Mexico's population was so sparse I don't think it had the people to guard its vast borders. If it hadn't been the United States someone else would've taken it from them.
I'd like to have left the continent to the indigenous inhabitants but, realistically, there's no way that was gonna happen..
Mark I guess time will tell. You are right I should not pre judge. As far a Canada goes every province delivers health care at a different level. Some better then others.
I think this may be another example of your illogic, Kend. Usually you're feigning stupidity, this time I think it might be the drinks you had last night hanging over. It does not necessarily follow at all that level of care has to go down if cost doesn't go up. The cost of health care in the U.S., hitherto, has been largely administrative. ACA mandates that 80% of the money insurance companies take in go to actual care provision and not to the administering of insurance or the CEO's salary like it did before. Even better would be excluding private insurance all together and giving it all to the government. That would bring the administrative cost to 3% and 97% would go to care.
I don't accept that the level of care would go down. I hear very different reports from other Canadians about their healthcare system and I lived in West Germany and heard no complaints about their system, however, I hear very MANY complaints about our healthcare system from visitors from Canada, Germany and elsewhere.
Our level of care is good only for the rich. It's often already pretty dismal for everyone else.
That's right Kend. The United States took half of Mexico - which was also sparsely populated and still relatively is in many parts - in 1846. We were manifesting our destiny.
This is why many Mexicans feel entitled to come to live in places like California which some of them call "occupied Mexico".
I often wish you Canadians had at some point over run and conquered us and civilized our savage asses.
DAnne, Americans apparently didn't care about the less fortunate prior to ACA. So you are going to add millions of people that could not afford insurance, or that had pre existing conditions and could not be insured to the system. Your president said your cost will not go up. So if the cost doesn't go up care level will go down. What am I missing?
Quote Kend:DAnne, I believe in single payer for basic health but there has to be a mix of private and public. Canada is the only country in the world that has only public And it isn't working very well. I should say since a supreme court decession in the 1990's we do have private clinics for non life threatening surgeries like knees and shoulders. As we have waiting lists for up to a year for those in some parts of Canada.
I think what Americans are missing with ACA is although everyone is covered I am very confident your level of care will drop. It has everywhere else in the world.
Kend ~ I fail to see what you mean by "level of care will drop." The way I see it, any care is a far higher level of care than no care. Unless, of course, you mean for the fortunate people who already are blessed with care? If that is the case, shame on you.
You don't have to worry about private insurance. There will always be a fair market for them to exist--just like they exist in Mexico and many other countries--in check. They can compete with private clinics and hospitals who also exist in Mexico as well. Prices at those institutions are affordable. Imagine that! The only thing that will be lacking is the monopoly over all health care private insurance used to enjoy in this country; and, the lack of competition that enables them to charge anything they want for coverage. The situation overall will dramatically improve for everyone. I have no doubt we will ever question that.
We can all thank the private insurance industry for one thing--the existence of Medicare. If it wasn't for the obtuse and shortsighted greed of the unchecked insurance industry there never would have been the profit hungry desire to boot all the most costly customers off the insurance claim payrolls. Thanks to the insurance industries blind greed and shortsightedness we already have in place a functional and proven single-payer health care system in this country; that, when push comes to shove will easily take over for the ACA. Thank you, health insurance industry. The only thing you've ever done right. The party's over.
Palindromedary ~ Thanks for the heads up on that JFK docudrama. I don't have the dish and will be busy at that time tonight anyway. I look forward to hearing what you think about it. From the description it sounds exceedingly hokey as hell, indeed. Another attempt at fooling the public into the idea that the fatal shot came from behind. Really? If that is the main plot you are probably right that it is more CIA sponsored disinformation than anything else. COINTELPRO and our tax dollars at work. But then, who knows. We must keep an open mind at all times. One will have to check it out before officially making that claim. I'll be sure to check back here when I get home tonight to see what you thought. Thanks again!
DAnne, I believe in single payer for basic health but there has to be a mix of private and public. Canada is the only country in the world that has only public And it isn't working very well. I should say since a supreme court decession in the 1990's we do have private clinics for non life threatening surgeries like knees and shoulders. As we have waiting lists for up to a year for those in some parts of Canada.
I think what Americans are missing with ACA is although everyone is covered I am very confident your level of care will drop. It has everywhere else in the world.
Ok Mark you are correct. , yes Canada was a British colony at that time we became indepented in 1867. but the French where there as well and Canada was just starting to find its identity. The French , independents and Indians that joined the British to fight for Canada's independence from the US. Although America was at war with the British it still wanted to take upper and lower Canada as it was even then loaded with trade items. America did attack the Canada's and was defeated mostly by terrible errors by the US military. Canada's army was out manned 3 to 1 but still won. I had relatives in Canada at that time as I am a fifith generation born Canadian. Very rare here At my age. How different America would be if they didn't drop the ball back then. Eh
Just a reminder for all you JFK conspiracy fans...yet another docudrama about the assassination of JFK will premier tonight on REELZ (299 on Dish). I don't know much about this except for the little I have read. Something like the Australian police investigator turned author after investigating for 4 years and after getting hold of all the released Warren Commission evidence that was supposed to be locked up for 75 years believes that there was a conspiracy...that Oswald did do the first shot and may have missed...and then another shot came from a secret service agent from one of the tailing cars. It went off accidentally? Hitting the President? I don't know if this is what the movie is trying to say but it sounds hokey as hell. Maybe that's what it is meant to do...
Anyway, I'll be watching to see what the movie is really about. It comes on tonight, Sunday Nov 3, at 7:00PM PST.
Aliceinwonderland ~ Sorry for taking your problem lightly. Personally, I'm terrified from the effects that billions of tonnes of radioactive water dumped off the coast of Japan every day is going to have on the entire west coast of America; and, eventually the entire world. Already I have given up any dreams of ever retiring in Hawaii. My favorite seafood treats are no more than a sweet memory. Forgive me if I look at the LNG like "spitting in the ocean." I have to remind myself that smaller scale problems are still quite serious. The last thing we need to do is to become discouraged with our struggle against the beast of industrialization.
I suppose if I were in your shoes--and for all practical purposes I am--the first thing I would try is to circulate a petition to ban LNG development in the local paper; or, gather signatures by sending reps to all your local markets. At least, that it what we are doing here to prevent fracking in the SF Bay Area. You could also try an online petition and advertise about it on billboards around the area. Take out an add in the local newspaper or newsletter. Put the petition on your own blog with a simple to remember URL. Announce it at community or city hall meetings so you can meet and join forces with other like-minded citizens. All things considered, you are still doing much more than most by simply making your opinion heard with your blog posts. Keep up the good work and kudos. If we can do it here you should be able to do it there. The best of luck!
The SF Bay Area is no stranger to industrial pollution. However, until now, other than a dirty feeling I've never before been afraid to stick my foot in the water. Alameda beach used to be one of my favorite hangouts when I was a kid. My father and I used to catch our own bait in the low tide flats along the marina in Berkeley and then fish with it at the pier the following day at high tide. The water always had a nasty, oily smell. We were afraid to eat the fish because they were all discolored with industrial pollution. We weren't afraid to touch them though; or, to touch the water. That's a modern fear. Oh, how the world has changed for the worst in such a short period of time thanks to greed and shortsightedness. One interesting note: Regardless of your success with an anti-LNG petition, we may all find ourselves being forced to move to Oklahoma in the not too distant future. If we are lucky, that is. Let us pray I am wrong.
Here's the bigger picture regarding the US Default kabuki theatre (just part of the usual neoliberal ploys to give state wealth to big business and finance at the expense of the people):
There is zero difference between the majority of Democrats and Republicans. There are or were a few good people from both parties but they're a dying breed -- Dennis Kucinich screwed by his own party :(
"Funny", unless you happen to be living in the viscinityt of such a threat. Then it isn't so funny. And to be perfectly frank, this terrifies me. - AIW
Aliceinwonderland ~ Funny story! Sounds like "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots" is actually "TrappedInAHouseFullOfMirrors." Poor guy. Everywhere he turns there is some idiot staring back at him. He probably doesn't have any windows either. Probably why he is such an expert in natural gas--it isn't just baloney that he is full of.
By the way, thanks for the support on Campaign Finance Reform. It seems like a lot of us already are on that boat. Lets keep that ship a' floating.
Kend ~ It looks like we finally agree about something--Single-Payer Health care for all. Thanks for thinking the problem through. I agree, that is going to have to be the final answer. Thanks for the input.
The beat goes on! And on! And on! What follows is more bullshit crap from Jordan Cove's shills, on that blog page our local newspaper "The World"displays online. Includes my rebuttals:
The project includes a power plant that will generate 420 MW, with the capability to support economic development in Coos Bay. Will lead to a redevelopment and modernization of the Port of Coos Bay’s facilities, helping it attract importers and exporters of other goods. 146 direct jobs, 54 indirect jobs paid by Jordan Cove (Sheriff’s deputies, firefighters, tugboat crews and emergency planners), 404 other indirect jobs and 182 induced jobs for a total of over 750 total family-wage jobs. - DannyGS
LIES, LIES, LIES! Don't fall for it, folks. - AIW
Tourism, tourism.... Why is it everyone who opposes LNG states it will hurt tourism? What tourism?? We are not a vacation hot spot and we will never be one. Our community was originally build around industry not tourism. When industry was ran out of the area this community died. There is no work or future here for our youth so they all grow up to be useless dope smoking, alcoholic, tweekers on welfare and that is all due to the "we are a resort town" mentality. WE NEED JOBS, WE NEED LNG!!!! - "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots"
Dear "Trapped", how about untrapping yourself with a one-way ticket to Bora Bora? - AIW
Oh and I just love how all these people who know nothing about the natural gas industry are all over night experts because they got learned by someone, who got learned by someone, who likes to tell people that LNG is the Devil because LNG doesn't help them make money because they invested in a golf course and their abuse of tax payer money lead to the eye sour that we call our new airport... Anyone feeling like having italian food? We need industry to save our community, not tourists. - "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots"
And I just love how you shills who care nothing about this community keep telling us the same lies as part of this aggressive public relations crusade, one that hides behind false pretense and is as manipulative as it is misleading. You guys are just trying to placate us so we don't put up resistance and get in your way. You're determined to ram this thing through. If this project proceeds, we'll not be getting tax $ from Jordan Cove; they are poised for a tax break of three years, minimum. Once tax revenue from Jordan Cove is actually forthcoming, it all goes to the port; NOT schools, NOT roads or law enforcement. You guys are full of baloney. - AIW
"TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots" is himself an idiot. Would you call that last post of his "compelling"? He's such an idiot, he doesn't know basic punctuation or even how to spell "sore" as in "eye sore". But seriously, what he and his tribe are determined to ram down our throats goes well beyond an eye sore. - Aliceinwonderland
I couldn't agree more with Aliceinwonderland. This country has been ripped apart and I suspect by design of the "Divide and Conquer" concept of 1% thinkers. While everyone is up in arms over this, that, and the other... pointing fault fingers, and admittedly it's hard not to because we all have our opinions and beliefs. But in doing so, things are happening, that is not readily disclosed and in many cases only after the fact, when it's too late.
Americans regardless of political, or religious affiliations, gender, age,and income (levels that aren't millionaires or billionaires) need to come back to basics on what unites us all and we can ALL agree on.
None of us are happy with our government officials and even less their methods regardless of who, what, where.
We have all lost respect for the men/women who hold those governing seats to a point of distrust that is self evident in the final results of what they do, do.
Given their power to rule over the people of this country in a fashion of childish public rants, loose loop-hole blocking measuresand tactics, finger pointing, and refusal to work with one another. We can all agree no employer in this country or any other would tolerate retaining such a dysfunctional employee. If we were employers ourselves, would we hire this team for our business? Well technically we do employ them because we are the reason they are where they are. "I voted for the other guy" doesn't get you off the hook ether because what they say and what they do doesn't appear to have anything to do with each other anymore... once they get into office, the office agendas seem to take on another life of it's own.
And finally, we can all agree...We share the same sense of feeling that the fate of the common man today, the plight of our children and those who come after, the land we live and depend on stands in dire jeopardy times. The energy force that sorrounds us in present time, is not eminating a postive force but a sense that more and more is being taken away and only the super rich and aristrocrats have rights as ours grows weaker every day.
Where once we all had differences of opinion and we always will... but what's absent today that wasn't before....Was we also had possabilities/aspirations and a means to move toward them. We had hope and dreams that weren't unrealistic or unatainable. Today, what we all sense and what succesfully divides us is the sense we're all sitting on the Titanic and the only hope available is to survive by whatever means.
Agreeing we all have a sense of these things and our differences are not as much what seperates us as our fear and anger as to what's to come. We should feel compassion for one another because we're not the problem. Our Government and it's handling and mishandling, misappropriating and ties are the problem. The money is there to accomplish all these things that can make it a healthier more prosperous America but not enough to fill the fat pockets of the 1% nor the war mongers that profit from it.
And Campaign finance reform is logically #1. Followed by a united front to demand a change in our trade agreements and removing tax breaks from the wealthiest. If people are back working, and EVERYONE is paying their fair share of taxes ...there won't be any need for "entitlements" to be an issue of discussion to address.
When it comes to our own people. the government was formed to protect those in this country and see to it's welfare. That is it's first obligation to which our leaders I think we're united in agreement...Get a Fail.
No Mark I never said the US should be more like Canada I was just pointing out the direction they are going. I will point out the mistake you are making about Canada. Welfare is looked after province by province just like our health care. Some are more liberal then others. It has to be that way as you know Canada is a very large country with a lot of very remote communities So you need a lot more money to live in those areas. $8 for a litre of milk.
Please note that we can afford to be more generous with our social programs as we have ten times the resources then you do with a ten of your population. We have over one third of the worlds fresh water, the second largest oil reserve in world. gas, copper, steel, coal, diamonds, well actually we have everything so so can pull it off.
We are also taxed a lot more on our personal taxes.
I do have to admit it is nice to get tuned in by you guys once and a while as I live in Alberta where the economy seems to do well all the time . It is good for me to know things are not as good in other places to keep me grounded. I have to admit though when I read that 47 million people in the US are on food stamps it scared the hell out of me. that is very scary. I sincerely didn't know it was that bad.
I have always said I agree you spend way too much on your military in my option. I guess we do agree on something once and a while.
Much more crowded countries than even the United States have exemplary national health care systems so you can quit that trick too Kend.
And correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the War of 1812 an attack upon us by the Brittish, whose colony Canada still was, in attempt to regain control of the United States? I n that sense who won and who lost?
Kend, there is much hope for jobs. Jobs continue to be created if at a slow but steady pace.
You're being disingenuous again. Obama has tried hard to create jobs. The stimulus package was a jobs and infrastructure program and many Republican governors tried to suffocate it refusing the funding. Also, the Jobs Bill that was an infrastructure bill that would have done much to get the economy started IF the Republicans in the House hadn't refused to consider it. Obama even tried to break it up into its componant parts and get each one passed individually but they wouldn't even think about it. With 500 filibusters (when the usual is less than 5) in the Senate and similar obstructionism by the House majority (if they're the majority why didn't they create the jobs) - even to the extent of shutting down the government - the Republicans have to accept much - if not most - of the responsibility for slow job growth and the state of the economy after six years of that shit..
Nobody hires anyone because of a tax break in an economy like this (or what we had until recently) unless the tax break is gonna pay that hirees ENTIRE salary AND the payroll taxes AND a profit to make even the paperwork worthwhile. You wouldn't get any infrastructure repairs or improvements out of such a straight up subsidy or welfare payment to business. If there's no demand or possibility of profitting from it NOONE will hire ANYBODY.
Any economist will tell you that in a time of recession government SHOULD run a deficit and not worry about it but invest in the economy because in times of neglible demand ONLY government will. The only scientific support the Repulicans have is a SINGLE study that was touted and hyped way beyond what it deserved because Repubs found it politically useful and which completely flew in the face of conventional scientific wisdom and didn't stand up at all under peer review. When other economists looked closely at it it just didn't add up and was clearly made up in very large part.
You're right Kend, we should be more like Canada. Canada's welfare benefits are even more generous than ours. You are of the European style welfare statism which is much more vigorous and robust than ours and is tinged with willfull socialism making Canada more a welfare state and more a workers' state than the U.S..
One of the great sense makings in Canada's system is its definition of poverty. In the U.S. the policy makers subscribe to a definition of poverty as "absolute poverty". That is, poverty is defined in terms that would be poverty anywhere in any period of history and purely in a very limited application - and thus, limited understanding - of the term. In the U.S. you are poor if your income makes you unable to procure basic necessities. You are not poor until you can't afford toothpaste.
In Europe poverty is defined as "relative poverty", i.e., you are poor if you are "relatively" poor, poor in relation to others in society. That is a very useful definition because people who are relatively poor - or, poor for their society but not as absolutely poor as the starving in Botswana - experience "social exclusion". They are not able to fully participate in society and - I would emphatically add - they are isolated, marginalized and unjustly denied the power to meaningfully participate in the decision making of society resulting in a less demnocratic, more oligarchic situation (I am a firm believer that socialism is an essential componant of any genuine democracy). Thus the "theatre allowance" to Germany's unemployed, and so forth.
Food stamps are about 2% of the U.S. budget. They and other welfare programs are an effecting of justice not an injudiciously wasteful charity. They are a just compensation for the undercompensation of American workers. Most welfare recipients are, in fact employed or children of employed people and a just compensation for business cycles that cause periods of widesprerad unemployment.
In this way - as an astute fellow poster on this site noted - they are a subsidy to unscrupulous business enabling undercompensation (e.g., Walmart in California giving seminars to its employees on how to get on food stamps) and business always hired PR campaigns and political campaigns against welfare because welfare benefits compete with wages and pressure them to pay a living wage.
If you want to reduce the debt cut the militeary budget. Stop the hither unfunded wars (Afghanistan) stop the wasteful spending on a military larger than all others combined whose opnly purpose is to enrich Pentegon cronies.
Sorry about the long windedness but you know how it is. Once you start you can't stop.
DAnneMarc -- You really need to read Thom's book "Ultimate Sacrifice", I didn't, but you should. I think Thom says something like JFK used the mafia to assist in the "Bay of Pigs". This led to the mafia eliminating JFK. That book is like 850 pgs.
Wendalore -- I listen to Thom via podcasts, so I am always behind by at least a day. If you are in the State of Washington, Wendell Potter said they have one of the only Medicare Advantage plans in the US that he would recommend. Whas the name SHINE or something like that.
Mexico's population was so sparse I don't think it had the people to guard its vast borders. If it hadn't been the United States someone else would've taken it from them.
I'd like to have left the continent to the indigenous inhabitants but, realistically, there's no way that was gonna happen..
"War is hell!" Kend declares. Yeah and theft is theft. In this case, land theft. Isn't "colonialism" the polite way of saying it? - Alice I.W.
Mark I guess time will tell. You are right I should not pre judge. As far a Canada goes every province delivers health care at a different level. Some better then others.
I think this may be another example of your illogic, Kend. Usually you're feigning stupidity, this time I think it might be the drinks you had last night hanging over. It does not necessarily follow at all that level of care has to go down if cost doesn't go up. The cost of health care in the U.S., hitherto, has been largely administrative. ACA mandates that 80% of the money insurance companies take in go to actual care provision and not to the administering of insurance or the CEO's salary like it did before. Even better would be excluding private insurance all together and giving it all to the government. That would bring the administrative cost to 3% and 97% would go to care.
I don't accept that the level of care would go down. I hear very different reports from other Canadians about their healthcare system and I lived in West Germany and heard no complaints about their system, however, I hear very MANY complaints about our healthcare system from visitors from Canada, Germany and elsewhere.
Our level of care is good only for the rich. It's often already pretty dismal for everyone else.
Mark we did, we pushed the American army back to fort Detroit. But gave it up and came home. They where pretty smart in those days.
Funny those Mexicans who lost that land to the US where the Spanish who took the land from the original Mexicans. War is hell.
That's right Kend. The United States took half of Mexico - which was also sparsely populated and still relatively is in many parts - in 1846. We were manifesting our destiny.
This is why many Mexicans feel entitled to come to live in places like California which some of them call "occupied Mexico".
I often wish you Canadians had at some point over run and conquered us and civilized our savage asses.
DAnne, Americans apparently didn't care about the less fortunate prior to ACA. So you are going to add millions of people that could not afford insurance, or that had pre existing conditions and could not be insured to the system. Your president said your cost will not go up. So if the cost doesn't go up care level will go down. What am I missing?
Kend ~ I fail to see what you mean by "level of care will drop." The way I see it, any care is a far higher level of care than no care. Unless, of course, you mean for the fortunate people who already are blessed with care? If that is the case, shame on you.
You don't have to worry about private insurance. There will always be a fair market for them to exist--just like they exist in Mexico and many other countries--in check. They can compete with private clinics and hospitals who also exist in Mexico as well. Prices at those institutions are affordable. Imagine that! The only thing that will be lacking is the monopoly over all health care private insurance used to enjoy in this country; and, the lack of competition that enables them to charge anything they want for coverage. The situation overall will dramatically improve for everyone. I have no doubt we will ever question that.
We can all thank the private insurance industry for one thing--the existence of Medicare. If it wasn't for the obtuse and shortsighted greed of the unchecked insurance industry there never would have been the profit hungry desire to boot all the most costly customers off the insurance claim payrolls. Thanks to the insurance industries blind greed and shortsightedness we already have in place a functional and proven single-payer health care system in this country; that, when push comes to shove will easily take over for the ACA. Thank you, health insurance industry. The only thing you've ever done right. The party's over.
Palindromedary ~ Thanks for the heads up on that JFK docudrama. I don't have the dish and will be busy at that time tonight anyway. I look forward to hearing what you think about it. From the description it sounds exceedingly hokey as hell, indeed. Another attempt at fooling the public into the idea that the fatal shot came from behind. Really? If that is the main plot you are probably right that it is more CIA sponsored disinformation than anything else. COINTELPRO and our tax dollars at work. But then, who knows. We must keep an open mind at all times. One will have to check it out before officially making that claim. I'll be sure to check back here when I get home tonight to see what you thought. Thanks again!
DAnne, I believe in single payer for basic health but there has to be a mix of private and public. Canada is the only country in the world that has only public And it isn't working very well. I should say since a supreme court decession in the 1990's we do have private clinics for non life threatening surgeries like knees and shoulders. As we have waiting lists for up to a year for those in some parts of Canada.
I think what Americans are missing with ACA is although everyone is covered I am very confident your level of care will drop. It has everywhere else in the world.
Ok Mark you are correct. , yes Canada was a British colony at that time we became indepented in 1867. but the French where there as well and Canada was just starting to find its identity. The French , independents and Indians that joined the British to fight for Canada's independence from the US. Although America was at war with the British it still wanted to take upper and lower Canada as it was even then loaded with trade items. America did attack the Canada's and was defeated mostly by terrible errors by the US military. Canada's army was out manned 3 to 1 but still won. I had relatives in Canada at that time as I am a fifith generation born Canadian. Very rare here At my age. How different America would be if they didn't drop the ball back then. Eh
Just a reminder for all you JFK conspiracy fans...yet another docudrama about the assassination of JFK will premier tonight on REELZ (299 on Dish). I don't know much about this except for the little I have read. Something like the Australian police investigator turned author after investigating for 4 years and after getting hold of all the released Warren Commission evidence that was supposed to be locked up for 75 years believes that there was a conspiracy...that Oswald did do the first shot and may have missed...and then another shot came from a secret service agent from one of the tailing cars. It went off accidentally? Hitting the President? I don't know if this is what the movie is trying to say but it sounds hokey as hell. Maybe that's what it is meant to do...
Anyway, I'll be watching to see what the movie is really about. It comes on tonight, Sunday Nov 3, at 7:00PM PST.
Aliceinwonderland ~ Sorry for taking your problem lightly. Personally, I'm terrified from the effects that billions of tonnes of radioactive water dumped off the coast of Japan every day is going to have on the entire west coast of America; and, eventually the entire world. Already I have given up any dreams of ever retiring in Hawaii. My favorite seafood treats are no more than a sweet memory. Forgive me if I look at the LNG like "spitting in the ocean." I have to remind myself that smaller scale problems are still quite serious. The last thing we need to do is to become discouraged with our struggle against the beast of industrialization.
I suppose if I were in your shoes--and for all practical purposes I am--the first thing I would try is to circulate a petition to ban LNG development in the local paper; or, gather signatures by sending reps to all your local markets. At least, that it what we are doing here to prevent fracking in the SF Bay Area. You could also try an online petition and advertise about it on billboards around the area. Take out an add in the local newspaper or newsletter. Put the petition on your own blog with a simple to remember URL. Announce it at community or city hall meetings so you can meet and join forces with other like-minded citizens. All things considered, you are still doing much more than most by simply making your opinion heard with your blog posts. Keep up the good work and kudos. If we can do it here you should be able to do it there. The best of luck!
The SF Bay Area is no stranger to industrial pollution. However, until now, other than a dirty feeling I've never before been afraid to stick my foot in the water. Alameda beach used to be one of my favorite hangouts when I was a kid. My father and I used to catch our own bait in the low tide flats along the marina in Berkeley and then fish with it at the pier the following day at high tide. The water always had a nasty, oily smell. We were afraid to eat the fish because they were all discolored with industrial pollution. We weren't afraid to touch them though; or, to touch the water. That's a modern fear. Oh, how the world has changed for the worst in such a short period of time thanks to greed and shortsightedness. One interesting note: Regardless of your success with an anti-LNG petition, we may all find ourselves being forced to move to Oklahoma in the not too distant future. If we are lucky, that is. Let us pray I am wrong.
Here's the bigger picture regarding the US Default kabuki theatre (just part of the usual neoliberal ploys to give state wealth to big business and finance at the expense of the people):
http://www.globalresearch.ca/economic-coup-detat-debt-and-deficit-as-sho...
There is zero difference between the majority of Democrats and Republicans. There are or were a few good people from both parties but they're a dying breed -- Dennis Kucinich screwed by his own party :(
"Funny", unless you happen to be living in the viscinityt of such a threat. Then it isn't so funny. And to be perfectly frank, this terrifies me. - AIW
Aliceinwonderland ~ Funny story! Sounds like "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots" is actually "TrappedInAHouseFullOfMirrors." Poor guy. Everywhere he turns there is some idiot staring back at him. He probably doesn't have any windows either. Probably why he is such an expert in natural gas--it isn't just baloney that he is full of.
By the way, thanks for the support on Campaign Finance Reform. It seems like a lot of us already are on that boat. Lets keep that ship a' floating.
Kend ~ It looks like we finally agree about something--Single-Payer Health care for all. Thanks for thinking the problem through. I agree, that is going to have to be the final answer. Thanks for the input.
The beat goes on! And on! And on! What follows is more bullshit crap from Jordan Cove's shills, on that blog page our local newspaper "The World"displays online. Includes my rebuttals:
The project includes a power plant that will generate 420 MW, with the capability to support economic development in Coos Bay. Will lead to a redevelopment and modernization of the Port of Coos Bay’s facilities, helping it attract importers and exporters of other goods. 146 direct jobs, 54 indirect jobs paid by Jordan Cove (Sheriff’s deputies, firefighters, tugboat crews and emergency planners), 404 other indirect jobs and 182 induced jobs for a total of over 750 total family-wage jobs. - DannyGS
LIES, LIES, LIES! Don't fall for it, folks. - AIW
Tourism, tourism.... Why is it everyone who opposes LNG states it will hurt tourism? What tourism?? We are not a vacation hot spot and we will never be one. Our community was originally build around industry not tourism. When industry was ran out of the area this community died. There is no work or future here for our youth so they all grow up to be useless dope smoking, alcoholic, tweekers on welfare and that is all due to the "we are a resort town" mentality. WE NEED JOBS, WE NEED LNG!!!! - "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots"
Dear "Trapped", how about untrapping yourself with a one-way ticket to Bora Bora? - AIW
Oh and I just love how all these people who know nothing about the natural gas industry are all over night experts because they got learned by someone, who got learned by someone, who likes to tell people that LNG is the Devil because LNG doesn't help them make money because they invested in a golf course and their abuse of tax payer money lead to the eye sour that we call our new airport... Anyone feeling like having italian food? We need industry to save our community, not tourists. - "TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots"
And I just love how you shills who care nothing about this community keep telling us the same lies as part of this aggressive public relations crusade, one that hides behind false pretense and is as manipulative as it is misleading. You guys are just trying to placate us so we don't put up resistance and get in your way. You're determined to ram this thing through. If this project proceeds, we'll not be getting tax $ from Jordan Cove; they are poised for a tax break of three years, minimum. Once tax revenue from Jordan Cove is actually forthcoming, it all goes to the port; NOT schools, NOT roads or law enforcement. You guys are full of baloney. - AIW
"TrappedInATownFullOfIdiots" is himself an idiot. Would you call that last post of his "compelling"? He's such an idiot, he doesn't know basic punctuation or even how to spell "sore" as in "eye sore". But seriously, what he and his tribe are determined to ram down our throats goes well beyond an eye sore. - Aliceinwonderland
I couldn't agree more with Aliceinwonderland. This country has been ripped apart and I suspect by design of the "Divide and Conquer" concept of 1% thinkers. While everyone is up in arms over this, that, and the other... pointing fault fingers, and admittedly it's hard not to because we all have our opinions and beliefs. But in doing so, things are happening, that is not readily disclosed and in many cases only after the fact, when it's too late.
Americans regardless of political, or religious affiliations, gender, age,and income (levels that aren't millionaires or billionaires) need to come back to basics on what unites us all and we can ALL agree on.
None of us are happy with our government officials and even less their methods regardless of who, what, where.
We have all lost respect for the men/women who hold those governing seats to a point of distrust that is self evident in the final results of what they do, do.
Given their power to rule over the people of this country in a fashion of childish public rants, loose loop-hole blocking measuresand tactics, finger pointing, and refusal to work with one another. We can all agree no employer in this country or any other would tolerate retaining such a dysfunctional employee. If we were employers ourselves, would we hire this team for our business? Well technically we do employ them because we are the reason they are where they are. "I voted for the other guy" doesn't get you off the hook ether because what they say and what they do doesn't appear to have anything to do with each other anymore... once they get into office, the office agendas seem to take on another life of it's own.
And finally, we can all agree...We share the same sense of feeling that the fate of the common man today, the plight of our children and those who come after, the land we live and depend on stands in dire jeopardy times. The energy force that sorrounds us in present time, is not eminating a postive force but a sense that more and more is being taken away and only the super rich and aristrocrats have rights as ours grows weaker every day.
Where once we all had differences of opinion and we always will... but what's absent today that wasn't before....Was we also had possabilities/aspirations and a means to move toward them. We had hope and dreams that weren't unrealistic or unatainable. Today, what we all sense and what succesfully divides us is the sense we're all sitting on the Titanic and the only hope available is to survive by whatever means.
Agreeing we all have a sense of these things and our differences are not as much what seperates us as our fear and anger as to what's to come. We should feel compassion for one another because we're not the problem. Our Government and it's handling and mishandling, misappropriating and ties are the problem. The money is there to accomplish all these things that can make it a healthier more prosperous America but not enough to fill the fat pockets of the 1% nor the war mongers that profit from it.
And Campaign finance reform is logically #1. Followed by a united front to demand a change in our trade agreements and removing tax breaks from the wealthiest. If people are back working, and EVERYONE is paying their fair share of taxes ...there won't be any need for "entitlements" to be an issue of discussion to address.
When it comes to our own people. the government was formed to protect those in this country and see to it's welfare. That is it's first obligation to which our leaders I think we're united in agreement...Get a Fail.
No Mark I never said the US should be more like Canada I was just pointing out the direction they are going. I will point out the mistake you are making about Canada. Welfare is looked after province by province just like our health care. Some are more liberal then others. It has to be that way as you know Canada is a very large country with a lot of very remote communities So you need a lot more money to live in those areas. $8 for a litre of milk.
Please note that we can afford to be more generous with our social programs as we have ten times the resources then you do with a ten of your population. We have over one third of the worlds fresh water, the second largest oil reserve in world. gas, copper, steel, coal, diamonds, well actually we have everything so so can pull it off.
We are also taxed a lot more on our personal taxes.
I do have to admit it is nice to get tuned in by you guys once and a while as I live in Alberta where the economy seems to do well all the time . It is good for me to know things are not as good in other places to keep me grounded. I have to admit though when I read that 47 million people in the US are on food stamps it scared the hell out of me. that is very scary. I sincerely didn't know it was that bad.
I have always said I agree you spend way too much on your military in my option. I guess we do agree on something once and a while.
Much more crowded countries than even the United States have exemplary national health care systems so you can quit that trick too Kend.
And correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the War of 1812 an attack upon us by the Brittish, whose colony Canada still was, in attempt to regain control of the United States? I n that sense who won and who lost?
Kend, there is much hope for jobs. Jobs continue to be created if at a slow but steady pace.
You're being disingenuous again. Obama has tried hard to create jobs. The stimulus package was a jobs and infrastructure program and many Republican governors tried to suffocate it refusing the funding. Also, the Jobs Bill that was an infrastructure bill that would have done much to get the economy started IF the Republicans in the House hadn't refused to consider it. Obama even tried to break it up into its componant parts and get each one passed individually but they wouldn't even think about it. With 500 filibusters (when the usual is less than 5) in the Senate and similar obstructionism by the House majority (if they're the majority why didn't they create the jobs) - even to the extent of shutting down the government - the Republicans have to accept much - if not most - of the responsibility for slow job growth and the state of the economy after six years of that shit..
Nobody hires anyone because of a tax break in an economy like this (or what we had until recently) unless the tax break is gonna pay that hirees ENTIRE salary AND the payroll taxes AND a profit to make even the paperwork worthwhile. You wouldn't get any infrastructure repairs or improvements out of such a straight up subsidy or welfare payment to business. If there's no demand or possibility of profitting from it NOONE will hire ANYBODY.
Any economist will tell you that in a time of recession government SHOULD run a deficit and not worry about it but invest in the economy because in times of neglible demand ONLY government will. The only scientific support the Repulicans have is a SINGLE study that was touted and hyped way beyond what it deserved because Repubs found it politically useful and which completely flew in the face of conventional scientific wisdom and didn't stand up at all under peer review. When other economists looked closely at it it just didn't add up and was clearly made up in very large part.
You're right Kend, we should be more like Canada. Canada's welfare benefits are even more generous than ours. You are of the European style welfare statism which is much more vigorous and robust than ours and is tinged with willfull socialism making Canada more a welfare state and more a workers' state than the U.S..
One of the great sense makings in Canada's system is its definition of poverty. In the U.S. the policy makers subscribe to a definition of poverty as "absolute poverty". That is, poverty is defined in terms that would be poverty anywhere in any period of history and purely in a very limited application - and thus, limited understanding - of the term. In the U.S. you are poor if your income makes you unable to procure basic necessities. You are not poor until you can't afford toothpaste.
In Europe poverty is defined as "relative poverty", i.e., you are poor if you are "relatively" poor, poor in relation to others in society. That is a very useful definition because people who are relatively poor - or, poor for their society but not as absolutely poor as the starving in Botswana - experience "social exclusion". They are not able to fully participate in society and - I would emphatically add - they are isolated, marginalized and unjustly denied the power to meaningfully participate in the decision making of society resulting in a less demnocratic, more oligarchic situation (I am a firm believer that socialism is an essential componant of any genuine democracy). Thus the "theatre allowance" to Germany's unemployed, and so forth.
Food stamps are about 2% of the U.S. budget. They and other welfare programs are an effecting of justice not an injudiciously wasteful charity. They are a just compensation for the undercompensation of American workers. Most welfare recipients are, in fact employed or children of employed people and a just compensation for business cycles that cause periods of widesprerad unemployment.
In this way - as an astute fellow poster on this site noted - they are a subsidy to unscrupulous business enabling undercompensation (e.g., Walmart in California giving seminars to its employees on how to get on food stamps) and business always hired PR campaigns and political campaigns against welfare because welfare benefits compete with wages and pressure them to pay a living wage.
If you want to reduce the debt cut the militeary budget. Stop the hither unfunded wars (Afghanistan) stop the wasteful spending on a military larger than all others combined whose opnly purpose is to enrich Pentegon cronies.
Sorry about the long windedness but you know how it is. Once you start you can't stop.
I kind of like the NLRB and ACLU alphabet soup.
DAnneMarc -- You really need to read Thom's book "Ultimate Sacrifice", I didn't, but you should. I think Thom says something like JFK used the mafia to assist in the "Bay of Pigs". This led to the mafia eliminating JFK. That book is like 850 pgs.
Wendalore -- I listen to Thom via podcasts, so I am always behind by at least a day. If you are in the State of Washington, Wendell Potter said they have one of the only Medicare Advantage plans in the US that he would recommend. Whas the name SHINE or something like that.