Yes! It's a sign of unity.
82%
No! The two sides are different and should sit on opposite sides.
18%
Asked on Jan. 14, 2011 8:53 am
Comments
Thom's Blog Is On the Move

By webmaster
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
At Mondragon - both the mountain and the cooperative city - in Spain (written about in "Threshold" book)
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Through compelling personal stories, Hartmann presents a dramatic and deeply disturbing picture of humans as a profoundly troubled species. Hope lies in his inspiring vision of our enormous unrealized potential and his description of the path to its realization."
—David Korten, author of Agenda for a New Economy, The Great Turning, and When Corporations Rule the World
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"In an age rife with media-inspired confusion and political cowardice, we yearn for a decent, caring, deeply human soul whose grasp of the problems confronting us provides a light by which we can make our way through the quagmire of lies, distortions, pandering, and hollow self-puffery that strips the American Dream of its promise. How lucky we are, then, to have access to the wit, wisdom, and willingness of Thom Hartmann, who shares with us here that very light, grown out of his own life experience."
—Mike Farrell, actor, political activist, and author of Just Call Me Mike and Of Mule and Man
From Screwed:
"Hartmann speaks with the straight talking clarity and brilliance of a modern day Tom Paine as he exposes the intentional and systematic destruction of America’s middle class by an alliance of political con artists and outlines a program to restore it. This is Hartmann at his best. Essential reading for those interested in restoring the institution that made America the envy of the world."
—David C. Korten, author of The Great Turning and When Corporations Rule the World
Thom Hartmann Newsletter
Don’t miss out again. Receive our daily rundown of news, show highlights and random musings.
© 2026 Mythical Intelligence, inc.
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT


I suggest that scattered seating should be the routine, when in session.
Arranged geographically to roughly represent a population-skewed map of the country would be interesting. Neighbors having to sit with neighbors might affect behavior in a good way.
It is a very good idea, that is why the Republicans will say "NO."
Intermixing the two parties to give the appearance of unity does NOT create unity. However... it does camouflage the disparity... which is exactly what the republicans would want. After all... "both sides do it".
If they are interspersed... when the screamers scream louder... it will look and sound like the entire body is in "unity"... when the reality is far from that.
Keep them apart so the viewers... the voters... can clearly see who supports what... who is trying to build... and who is trying to destroy.
DON'T GET SUCKED INTO THIS. It sounds good... but it will yeild nothing but distortion of the reality.
This is a very good idea. While it may be largely symbolic, it does send a very positive message to the nation.
But for those who hate the idea of American unity, I can see how this may be threatening.
In theory, this sounds like the right thing. However, I remain cynical about this idea from the Republican standpoint. They don't want unity and cooperation. Their only goal is to bring down this president.
The party labels, Democrat and Republican, are abstractions that do not reflect the actual position of each representative. Within each party you have centrist, liberals, and conservatives. For example, to label all Republicans as conservatives does not reflect reality. Each House Representative represents districts whose constituent's beliefs and position vary with each issue. That difference of opinion on various issues becomes even greater within each state and each state Senator in Congress must account for those differences. For that reason, there is no logic and reason for the parties to sit separately during the State of Union Message. If you want to create a culture of debate and compromise in Congress, you don't create fences or borders that only separate and distance political representative from arriving at solutions to various issues.
Leaders lead; this country needs more than just shows of civility, and I think that sitting with one another is important to the practice of being civil, maybe even respectful.
It would be much harder to slight a leader of the opposing party, if one was sitting right next to members of that party. Congress needs to keep stretching themselves, and growing up, a s w e a l l d o .