to crap. All of Saturdays I was in the shop racking my brain to come up with new ways to compete. What was I thinking. Why was I so greedy. I could of worked for the post office and been done work a 1:00 every day with my 6 weeks holidays and my 12 sick days a Year. The best benifits in the world. Thanks for the advice I think I am going to go into work Tuesday (because Monday is Canadian thanksgiving" and shut the company down and go golfing in Scottsdale all winter. I will feel so much better knowing i am not a "selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, short sided person" Thanks buddy I can feel the wait lifting right off my shoulders Already. What the hell was I thinking.
Thanks for speaking out on this issue Thom. You seem to be a gentle soul that can maintain his equilibrium under the bitterest of attacks. I think it's because you have studied your material and know from which you speak. In any case I, and some in my family (we are scattered about the country), watch The Big Picture on RT, as well as FSTV. Thanks to my Roku Box, I seldom miss your program or Democracy Now. Keep up the good work, as we need as many people as possible to speak truth to power, and are not bought out by corporate money.
Oh by the way, I am of Slovak heritage (my Mom came here to Ellis Island on the President Roosevelt in 1928), and was wonderng about your spelling your name Thom, rather than Tom.
Quote Aliceinwonderland:Ohmygosh Marc, it sounds like Louise has had a relapse! No wonder they've let the blog slide. That's got to be the reason, because it seems so unusual. Anyway I'm bummed. I'll hold a secular prayer in my heart for those two. -AIW
Aliceinwonderland ~ Please don't be bummed, at least yet. I've just learned that Louise had breast cancer last year. It is news to me. I vaguely remember her being treated for something; and, when I Googled it, her breast cancer popped up. I have no idea how she is doing today. I was merely speculating as to the answer to our questions as to why Thom has only posted two topics in the last two weeks; and why Louise hasn't posted any topics for some while. I don't know her condition and I certainly hope she is at least stable if not fully recovered.
Remember, that is mere speculation. There are other sound reasons for the lingering topics--first and foremost, that they are probably the most important topics Thom has posted all year and he want us to think long and hard about them. If so, it's working.
Quote Bob Hearns:Solving some of the major symptoms will do one potentially benefitting thing. It pushes the tipping point a little further into the future.
Bob Hearns ~ We've explored this issue enough already to draw some conclusions. This brings us right back to the topic of this blog Global Climate Change. As you've mentioned my idea to bring a functional culture to this nation is 'desperate' at best. I myself doubt that it will have the intended effect of creation of a functional culture. Culture development is a form of evolution and I really don't believe that you can force evolution. My main goal is to preserve and incorporate pre-existing cultures into the American paradigm.
Now, on to the real solution. To solve our immediate problems of thought we have to change our social structure. You will never achieve the goals you have described in a Gesellschaft social structure. If you doubt me go to Mexico and spend a week in Mexico city; and then go to a small rural pueblo. Mingle, and get to know the natives remembering everything I've just stated about Gesellschaft vs Gemeinschaft social structures. What you will discover is that the underlying problems of thought that you have described are a direct result of social structure and not so much culture.
Therefore, the only way to cure the problem is to convert the Gesellschaft to the Gemeinschaft. Essentially, the trick to doing this is to revert the base economy from that of an industrial one to that of an agricultural one. A daunting task for sure; unless, you go back to one of my first posts on this blog where I mention that Hemp, if grown for industrial purposes, would be able to solve global climate change. It would do so by simply removing CO2 from the atmosphere and replacing it with O2.
One of the big 'side effects' a Hemp based economy would achieve is to convert our industrial economy base to an agricultural economy base--in effect taking our Gesellschaft society and turning it into a Gemeinschaft society along with all the typical characteristics involved and described in Post #86 above. In doing so, not only will social structure and individual identity change, so will the priorities that comprise and drive individual thought. In essence, you can kill two birds with one stone.
Once our economic base is converted to agricultural the natural evolutionary development of our culture will take care of itself.
Quote Kend:What I don't understand is why do we care if immigrants don't keep their culture, isn't that why they moved here in the first place.
Kend goes on to answer part of his own question
Quote Kend:What makes our countries great is we have a choice. If you work hard you can have what ever you want. You don't see middle class Europeans with boats, RV's, summer and winter homes etc like we do. Why would we want to bring that culture here?
Kend ~ Well then you just answered your own question. By and large immigrants here are motivated by pure greed. Greed blinds people and makes them stupid. That is why they readily sacrifice the most important thing they have--their culture. Culture is priceless and must be preserved at all other costs. This is why you see people who chose to remain in the home country perfectly happy and content to live more frugal lifestyles. They have everything they need. In fact, they are a little bit smarter then their brethren who fled. Immigrants who foolishly abandoned their culture will never be happy. They will experience the void of culture and that central unifying identity culture provides and unsuccessfully try to fill that gap with all manner of material junk for the rest of their lives--never knowing true inner peace. Never being really happy. The truth hurts doesn't it?
In a way Kend you put your finger on one of the key issues that is wrong with this country--by and large we are a nation of the offspring of selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, and short sided immigrants.
To go fishing or spend this saturday morning on a reply to Bob Hearns and to myself. I find a detailed reply is going to take some time. Think I'll go fishing. There are alot of different sorts who fish. Some expect fish and sense diappointment or scarcity with being "skunked" they might even hoard fish when fishing is "good" . A true fishermen knows the act of fishing to be an abundant experience in and of itself. More details to come (and maybe a fish).
DAnne, I find it interesting how people are always trying to change people. It happens on this blog all the time. I am just as guilty. Your conversation with Bob are great. What I don't understand is why do we care if immigrants don't keep their culture, isn't that why they moved here in the first place. I hear all the time how we should be more like Europeans. Most of my suppliers are in Italy, and Germany and all they talk about is how great it is here. yes they get tons of time off but they live in their parents home until they are 40. Then if they have a great job they finally save enough for a down payment on a 800 sq/ft flat. No back yard, no garage, maybe one car. What makes our countries great is we have a choice. If you work hard you can have what ever you want. You don't see middle class Europeans with boats, RV's, summer and winter homes etc like we do. Why would we want to bring that culture here?
N Z Sarah, what I am about to say is not intended to disparage women as I do think that women and men are equal in general. I'm not sure what you are agreeing with when you say that you agree with me. But when it comes to problem solving, as I have been talking about it here, women are no better than men, as a group, at addressing it. Women lack critical thinking skills, just as much as men do. It's not just men who are doing symptom solving on our critical issues, environmental and otherwise. Women by the millions, as well, are heavily engaged in these 'not significantly going anywhere' activities. I don't think that gender makes anyone more or less capable of exploring and investigating the problems that we are not facing, that we are not working on resolving. There is nothing exclusive in my invitation that we explore, inquire and investigate, right here and right now.
dialindicator, the intellectual understanding of greed is one thing. If it does not move the person to end the action of greed in themselves, then intellectual understanding is no understanding at all. Exploring and investigating what is actually happening, internally and externally, before the action of greed occurs will give you the understanding, which is beyond the merely intellectual, to see greed and end it. Similarly, you will see how envy occurs, how jealousy occurs, anger, sadness and so on, the whole of self generated feelings and emotions. And when these come to an end in oneself, what happens then?
DAnneMarc, you acknowledge that you can't impose a culture and then go on to propose a way to achieve just that by exploiting people who lack the ability to think critically, which is most of society, by using the same advertising tactics that the CEOs of the huge junk food corporations use to get us to stuff enormous quantities of poisonous crap down our throats.
Solving some of the major symptoms will do one potentially benefitting thing. It pushes the tipping point a little further into the future.However, if that extra time is not used to solve the problem, the tipping point will not be in the future, it will be now. We have millions of people working hard, expending lots of energy, on symptom solving. How many are focussed on problem solving? How much energy is being expended on exploring and investigating that?
a ceiling that continues to rise in proportion to the public debt required to produce greater private profits from more costly wars waged
debt ceiling increase:
something regularly required for the the most militarized nation to become even more militarized
raising the people's debt to pay for the corporate-state's aggressor wars, to continue its aggression against people here at home, while it wages its endless war of terror over there
non-negotiable:
what corporatists and their corporate media say raising the people's debt ceiling is... without ever explaining why what they claim is "non-negotiable" requires a legislative vote before government does it to the people
what corporate persons call their offers that people can't refuse ______________________________ The APT: American Political Terms www.chenangogreens.org
"hawkDU" says "Would love to invite you to my Facebook page...not sure I want to put my details up..." and I understand completely. In fact, I've had similar thoughts. It's a friggin' jungle "out there". Frustrating, isn't it? - AIW
What I miss the very most about the S.F. Bay Area is the demographic & cultural diversity. Even Santa Cruz (where we lived our last ten years in California) wasn't as diverse as the Bay Area. The small rural town in Oregon we now call home is the most lilly-white, culturally homogenous, conservative area either of us has ever lived in. Took a good while to find our social niche here. Now that we have, I'm content enough to stay. It's been over 20 years already. But I'll always miss that cultural & ethnic diversity unique to the S.F. Bay Area.
I think one of the keys to humans learning how to co-exist happily as well as peacefully is embracing diversity. This isn't to say I'm okay with every aspect of every culture; for example, Chinese culture. While I am awed by the brilliance and innovation Chinese culture has produced through the millenia, I'm just as repulsed by that culture's treatment of my gender: foot binding, infanticide ad nauseam. But that goes back to the issue of spirituality, at least for me.
What we are grappling with goes back before recorded history, to the earliest manifestations of "civilization", and it runs deep. What we're up against are defense mechanisms that may have served us well eons ago, long before we evolved to become the dominant species on this planet. Xenophobia might have had its place in prehistoric times. Ditto rigid gender roles, to cite another example. But what may have been useful back then is no longer serving us and must be modified, or eliminated, before we can move forward.
Early European settlers believed they were more advanced, more "civilized", than the natives. But as Thom has pointed out, native Americans were more spiritually evolved than our European ancestors, in many ways. Greed was viewed as a mental illness. Psychopaths were banished, not rewarded; left to the elements to fend for themselves. When the tribe went hungry, so did the chief.
I don't want to paint an overly rosy picture here; indigenous Americans were not saints. They had their conflicts, their territorial disputes, even their wars. But members of a clan at least knew how to care for one another, in lean times as well as in times of abundance. The more inequality exists in any society, the more violence there is, and mental illness, and distrust and resentment among members of that society, along with a host of other problems that can be identified as "symptoms". I don't know about the rest of you, but from my vantage point it seems an awful lot of what ails us could be resolved by a universal sense of shared destiny, of us all "being in this together" regardless of language, religion, gender, class, skin color... whatever...
If a fetus's brain development is determined in large part by messages it gets from the mother's stress hormones (or lack thereof), and if the difference between "liberals" and "conservatives" can be detected by brain scans, it seems there are biological factors also at work here, that could help explain why some humans have more compassion than others, more capacity for empathy, and less need to hoard, dominate and control. - Aliceinwonderland
Ohmygosh Marc, it sounds like Louise has had a relapse! No wonder they've let the blog slide. That's got to be the reason, because it seems so unusual. Anyway I'm bummed. I'll hold a secular prayer in my heart for those two. -AIW
Bob Hearns ~ It is worth exploring and I have spent some time doing so. The problem is you are right, you cannot impose a culture on people. People have to develop it on their own. People are funny that way. One potential solution I have explored is the assimilation of other cultures into our own. Most notably I have explored Chinese culture. Right now we have had an influx of Chinese immigrants settling all over the Bay Area. They are battling the first hurtle of cultural assimilation--language. They, like all other immigrants, are unaware of the tragic future gradual loss of culture that will befall their children. The Chinese culture is of one of the oldest and most advanced cultures on Earth. They have no idea the sacrifice they are making to live in this country.
One day, several years ago, I was walking through a Chinese New Years festival in Chinatown. While standing at a crosswalk and watching a Chinese family cross the street on the opposite side it suddenly occurred to me that it should be we who assimilate the culture of the immigrants rather then the other way around. Imagine, it would take our country thousands of years to develop a culture as evolved as the Chinese culture. The Chinese culture is priceless. You can't buy that kind of a culture. Then I thought, maybe you can.
There are many aspects of the Chinese culture that are healthy, spiritual, and productive. You would never succeed at forcing any culture on the American people. However, the American people are so brainwashed by the commercial media that you might just be able to sell it to them. I have discussed with friends a possible way to sell the Chinese culture to the American people. The American people love novelties, such as cooking recipes, fad diets, exotic foods, foreign traditions, alternate religions and new belief systems, exercise programs, hobbies, etc. What if we were to break up the fundamental aspects of the Chinese culture, bottle it, market it and sell it with the intent on spoon feeding it to the American masses? Americans value things that have a price attached to it, don't they? What might be impossible to give them for free, they might readily buy for a price. For example, bottled water. Examples of such commercial cultural integration are all around us in restaurants, Buddhist temples, and acupuncture. What if we expanded on that?
The best salesmen for this idea are indigenous Chinese themselves for no one knows the Chinese culture better than the Chinese themselves. If such idea is feasible, than other functional cultures may be marketed in the same fashion. What at first appears to be the latest market fad, might just lead to a real new, functional American culture in record time. Unfortunately, that is the only solution I have been able to come up with. I think it's worth a shot--if only to preserve those priceless, precious cultures before they disappear forever.
Another critical issue in society that has a pronounced effect on thought is social structure. As described above the two ideal types of social structure Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft also play a critical role on thought hand in hand with culture. Basically big cities, the nuclear family, and the industrial economy lifestyle also tend to generate dysfunctional personality disorders and thought. If we are successful at somehow manufacturing a functional potpourri culture we will still have to contend with the substantial negative effects of the Gesellschaft social order. A strong culture is the only defense against the ravages of the Gesellschaft social order. Our industrial revolution has a price. In a Gesellschaft social order--as opposed to a Gemeinschaft social order--the interests of the larger group never takes precedence over the individual's self-interest. That is the major problem with Gesellschaft social orders and there is little that can be done about it.
Apropos to #82 ~ Perhaps I should elaborate on some terms I used:
Gemeinschaft society ~ Is a rural, usually agricultural economy based group of people. Fewer people per square foot. There is strong family cohesion bonding and interdependence. Families tend to be extended families with many children. The society is characterized by a strong sense of common identity, strong common binding norms, self rule and self regulation, close personal relationships, and a close attachment to traditional and sentimental concerns. Individual focus tends to be group/family oriented. Children follow the trade of the parents and are usually encouraged to remain in family at home for life for their own good. The family is strong and has permanent bonds.
Gesellschaft society ~ An urban, usually industrial economy based group of people. Far greater numbers of people per square foot. A nuclear family with loose cohesion bonding and strong parental dependence. Groups are characterized chiefly by formal organizations, impersonal relations with loose ties, the absence of generally held or binding norms, officially sanctioned legal regulation, and a general detachment from traditional and sentimental concerns; and, often tending to be rationalistic and secular in outlook. Families tend to be small with few children. Individual focus tends to be self-oriented. Children are usually encouraged to leave the home as soon as possible and make it on their own for their own good. The family members tend to repel each other and share weaker bonds.
Values, mores, and traditions vary widely between the two social group ideal types.
Bob Hearns you wrote simply understanding greed intellectully is no understanding at all. I guess you mean knowing the definition is not a solution to ones own greed. Indeed seeing greed arise as a reaction to ones emotion is the mechanism to dissolve it within oneself. You wish to explore what happens when all negative emotions, envy, jealousy anger, saddness etc., cease within oneself. Ummmm you become The Budda, Jesus, Lao Tzu? Seriouslly I don't know, guess I've not arrived. I do find it hard to belive greed can manifest, thrive and persist within a person without them knowing it,observing it,living with it, hideing it. Unlike momentary saddness or anger or even fear, true greed seems to be an addiction.
I've read and understand greed to arrise from fear, specifically fear of scarcity. Scarcity being a relative and sometimes even abstract thing, we often find the wealthy to be the most afaid of scarcity. Afraid of losing,afraid of becoming common, afraid of loss of control etc. I have personally observed the seeds of greed arise in myself and in animals when wealth is suddenly introduced.
Here on my little homestead I have horses, goats and chickens, and dogs of course. What I have noticed especially with goats and and horses is contentment is the normal state when forage is abundant. But even when forage is sparse (winter etc.) they seem to go on as if abundance remained, nibbling what they can find where they can find it, occasionally engaging in playful conflict. Now introduce grain. Suddenly the most aggresive (maybe not stongest or largest) attemps to take it and with whatever level of violence it takes to gain control. If the portion was concentrated to a single small area the most aggresive would take all. Even if portions of hay or grain are separated by a hundred feet or more the aggresive one will atempt to control even if it causes them to get the least. In spring and the grass is knee high and two horses are suddenly turned out on common pasture the most aggresive will try to dominate all of the space. I'm not exactlly sure how this relates to the Koch brothers or you or me or global climate change.
A Native American Proverb I found here on the internet goes.; A grandfather talking to his young grandson tells the boy he has two wolves inside him struggling with each other. The first is the wolf of peace, love and kindness. The other wolf is fear,greed, and hatred. Which wolf will win grandfather? ask the young boy. Whichever one I feed replys the grandfather.
I think that proverb speaks well to where our culture is as well as how we are move it to a better place.
On a side note, many of you are wondering where Thom And Louise are while I'm wondering which of you is secretly Thom and which is Louise
DAnneMarc, so from your response, the solution is to grow hemp. Over time the industrialized world will revert to agricultural, the tipping point will never be reached and all the ills of the world will disappear. Really?
As far as your statement about exploring the issue enough. I'm not sure what issue you are referring to - problem solving? symptom solving in general? or the specific symptom of melting permafrost? As I said earlier, I have no interest in symptom solving. If you are referring to problem solving we have only scratched the surface, at best.
It appears to me that as far as problem solving goes, you and I have not connected at all so far.
Kend, ahem... in response to your remark about Europeans' frugal ways: "Why would we want to bring that culture here?" my answer is: Who the hell needs more than one home for chrissakes?! Plus RVs, boats and other big-ass expensive toys. That's what life's supposed to be about, eh; more-and-more-and-more STUFF... Oh yeah? Gimmie a break. This lifestyle you describe is friggin' unsustainable, and ya know what Kend? Like Thom put it so succinctly, it's gonna destroy all life forms bigger than cockroaches inhabiting this planet. Oh and by the way, that includes us.
Now, while I'm not in the habit of using Biblical references, what comes to mind is that golden calf we were warned about in the story of Moses; you know, one of those false gods we'd better not worship unless we want all hell to cut loose... Remember that? Secular though I am, the power of such metaphor hasn't escaped me. And look where we are today. It hasn't all cut loose quite yet; not full tilt boogie - but that's where we're headed. You fossil fuel defenders who like to deny what climate scientists keep warning us about-- hey, you guys can keep denying it all you want. Pardon me pal, I hate to break it to ya but you're barking up the wrong tree with that bull crap.
I'm talking about climate deniers' false claim that ice is increasing on the Arctic, for example. And how many times have we heard some doofus proclaim: "The planet isn't warming 'cuz it's cold up here!"... I swear, if I hear that one more time I think I'll scream. But seriously, when it comes to matters of geology and climate science (which, incidently, Kend and I know nothing about), I'd prefer to listen to real experts; actual scientists who've spent a lifetime studying and learning about this stuff. And the fact is, dear Kend, about 95% of these experts are telling us to wake up, that we're blowing it for our grandkids and later generations. Earth will no longer be able to sustain life a couple centuries from now, unless we get our priorities straight and learn to live in harmony with nature.
Thom Hartmann happens to be no slouch when it comes to matters of science, possessing enough of a knowledge base to be capable of intelligently discussing subjects that are scientific by nature. Thom has reminded us repeatedly how our way of life will have awful consequences if it continues unchanged for much longer. He warns us (and I'm paraphrasing) that the damage inflicted on the structural integrity of this planet - since the 1850s, when the industrial revolution began - has been accelerating the very process that caused five previous mass extinctions scientists have identified, dating back millions upon millions of years. Now, who's got your ear; climate experts with no profit motive behind their message, who are only trying to prevent or diffuse a looming disaster by educating the public? Or do you listen instead to fossil fuel industry's schills who have a vested interest in the status quo and don't know doodily-do about climate science, who are only brainwashing the public with psuedo-scientific hogwash to serve a private agenda? Who seems most credible to you, Kend? Duh, hello...
Now if my memory serves me, didn't you draw a paycheck from a fossil fuel company for a few years? Is that who feathered your nest? I rest my case. - Aliceinwonderland
DAnneMarc: Thanks for the German lessons...I always wondered what Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft meant...now I know! G1 and G2...cool!
DAnneMarc & Aliceinwonderland: That link in DAnneMarc's #76 was from last year. So, unless anyone has heard anything recently about this we may be jumping to conclusions. Maybe they just went on a vacation? I hope that's all it is. By the way AIW...nice hat! I also play trumpet...but not in a while. Just for the fun of it ...no bands. I guess I should get it out and see if I can still play it.
Kend: I have nothing against people who actually do work hard and take risks and even get rich from their labors. They really do deserve what they have earned. But I believe that even you would agree that there are some people who have become very wealthy by screwing other people...and I'm not talking about bordellos here. Many of those people may have inherited much of what they now have and they, and other opportunists, have just schemed and rigged the system to cheat others out of their money. They are not all as magnanimous as you are because they have consistently worked to squeeze workers out of benefits and wages. I'm glad that you are setting the example for being a good employer. But these other selfish parasites have frequently committed illegal acts just to get a slap-on-the-wrist fine that they consider the cost-of-doing-business and end up making the consumers pay those fines by increasing prices. The top execs make out like bandits...because they are bandits.
Roland369: I went to Slovakia back a few years ago. Piestany. Nice Place! Was there for a couple of weeks on business but had plenty of time to enjoy walking around town and across the bridge to the Spa area. I enjoyed the accordion music one old guy was playing on that bridge. In fact, I grew up in a town in the US whose population was mostly Czech and Slovak..back then, of course, ..it was called Czechoslovakia.
DAnne there is a difference between greed and motivation. Yet you look at them the same. Culture is created by desire. Desire do to the best for your family. Whatever you believe that is.
Because I worked endless hours and took massive risks to accumulate the lifestyle I have you call me selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, and short sided.
Are you suggesting I should have just took a government just and been content with that. That if I did that I would be a better person.
DAnne I agree, I think your right. Just think of all the nights I could of slept all night because I didn't have to worry how I could bring in enough business to keep those great Employiees I have in a job when the economy went to crap. All of Saturdays I was in the shop racking my brain to come up with new ways to compete. What was I thinking. Why was I so greedy. I could of worked for the post office and been done work a 1:00 every day with my 6 weeks holidays and my 12 sick days a Year. The best benifits in the world. Thanks for the advice I think I am going to go into work Tuesday (because Monday is Canadian thanksgiving" and shut the company down and go golfing in Scottsdale all winter. I will feel so much better knowing i am not a "selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, short sided person" Thanks buddy I can feel the wait lifting right off my shoulders Already. What the hell was I thinking.
Thanks for speaking out on this issue Thom. You seem to be a gentle soul that can maintain his equilibrium under the bitterest of attacks. I think it's because you have studied your material and know from which you speak. In any case I, and some in my family (we are scattered about the country), watch The Big Picture on RT, as well as FSTV. Thanks to my Roku Box, I seldom miss your program or Democracy Now. Keep up the good work, as we need as many people as possible to speak truth to power, and are not bought out by corporate money.
Oh by the way, I am of Slovak heritage (my Mom came here to Ellis Island on the President Roosevelt in 1928), and was wonderng about your spelling your name Thom, rather than Tom.
Aliceinwonderland ~ Please don't be bummed, at least yet. I've just learned that Louise had breast cancer last year. It is news to me. I vaguely remember her being treated for something; and, when I Googled it, her breast cancer popped up. I have no idea how she is doing today. I was merely speculating as to the answer to our questions as to why Thom has only posted two topics in the last two weeks; and why Louise hasn't posted any topics for some while. I don't know her condition and I certainly hope she is at least stable if not fully recovered.
Remember, that is mere speculation. There are other sound reasons for the lingering topics--first and foremost, that they are probably the most important topics Thom has posted all year and he want us to think long and hard about them. If so, it's working.
Bob Hearns ~ We've explored this issue enough already to draw some conclusions. This brings us right back to the topic of this blog Global Climate Change. As you've mentioned my idea to bring a functional culture to this nation is 'desperate' at best. I myself doubt that it will have the intended effect of creation of a functional culture. Culture development is a form of evolution and I really don't believe that you can force evolution. My main goal is to preserve and incorporate pre-existing cultures into the American paradigm.
Now, on to the real solution. To solve our immediate problems of thought we have to change our social structure. You will never achieve the goals you have described in a Gesellschaft social structure. If you doubt me go to Mexico and spend a week in Mexico city; and then go to a small rural pueblo. Mingle, and get to know the natives remembering everything I've just stated about Gesellschaft vs Gemeinschaft social structures. What you will discover is that the underlying problems of thought that you have described are a direct result of social structure and not so much culture.
Therefore, the only way to cure the problem is to convert the Gesellschaft to the Gemeinschaft. Essentially, the trick to doing this is to revert the base economy from that of an industrial one to that of an agricultural one. A daunting task for sure; unless, you go back to one of my first posts on this blog where I mention that Hemp, if grown for industrial purposes, would be able to solve global climate change. It would do so by simply removing CO2 from the atmosphere and replacing it with O2.
One of the big 'side effects' a Hemp based economy would achieve is to convert our industrial economy base to an agricultural economy base--in effect taking our Gesellschaft society and turning it into a Gemeinschaft society along with all the typical characteristics involved and described in Post #86 above. In doing so, not only will social structure and individual identity change, so will the priorities that comprise and drive individual thought. In essence, you can kill two birds with one stone.
Once our economic base is converted to agricultural the natural evolutionary development of our culture will take care of itself.
Kend ~ Well then you just answered your own question. By and large immigrants here are motivated by pure greed. Greed blinds people and makes them stupid. That is why they readily sacrifice the most important thing they have--their culture. Culture is priceless and must be preserved at all other costs. This is why you see people who chose to remain in the home country perfectly happy and content to live more frugal lifestyles. They have everything they need. In fact, they are a little bit smarter then their brethren who fled. Immigrants who foolishly abandoned their culture will never be happy. They will experience the void of culture and that central unifying identity culture provides and unsuccessfully try to fill that gap with all manner of material junk for the rest of their lives--never knowing true inner peace. Never being really happy. The truth hurts doesn't it?
In a way Kend you put your finger on one of the key issues that is wrong with this country--by and large we are a nation of the offspring of selfish, greedy, foolish, ignorant, and short sided immigrants.
To go fishing or spend this saturday morning on a reply to Bob Hearns and to myself. I find a detailed reply is going to take some time. Think I'll go fishing. There are alot of different sorts who fish. Some expect fish and sense diappointment or scarcity with being "skunked" they might even hoard fish when fishing is "good" . A true fishermen knows the act of fishing to be an abundant experience in and of itself. More details to come (and maybe a fish).
DAnne, I find it interesting how people are always trying to change people. It happens on this blog all the time. I am just as guilty. Your conversation with Bob are great. What I don't understand is why do we care if immigrants don't keep their culture, isn't that why they moved here in the first place. I hear all the time how we should be more like Europeans. Most of my suppliers are in Italy, and Germany and all they talk about is how great it is here. yes they get tons of time off but they live in their parents home until they are 40. Then if they have a great job they finally save enough for a down payment on a 800 sq/ft flat. No back yard, no garage, maybe one car. What makes our countries great is we have a choice. If you work hard you can have what ever you want. You don't see middle class Europeans with boats, RV's, summer and winter homes etc like we do. Why would we want to bring that culture here?
Aliceinwonderland, if it is true that Louise has had a relapse, I, too, wish her a full and speedy remission.
N Z Sarah, what I am about to say is not intended to disparage women as I do think that women and men are equal in general. I'm not sure what you are agreeing with when you say that you agree with me. But when it comes to problem solving, as I have been talking about it here, women are no better than men, as a group, at addressing it. Women lack critical thinking skills, just as much as men do. It's not just men who are doing symptom solving on our critical issues, environmental and otherwise. Women by the millions, as well, are heavily engaged in these 'not significantly going anywhere' activities. I don't think that gender makes anyone more or less capable of exploring and investigating the problems that we are not facing, that we are not working on resolving. There is nothing exclusive in my invitation that we explore, inquire and investigate, right here and right now.
Its a world of cockroaches. Tthey've been here 250 million years and are still defying all the insecticide we can invent.
The problems is, there are too many two-legged cockroaches!
dialindicator, the intellectual understanding of greed is one thing. If it does not move the person to end the action of greed in themselves, then intellectual understanding is no understanding at all. Exploring and investigating what is actually happening, internally and externally, before the action of greed occurs will give you the understanding, which is beyond the merely intellectual, to see greed and end it. Similarly, you will see how envy occurs, how jealousy occurs, anger, sadness and so on, the whole of self generated feelings and emotions. And when these come to an end in oneself, what happens then?
DAnneMarc, you acknowledge that you can't impose a culture and then go on to propose a way to achieve just that by exploiting people who lack the ability to think critically, which is most of society, by using the same advertising tactics that the CEOs of the huge junk food corporations use to get us to stuff enormous quantities of poisonous crap down our throats.
Solving some of the major symptoms will do one potentially benefitting thing. It pushes the tipping point a little further into the future.However, if that extra time is not used to solve the problem, the tipping point will not be in the future, it will be now. We have millions of people working hard, expending lots of energy, on symptom solving. How many are focussed on problem solving? How much energy is being expended on exploring and investigating that?
debt ceiling:
a ceiling that continues to rise in proportion to the public debt required to produce greater private profits from more costly wars waged
debt ceiling increase:
something regularly required for the the most militarized nation to become even more militarized
raising the people's debt to pay for the corporate-state's aggressor wars, to continue its aggression against people here at home, while it wages its endless war of terror over there
non-negotiable:
what corporatists and their corporate media say raising the people's debt ceiling is... without ever explaining why what they claim is "non-negotiable" requires a legislative vote before government does it to the people
what corporate persons call their offers that people can't refuse
______________________________
The APT: American Political Terms
www.chenangogreens.org
"hawkDU" says "Would love to invite you to my Facebook page...not sure I want to put my details up..." and I understand completely. In fact, I've had similar thoughts. It's a friggin' jungle "out there". Frustrating, isn't it? - AIW
What I miss the very most about the S.F. Bay Area is the demographic & cultural diversity. Even Santa Cruz (where we lived our last ten years in California) wasn't as diverse as the Bay Area. The small rural town in Oregon we now call home is the most lilly-white, culturally homogenous, conservative area either of us has ever lived in. Took a good while to find our social niche here. Now that we have, I'm content enough to stay. It's been over 20 years already. But I'll always miss that cultural & ethnic diversity unique to the S.F. Bay Area.
I think one of the keys to humans learning how to co-exist happily as well as peacefully is embracing diversity. This isn't to say I'm okay with every aspect of every culture; for example, Chinese culture. While I am awed by the brilliance and innovation Chinese culture has produced through the millenia, I'm just as repulsed by that culture's treatment of my gender: foot binding, infanticide ad nauseam. But that goes back to the issue of spirituality, at least for me.
What we are grappling with goes back before recorded history, to the earliest manifestations of "civilization", and it runs deep. What we're up against are defense mechanisms that may have served us well eons ago, long before we evolved to become the dominant species on this planet. Xenophobia might have had its place in prehistoric times. Ditto rigid gender roles, to cite another example. But what may have been useful back then is no longer serving us and must be modified, or eliminated, before we can move forward.
Early European settlers believed they were more advanced, more "civilized", than the natives. But as Thom has pointed out, native Americans were more spiritually evolved than our European ancestors, in many ways. Greed was viewed as a mental illness. Psychopaths were banished, not rewarded; left to the elements to fend for themselves. When the tribe went hungry, so did the chief.
I don't want to paint an overly rosy picture here; indigenous Americans were not saints. They had their conflicts, their territorial disputes, even their wars. But members of a clan at least knew how to care for one another, in lean times as well as in times of abundance. The more inequality exists in any society, the more violence there is, and mental illness, and distrust and resentment among members of that society, along with a host of other problems that can be identified as "symptoms". I don't know about the rest of you, but from my vantage point it seems an awful lot of what ails us could be resolved by a universal sense of shared destiny, of us all "being in this together" regardless of language, religion, gender, class, skin color... whatever...
If a fetus's brain development is determined in large part by messages it gets from the mother's stress hormones (or lack thereof), and if the difference between "liberals" and "conservatives" can be detected by brain scans, it seems there are biological factors also at work here, that could help explain why some humans have more compassion than others, more capacity for empathy, and less need to hoard, dominate and control. - Aliceinwonderland
Ohmygosh Marc, it sounds like Louise has had a relapse! No wonder they've let the blog slide. That's got to be the reason, because it seems so unusual. Anyway I'm bummed. I'll hold a secular prayer in my heart for those two. -AIW
Bob Hearns ~ It is worth exploring and I have spent some time doing so. The problem is you are right, you cannot impose a culture on people. People have to develop it on their own. People are funny that way. One potential solution I have explored is the assimilation of other cultures into our own. Most notably I have explored Chinese culture. Right now we have had an influx of Chinese immigrants settling all over the Bay Area. They are battling the first hurtle of cultural assimilation--language. They, like all other immigrants, are unaware of the tragic future gradual loss of culture that will befall their children. The Chinese culture is of one of the oldest and most advanced cultures on Earth. They have no idea the sacrifice they are making to live in this country.
One day, several years ago, I was walking through a Chinese New Years festival in Chinatown. While standing at a crosswalk and watching a Chinese family cross the street on the opposite side it suddenly occurred to me that it should be we who assimilate the culture of the immigrants rather then the other way around. Imagine, it would take our country thousands of years to develop a culture as evolved as the Chinese culture. The Chinese culture is priceless. You can't buy that kind of a culture. Then I thought, maybe you can.
There are many aspects of the Chinese culture that are healthy, spiritual, and productive. You would never succeed at forcing any culture on the American people. However, the American people are so brainwashed by the commercial media that you might just be able to sell it to them. I have discussed with friends a possible way to sell the Chinese culture to the American people. The American people love novelties, such as cooking recipes, fad diets, exotic foods, foreign traditions, alternate religions and new belief systems, exercise programs, hobbies, etc. What if we were to break up the fundamental aspects of the Chinese culture, bottle it, market it and sell it with the intent on spoon feeding it to the American masses? Americans value things that have a price attached to it, don't they? What might be impossible to give them for free, they might readily buy for a price. For example, bottled water. Examples of such commercial cultural integration are all around us in restaurants, Buddhist temples, and acupuncture. What if we expanded on that?
The best salesmen for this idea are indigenous Chinese themselves for no one knows the Chinese culture better than the Chinese themselves. If such idea is feasible, than other functional cultures may be marketed in the same fashion. What at first appears to be the latest market fad, might just lead to a real new, functional American culture in record time. Unfortunately, that is the only solution I have been able to come up with. I think it's worth a shot--if only to preserve those priceless, precious cultures before they disappear forever.
Another critical issue in society that has a pronounced effect on thought is social structure. As described above the two ideal types of social structure Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft also play a critical role on thought hand in hand with culture. Basically big cities, the nuclear family, and the industrial economy lifestyle also tend to generate dysfunctional personality disorders and thought. If we are successful at somehow manufacturing a functional potpourri culture we will still have to contend with the substantial negative effects of the Gesellschaft social order. A strong culture is the only defense against the ravages of the Gesellschaft social order. Our industrial revolution has a price. In a Gesellschaft social order--as opposed to a Gemeinschaft social order--the interests of the larger group never takes precedence over the individual's self-interest. That is the major problem with Gesellschaft social orders and there is little that can be done about it.
Apropos to #82 ~ Perhaps I should elaborate on some terms I used:
Gemeinschaft society ~ Is a rural, usually agricultural economy based group of people. Fewer people per square foot. There is strong family cohesion bonding and interdependence. Families tend to be extended families with many children. The society is characterized by a strong sense of common identity, strong common binding norms, self rule and self regulation, close personal relationships, and a close attachment to traditional and sentimental concerns. Individual focus tends to be group/family oriented. Children follow the trade of the parents and are usually encouraged to remain in family at home for life for their own good. The family is strong and has permanent bonds.
Gesellschaft society ~ An urban, usually industrial economy based group of people. Far greater numbers of people per square foot. A nuclear family with loose cohesion bonding and strong parental dependence. Groups are characterized chiefly by formal organizations, impersonal relations with loose ties, the absence of generally held or binding norms, officially sanctioned legal regulation, and a general detachment from traditional and sentimental concerns; and, often tending to be rationalistic and secular in outlook. Families tend to be small with few children. Individual focus tends to be self-oriented. Children are usually encouraged to leave the home as soon as possible and make it on their own for their own good. The family members tend to repel each other and share weaker bonds.
Values, mores, and traditions vary widely between the two social group ideal types.