Recent comments
ADHD: Hunter in a Farmer's World
Thom Hartmann has written a dozen books covering ADD / ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder.
Join Thom for his new twice-weekly email newsletters on ADHD, whether it affects you or a member of your family.
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Agreed. Not just the "right", the responsibility.
What the crazies don't realize is that nobody, but nobody speaks for God. Whatever attempt we make to interpret the will of God, we will fall short. Therefore, we should never have the audacity to claim that our laws are God's laws. To do so is blasphemy and also runs the great risk that we will give God-like authority to our own faulty human logic.
Separation of Church and State protects both from each other.
It’s the FED. Last week listening to the political electromagnetic journalists, like Thom Hartmann, or Norman Goldman using the catchy jingle “where Justice is served” characterized radio people, and that admit we the reporters in modern electromagnetic journalism fail Americans. One other reporter named Ezra Kline or the Washington Post let the same reality out that what is told in reporting falls way short to likely much suppressed news informing the American electorate. So far these can be my favorite people because this is the essence of why America is failing. At least Thom has the humility, and honesty to admit this failing. But, Mr. Goldman dropped a bomb about the FED the other day that would show reason to not even care about trade agreements.
As explained, by Mr. Goldman, the FED does not need to print money to make adjustments in the so called American economy. Just as Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan, keyed in dollar values likely to the tune of trillions of dollars to American banks, so has the now FED Chairman Ben Bernanke. Ladies and gentlemen of America both Chairman just key in numbers just as we here key in letters to make these messages. No need to print money.
So to the top end of the one per centers they, the banksters get a new transmission from the Federal Reserve and they only need to just look at new numbers. Presto, change the account to a whole bunch of money. In this case if Norman Goldman is right, it’s to the tune of twenty six trillion dollars. Do we have trade agreements that big? No. Gee only a little in significant million would get me out of the rat race. These guys have a lot of big rats chasing them! LOL. Really are Americans as hostage and we don’t know it? Where is Superman? Or hey Batman ya out there? We need help!! President Obama let’s get this thing figured out!!!
That is a huge, huge amount of money, and think about it. Huge, huge dollar values are shifting around constantly in this upper circle. Not real paper, just numbers. Here is the deal; you and I need the real paper. The bulk of gas, groceries the lower income people pay out to survive is done with real paper. It’s easy for politically connected Republican banksters to red line home loans, car loans, or just about any business loan. That in your face fact is when Mitch Mcconnell made his famous statement to commit to make Obama a one term president did in fact shoot himself in the face politically. The rest of the party which includes the so called TEA party underscored by Dick Army is nothing more than the same part a freelance Republican branch that cares even less or will not serve any better than the original Republican party. Please anyone who hangs tea bags on a hat is mentally adjusted to a need for a huge tea cup to jump into. That ladies and Gentlemen this is the whole bunch of tax cuts that will accumulate into Russell’s tea pot. What the heck is that?
If you don’t know, Russell’s tea pot theory is a famous theory about “is there a God” In other words nobody can prove that there is not between the Earth and Mars a china teapot revolving in an elliptical orbit. So no proof no God. LOL. This is the same falsehood with most Republican inititives, no proof. But Russell did not know we landed something on Mars which did not pass any tea pots. Ha ha. That is something really huge too.
I am amazed that this is a question!
Isn't this what we fought for?
Yes, we have civil liberties, but we also have civil obligations and voting needs to be one of them.
Shame on the GOP for trying to disenfranchise millions of American!
Stan near Seattle, WA
The "rights come from God, not government/men" mantra sounds like a prelude to removing those rights from the Constitution. Otherwise, the Republicans (Paul Ryan and Janine Turner, especially) sound like idiots who don't understand that the governmental side of this how natural rights are turned into fundamental rights, meaning that they're actually protected, rather than just talked about.
It occurs to me that Ann Romney's "I (not we) love women" speech should have consisted of her walking up to the microphone, saying "The Republican Party hereby panders to women," and walking away.
Thom, I think that it would be helpful to use language like George Lakoff suggests for getting our message across. It seems that some times we spend too much time using language that only liberals will hear. We need to practice language and thought patterns that others will be receptive to.
So long as the money bailouts the People and NOT the banksters and corporations, I'm all for it. Let's help people not loose their homes and students with their loans first and foremost with that bailout money. If not, we are going to have a lost generation chained to so much debt that they'll be in economic slavery. Time to kill apathy. Spread empathy and compassion. Peace.
I'd like to believe, that once not only in America, but all over the world will begin a revival. Beautiful, unique places. People will enjoy being in such places resume help writing
Prescription drug relief for uninsured?
I received my free cards in the October 2012 issue of Prevention magazine and thought there must be a catch..free? Yeah right! If you have other insurance...these cards will not help you...but if you have no insurance at all...like many millions of people in the US today...you could save lots of money on prescription drugs. You can ask for these cards on-line. http://rxreliefcard.com/
"Over 50 Million Americans have no medical insurance, or the insurance they do have doesn’t cover the costs of their prescription medications. Healthcare Alliance can help you save up to 75% on prescriptions at almost any pharmacy, with their simple to use and totally free pharmacy card."
http://thehealthcarealliance.com/
On CNN Saturday, Sept. 1, 2012, for the Financial news, a financial expert (I don't recall which person) said that with Ryan's plan, that the U. S. will experience almost immediately--- austerity just like Greece. Ryan scares me.
Also one of the financial experts said that cuts should not be made until unemployment is at 6%. That it will just get worse, and that we need to feed our poor. Get people working.
Here in the UK the public bailed out the banks to a tune of 395 billion pounds,according to the independent newspaper last week 90% of that money went to the richest 10 % of the population and just 10% of that stimulus (the public's money) went to the least well off.
The people have no idea what is going on because there is no transparency and that means no truth ,we are being played like a fiddle. .the UK has been in official recession since 2008 and austerity is not working but the power,s that be have decided that this is the road to go down.As in America we are a wash with money ,money is not the problem fairness is and the thought that there is not enough to go around.
Obama serves the same corporations that have stripped away American jobs over the last two decades. He, like most politicians speak out of one side of their mouths when speaking to the electorate and the other side when speaking to big business. If he is sooo concerned about our jobs and producing good jobs here, why did he just sign a new free trade agreement, the TPP with several Asian countries, so our jobs can be exported there? His hands are in the same pockets as Romney. He needs those big bucks coming in to remain in power and that is his main concern about job protection. Why didn't he pass all these measures to produce jobs here, while the Democrats had the Senate and the House? No, instead he waited so could blame it on the Republicans for all the lack of job growth in America. Austerity should be imposed on the tax breaks given to the rich corporations and the wealthy elite of our nation. Not imposed on the poor and disabled citizens of America, that have no where to get relief from the poverty imposed upon them by an unfair and corrupt system that favors the wealthiest citizens with tax breaks and loop holes for the giant corporations to pay less and less each year in taxes.
And on what information do you base your accusation that it is the teachers unions that are tearing this country apart? Do you hate all unions that provide a decent wage and benefits for their members? As I recall, being a union member in the meat packers union, it was only becuase we had a union that we received fair wages. Now that the unions have been destroyed by the right wing political system and the corporations that import cheap illegal labor from south of our border, the once good jobs are now dominated by cheap illegal workers, like Hormel in the Mid West, who got caught with three bus loads of illegal alien meat cutters. Our jobs disappeared because our Presidents, Senators and Congress people allowed free trade agreements to happen, starting with the NAFTA agreement sending our good paying jobs south to Mexico and other cheap labor countries. Your President Obama just signed a new freetrade agreement TPP with Asian countries, so the corporations won't run out of cheap labor to produce goods to send back to the states and jerks like you buy and think your getting a good deal!! When we had Tariffs to protect American workers we had plenty of good paying jobs, even non union jobs paid well. So get your head out of your ass and start reading about why our jobs have gone away, it is not the living wage that ended American production, it was and is the greedy corporates that have shipped our jobs to China for more profit so they can get those million dollar bonuses each year. It is jerks like you who buy into the garbage that it is our teachers, firemen and policemen who have caused jobs to leave. Wake up and stop being fooled into believing it is all the good paying jobs that drove our jobs away. You sound like a right wing follower believing what the right wing nut jobs have fed you.......
I never imagined how much stuff there was online about this! Thank you for making it easy to grasp UK and London massages
"....offering the large corporations that are holding their profits overseas because they don't want to pay taxes on those profits the ability to write proposals on how they would use the one trillion dollars that they collectively have out there to be brought in tax free if for every $100,000 they bring in they create a job in one of the areas that need work or train a person to do the job."
They already tried this and the corporations, once they got their tax breaks, failed to follow through in creating the jobs they were supposed to create....they continued to send our jobs overseas anyway. You just cannot make any agreements with these people because they will renege on the deal after they get what they want. And our government has not held their feet to the fire..and forced them to make good on any agreements or understandings.
"..(Reuters) - Congress should not endorse another big tax break for overseas corporate profits because the last one in 2004-2005 was a costly failure, said U.S. congressional investigators in a report released on Monday.
With an army of lobbyists pushing on Capitol Hill for a repeat of the Bush administration's 2004-2005 program, the head of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations urged lawmakers to reject another corporate give-away.
"We can't afford a tax break that would deepen the deficit, disadvantage domestic firms, and push more corporate dollars offshore, while failing to stimulate the economy," said Senator Carl Levin in a statement on his panel's report.
Levin was joined by Senator Kent Conrad, a fellow Democrat, in writing to Congress' deficit-reduction "super committee," urging members to refuse lobbyists' pleas for a second overseas corporate income repatriation tax "holiday."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/11/us-usa-tax-repatriation-idUSTR...
-----------
".... firms are unlikely to invest the repatriated funds. Congress passed a similar repatriation tax holiday in 2004 and required firms to create domestic jobs or make new domestic investments to get the tax break. Nonetheless, the firms, on average, used the tax break to repurchase shares or pay dividends — not to increase investment.
The holiday, instead, turned into a massive tax break for shareholders — resulting in little or no economic gain or job market expansion. Why? Because money is fungible, to satisfy the requirements of the law, corporations reported repatriated funds as the source of money for investments or jobs they would have created anyway — and used other funds to increase shareholder wealth.
Today, domestic firms are sitting on near-record levels of liquid assets. The reason they’re not investing or creating more jobs is not a cash shortage. Allowing them to repatriate foreign profits at low tax rates would only heap more cash onto their already huge stockpile."
"....would be the dangerous precedent that firms would expect regular repatriation holidays. This expectation may persuade firms to hoard profits overseas and perhaps even move production abroad, betting that Congress will eventually grant another “one-time” tax break."
"Indeed, the prior tax holiday was supposed to discourage firms from holding profits overseas. But instead, firms stockpiled new reserves, presumably in anticipation of another holiday."
http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/06/27-corporate-tax-holi...
The purpose of "austerity" policies is not primarily to boost economic recovery. If one looks at what is actually taking place, such measures promote the redistribution of wealth and income from the working poor and middle class to the top layers of society. Hence, "austerity" achieves its basic purpose even though the economy sags, as has happened in Europe and the UK. Of course, this is the script for the USA as well. The supposed "necessity" of austerity is best seen as justification for the shedding of any prior obligation the wealthy may have had to support overal social wellbeing.
Years ago when Regan was president, I talked to a shoe department clerk in Sears. This was his second job, working evenings. He loved Regan and hated unions. Yes. He blamed unuon workers for making the cost of living so high. And today we all know that it's the teachers unions that are tearing this nation apart. When the minimum wage is reduced to $4.50 an hour, we will all be offered work, and big industry will move back to America. What a plan! Good middle class jobs return as promised...................But not middle class wages.
BELIEVING IN AMERICA: Increasingly in recent decades with the rapid growth and concentration of wealth in the private sector what politicians (especially at the federal level) believes is not, it seems, particularily relevant. I mean, of course on a primal level (like the song says) everyone wants to rule the world. Likewise, obviously the U.S. government is organzed to widely distributed political power on the state, local and
federal level, and then throughout various branches and agencies, with additional checks and balances. However, like in Hollywood where, for example, Morgan Freeman is often cast as a godlike character, what the just concluded RNC, I think, attempted to display was a Mitt Romney that can slot (with competence, decency and dignity) into various roles ranging from Harvard college and family man to investment bank front man, Olympic organizer or Governor of Massachusetts. The point being that (again) what politicians believe or are passionate about and/or (as with Obama in 2008) they promise voters, it's not particularlarily relevant thse days. Instead, regarding beliefs, it is what the politician's moneyed benefactor(s) believe and/or more specifically want in return for their financial support, for their investment. And with the concurrent concentration of corporate media I don't see how elected politicians regain the power to act on principled beliefs. But then did anyone anticipated the political uprisings in the Middle-East (The Arab Spring)? Thinking ahead, maybe this imbalance of power eventually gets reversed by e-democracy where there's (an inevitable?) transition from 'analog' campaigns (costly travel & advertising) to, in effect, a more frictionless online digital democracy where elected politicians can be more responsive to citizens....and where, for instance, older children ( if capable of considering the issues) are also allowed to vote.
HEY, KIDS! In 2008 with Obama was taking his vainglorious Grant Park victory lap I instead was advocating (blogging at thewashingtonpost.com) that with 'banksters' in desperate need of a government bailout there was maybe a window-of-opportunity for a Constitutional Amendment seperating cash from politics, and (by necessity) moving U.S. elections away from expensive 'analog' campaigns (meaning extensive travel and advertising) to digital 'e-democracy'. Now however, with corporations richer and thus seemingly more politically powerful than ever, that window looks (to Tom Brokaw, for example) to be shut tight...But hey, if you want meat, ya' gotta keep pluckin' that chicken.
Obama has tried to improve the job situation, mainly because keeping his job depends on it. When he could have done more, the House and the Senate were held by the Dem.s, he did very little. Now when he tries to do something the GOP blocks it in the Senate and the House is now in the hands of the far rights control. He claims he is trying to secure jobs here, while he claims Romney is responsible for sending jobs overseas. Then why has he signed a new free trade agreement, mainly for the benefit and profits of the corporations with Asian countries like Vietnam and others. Why, because he needs those corporate dollars, just like Romney! It does not matter who wins the next election, the days of a strong and prosperous middle class in America are over......The best any of us can do is vote for a third party, in hopes someday we will be more than a two party nation...But as long as big money rules our elections, that will never happen...I feel sorry for my daughter and her generation and those that will follow, for I truly believe it is too late to bring manufacturing back to this country with all the trade agreements our politicians have signed giving our future away to the Chinese, Indians and other countries now producing what we used to...a sad, but a true scenario of our future economic situation here...........
I have noticed that bankers, politicians and other members of the top 1% have not taken a pay cut... but still seem happy to cut the income of those who can least afford it. This seems more prevalent in countries supporting austerity...
I agree with the concensus that austerity will not work and Obama is the only one that is likely to implement a program like the one you mentioned. Upgrading the grid is only one of several major programs that could be undertaken that would benefit the whole country, make us more competitive and allow industry to make a profit, perhaps small in the short run, but substantial in the long run. The programs might include making the grid and our wideband network less subject to potential cyber attack, weatherizing buildings so that they use less energy for heating and cooling, bringing our roads and bridges up to snuff (a technical term) and programming computers in all our K-12 public schools so that every student can have a tutor/computer that will enable all students to learn to the maximum of their abilities.
The problem is how to get the private sector to undertake such programs so that they are pursued at a level that will really make a difference. I believe this can be done by offering the large corporations that are holding their profits overseas because they don't want to pay taxes on those profits the ability to write proposals on how they would use the one trillion dollars that they collectively have out there to be brought in tax free if for every $100,000 they bring in they create a job in one of the areas that need work or train a person to do the job. If all the money came in, it would generate 10 million jobs. That would do wonders for our economy, would greatly reduce our deficits and move this country in the direction it needs to go.
I think that if Obama were to propose a program like this for his next 4 years, he would win reelection in a breeze (another technical term)..
The time proven basics of communication theory; Frequency, Duration, Amplitude (often enough, long enough, loud enough) are now mostly mediated by media and money drives media in each of these basics. The side with the most money can push these messages and they sometimes carry the day. In California (the Jerry vs. Meg) election proved the rule by the exception. Jerry was a known entity and trusted in ways that Meg could not buy. The BIG LIE worked most famously with the Josef Geobbels propaganda machine, but the tactics have found fertile ground throughout history. The present situation is very problematic. Will the truth be recognizable through the smoke screen of media buys? I'm not sure.
I want to reiterate Thom Hartmann’s rant on the Republican Strategy and any austerity program will not prove positive for the middle class. Under a new Presidency and Congress under Willard Mitt Romney we the middle class are doomed!
Here with the Campaign Dinner Address excerpt of FDR is the Republican strategy then and still practiced today and the quote from Neil Newhouse, the Romney adviser.
Campaign Dinner Address of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, September 23, 1944. Washington, DC
“The opposition in this year has already imported into this campaign a very interesting thing, because it is foreign. They have imported the propaganda technique invented by the dictators abroad. Remember, a number of years ago, there was a book, Mein Kampf, written by Hitler himself. The technique was all set out in Hitler's book - and it was copied by the aggressors of Italy and Japan. According to that technique, you should never use a small falsehood; always a big one, for its very fantastic nature would make it more credible - if only you keep repeating it over and over and over again.”
“... and we're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers,” Romney Pollster Neil Newhouse said.