I haven't a clue what those deadbeat do-nothing bastards will decide before the end of 2012. But I sure am tired of these stupid dramas going on in Congress. Who needs soap operas?! - Aliceinwonderland
You need to look up the Congressional Republicans that were just voted out of office in Illinois, especially Joe Walsh. He loves to see himself on any public media that is available - look him up, he makes Blago look like he has his act together. Please look him up - you will love it.
Too many of us regard the Republican leadership as a Moron Nation cabal of stupidly dysfunctional politicians engaged in an idiotic frenzy of mindless fanaticism.
Especially for the progressive elite, it's a profoundly appealing portrait, evoking all the boundless self-flattery implicit in redefining "conservative" as a synonym for “imbecile.”
But what if the Left -- as it habitually does -- is again suicidally underestimating the iron will and Machiavellian sophistry of the enemy?
What if these politicians are not "dysfunctional" at all?
What if they are part of a disciplined cadre of Wall-Street-funded agents methodically creating dysfunction and chaos to lay the groundwork for a military-industrial coup?
Frightening as such a possibility is, it is actually far more plausible than the alternatives evoked by super-smug dismissal of the Republican Obersturmbannführers as hopeless idiots.
(Investigative reporters -- if indeed there are any left -- please take note.)
Should the Republicans continue to block any progress on both the "cliff" and debt limit, it will not be forgotten and they be unelectable in many states, including mine; as several Republican Tea Party Congressmen lost in the last election. In practical terms, they will be unelectable.
Akunard, we are in this "mess" because George Bush kept the expense of TWO WARS off the books (!!!!!!!) for most of his two terms and Obama put them on the books. Then Obama had to deal with an obstructionist Congress that employed several hundred filibusters (when the average for a legislative term is less than 5) to prevent ANY action on almost ANYTHING for no other reason than to make the President look bad, knowing that many people, some of whom contribute to this forum, would be accept that the President was the blameworthy party as they aren't really paying attention.
Also, it's okay to keep a deficit in a recession as stimulus of the government putting money into the economy would restart it and then bring in enough to run a surplus.
time4change - Perhaps the President does not want to use his constitutionally granted powers. Consider the thought he feels there is more to gain for HIM if he allows taxes to go up on everyone and cuts to social programs. He could then claim it was not what he wanted, but he could do nothing to get the Republicans to agree on anything. He gets more revenue and the cuts will help him state he was the president who balanced the budget, when he leaves office in four years. He gets what he really wants and does not have to take any political hits to his legacy. It was the Republicans that hurt America not his administration. I do not trust him anymore than I trust the tea bagger Republicans or any Republicans as far as that goes.
Akunard - It is not hard to know which party you voted for, the losing party. Are you stating it is the President who was responsible for the amount spent over the last four years and the Congress has nothing to do with it? If so you are showing why you voted for the Republican candidate. It has been the tea baggers in the House that have decided they will allow the cuts in our fiscal crisis if the billionaires and millionaires that put them in office do not get their huge tax breaks, after all they bought the politicians on the right and expect their payoff no matter what it costs the country. I almost believe there is a conspiracy between the President and the Republicans in the House to allow this so called fiscal cliff scenario to happen. The President will get his tax increases he has been bagging for and the Republicans will get the cuts they want in the social programs they hate so much. I do not believe that Social Security or Medicare are going to get the cuts the Republicans drool over since they were left out of this agreement. I could be wrong about Social Security and Medicare, but either way the social programs that the poor and middleclass rely on will be decimated. Education, housing, food stamps are just a few of the social programs that will come under the ax if no agreement is reached. Since the super wealthy are going to get increases no matter what, the tea bagger Republicans have very little insensitive to sign onto any agreement. The middleclass tax payers on average will lose their tax cuts that are around $2500 a year and the Republicans in the House are only concerned with the increases their masters will have to pay, to Hell with the rest of America. Obama keeps edging forward with agreeing that the tax increases he now proposes will increase taxes on those making more than $400,000 a year instead of the $250,000 he first asked for. Boehner said he would go for tax changes for those making more than $1,000,000 a year and he still could not get the tea baggers to agree with that! It is time to gather ourselves together and march on the Republicans and Democrats that are holding our country and its citizen’s hostage over whether we should tax the very wealthiest in our country. We need to march on their offices and homes. Yes HOMES, as in the home they live in and not just Washington offices. If that does not work we need to consider even more effective ways of getting their attention. Just calling their Washington offices will not do a thing. I realize that sounds like a scenario that would be hard to do, but it is exactly what the Wall St. protesters did and they were noticed, until the Gestapo police in N.Y. started playing hardball. Well the citizenry can play the same kind of game the Greeks and the Spanish demonstrators are having to do in order to get their point across. I believe if we band together in the tens of thousands we would see an immediate change in the way the Whitehouse and the Congress are handling or not handling this crisis. This fiscal crisis, we will see take place on Jan. 2, 2013, will only be the first of cuts to programs for the poor and the middleclass to happen. Once they think we are down for the count they will step even harder on our necks and the necks of generations to come. Our Children and Grandchildren deserve more from us, than just cowering from this governmental body that holds us in such ill disregard. I will be happy to join any movement that can be put together, to stop this tyranny by our politicians.
Although the Rebulican Oligarchs engineered the fiscal cliff and have brought us to the precipice, they show no movement toward relenting in their plan to destroy the United States of America, its economy and its people who happen to earn less than $1,000,000 per annum. I say bring on the cliff and bring on the debt default and then perhaps we shall finally see the end of these dastardly villains and all that they represent (at least for a while). Let the whole damn thing go and perhaps even bring the oloigarchs down to where the rest of us are.
Although the Rebulican Oligarchs engineered the fiscal cliff and have brought us to the precipice, they show no movement toward relenting in their plan to destroy the United States of America, its economy and its people who happen to earn less than $1,000,000 per annum. I say bring on the cliff and bring on the debt default and then perhaps we shall finally see the end of these dastardly villains and all that they represent (at least for a while). Let the whole damn thing go and perhaps even bring the oloigarchs down to where the rest of us are.
Why would this guest, Neil Asbury, say that envying success is bad? Envying it means that you will try to attain it. Maybe he meant to say "punish success" which is the normal right-wing talking point. The fact that he got it wrong implies that he's speaking by rote and not really thinking for himself.
I've never found out why it's called geometric progression, but it's also known as exponential increase (or decrease) and, in certain cases, compound interest.
If the first square on the chessboard gets one penny, and each one thereafter gets double the previous one, the total of all 64 squares would be (2^64 - 1) cents = $184,467,440,737,095,516.15, so about 200 quadrillion dollars.
Re today's geeky science, I've noticed that I feel really good when I've recently been giving and helpful.
Regarding violence though, I overheard someone at work advocating corporal punishment for one's own children. I didn't get involved in the discussion, but I believe that use of violence sets a threshold of what it takes to modify someone's behavior. Adults that were beaten as children are probably incapable of learning to alter their behavior through words. They've been raised to believe (subconsciously) that, if no one is beating the tar out of them, their behavior is okay, regardless of verbal complaints.
I'm waiting for one of the security officers to lose it, draw his weapon and kill a bunch of people. Then we'll be talking about armed guards guarding the armed guards.
It's not only schools but stores, malls, hospitals and EVERY building that is going to need guard checkpoints, scanners and metal detectors as these shootings occur everywhere.
Sam! Social Security recipients HAVE EARNED their money MUCH MORE SO than vulture capitalists and other 1peercenters.. The 1 percenters' billions are much more gambling winnings than earned income even when it's by legitimately starting a business and not in the stock market - which is not earned at all but making money on other people's labor.
Nobody earns a billion, certainly not in one pop and certainly not more than working people "earn" a few thousand.
True but , remember, they sureley have a crucififiction in store for a defiant president.. soo he must be careful and tread lightly and secretly. billy can attest to that .
Sorry Tom, but I have to disagree. The debt ceiling issue can be addressed by the President invoking the 14th Amd and just saying "We honor the debts we have created." I agree with your assessments regarding the Tea Party (which doesnt really even deserve to be capitalized), but this is one issue we dont have to face and therefore the President is to blame for not using his constitutionally granted powers.
That's what it is, essentially. The fiscal cliff is a problem made up by the two corporate lobbyist bought parties for their "good cop, bad cop" routine to get us (instead of the 1%) to accept austerity. Similarly, raising the debt cieling will be a made up crisis as raising it is routine and no big deal but the two parties will pretend it is a great calamimty to be averted, to the same end.
Too many people must be getting wise to the "fiscal cliff" and the false ominousness surrounding it.
Reply to #113 (as is my post #117) not to #119 The problem is that whenever someone goes back to edit their comment it gets put on the end and then reshuffles the order.
Actually, they (the earliest societies) had no hierarchies of ANY kind.
I truly agree with 2950-10K and Jcacourt even though Boehner disgusts me I certainly don't want Cantor or Ryan (or for that matter of fact do not want some idiot T Party) being put in as speaker of the house!!
I haven't a clue what those deadbeat do-nothing bastards will decide before the end of 2012. But I sure am tired of these stupid dramas going on in Congress. Who needs soap operas?! - Aliceinwonderland
"The fact that we are here today to debate rasing America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure" .
2006 what Senator uttered those words on the Senate floor?
Last 2 years of Bush first 2 years of Obama who controled BOTH houses? And it's still Bushes fault!
You need to look up the Congressional Republicans that were just voted out of office in Illinois, especially Joe Walsh. He loves to see himself on any public media that is available - look him up, he makes Blago look like he has his act together. Please look him up - you will love it.
Too many of us regard the Republican leadership as a Moron Nation cabal of stupidly dysfunctional politicians engaged in an idiotic frenzy of mindless fanaticism.
Especially for the progressive elite, it's a profoundly appealing portrait, evoking all the boundless self-flattery implicit in redefining "conservative" as a synonym for “imbecile.”
But what if the Left -- as it habitually does -- is again suicidally underestimating the iron will and Machiavellian sophistry of the enemy?
What if these politicians are not "dysfunctional" at all?
What if they are part of a disciplined cadre of Wall-Street-funded agents methodically creating dysfunction and chaos to lay the groundwork for a military-industrial coup?
Frightening as such a possibility is, it is actually far more plausible than the alternatives evoked by super-smug dismissal of the Republican Obersturmbannführers as hopeless idiots.
(Investigative reporters -- if indeed there are any left -- please take note.)
Should the Republicans continue to block any progress on both the "cliff" and debt limit, it will not be forgotten and they be unelectable in many states, including mine; as several Republican Tea Party Congressmen lost in the last election. In practical terms, they will be unelectable.
Akunard, we are in this "mess" because George Bush kept the expense of TWO WARS off the books (!!!!!!!) for most of his two terms and Obama put them on the books. Then Obama had to deal with an obstructionist Congress that employed several hundred filibusters (when the average for a legislative term is less than 5) to prevent ANY action on almost ANYTHING for no other reason than to make the President look bad, knowing that many people, some of whom contribute to this forum, would be accept that the President was the blameworthy party as they aren't really paying attention.
Also, it's okay to keep a deficit in a recession as stimulus of the government putting money into the economy would restart it and then bring in enough to run a surplus.
time4change - Perhaps the President does not want to use his constitutionally granted powers. Consider the thought he feels there is more to gain for HIM if he allows taxes to go up on everyone and cuts to social programs. He could then claim it was not what he wanted, but he could do nothing to get the Republicans to agree on anything. He gets more revenue and the cuts will help him state he was the president who balanced the budget, when he leaves office in four years. He gets what he really wants and does not have to take any political hits to his legacy. It was the Republicans that hurt America not his administration. I do not trust him anymore than I trust the tea bagger Republicans or any Republicans as far as that goes.
Check your facts, please. You are misinformed.
Akunard - It is not hard to know which party you voted for, the losing party. Are you stating it is the President who was responsible for the amount spent over the last four years and the Congress has nothing to do with it? If so you are showing why you voted for the Republican candidate. It has been the tea baggers in the House that have decided they will allow the cuts in our fiscal crisis if the billionaires and millionaires that put them in office do not get their huge tax breaks, after all they bought the politicians on the right and expect their payoff no matter what it costs the country. I almost believe there is a conspiracy between the President and the Republicans in the House to allow this so called fiscal cliff scenario to happen. The President will get his tax increases he has been bagging for and the Republicans will get the cuts they want in the social programs they hate so much. I do not believe that Social Security or Medicare are going to get the cuts the Republicans drool over since they were left out of this agreement. I could be wrong about Social Security and Medicare, but either way the social programs that the poor and middleclass rely on will be decimated. Education, housing, food stamps are just a few of the social programs that will come under the ax if no agreement is reached. Since the super wealthy are going to get increases no matter what, the tea bagger Republicans have very little insensitive to sign onto any agreement. The middleclass tax payers on average will lose their tax cuts that are around $2500 a year and the Republicans in the House are only concerned with the increases their masters will have to pay, to Hell with the rest of America. Obama keeps edging forward with agreeing that the tax increases he now proposes will increase taxes on those making more than $400,000 a year instead of the $250,000 he first asked for. Boehner said he would go for tax changes for those making more than $1,000,000 a year and he still could not get the tea baggers to agree with that! It is time to gather ourselves together and march on the Republicans and Democrats that are holding our country and its citizen’s hostage over whether we should tax the very wealthiest in our country. We need to march on their offices and homes. Yes HOMES, as in the home they live in and not just Washington offices. If that does not work we need to consider even more effective ways of getting their attention. Just calling their Washington offices will not do a thing. I realize that sounds like a scenario that would be hard to do, but it is exactly what the Wall St. protesters did and they were noticed, until the Gestapo police in N.Y. started playing hardball. Well the citizenry can play the same kind of game the Greeks and the Spanish demonstrators are having to do in order to get their point across. I believe if we band together in the tens of thousands we would see an immediate change in the way the Whitehouse and the Congress are handling or not handling this crisis. This fiscal crisis, we will see take place on Jan. 2, 2013, will only be the first of cuts to programs for the poor and the middleclass to happen. Once they think we are down for the count they will step even harder on our necks and the necks of generations to come. Our Children and Grandchildren deserve more from us, than just cowering from this governmental body that holds us in such ill disregard. I will be happy to join any movement that can be put together, to stop this tyranny by our politicians.
Congress spends the money.
Are you suggesting that Obama can spend whatever he wants?
We are in this mess because the Pres. spent 1 Trillion a year over what the Govt. took in!!!!!!!!!!!!
Although the Rebulican Oligarchs engineered the fiscal cliff and have brought us to the precipice, they show no movement toward relenting in their plan to destroy the United States of America, its economy and its people who happen to earn less than $1,000,000 per annum. I say bring on the cliff and bring on the debt default and then perhaps we shall finally see the end of these dastardly villains and all that they represent (at least for a while). Let the whole damn thing go and perhaps even bring the oloigarchs down to where the rest of us are.
Although the Rebulican Oligarchs engineered the fiscal cliff and have brought us to the precipice, they show no movement toward relenting in their plan to destroy the United States of America, its economy and its people who happen to earn less than $1,000,000 per annum. I say bring on the cliff and bring on the debt default and then perhaps we shall finally see the end of these dastardly villains and all that they represent (at least for a while). Let the whole damn thing go and perhaps even bring the oloigarchs down to where the rest of us are.
Why would this guest, Neil Asbury, say that envying success is bad? Envying it means that you will try to attain it. Maybe he meant to say "punish success" which is the normal right-wing talking point. The fact that he got it wrong implies that he's speaking by rote and not really thinking for himself.
"Bellum omnia contra omnia" would be a war of all against all, i.e. every man for himself.
I've never found out why it's called geometric progression, but it's also known as exponential increase (or decrease) and, in certain cases, compound interest.
If the first square on the chessboard gets one penny, and each one thereafter gets double the previous one, the total of all 64 squares would be (2^64 - 1) cents = $184,467,440,737,095,516.15, so about 200 quadrillion dollars.
Re today's geeky science, I've noticed that I feel really good when I've recently been giving and helpful.
Regarding violence though, I overheard someone at work advocating corporal punishment for one's own children. I didn't get involved in the discussion, but I believe that use of violence sets a threshold of what it takes to modify someone's behavior. Adults that were beaten as children are probably incapable of learning to alter their behavior through words. They've been raised to believe (subconsciously) that, if no one is beating the tar out of them, their behavior is okay, regardless of verbal complaints.
I'm waiting for one of the security officers to lose it, draw his weapon and kill a bunch of people. Then we'll be talking about armed guards guarding the armed guards.
It's not only schools but stores, malls, hospitals and EVERY building that is going to need guard checkpoints, scanners and metal detectors as these shootings occur everywhere.
Sam! Social Security recipients HAVE EARNED their money MUCH MORE SO than vulture capitalists and other 1peercenters.. The 1 percenters' billions are much more gambling winnings than earned income even when it's by legitimately starting a business and not in the stock market - which is not earned at all but making money on other people's labor.
Nobody earns a billion, certainly not in one pop and certainly not more than working people "earn" a few thousand.
True but , remember, they sureley have a crucififiction in store for a defiant president.. soo he must be careful and tread lightly and secretly. billy can attest to that .
THERE'S NO END TO THE TRICKS THEY'LL PULL.!
Sorry Tom, but I have to disagree. The debt ceiling issue can be addressed by the President invoking the 14th Amd and just saying "We honor the debts we have created." I agree with your assessments regarding the Tea Party (which doesnt really even deserve to be capitalized), but this is one issue we dont have to face and therefore the President is to blame for not using his constitutionally granted powers.
That's what it is, essentially. The fiscal cliff is a problem made up by the two corporate lobbyist bought parties for their "good cop, bad cop" routine to get us (instead of the 1%) to accept austerity. Similarly, raising the debt cieling will be a made up crisis as raising it is routine and no big deal but the two parties will pretend it is a great calamimty to be averted, to the same end.
Too many people must be getting wise to the "fiscal cliff" and the false ominousness surrounding it.
Reply to #113 (as is my post #117) not to #119 The problem is that whenever someone goes back to edit their comment it gets put on the end and then reshuffles the order.
Actually, they (the earliest societies) had no hierarchies of ANY kind.
I truly agree with 2950-10K and Jcacourt even though Boehner disgusts me I certainly don't want Cantor or Ryan (or for that matter of fact do not want some idiot T Party) being put in as speaker of the house!!