Georgia caller Consequences not thought through. The real issue is that with no papers, you can be detained for no real crime, unless of course we make it a crime.
I am counting down the four days until Blue Shield of California destroys over two decades of continuity of care just to protect the executive bonus of Bruce Bodaken (Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) . . . So you can understand my rant:
Blue Shield of California AND Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates are in the middle of their biennial HMO Provider negotiations.
My company received a letter from Blue Shield, dated 05/28/10, notifying the company that Cedars-Sinai Health Associates/Cedars-Sinai Medical Group will no longer be a provider for Blue Shield. As Cedar-Sinai is one of the finest and largest medical providers in the entire country, it caused concern that Blue Shield appeared intent on blockading staff members of our company from seeking the best quality healthcare available in the local region. My company was left wondering what it said about worthiness of Blue Shield as a vendor that their reimbursement rates are unacceptable to such a quality institution. Frankly, my company paid $81,997.86 in 2009 and has paid $43 thousand in premiums this year to date and we were left questioning if our company’s premium dollars could be more wisely spent.
On a personal note: My family has received letters from both Blue Shield and Cedars Sinai describing the impasse in their negotiations. The letter from Blue Shield states that they will be transferring my family to another medical group on 08/01/10 . . . One that is over fifty miles from my home and with a far less than stellar reputation. From my point of view, this is an extremely poor provider choice. So I expressed to my insurance agency that I, personally, had less than zero interest ensuring the salary and bonuses of Blue Shield’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bruce Bodaken, at the expense of providing adequate healthcare for my beloved family.
My agent provided me a direct contact within Blue Shield of California so I could adequately express my personal discontent as I was sure that calling Customer Service would not allow me to efficiently and effectively communicate my personal views regarding the situation. Being helpful, my agent did so.
I recognize that the individual I spoke with is employed as a flack and it was her obligation to her company to diffuse dissatisfaction in Blue Shield’s customer base. Once I finally impressed upon her that I am an accounting and finance professional with almost two decades of experience and a business degree from Pepperdine University and actually do understand the process of (and the use of public opinion in) business negotiations, I believe that she did listen to my personal concerns. On the other hand, I was left with the distinct impression that Blue Shield will do as they see fit to ensure the paying for the overhead that represents their company and its profits.
In short, I was not placated but I believe that one person at Blue Shield might have heard me.
I read my company’s renewal letter from Mark Gastineau, Senior Vice President of Blue Shield of California at the mid July . . . Rate increase 10.3%. Services and definitions will be modified in their favor. Additionally, it turns out that if we re-up with them they will cut that increase by about half by lowering our risk profile . . . BUT will not state the quote of the rate increase that way SO other insurers are forced to quote us at the higher risk profile.
I recognize that with Blue Shield my company paid about 9.6% more in 2008 over 2009 AND although we have had less employees this year, my company is paying 5.3% more in 2010 than in 2009. While health insurance presently makes up 3.0% of my company‘s expenses, it remains important to employee satisfaction and retention.
To sum up the situation:
Blue Shield of California wants to cut the reimbursement rates paid to Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates beyond the quick (dead into heart wood, keeping with the metaphor) and Cedars refuses to be screwed into the dirt (brand new metaphor).
Blue Shield of California feels that their profit margins are sacred as it is what their Executive Bonuses are paid upon AND Blue Shield of California’s Executives feel that their Executive Bonuses are sacred . . . More sacred than providing quality healthcare to their paying customers . . . More sacred than reimbursing healthcare providers adequately . . . More sacred than allowing patients to see the healthcare provider of their choice . . . More sacred than giving my family members access to one of the largest healthcare providers in the whole State of California . . . More sacred than allowing my family to be treated by the nationally recognized medical Excellence Center of our choice.
So the truth about the big lie that the health insurance industry purveyed during the Obamacare debate is that government will never come between me and my doctor BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . Is that government will never deny me healthcare I deserve and have paid for BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . Is that government will never ration healthcare BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . (The Death Panel thingy was also false).
So my kid can’t see the doctor she has seen since birth . . . My wife and I can’t see our doctor . . . Who cares if Cedars Sinai actually saved my life and my only child was born into and lived her entire life under Cedar Sinai’s care.
My overriding concern is that I remain interested in ensuring that my family receive effective, efficient and quality healthcare from the provider of my choice.
Given that their Blue Shield of California totally mishandled me when I expressed my displeasure AND that they are imposing a 10.3% rate increase upon the premium that my company and I pay for coverage, I am expressing my discontent in a public forum. My personal concerns with BSoC do not seem to be resolving. While these may not be the deciding factors on whether my company stays with BSOC, please, understand that I personally remain notably less than pleased.
In short, this situation is wholly unacceptable and definitely figures into the discussion of whether Blue Shield will continue as my company’s health insurance provider in the future. Both service and cost containment are important to my company. If it were solely up to me, BSoC would probably lose over $100K in premium next year.
It appears that no one in the upper echelons at Blue Shield of California experiences shame so the direct effect of my postings will be minimal BUT hopefully my rants will result in enough inquiry/work that BSoC realizes that it is in their best interest to do the ethical thing and stop Inappropriately handling Cedars AND my family can see their chosen doctors and medical staff.
1. It is not a Mosque that is being built at/near the old Twin Towers site . . . It is a community/cultural center focused on peaceful co-existence between all religions and designed to foster peace and understanding between people of all religions that happens to be being paid for by people of the Muslim faith.
2. The 09/11 Memorial is not a war memorial; it is the site of a horrific crime against all people that has been memorialized. To condemn the attempt of people to heal the wound inflicted is a disservice to people everywhere.
3. As a percentage of fatalities and injuries, more innocent U.S. Citizens of Moslem faith died and were injured in the 09/11 attacks than their percentage in the general population. The attacks were, also, a crime against peace-loving Muslims everywhere AND more especially here in the United States of America where we all enjoy freedom of religion. Their pain is no less real than that felt by the population-at-large and they have rights to the same freedoms earned through the expense of their blood as the rest of us.
4. The Torah teaches my tribe that we are to respect folk of all traditions because my people were once strangers in the land of Egypt . . . Unkind acts inspired by or inflicted because of xenophobia is not a Divine Commandment in any of the religions inspired by Abraham’s understanding of divine. This includes intentionally inflicted suicidal acts of mass murder AND protests inspired by the willfully imperfect understanding of the facts and other folk of differing traditions and backgrounds.
Sheriff Joe sure seems to be having problems finding laws against illegal employers, but no problem exaggerating existing laws against undocumented workers. I wonder what's keeping him from looking into the illegal employer problem and existing laws about it... I'm guessing a green veil and a bullies attitude. All I ever heard about Sheriff Joe, leads me to believe he's a pseudo sadist (and perhaps not even pseudo).
Gawd! These anti immigrant folks just have to shift the blame from one class of workers to another. The worst thing wrong with morons is morons with power.
Ocean Energy Institute Founder Matthew Simmons is another, telling Bloomberg we've killed the Gulf of Mexico - its $2.2 trillion economy by depleting oxygen, decimating aquatic life and poisoning the food chain. We've also created a public health crisis, problems showing up first in cleanup workers experiencing dizziness, fainting, nausea, nosebleeds, vomiting, coughing, headaches, stomach upset, and difficulty breathing, compounded by heat, fatigue, hydrocarbon smell, and combined toxicity of oil and dispersants.
I would like to share with you two articles. I would also want to share with you two pet peeves. As you know, I love to piss off people. But, there are people who piss me off. The first people are the power elite who have no concern for the average person. The second person who is our commander-in-chief who goes to war recklessly with our all volunteer military and are placed in harm's way on a pack of lies. With an all voluteer military the commander needs to be very careful about starting a war.
**Reflection of the Week** "The challenge of social justice is to evoke a sense of community that we need to make our nation a better place, just as we make it a safer place." - Marian Wright Edelman
PROTESTS FORCE OBAMITES TO BACK DOWN ON JOURNALIST BANXi Yu, Harvard Crimson - A Colombian journalist who was denied entrance to the United States has finally been granted his student visa to participate in a journalism fellowship at Harvard, according to an e-mail sent this morning to the organizations and individuals who rallied to his aid.
Hollman Morris Rincon, a Nieman Fellow for the 2010-2011 year, expressed "solidarity" with those who supported his career in "defending the truth and human rights" in his objective reporting of the sufferings and ravages of the war in Colombia, stated his e-mail, which was written in Spanish.
The acclaimed human rights reporter and producer of an independent television news program was denied a student visa by the Department of State on "security-related grounds."
A reporter known for his critical coverage of Colombia President Alvaro Uribe Velez’s administration, Morris developed connections with sources who did not support the outgoing president—a move that could have been interpreted as terrorist activity, according to Nieman Curator Robert H. Giles.
The decision by the federal government had prompted several journalism and human rights organizations to rally behind Morris' situation.
“The denial is alarming,” Giles wrote in a tersely-worded editorial expressing the far-reaching impacts on freedom of speech. “It would represent a major recasting of press freedom doctrine if journalists, by establishing contacts with so-called terrorist organizations in the process of gathering news, open themselves to accusations of terrorist activities and the possibility of being barred from travel to the United States.”
"Corrupted by wealth and power, your government is like a restaurant with only one dish. They've got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side. But no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen." - Huey Long
Dear Thom,
I hate to say it, but just like Ed Shultz and Raechel Maddow, you are sounding more and more like a Democratic version of FOX News and just a puppet mouthpiece and apologist. For example, today you said Republicans are corporatist and implied that the Obama Administration isn't. That is pure BS and you know it! Here are some facts that you and people like Ed Shultz and Raechel Maddow selectively do not report on:
Obama has gone after more whistle blowers than all previous President's combined. So much for his "transparent government." He is worse than "W" on this!
He also held sixty-five private meetings with insurance execs and made a back-room deal to kill the public option and competition between providers. He then guaranteed the largest public subsidy in that industry's history. Transparent government? Sure.... Dick Cheny's Energy Taskforce anyone?
He broke the law along with Ken Salazar in permitting the Mocondo oil rig. And, that's why there will never be a criminal investigation of BP because if there is, it won't just be BP personnel who will be charged. I helped write sections of NEPA regarding environmental, social, and economic impact requirements and I know what I'm talking about. Ken Salazar actually ramped up the granting of "categorical exclusions" at a faster clip than even "W's" Administration. In the case of deep water drilling in a sensitive ecology, the granting of a categorical exclusion is quite illegal! He is worse than Bush on this as well.
It just came out that he and his generals have been lying to the public about the conduct of the Afghanistan War. I applaud WIKI leaks. They are heros and Obama is a war monger!
He said he would stop medicinal marijuana raids in places like California where medicinal pot is legal. The latest raid conducted by the DEA in Northern Cal. occurred just three and a half weeks ago. The grower was a medicinal supplier with all the required permits and papers. State regulators were even on site when the Feds showed up and they could do nothing to stop this insult.
While Wachovia laundered $380B in Mexican Cocaine Cartel money through Wells Fargo and Wall Street. Obama has renominated "W's" DEA chief under who's watch the pot raids and the money laundering occurred. Are you familiar with Michael Rupert? It turns out he was right the whole time. And, the money laundering occurred under Obama as well. You can't tell me that's another "oops!" $380B is half the GDP of Mexico and they were only fined $160M by the Obama Administration - WTF?
The so called, "Financial Reform Bill" was stripped of the Glass Stegall protections by Tim Geithner and Rham Emmanuel. And what the hell is a person like Rham Emannuel, with dual loyalties, doing in such a powerful position. Is Obama running his government or is AIPAC?
To wit:
U.S. SPY SYSTEM OUT OF CONTROL
ACLU - The Washington Post has issued a major new investigative report on what it calls “Top Secret America” — a geographically sprawling network of secret government agencies with a budget of $75 billion. Based on the Post’s reporting, it is no exaggeration to say that our secret intelligence establishment has spun out of control. The report — the first in a series of three to be published this week — contains amazing new hard reporting that confirms what has long been known to those who pay attention. The fact is, bureaucracies almost always seek to expand their own power and budgets. Add secrecy powers that protect them from independent public oversight, ineffective oversight by Congress and even from within the executive branch, and mix in ever-expanding budgets, and you’ve got a recipe for an out-of-control security establishment: • The Post reports that 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence at 10,000 locations across the United States. • • Two-thirds of the intelligence programs reside in the Department of Defense — a worrisome militarization of our intelligence capabilities, especially at a time when those capabilities are increasingly being turned inward upon the American people. • • The $75 billion intelligence budget is 2 ½ times its size before 9/11. The budget of the NSA doubled between 2002 and today. • • There is no person or agency with the “authority, responsibility or a process in place to coordinate all these activities,” in the words of one official. “There's only one entity in the entire universe that has visibility on all” secret programs, the Obama administration's nominee to be the next director of national intelligence told the Post. “That’s God.” However, since men are not angels, as James Madison wrote, checks and balances on government power are crucial, and that state of affairs is frightening and unacceptable. • • Since there is no one overseeing all this, there is also no way of knowing how effective it all is. One top general complained to the Post, for example, that the National Counterterrorism Center “never produced one shred of information that helped me prosecute three wars!” The Post paints a stark portrait of hundreds of government agencies drowning in data, as government systems vacuum up vast quantities of information about daily activities across the planet in the unlikely hope of discovering useful information. Unsurprisingly, the government cannot possibly make sense of all that data: - The National Security Agency is intercepting 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other communications per day.
- Analysts publish 50,000 intelligence reports each year.
Posted by TPR at 7/20/2010 Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
1 comments:
Simple Country Physicist said... Back when I was a fairly young employee of the Yankee government, back during Containment, I heard a suggestion made that we should add the Kremlin to the distribution list of all USG reports, memoranda, .... The idea was to inundate them with information overload. Somehow analysis and operational research have been lost. July 20, 2010 8:02 AM Post a Comment
Newer Post Older Post Home
Posted by Zach Carter at 12:36 pm July 17, 2010 13 COMMENTS Elizabeth Warren vs. Timothy Geithner
A lot of people have rightfully scolded Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for attempting to block Elizabeth Warren’s nomination to head the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Here’s what I have to add: What a whiny cry-baby wimp. Geithner only has to answer to two people, the President of the United States and the Chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Only one of those people openly criticizes him in public when he commits unbelievable, disastrous errors. Guess which one? So of course Geithner is pushing against Warren. She holds him accountable to the public, and he doesn’t want to be held accountable. Geithner is acting like a vindictive baby, trying to dish-out some payback at someone who highlighted very real failures that he himself orchestrated (stress tests, foreclosures, AIG . . . nearly everything that was screwed up under TARP). He deserves the public flogging he’s receiving, and he really ought to be stripped of his post for so transparently playing personal politics with national policy. Incidentally, this embarassing little farce of Geithner’s should give Warren more credibility to head the new bureau. It proves that she is willing to stand up to powerful people and make them uncomfortable, which is exactly what the head of the CFPB will have to do in order to be effective. The Warren appointment really will be a litmus test for the Obama administration. It’s not a progressive litmus test– she’s profoundly popular on the left, right and center, because she understands working people and is one of the few public figures willing to defend them against Wall Street lobbyists. But it will be a test of whether Obama can do the right thing in the face of opposition from a single, powerful corporate interest group (bankers). Business does not oppose her– small businesses, in fact, love her, because they know she’ll stand up for them against unscrupulous lenders. It’s really just the big banks that are allied against her. And Warren is so clearly the best candidate for the job– she invented the very idea of a consumer regulator for finance– that appointing anyone else will be a transparent political ploy. If Obama doesn’t have the guts to stand behind an enormously popular and effective public figure in the face of opposition from the very industry she will be charged with regulating, it will say a great deal about his capacity as a leader.
Last year Pres. Obama and AG Eric Holder promised that the feds would not go after medical marijuana providers in states with medical marijuana laws so long as orangepunch.ocregisOrange Punch: Rogue DEA defies Obamater.com/2010/02/16/.../17561 - 109k - Cached
Obama To Nominate Acting DEA Chief Leonhart For Post – Main ... Obama To Nominate Acting DEA Chief Leonhart For Post. By Andrew ... Acting chief Michele Leonhart became a DEA agent in 1980, rising through the ranks to ... mainjustice.com/2010/01/26/obama-to-nominate-acting-dea-chief... - Cached
Wall Street Is Laundering Drug Money And Getting Away With It ... Jul 14, 2010 ... I remember him doing a stand up bit on banks who launder drug money and how to stop the drug war. Just pick someone at Wachovia Bank and ... cannabisculture.com/.../Wall-Street-Laundering-Drug-Money-And-Getting-Away-It - 16 hours ago
Mexican army soldiers guard the scene after Monday's assassination of Rodolfo Torre Cantu, a candidate for governor of the state of Tamaulipas. Drug cartel gunmen are suspected of ambushing Torre Cantu's convoy outside Ciudad Victoria. CAPTION By Agencia Contraluz/AP Wachovia regularly helped move money for Mexican drug cartels, the bank's parent, Wells Fargo, has admitted in a deal with federal prosecutors, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August issue
The deal, struck in March, "sheds light on the largely undocumented role of U.S. banks in contributing to the violent drug trade that has convulsed Mexico for the past four years," Bloomberg writes. Wachovia, which San Francisco-based Wells Fargo bought in 2008 amid the financial crisis, admitted it "didn't do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That's the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history -- a sum equal to one-third of Mexico's current gross domestic product," according to Bloomberg. "Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor who handled the case, told Bloomberg. Bloomberg tells how Mexican soldiers seized a DC-9 jet after it landed in April 2006 at the international airport in Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City: "They found 128 black suitcases, packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found." They also found that the smugglers had bought the jet with laundered funds they transferred through Wachovia and Bank of America, both headquartered in Charlotte, N.C. The plane was one of four that narcotraffickers bought and used to ship a total of 22 tons of cocaine. People working for Mexican cartels deposited illegal funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009, and Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at HSBC Holdings, Europe's biggest bank by assets, U.S. and Mexican prosecutors found. But neither bank was accused of wrongdoing. Spokespeople for the banks said laws prevent them from discussing the cases.
Miles Mogulescu Entertainment attorney, writer, and political activist
For months I've been reporting in The Huffington Post that President Obama made a backroom deal last summer with the for-profit hospital lobby that he would make sure there would be no national public option in the final health reform legislation. (See here, here and here). I've been increasingly frustrated that except for an initial story last August in the New York Times, no major media outlet has picked up this important story and investigated further. Hopefully, that's changing. On Monday, Ed Shultz interviewed New York Times Washington reporter David Kirkpatrick on his MSNBC TV show, and Kirkpatrick confirmed the existence of the deal. Shultz quoted Chip Kahn, chief lobbyist for the for-profit hospital industry on Kahn's confidence that the White House would honor the no public option deal, and Kirkpatrick responded: "That's a lobbyist for the hospital industry and he's talking about the hospital industry's specific deal with the White House and the Senate Finance Committee and, yeah, I think the hospital industry's got a deal here. There really were only two deals, meaning quid pro quo handshake deals on both sides, one with the hospitals and the other with the drug industry. And I think what you're interested in is that in the background of these deals was the presumption, shared on behalf of the lobbyists on the one side and the White House on the other, that the public option was not going to be in the final product." Kirkpatrick also reported in his original New York Times article that White House was standing behind the deal with the for-profit hospitals: "Not to worry, Jim Messina, the deputy White House chief of staff, told the hospital lobbyists, according to White House officials and lobbyists briefed on the call. The White House was standing behind the deal". This should be big news. Even while President Obama was saying that he thought a public option was a good idea and encouraging supporters to believe his healthcare plan would include one, he had promised for-profit hospital lobbyists that there would be no public option in the final bill. The media should be digging deeper into this story. Washington reporters should be asking Robert Gibbs if President Obama is still honoring this deal. They should be calling Jim Messina and hospital lobbyist Chip Kahn to confirm the specifics of the deal. They should be asking Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leaders Dick Durbin and Harry Reid the extent of their knowledge of this deal. They should be asking Pelosi if the reason she's refusing to include a public option in the House reconciliation bill to be sent to the Senate is that there are at least 51 Senate Democrats who would vote for it and she needs to insure that a final bill with a public option does not end up on President Obama's desk where he would then have to break his deal with the hospital lobbyists and sign it, or veto it to honor his deal. More deeply, there are serious questions about the extent to which Obama, with the help of Rahm Emanuel, used a K Street strategy to pursue health care reform. The strategy seems to have been to make backroom deals to protect the interests of the likes of the drug industry and the for-profit hospital industry in exchange for campaign cash, even if this meant reversing campaign promises to include a public option to put competitive pressure on private insurance premiums, and to allow Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices and Americans to buy cheaper drugs from Canada. The result is a health care bill that is generally unpopular with voters. Questions need to be asked, too, about the extent to which the White House is following a similar K Street strategy with Wall Street financiers when it comes to shaping financial reform and new regulations to rein in the banks who brought the economy to its knees. Voters viscerally sense that the White House and Congressional Democrats may be as concerned with protecting special interests -- whether it's drug companies, private hospitals, or Wall Street bank -- than they are with protecting the people, and this is feeding a populist backlash against Democrats that resulted in Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts and is making a Democratic bloodbath in the fall elections increasingly likely. Polls indicate that about 60% of voters support a public option while only about 1/3 support the overall Democratic healthcare bill. There still time -- very little time -- for Democrats to shift course and include a public option in the final bill, even if it means going back on the White House's backroom deal with the hospital industry. If the media picks up on this story, perhaps the White House and Congressional Democrats can be embarrassed into changing course. If, on the other hand, Democrats continue to honor these special interest deals, then passing an unpopular health care bill may just be walking into a Republican trap. Barack Obama reverses campaign promise and approves offshore ... Mar 31, 2010 ... Barack Obama reverses campaign promise and approves offshore drilling. President allows oil and gas exploration off several coastal areas to ... www.guardian.co.uk/.../barack-obama-drilling-offshore-approves - Cached Barack Obama Reverses Campaign Promise and Approves Offshore ... Mar 31, 2010 ... Barack Obama Reverses Campaign Promise and Approves Offshore Drilling. President allows oil and gas exploration off several coastal areas to ... www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/31 - Cached
The Spill, The Scandal and the President | Rolling Stone Politics Jun 8, 2010 ... This article originally appeared in RS 1107 from June 24, 2010. ..... But when Rolling Stone asked MMS whether BP had the required ... www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/111965 - Cached BP's Next Disaster | Rolling Stone Politics Jun 23, 2010 ... The Spill, The Scandal and the President: How Obama let BP ... www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/120130 Dereliction of Duty | Rolling Stone Politics Jun 24, 2010 ... be BP and president Obama and all his generals and admi. ... www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/121436 More results from rollingstone.com »
Oil-coated baby dolphin carried to shore by tourist dies (VIDEO ... Jun 24, 2010 ... Oiled dolphin's rescue ends in death (PHOTO), Pensacola News Journal, June 24, 2010 Christy Travis first saw oil splotched along the beach ... www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/dead-oil-coated-baby-dolphin-carried-to-shore-by-tourist-photos-dolphin-was-crying-as-people-oil-off-coast-guard... - Cached
BP is Burning Sea Turtles Alive [VIDEO] BP is Burning Sea Turtles Alive: Mike Ellis is a boat captain who's been rescuing the endangered Kemp's Ridley sea turtles near Deepwater Horizon. www.buzzfeed.com/turtlefeed/bp-is-burning-turtles-ruc - Cached
The oil spill's forgotten victims-- Gulf Coast pets Jul 13, 2010 ... He could no longer afford to even feed his loving companions that he ... Donation programs such as this can help keep these pets in their loving homes. ... Residents throughout the region, including those in Southwest ... www.examiner.com/x-55867-Ft-Myers-Gulf-Oil-Spill-Examiner~y2010m7d11-The-oil-spills-forgotten-victims-Gulf-Coast... - Cached Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - Reporter's Notebook: Oil and ... Jul 14, 2010 ... The shelter we visited is not a no-kill shelter and almost every cage was taken. ... I don't know who to feel more compassion for – the pets or the poor owners ... hear of more sufferings trickling down from the oil spill in the gulf. To the innocent animals whose owners can not afford to keep them ... ac360.blogs.cnn.com/.../reporters-notebook-oil-and-the-family-pet/ - 17 hours ago - Add to iGoogle
Obama Still Believes in Off-Shore Oil Drilling - Political Punch President Barack Obama says despite a massive oil spill in the Gulf, he still believes that responsible off-shore oil drilling is an ..... or is this another case of a Republican pushing a Big Lie and hoping no one bothers to ... As the damage from this disaster becomes more apparent, it will be very clear the ... blogs.abcnews.com/.../obama-still-believes-in-offshore-oil-drilling.html - Cached
I would like to know what inflationary impact of having the masses invest in stocks will have on those stock prices and who is most likely to gain from it. I remember thinking Japan's stock market was grossly overvalued ~20-30 years ago and how everyone in Japan was a "good saver" and invested in it. I think today's market is overvalued and will only get worse with trillions of dollars pouring in. Of course if you are already heavily invested, and clever, you will benefit handsomely.
So you all understand my rambling healthcare rants:
Blue Shield of California AND Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates are in the middle of their biennial HMO Provider negotiations:
Blue Shield of California wants to cut the reimbursement rates paid to Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates beyond the quick (dead into heart wood, keeping with the metaphor) and Cedars refuses to be screwed into the dirt (brand new metaphor).
Blue Shield of California feels that their profit margins are sacred as it is what their Executive Bonuses are paid upon AND Blue Shield of California’s Executives feel that their Executive Bonuses are sacred . . . More sacred than providing quality healthcare to their paying customers . . . More sacred than reimbursing healthcare providers adequately . . . More sacred than allowing patients to see the healthcare provider of their choice . . . More sacred than giving my family members access to one of the largest healthcare providers in the whole State of California . . . More sacred than allowing my family to be treated by the nationally recognized medical Excellence Center of our choice.
So the truth about the big lie that the health insurance industry purveyed during the Obamacare debate is that government will never come between me and my doctor BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . Is that government will never deny me healthcare I deserve and have paid for BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . Is that government will never ration healthcare BUT Blue Shield of California will enthusiastically do so . . . (The Death Panel thingy was also false).
So my kid can’t see the doctor she has seen since birth . . . My wife and I can’t see our doctor . . .
Given that their Blue Shield of California totally mishandled me when I expressed my displeasure AND that they are imposing a 10.3% rate increase upon the premium that my company and I pay for coverage, I expressing my discontent in a public forum. I know that no one at Blue Shield of California experiences shame so the direct effect of my postings will be minimal BUT hopefully my rants will result in enough inquiry/work that BSoC realizes that it is in their best interest to do the ethical thing and stop dicking Cedars about AND my family can see their chosen doctors and medical staff.
Although I get the point that Obama's appointees (Sotomayor and Kagan) are far, far better than the Bush appointees (Roberts, Alito) I also understand there are many open seats on the Federa bench without appointments and Obama did not call for the resignation of the US Attorneys that passed Bush's political prosecution litmus tests (e.g Siegelman prosecutor). Obama re-appointed Bernanke to the Fed even though he failed to see the recession as late as March 2008. Obama left a Republican in charge of Defense and put more-of-the-same Geithner in charge of Treasury. Obama has defended the Bush rendition/torture/habeas corpus policies in court and was unable to utter the words 'public option' after becoming President. All that said, the Republicant minority has successfully stonewalled and slandered much of the little. marginal changes that were proposed or passed by Obama.
Outside the SCOTUS appointments, the real action is in Congress. The House has consistently passed more legislation than the Senate and it was more progressive in content too. The right wing noise machine will unload thousands of slick ads against House Democrats this fall. If your US Rep is to the left of Eisenhower (which Obama is not) then please consider supporting them and talking them up to friends and family. It is the only way we can beat the power of big money in our elections. And please remember your Democratic rep probably needs an extra 5 to 10% to beat the Republican and the proprietary voting machines.
You are being logical and reasonable . . . Hallmarks of a Liberal/Progressive mindset.
“BRAT TAX” speaks to the gut, triggering mindless emotions . . . The hallmark of communicating to Recessivists, Conservatives, and Authoritarians.
Pick up George Lakoff’s ‘Don't Thinkof anElephant!’ and his ‘MoralPolitics' or John Dean’s ‘ConservativesWithoutConscience‘.
The reason “BRAT TAX” fails to speak to you is that it designed not for you . . . BUT do not discount being able to re-write memes for folk less oriented to being logical and reasonable. Lots of folk don’t visit the factual world very often.
And amusingly enough, the lower RH corner of the California Driver's License reads: "This License is issued as a license to drive a motor vehicle. It does not establish eligibility fir employment, voter registration or public benefits." As I point out to my family here in California, we get pulled over in Arizona, we don't have any ID without the separate California State ID Card (it costs more too).
Memo to Congress: No more money for violence in Afghanistan and Iraq. I will pay for schools -- but not for more violence, nor violent contactors. We are creating our own enemies, and those that want endless war are the only winners. Every day, the Children lose.
Georgia caller Consequences not thought through. The real issue is that with no papers, you can be detained for no real crime, unless of course we make it a crime.
Comment I posted to California's Department of Managed Care's Comment Website - http://www.hmohelp.ca.gov/aboutthedmhc/gen/gen_hmohelp.aspx :
I am counting down the four days until Blue Shield of California destroys over two decades of continuity of care just to protect the executive bonus of Bruce Bodaken (Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) . . . So you can understand my rant:
Blue Shield of California AND Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates are in the middle of their biennial HMO Provider negotiations.
My company received a letter from Blue Shield, dated 05/28/10, notifying the company that Cedars-Sinai Health Associates/Cedars-Sinai Medical Group will no longer be a provider for Blue Shield. As Cedar-Sinai is one of the finest and largest medical providers in the entire country, it caused concern that Blue Shield appeared intent on blockading staff members of our company from seeking the best quality healthcare available in the local region. My company was left wondering what it said about worthiness of Blue Shield as a vendor that their reimbursement rates are unacceptable to such a quality institution. Frankly, my company paid $81,997.86 in 2009 and has paid $43 thousand in premiums this year to date and we were left questioning if our company’s premium dollars could be more wisely spent.
On a personal note: My family has received letters from both Blue Shield and Cedars Sinai describing the impasse in their negotiations. The letter from Blue Shield states that they will be transferring my family to another medical group on 08/01/10 . . . One that is over fifty miles from my home and with a far less than stellar reputation. From my point of view, this is an extremely poor provider choice. So I expressed to my insurance agency that I, personally, had less than zero interest ensuring the salary and bonuses of Blue Shield’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bruce Bodaken, at the expense of providing adequate healthcare for my beloved family.
My agent provided me a direct contact within Blue Shield of California so I could adequately express my personal discontent as I was sure that calling Customer Service would not allow me to efficiently and effectively communicate my personal views regarding the situation. Being helpful, my agent did so.
I recognize that the individual I spoke with is employed as a flack and it was her obligation to her company to diffuse dissatisfaction in Blue Shield’s customer base. Once I finally impressed upon her that I am an accounting and finance professional with almost two decades of experience and a business degree from Pepperdine University and actually do understand the process of (and the use of public opinion in) business negotiations, I believe that she did listen to my personal concerns. On the other hand, I was left with the distinct impression that Blue Shield will do as they see fit to ensure the paying for the overhead that represents their company and its profits.
In short, I was not placated but I believe that one person at Blue Shield might have heard me.
I read my company’s renewal letter from Mark Gastineau, Senior Vice President of Blue Shield of California at the mid July . . . Rate increase 10.3%. Services and definitions will be modified in their favor. Additionally, it turns out that if we re-up with them they will cut that increase by about half by lowering our risk profile . . . BUT will not state the quote of the rate increase that way SO other insurers are forced to quote us at the higher risk profile.
I recognize that with Blue Shield my company paid about 9.6% more in 2008 over 2009 AND although we have had less employees this year, my company is paying 5.3% more in 2010 than in 2009. While health insurance presently makes up 3.0% of my company‘s expenses, it remains important to employee satisfaction and retention.
To sum up the situation:
My overriding concern is that I remain interested in ensuring that my family receive effective, efficient and quality healthcare from the provider of my choice.
Given that their Blue Shield of California totally mishandled me when I expressed my displeasure AND that they are imposing a 10.3% rate increase upon the premium that my company and I pay for coverage, I am expressing my discontent in a public forum. My personal concerns with BSoC do not seem to be resolving. While these may not be the deciding factors on whether my company stays with BSOC, please, understand that I personally remain notably less than pleased.
In short, this situation is wholly unacceptable and definitely figures into the discussion of whether Blue Shield will continue as my company’s health insurance provider in the future. Both service and cost containment are important to my company. If it were solely up to me, BSoC would probably lose over $100K in premium next year.
It appears that no one in the upper echelons at Blue Shield of California experiences shame so the direct effect of my postings will be minimal BUT hopefully my rants will result in enough inquiry/work that BSoC realizes that it is in their best interest to do the ethical thing and stop Inappropriately handling Cedars AND my family can see their chosen doctors and medical staff.
1. It is not a Mosque that is being built at/near the old Twin Towers site . . . It is a community/cultural center focused on peaceful co-existence between all religions and designed to foster peace and understanding between people of all religions that happens to be being paid for by people of the Muslim faith.
2. The 09/11 Memorial is not a war memorial; it is the site of a horrific crime against all people that has been memorialized. To condemn the attempt of people to heal the wound inflicted is a disservice to people everywhere.
3. As a percentage of fatalities and injuries, more innocent U.S. Citizens of Moslem faith died and were injured in the 09/11 attacks than their percentage in the general population. The attacks were, also, a crime against peace-loving Muslims everywhere AND more especially here in the United States of America where we all enjoy freedom of religion. Their pain is no less real than that felt by the population-at-large and they have rights to the same freedoms earned through the expense of their blood as the rest of us.
4. The Torah teaches my tribe that we are to respect folk of all traditions because my people were once strangers in the land of Egypt . . . Unkind acts inspired by or inflicted because of xenophobia is not a Divine Commandment in any of the religions inspired by Abraham’s understanding of divine. This includes intentionally inflicted suicidal acts of mass murder AND protests inspired by the willfully imperfect understanding of the facts and other folk of differing traditions and backgrounds.
Sheriff Joe sure seems to be having problems finding laws against illegal employers, but no problem exaggerating existing laws against undocumented workers. I wonder what's keeping him from looking into the illegal employer problem and existing laws about it... I'm guessing a green veil and a bullies attitude. All I ever heard about Sheriff Joe, leads me to believe he's a pseudo sadist (and perhaps not even pseudo).
N
Gawd! These anti immigrant folks just have to shift the blame from one class of workers to another. The worst thing wrong with morons is morons with power.
He cannot be trusted!!! http://www.opednews.com/articles/America-s-Most-Dangerous-M-by-Rory-OConnor-100726-800.html
Can we really trust a Democrat in the White House, like Obama? His DNA is similar to Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II.
More killing of God's children! America's soul is damned for eternity!!! http://news.antiwar.com/2010/07/27/house-approves-more-afghan-war-funding/
Who will pay the health care bills? It won't be the rich, elites, and corporatists. It will be suckers like you and me.
Ocean Energy Institute Founder Matthew Simmons is another, telling Bloomberg we've killed the Gulf of Mexico - its $2.2 trillion economy by depleting oxygen, decimating aquatic life and poisoning the food chain. We've also created a public health crisis, problems showing up first in cleanup workers experiencing dizziness, fainting, nausea, nosebleeds, vomiting, coughing, headaches, stomach upset, and difficulty breathing, compounded by heat, fatigue, hydrocarbon smell, and combined toxicity of oil and dispersants.
Here is the second article. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Growing-Health-Crisis-in-t-by-Stephen-Lendman-100727-854.html
I would like to share with you two articles. I would also want to share with you two pet peeves. As you know, I love to piss off people. But, there are people who piss me off. The first people are the power elite who have no concern for the average person. The second person who is our commander-in-chief who goes to war recklessly with our all volunteer military and are placed in harm's way on a pack of lies. With an all voluteer military the commander needs to be very careful about starting a war.
Here is the first article. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Toxic-Black-Rain-Falling-I-by-Allen-L-Roland-100726-155.html
**Reflection of the Week** "The challenge of social justice is to evoke a sense of community that we need to make our nation a better place, just as we make it a safer place." - Marian Wright Edelman
PROTESTS FORCE OBAMITES TO BACK DOWN ON JOURNALIST BAN Xi Yu, Harvard Crimson - A Colombian journalist who was denied entrance to the United States has finally been granted his student visa to participate in a journalism fellowship at Harvard, according to an e-mail sent this morning to the organizations and individuals who rallied to his aid.
Hollman Morris Rincon, a Nieman Fellow for the 2010-2011 year, expressed "solidarity" with those who supported his career in "defending the truth and human rights" in his objective reporting of the sufferings and ravages of the war in Colombia, stated his e-mail, which was written in Spanish.
The acclaimed human rights reporter and producer of an independent television news program was denied a student visa by the Department of State on "security-related grounds."
A reporter known for his critical coverage of Colombia President Alvaro Uribe Velez’s administration, Morris developed connections with sources who did not support the outgoing president—a move that could have been interpreted as terrorist activity, according to Nieman Curator Robert H. Giles.
The decision by the federal government had prompted several journalism and human rights organizations to rally behind Morris' situation.
“The denial is alarming,” Giles wrote in a tersely-worded editorial expressing the far-reaching impacts on freedom of speech. “It would represent a major recasting of press freedom doctrine if journalists, by establishing contacts with so-called terrorist organizations in the process of gathering news, open themselves to accusations of terrorist activities and the possibility of being barred from travel to the United States.”
Thom Hartman Show,
"Corrupted by wealth and power, your government is like a restaurant with only one dish. They've got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side. But no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen." - Huey Long
Dear Thom,
I hate to say it, but just like Ed Shultz and Raechel Maddow, you are sounding more and more like a Democratic version of FOX News and just a puppet mouthpiece and apologist. For example, today you said Republicans are corporatist and implied that the Obama Administration isn't. That is pure BS and you know it! Here are some facts that you and people like Ed Shultz and Raechel Maddow selectively do not report on:
Obama has gone after more whistle blowers than all previous President's combined. So much for his "transparent government." He is worse than "W" on this!
He also held sixty-five private meetings with insurance execs and made a back-room deal to kill the public option and competition between providers. He then guaranteed the largest public subsidy in that industry's history. Transparent government? Sure.... Dick Cheny's Energy Taskforce anyone?
He broke the law along with Ken Salazar in permitting the Mocondo oil rig. And, that's why there will never be a criminal investigation of BP because if there is, it won't just be BP personnel who will be charged. I helped write sections of NEPA regarding environmental, social, and economic impact requirements and I know what I'm talking about. Ken Salazar actually ramped up the granting of "categorical exclusions" at a faster clip than even "W's" Administration. In the case of deep water drilling in a sensitive ecology, the granting of a categorical exclusion is quite illegal! He is worse than Bush on this as well.
It just came out that he and his generals have been lying to the public about the conduct of the Afghanistan War. I applaud WIKI leaks. They are heros and Obama is a war monger!
He said he would stop medicinal marijuana raids in places like California where medicinal pot is legal. The latest raid conducted by the DEA in Northern Cal. occurred just three and a half weeks ago. The grower was a medicinal supplier with all the required permits and papers. State regulators were even on site when the Feds showed up and they could do nothing to stop this insult.
While Wachovia laundered $380B in Mexican Cocaine Cartel money through Wells Fargo and Wall Street. Obama has renominated "W's" DEA chief under who's watch the pot raids and the money laundering occurred. Are you familiar with Michael Rupert? It turns out he was right the whole time. And, the money laundering occurred under Obama as well. You can't tell me that's another "oops!"
$380B is half the GDP of Mexico and they were only fined $160M by the Obama Administration - WTF?
The so called, "Financial Reform Bill" was stripped of the Glass Stegall protections by Tim Geithner and Rham Emmanuel. And what the hell is a person like Rham Emannuel, with dual loyalties, doing in such a powerful position. Is Obama running his government or is AIPAC?
To wit:
U.S. SPY SYSTEM OUT OF CONTROL
ACLU - The Washington Post has issued a major new investigative report on what it calls “Top Secret America” — a geographically sprawling network of secret government agencies with a budget of $75 billion. Based on the Post’s reporting, it is no exaggeration to say that our secret intelligence establishment has spun out of control.
The report — the first in a series of three to be published this week — contains amazing new hard reporting that confirms what has long been known to those who pay attention.
The fact is, bureaucracies almost always seek to expand their own power and budgets. Add secrecy powers that protect them from independent public oversight, ineffective oversight by Congress and even from within the executive branch, and mix in ever-expanding budgets, and you’ve got a recipe for an out-of-control security establishment:
• The Post reports that 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence at 10,000 locations across the United States.
•
• Two-thirds of the intelligence programs reside in the Department of Defense — a worrisome militarization of our intelligence capabilities, especially at a time when those capabilities are increasingly being turned inward upon the American people.
•
• The $75 billion intelligence budget is 2 ½ times its size before 9/11. The budget of the NSA doubled between 2002 and today.
•
• There is no person or agency with the “authority, responsibility or a process in place to coordinate all these activities,” in the words of one official. “There's only one entity in the entire universe that has visibility on all” secret programs, the Obama administration's nominee to be the next director of national intelligence told the Post. “That’s God.” However, since men are not angels, as James Madison wrote, checks and balances on government power are crucial, and that state of affairs is frightening and unacceptable.
•
• Since there is no one overseeing all this, there is also no way of knowing how effective it all is. One top general complained to the Post, for example, that the National Counterterrorism Center “never produced one shred of information that helped me prosecute three wars!”
The Post paints a stark portrait of hundreds of government agencies drowning in data, as government systems vacuum up vast quantities of information about daily activities across the planet in the unlikely hope of discovering useful information. Unsurprisingly, the government cannot possibly make sense of all that data:
- The National Security Agency is intercepting 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other communications per day.
- Analysts publish 50,000 intelligence reports each year.
Posted by TPR at 7/20/2010
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
1 comments:
Simple Country Physicist said...
Back when I was a fairly young employee of the Yankee government, back during Containment, I heard a suggestion made that we should add the Kremlin to the distribution list of all USG reports, memoranda, .... The idea was to inundate them with information overload. Somehow analysis and operational research have been lost.
July 20, 2010 8:02 AM
Post a Comment
Newer Post Older Post Home
Posted by Zach Carter at 12:36 pm
July 17, 2010
13 COMMENTS
Elizabeth Warren vs. Timothy Geithner
A lot of people have rightfully scolded Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for attempting to block Elizabeth Warren’s nomination to head the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Here’s what I have to add: What a whiny cry-baby wimp.
Geithner only has to answer to two people, the President of the United States and the Chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Only one of those people openly criticizes him in public when he commits unbelievable, disastrous errors. Guess which one?
So of course Geithner is pushing against Warren. She holds him accountable to the public, and he doesn’t want to be held accountable. Geithner is acting like a vindictive baby, trying to dish-out some payback at someone who highlighted very real failures that he himself orchestrated (stress tests, foreclosures, AIG . . . nearly everything that was screwed up under TARP). He deserves the public flogging he’s receiving, and he really ought to be stripped of his post for so transparently playing personal politics with national policy.
Incidentally, this embarassing little farce of Geithner’s should give Warren more credibility to head the new bureau. It proves that she is willing to stand up to powerful people and make them uncomfortable, which is exactly what the head of the CFPB will have to do in order to be effective.
The Warren appointment really will be a litmus test for the Obama administration. It’s not a progressive litmus test– she’s profoundly popular on the left, right and center, because she understands working people and is one of the few public figures willing to defend them against Wall Street lobbyists. But it will be a test of whether Obama can do the right thing in the face of opposition from a single, powerful corporate interest group (bankers). Business does not oppose her– small businesses, in fact, love her, because they know she’ll stand up for them against unscrupulous lenders. It’s really just the big banks that are allied against her. And Warren is so clearly the best candidate for the job– she invented the very idea of a consumer regulator for finance– that appointing anyone else will be a transparent political ploy. If Obama doesn’t have the guts to stand behind an enormously popular and effective public figure in the face of opposition from the very industry she will be charged with regulating, it will say a great deal about his capacity as a leader.
Last year Pres. Obama and AG Eric Holder promised that the feds would not go after medical marijuana providers in states with medical marijuana laws so long as
orangepunch.ocregisOrange Punch: Rogue DEA defies Obamater.com/2010/02/16/.../17561 - 109k - Cached
Obama To Nominate Acting DEA Chief Leonhart For Post – Main ...
Obama To Nominate Acting DEA Chief Leonhart For Post. By Andrew ... Acting chief Michele Leonhart became a DEA agent in 1980, rising through the ranks to ...
mainjustice.com/2010/01/26/obama-to-nominate-acting-dea-chief... - Cached
Wall Street Is Laundering Drug Money And Getting Away With It ...
Jul 14, 2010 ... I remember him doing a stand up bit on banks who launder drug money and how to stop the drug war. Just pick someone at Wachovia Bank and ...
cannabisculture.com/.../Wall-Street-Laundering-Drug-Money-And-Getting-Away-It - 16 hours ago
Mexican army soldiers guard the scene after Monday's assassination of Rodolfo Torre Cantu, a candidate for governor of the state of Tamaulipas. Drug cartel gunmen are suspected of ambushing Torre Cantu's convoy outside Ciudad Victoria.
CAPTION
By Agencia Contraluz/AP
Wachovia regularly helped move money for Mexican drug cartels, the bank's parent, Wells Fargo, has admitted in a deal with federal prosecutors, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August issue
The deal, struck in March, "sheds light on the largely undocumented role of U.S. banks in contributing to the violent drug trade that has convulsed Mexico for the past four years," Bloomberg writes.
Wachovia, which San Francisco-based Wells Fargo bought in 2008 amid the financial crisis, admitted it "didn't do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That's the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history -- a sum equal to one-third of Mexico's current gross domestic product," according to Bloomberg.
"Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor who handled the case, told Bloomberg.
Bloomberg tells how Mexican soldiers seized a DC-9 jet after it landed in April 2006 at the international airport in Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City: "They found 128 black suitcases, packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found."
They also found that the smugglers had bought the jet with laundered funds they transferred through Wachovia and Bank of America, both headquartered in Charlotte, N.C. The plane was one of four that narcotraffickers bought and used to ship a total of 22 tons of cocaine.
People working for Mexican cartels deposited illegal funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009, and Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at HSBC Holdings, Europe's biggest bank by assets, U.S. and Mexican prosecutors found. But neither bank was accused of wrongdoing. Spokespeople for the banks said laws prevent them from discussing the cases.
Miles Mogulescu
Entertainment attorney, writer, and political activist
For months I've been reporting in The Huffington Post that President Obama made a backroom deal last summer with the for-profit hospital lobby that he would make sure there would be no national public option in the final health reform legislation. (See here, here and here). I've been increasingly frustrated that except for an initial story last August in the New York Times, no major media outlet has picked up this important story and investigated further.
Hopefully, that's changing. On Monday, Ed Shultz interviewed New York Times Washington reporter David Kirkpatrick on his MSNBC TV show, and Kirkpatrick confirmed the existence of the deal. Shultz quoted Chip Kahn, chief lobbyist for the for-profit hospital industry on Kahn's confidence that the White House would honor the no public option deal, and Kirkpatrick responded:
"That's a lobbyist for the hospital industry and he's talking about the hospital industry's specific deal with the White House and the Senate Finance Committee and, yeah, I think the hospital industry's got a deal here. There really were only two deals, meaning quid pro quo handshake deals on both sides, one with the hospitals and the other with the drug industry. And I think what you're interested in is that in the background of these deals was the presumption, shared on behalf of the lobbyists on the one side and the White House on the other, that the public option was not going to be in the final product."
Kirkpatrick also reported in his original New York Times article that White House was standing behind the deal with the for-profit hospitals: "Not to worry, Jim Messina, the deputy White House chief of staff, told the hospital lobbyists, according to White House officials and lobbyists briefed on the call. The White House was standing behind the deal".
This should be big news. Even while President Obama was saying that he thought a public option was a good idea and encouraging supporters to believe his healthcare plan would include one, he had promised for-profit hospital lobbyists that there would be no public option in the final bill.
The media should be digging deeper into this story. Washington reporters should be asking Robert Gibbs if President Obama is still honoring this deal. They should be calling Jim Messina and hospital lobbyist Chip Kahn to confirm the specifics of the deal. They should be asking Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leaders Dick Durbin and Harry Reid the extent of their knowledge of this deal. They should be asking Pelosi if the reason she's refusing to include a public option in the House reconciliation bill to be sent to the Senate is that there are at least 51 Senate Democrats who would vote for it and she needs to insure that a final bill with a public option does not end up on President Obama's desk where he would then have to break his deal with the hospital lobbyists and sign it, or veto it to honor his deal.
More deeply, there are serious questions about the extent to which Obama, with the help of Rahm Emanuel, used a K Street strategy to pursue health care reform. The strategy seems to have been to make backroom deals to protect the interests of the likes of the drug industry and the for-profit hospital industry in exchange for campaign cash, even if this meant reversing campaign promises to include a public option to put competitive pressure on private insurance premiums, and to allow Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices and Americans to buy cheaper drugs from Canada. The result is a health care bill that is generally unpopular with voters. Questions need to be asked, too, about the extent to which the White House is following a similar K Street strategy with Wall Street financiers when it comes to shaping financial reform and new regulations to rein in the banks who brought the economy to its knees.
Voters viscerally sense that the White House and Congressional Democrats may be as concerned with protecting special interests -- whether it's drug companies, private hospitals, or Wall Street bank -- than they are with protecting the people, and this is feeding a populist backlash against Democrats that resulted in Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts and is making a Democratic bloodbath in the fall elections increasingly likely.
Polls indicate that about 60% of voters support a public option while only about 1/3 support the overall Democratic healthcare bill. There still time -- very little time -- for Democrats to shift course and include a public option in the final bill, even if it means going back on the White House's backroom deal with the hospital industry. If the media picks up on this story, perhaps the White House and Congressional Democrats can be embarrassed into changing course. If, on the other hand, Democrats continue to honor these special interest deals, then passing an unpopular health care bill may just be walking into a Republican trap.
Barack Obama reverses campaign promise and approves offshore ...
Mar 31, 2010 ... Barack Obama reverses campaign promise and approves offshore drilling. President allows oil and gas exploration off several coastal areas to ...
www.guardian.co.uk/.../barack-obama-drilling-offshore-approves - Cached
Barack Obama Reverses Campaign Promise and Approves Offshore ...
Mar 31, 2010 ... Barack Obama Reverses Campaign Promise and Approves Offshore Drilling. President allows oil and gas exploration off several coastal areas to ...
www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/31 - Cached
The Spill, The Scandal and the President | Rolling Stone Politics
Jun 8, 2010 ... This article originally appeared in RS 1107 from June 24, 2010. ..... But when Rolling Stone asked MMS whether BP had the required ...
www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/111965 - Cached
BP's Next Disaster | Rolling Stone Politics
Jun 23, 2010 ... The Spill, The Scandal and the President: How Obama let BP ...
www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/120130
Dereliction of Duty | Rolling Stone Politics
Jun 24, 2010 ... be BP and president Obama and all his generals and admi. ...
www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/121436
More results from rollingstone.com »
Oil-coated baby dolphin carried to shore by tourist dies (VIDEO ...
Jun 24, 2010 ... Oiled dolphin's rescue ends in death (PHOTO), Pensacola News Journal, June 24, 2010 Christy Travis first saw oil splotched along the beach ...
www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/dead-oil-coated-baby-dolphin-carried-to-shore-by-tourist-photos-dolphin-was-crying-as-people-oil-off-coast-guard... - Cached
BP is Burning Sea Turtles Alive [VIDEO]
BP is Burning Sea Turtles Alive: Mike Ellis is a boat captain who's been rescuing the endangered Kemp's Ridley sea turtles near Deepwater Horizon.
www.buzzfeed.com/turtlefeed/bp-is-burning-turtles-ruc - Cached
The oil spill's forgotten victims-- Gulf Coast pets
Jul 13, 2010 ... He could no longer afford to even feed his loving companions that he ... Donation programs such as this can help keep these pets in their loving homes. ... Residents throughout the region, including those in Southwest ...
www.examiner.com/x-55867-Ft-Myers-Gulf-Oil-Spill-Examiner~y2010m7d11-The-oil-spills-forgotten-victims-Gulf-Coast... - Cached
Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - Reporter's Notebook: Oil and ...
Jul 14, 2010 ... The shelter we visited is not a no-kill shelter and almost every cage was taken. ... I don't know who to feel more compassion for – the pets or the poor owners ... hear of more sufferings trickling down from the oil spill in the gulf. To the innocent animals whose owners can not afford to keep them ...
ac360.blogs.cnn.com/.../reporters-notebook-oil-and-the-family-pet/ - 17 hours ago - Add to iGoogle
Obama Still Believes in Off-Shore Oil Drilling - Political Punch
President Barack Obama says despite a massive oil spill in the Gulf, he still believes that responsible off-shore oil drilling is an ..... or is this another case of a Republican pushing a Big Lie and hoping no one bothers to ... As the damage from this disaster becomes more apparent, it will be very clear the ...
blogs.abcnews.com/.../obama-still-believes-in-offshore-oil-drilling.html - Cached
I would like to know what inflationary impact of having the masses invest in stocks will have on those stock prices and who is most likely to gain from it. I remember thinking Japan's stock market was grossly overvalued ~20-30 years ago and how everyone in Japan was a "good saver" and invested in it. I think today's market is overvalued and will only get worse with trillions of dollars pouring in. Of course if you are already heavily invested, and clever, you will benefit handsomely.
I have been around plumbing a lot in my life and there is only one thing that trickles down, and it definitely ain't green!
So you all understand my rambling healthcare rants:
Blue Shield of California AND Cedars Sinai Medical Group and Cedars Sinai Health Associates are in the middle of their biennial HMO Provider negotiations:
Given that their Blue Shield of California totally mishandled me when I expressed my displeasure AND that they are imposing a 10.3% rate increase upon the premium that my company and I pay for coverage, I expressing my discontent in a public forum. I know that no one at Blue Shield of California experiences shame so the direct effect of my postings will be minimal BUT hopefully my rants will result in enough inquiry/work that BSoC realizes that it is in their best interest to do the ethical thing and stop dicking Cedars about AND my family can see their chosen doctors and medical staff.
What he said ^^ Thank you kyslim for the conversational ammo.
Although I get the point that Obama's appointees (Sotomayor and Kagan) are far, far better than the Bush appointees (Roberts, Alito) I also understand there are many open seats on the Federa bench without appointments and Obama did not call for the resignation of the US Attorneys that passed Bush's political prosecution litmus tests (e.g Siegelman prosecutor). Obama re-appointed Bernanke to the Fed even though he failed to see the recession as late as March 2008. Obama left a Republican in charge of Defense and put more-of-the-same Geithner in charge of Treasury. Obama has defended the Bush rendition/torture/habeas corpus policies in court and was unable to utter the words 'public option' after becoming President. All that said, the Republicant minority has successfully stonewalled and slandered much of the little. marginal changes that were proposed or passed by Obama.
Outside the SCOTUS appointments, the real action is in Congress. The House has consistently passed more legislation than the Senate and it was more progressive in content too. The right wing noise machine will unload thousands of slick ads against House Democrats this fall. If your US Rep is to the left of Eisenhower (which Obama is not) then please consider supporting them and talking them up to friends and family. It is the only way we can beat the power of big money in our elections. And please remember your Democratic rep probably needs an extra 5 to 10% to beat the Republican and the proprietary voting machines.
@speedbird9: I carry my passport when I travel to Arizona.
SysBanana,
You are being logical and reasonable . . . Hallmarks of a Liberal/Progressive mindset.
“BRAT TAX” speaks to the gut, triggering mindless emotions . . . The hallmark of communicating to Recessivists, Conservatives, and Authoritarians.
Pick up George Lakoff’s ‘Don't Think of an Elephant!’ and his ‘Moral Politics' or John Dean’s ‘Conservatives Without Conscience‘.
The reason “BRAT TAX” fails to speak to you is that it designed not for you . . . BUT do not discount being able to re-write memes for folk less oriented to being logical and reasonable. Lots of folk don’t visit the factual world very often.
And amusingly enough, the lower RH corner of the California Driver's License reads: "This License is issued as a license to drive a motor vehicle. It does not establish eligibility fir employment, voter registration or public benefits." As I point out to my family here in California, we get pulled over in Arizona, we don't have any ID without the separate California State ID Card (it costs more too).
Memo to Congress: No more money for violence in Afghanistan and Iraq. I will pay for schools -- but not for more violence, nor violent contactors. We are creating our own enemies, and those that want endless war are the only winners. Every day, the Children lose.
The Pritzker (not "Pritzer") family founded & owns Hyatt Hotels. They're not involved with the Hilton chain.