Yes! It's a sign of unity.
82%
No! The two sides are different and should sit on opposite sides.
18%
Asked on Jan. 14, 2011 8:53 am
Comments
Thom's Blog Is On the Move

By webmaster
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
At Mondragon - both the mountain and the cooperative city - in Spain (written about in "Threshold" book)
With His Holiness The Dalai Lama, at His home in Dharamsala, India (Synthesis Dialogues - made into a movie narrated by Harrison Ford)
Thom & Louise at a "private audience" with His Holiness Pope John Paul II at his summer palace, Castle Gandolfo, Italy
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
—Dean Baker, economist and author of Plunder and Blunder, False Profits, and Taking Economics Seriously
From Screwed:
"I think many of us recognize that for all but the wealthiest, life in America is getting increasingly hard. Screwed explores why, showing how this is no accidental process, but rather the product of conscious political choices, choices we can change with enough courage and commitment. Like all of Thom’s great work, it helps show us the way forward."
—Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen and The Impossible Will Take a Little While
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a literary descendent of Ben Franklin and Tom Paine. His unflinching observations and deep passion inspire us to explore contemporary culture, politics, and economics; challenge us to face the facts of the societies we are creating; and empower us to demand a better world for our children and grandchildren."
—John Perkins, author of the New York Times bestselling book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
The Hartmann Report
Thom's Daily Newsletter of Renaissance Thinking about Progressive Politics, Economics, Science, and the Political News Issues of Our Day.
© 2026 Mythical Intelligence, inc.
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT


I suggest that scattered seating should be the routine, when in session.
Arranged geographically to roughly represent a population-skewed map of the country would be interesting. Neighbors having to sit with neighbors might affect behavior in a good way.
It is a very good idea, that is why the Republicans will say "NO."
Intermixing the two parties to give the appearance of unity does NOT create unity. However... it does camouflage the disparity... which is exactly what the republicans would want. After all... "both sides do it".
If they are interspersed... when the screamers scream louder... it will look and sound like the entire body is in "unity"... when the reality is far from that.
Keep them apart so the viewers... the voters... can clearly see who supports what... who is trying to build... and who is trying to destroy.
DON'T GET SUCKED INTO THIS. It sounds good... but it will yeild nothing but distortion of the reality.
This is a very good idea. While it may be largely symbolic, it does send a very positive message to the nation.
But for those who hate the idea of American unity, I can see how this may be threatening.
In theory, this sounds like the right thing. However, I remain cynical about this idea from the Republican standpoint. They don't want unity and cooperation. Their only goal is to bring down this president.
The party labels, Democrat and Republican, are abstractions that do not reflect the actual position of each representative. Within each party you have centrist, liberals, and conservatives. For example, to label all Republicans as conservatives does not reflect reality. Each House Representative represents districts whose constituent's beliefs and position vary with each issue. That difference of opinion on various issues becomes even greater within each state and each state Senator in Congress must account for those differences. For that reason, there is no logic and reason for the parties to sit separately during the State of Union Message. If you want to create a culture of debate and compromise in Congress, you don't create fences or borders that only separate and distance political representative from arriving at solutions to various issues.
Leaders lead; this country needs more than just shows of civility, and I think that sitting with one another is important to the practice of being civil, maybe even respectful.
It would be much harder to slight a leader of the opposing party, if one was sitting right next to members of that party. Congress needs to keep stretching themselves, and growing up, a s w e a l l d o .