I think the monied elites have been more successful than not in their efforts to publically discredit those who support climate change, or at the very least, to create enough doubt in the mind of the public that there isn't sufficent pressure being brought to bear to make any real change. Facts matter little in today's political world---be the economy, foreign policy, or climate change. What matters is preception and who is able to convince the public to buy into its version.
There is without a doubt an increase in protests and civil activism, both on the Left and on the Right. However, we are also seeing an attempt by the corporate media to exploit events and the protesters, and on occassion, to try and manufacture events. The corporate media has been very careful not to cover protests and other events which would reflect negatively on its agenda. Accordingly, protestors and organziers must make better use of social media outlets to make sure their message gets out so that more people become aware of what's actually going on and not what the corporate media wants us to believe is going on, if anything.
One thing global warming has done is raise the average global humidty, by about 2% over the last few years. Higher humidty can cause respiratory problems for animals and humans; and increase the growth rates for molds and fungii. As someone who is allergic to mold, I've experienced the effects of higher humidty and mold growths, with more and severer bouts of bronchitis. My employer had a cat that was having respiratory problems as well; turns out, it, too, was allergic to mold. Poor kitty, it didn't survive.
Tom I love you, but the miltiarization of the police goes much farther back than 911. And I mean much farther back, like you can tenously place it anywhere between WATS and war on drugs. Experts on this will qubble as to exactly where it started. Suffice it to say, Daryl Gates truly is the gift that keeps on giving.
Regardless, the legal background for a lot of this goes also much father back than 911, like to the early years of the Warren court.
911 is the day that many people finally noticed, but seriously, I would expect you to know that this goes much father back.
Can it be reversed? Yes, and I think we are starting to see signs that peopel both within and outside law enforcement realize change is needed. There will be a lot of resistance too, but the kinds of changes needed will be rather scary. The first step is truly learning how miltitarized the police has become, and it is not just the MRAPs, though the local one meant for a school district, was returend after we broke how miltiarized the local police was.
I long for days when policemen were professional, like Sargeant Friday and his various partners. The would get a report of something or other, get to scene of the crime and investigate, ask questions, check out what happened "The facts ma'am, just the facts", after a half an hour of good police work, the thief, or the murderer, or whatever was supposed to have occurred, was solved.
Today, in order to take down one criminal it requires a truckful of "men in black", their faces covered over with ski masks running about the scene like... (the name of those things that they look like escapes me). It's not clear what sort of crimes will be treated this way in the wake of the legalization of pot--nobody to raid. If the accounts I see in the social media, the search for the "250" by the NYPD on the streets of that city as resulted in more violations of human rights that the prevention of crime, or promoting the "rule of law". The demonstators of the Occupy Movement know all too well how, when they wanted to speak freely, they were bullied by NY's finest into submitting to their authorities, some of them were even placed in jail, for "resisting arrest".
If that weren't enough the social media has revealed how plain ordinary citizens that live along state borders in the Southwest, discover a officer of the border patrol stopping to ask them all sorts of "questions", and if the answer is "there is a sale on household appliances in the mall across the state line" is not enough. They are required to stop and be investigated for something or other. For the record, many places of business along the state borders, and up close to them have experienced downtown in their business activity,the result of road blocks. People are not driving along those roads from fear of being "stopped and frisked".
There is something very wrong with the United States of America. Heck, in Tel Aviv, two summers ago, people that were dissatified with the lack of affordable housing took to the parks, and "camped out". Some of them were removed, but only after quite a while--the mayor didn't "send the cops" to remove them. In fact across from the Central Railroad Station, the people that camped out two years ago, are still there, and likely there are other places in Tel Aviv, where people continue to "camp out". No police, no violence, in the "troublesome Middle East", while people in the Big Apple risk being greeted by policemen, being told to "get out their cars", or "on their knees", for not showing them the respect they deserve, or something like that.
Yeah I wonder what Jack Webb, or his alter ego Sargeant Friday would say if they were brought down from Heaven, reincarnated as policemen. Would they understand all the loss of life and limb that goes on today? I think not.
eatraum, I agree with some of what you've written, but CHOKING ERIC GARNER until he was UNCONCIOUS and then NOT DOING CPR (or letting bystanders do it) is pretty cold & unforgiveable. Or, did we all miss something?
And, I GENERALLY ADMIRE & RESPECT COPS, honest cops that is.
But, we all know that cops are using TASERS and PEPPER SPRAY on OLD LADIES now. So, if a TRUST has been BROKEN, just WHO BROKE IT?
And yes, cops have "chosen" their careers. They also choose to be in UNIONS. And, then choose to keep other unions, the working poor, and the middle class in their place.
They choose to blindly enforce laws that CORPORATIONS (and their LOBBYISTS) have BRIBED obviously CORRUPT POLITICIANS to pass.
And, when the CORPORATE CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT that you mention occurs, just WHO WILL MAKE IT ALL POSSIBLE? WHO WILL BE THE "STORM TROOPERS" OF CORPORATE AMERICA?
Who indeed.
But, CORPORATE CONTROL of our "democracy" IS ALREADY HERE. They own the Supreme Court and most of our politicians. And, corporate lawyers are literally writing the bills that politicians introduce.
Corporate operatives "lead" the government agencies that are supposed to protect us.
Corporations and their employees spy on us on behalf of the government, and in their own interest.
Corporations build electronic voting machines and design the rigged "proprietary" software they run on.
And, corporations own the "mainstream" news media which parrot GOP talking points and knowingly lie to us on a regular basis.
So, in 2014, most eligible Americans were apparently either too stupid or lazy to vote.
Or, perhaps they've peeked behind the curtain and finally decided (in exhaustion) to stop participating in such a rigged game.
No, people shouldn't stop protesting because of the two cops having been shot. However, they should be aware of this and show a little sensitivty towards the police. They are obviously---and rightly so---going to be on edge.
I agree with Ms. Necker in that neither police officer was white. Perhaps given the light and angle at which the shooter saw the two officers, they appeared white to him. Then again, he not have cared and just wanted to murder a couple of cops. Who knows what path logic takes through a twisted mind?
Thanks for mentioning that docs can kill people with their mistakes. People also die despite our best efforts as well. As a doc and as someone who has had patients die under my care, you ALWAYS second guess yourself. Imagine my disgust when I hear cops who've killed in the line of duty proclaim they have no regrets and "would do it again"....I think, in many cases, THAT is what the protestors are protesting and, until everyone understands that, we aren't going to have the conversation we need to have as a society. Heck, even Frank Sinatra has regrets....
I have enjoyed reading most of what Thom Hartmann has proposed and elaborated upon in the past even though I have disagreed with some of it but this is a poorly directed and shallow document. Thom and most responders who have agreed with this premise have failed to recognize the complexity of the issue.
Yes, police officers can be heavy handed and their should be public input into the regulation of their behavior and practice. However, there has been no mention of the difficulties faced by police officers nor an exploration of the differences between big city officers and small town officers. There has been no recognition of the heroism that officers display every day for the public.
They do a job that none of the responders (nor Thom) have have chosen to do. At least, none have stated it as their profession. Therefore, none have any idea what it is like to be charged with enforcing law that the public has chosen to legislate through the electoral process. Worse, none of the responders sound as thought they have experience with street combat, which is what officers face every day. Most people turn their backs and run (wisely) in the face of aggression. Police officers do not have that luxury. Furthermore, none appear to have any experience with combat (armed or unarmed) and the celerity with which it occurs nor with the speed with which a blow to the head can change your life.
I state this because it is obvious that Thom and his supporters are sitting upon some very high horses. You are failing to recognize the changes that come to one's mind and body when facing these situations. There is no way to avoid these changes and the only way to adapt to them is to require counseling for the officers and ongoing training. Granted, this is a tough thing to require in their culture but, require it non the less.
But, back to the idea of heroism. I have personally seen police officers reach into burning cars to pull out children still strapped into car seats after a crash. I have seen them come out of burning buildings before we firefighters run in with all our fire gear. I have seen them beaten up and bloodied after fighhting and subduing a drug induced psychotic black man who was threatening the public (they did not shoot him).
They have a different mentality than most of the general population and they live by a VERY different code than the vast majority of us. Do we need to continue with the efforts to deepen civilian control over the putative emergence of a police state? YES.
But to naively state that police should not be seen as heros is shallow and, quite honestly, weak.
They do a job that Thom has opted NOT to do. More importantly, we all benefit from the fulfillment of their duties and we need to show them respect and appreciation for that daily. After my time in the Peace Corps I can say with confidence that, without their efforts and blood, our country would be no better than any other third world country with its concomittant chaos and corruption. If you really want to fight against oppression then fight agains corporate control of government because THAT is the most corrosive agent of democracy. That is the coming oppressor of your freedoms.
A New York City Police Union opportunist is trying to blame PEACEFUL PROSTESTORS exercising their rights to FREE SPEECH (and the NYC MAYOR) for the recent tragic murders of TWO COPS.
And, I'm pretty sure that FOX NEWS is doing it too, but that would be neither FAIR nor BALANCED.
It would probably be more accurate to blame the NRA, the GOP, and their TEA PARTY FRINGE for the brutal executions of those TWO LAS VEGAS COPS.
To say "why is no one protesting the cop murders?" is racist and stupid. Who would be the target of the protest? The killer? He's dead. If there had been vidio and then he had been caught and then not charged by a grand jury, that would be a reason for a protest. Then the protesters would likely be made up of cops and mostly white citizens. That would never happen because the cops likely would have murdered the shooter so he could not go to trial and plead insanity even if he tried to surrender. The cops would have their stories (lies) together. The protesters are not to blame. The media is not to blame. Let's put blame where where it belongs. First the lone shooter is to blame. Second is our supreme court who interprets the second amendment, that was designed to protect our country from a foreign invasion with the help of a citizen army, by saying that it says that everyone can carry guns, nevermind the part about a "WELL REGULATED MALITA". Has it occured to anyone in our government that this amendment is obsolete and should be changed because now we spend billions of dollars every year on a standing military to protect us and now there's no chance a private citizen is going to be called upon to protect this country with his HUNTING RIFEL? Third is our system of how we police the police, When a police officer stands accused of violating a citizens rights, HIS FRIENDS, the prossicutor and fellow officers most often will make sure the officer will not be charged with any crime, no matter what the officer has done or who the officer has murdered unless it's another cop. Cops harrass and illeagaly search people every day, not all cops, not all police forces, but in some places it's routine, usually where there are a lot of black targets to choose from. This has to stop. Cops trying to find reasons to arrest people for the sake of getting a big number of arrests on their record has to stop too. Most cops are very good people but in some police forces they need to do a better job of acting like their job is to protect everyone, even the people they must arrest. The fourth reason the two cops were murdered is OUTRAGE caused by a rash of vidios of cops shooting and killing people when they didn't have to.
You have no way of knowing this, but I come from a family of police and firemen. I never remember Sheriffs or police (or firefighters!) ever shooting anyone just for suspicion... The only things they shot when I was young were helpless o'possums trying to safely transporting their young, clinging to their bodies, trying to safely cross a road... THAT really pissed me off. For them, it was just "fun target shooting" to a defenseless animal who never wanted to harm anyone. I detested that kind of behavior, and I still do. When did they go from shooting defenseless wildlife for sport, to shooting people out of fear? There'ssomething entirely wrong with this kind of behavior. I'm so glad I never followed in the steps of my uncles, cousins, and friends...
POLICE used to take oaths to "Protect and Serve the masses." Now it has become "Enforce the Law and save yourself when you have an inkling that you might be in danger." Black people and people with darker skin are more likely to be mistaken as someone likely to be carrying a weapon, but sadly most are not held responsible for being afraid for their lives. We seem to be training a bunch of wussies, instead of training Law Officers to stay strong, wear their vests, and not shoot people you only suspect of having a weapon. A lot more of us will die because of fear from those who are supposed to be well-trained. America is going nuts. Where on earth are the brave officers who take more than 3 seconds to make a wise decision?!
One thing is for sure, and that is that the unconstitutional drug war is the main thing that puts our country in danger where the dangers of our society becoming an authoritarian police state is concerned. It's the main reason that our police have become so militaryised, and so abusive toward average citizens. The drug war has led to the abuse of powers and why so many black people and also people of other races are in prison. Richard Nixon was a criminal, and there is no reason why we as Americans should still be under the thumb of laws that were created by criminals like Nixon. There is no doubt in my mind that if we do away with the drug war now, most of the societal problems we are facing today will automatically disappear. The rich fat cat monopoly loving corporations are at fault for all these problems, and one way or another, we as citizens must do something about their tyranny that they have established over us.
It is a sad day when I agree with Mike Barnacle and Rudy Guiliani and disagree with Thom. My mother and father were police officers so I take it personally when police officers are killed. I will always support the police.
It's odd that neither of the slain police officers were white. Might they just be an attemt to stir the pot of unrest even further than it has been of late?
Who's to say it wasn't yet another agent provocateur attack. Also if the elite really wanted gun control, they would simply stop manufacturing the weapons
People like Giuliani say it is the fault of Obama, Democrats, protesters of police brutality, etc., that the two cops were murdered. I ask, how is it that somebody with a history like that of the killer was able to get a gun? I blame the NRA for the murder of the two cops, and thousands of other deaths per year.
Mr. Barnicle's article is one more example of the asinine false equivalency being propagated by the Right, and also one more attempt to make a partisan black/white liberal/conservative issue out of this, when police brutality should be everyone's concern. By all accounts this shooter was mentally unstable and acted alone. The suggestion that people should organize a protest against the actions of this killer is simply ludicrous. What would that accomplish? How many violent acts are committed every day by people with mental problems? Mr. Barnicle is really attempting to link the shooting to the protests against police brutality when there is none.
Police are not the only people who can kill somebody when they make a 'bad mistake.' The same can be said for doctors. That is why governments issues licenses and hold the profession of medical doctors to certain standards. If some demographics start dying at bizarrely high rates while under a doctor's care then it is realistic to expect an investigation. Police, as professionals, must also be held to standards, although the guidelines are usually inconsistent, in fact it is usually up to the community and not the state to issue guidelines for behavior and training. The people have a right to expect that their police forces, being a so-called professional organization, should be held to some sort of standards. This is a responsibility that any police officer should assume when he or she puts on the badge. Any profession must shoulder expectations from the public for it's behavior and skill. We have expectations of the police that we do not have of the average 'civilian' and for good reason. When an organization fails those expectations we the public have a right to ask why.
Think of what you are saying. Since a consequence of protesting police violence may be the heightened chance of acts of violence being committed against police, then People shouldn’t protest police violence.
I know part of you talking heads jobs is to help the Democrats keep the People in line, but I’m not sure such thinking as you indicated above would make for good social engineering. The killer committed the murders in response to the deaths of Eric and Michael, not because of the protests.
Violence begets violence. Protests are in response to violence. My condolences to the families of the two police officers who were slain.
One distinction that gets lost is that the protests were about the lack of an arrest and trial for the killers of the young black men. You can bet that if the killer of the policemen had not taken his own life, he would have been immediately arrested, tried for murder and executed.
All killings are tragic. The justice system handles kilings of policemen, but not killings by policemen. That's why there are protests about one kind of killing and not the other.
I have had several conversations with friends about the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner and they all basically say the same thing, "Good riddance. One less thug in the world."
Though none of them like to hear it that statement reeks of racism of the lowest order. Despite the fact that Mr. Brown was caught on tape roughing up a store clerk and Mr. Garner was caught resisting arrest, the people I have spoken to know nothing about these two men other than the fact they are black. Everything implied in these statements indicate that they don't need to know anything else.
About 30 years ago a brother of a good friend of mine had a rather spectacular encounter with the local police. It made the local TV and paper news. At first, the police thought he was crazy or on PCP. He smashed a storefront window and started destroying private property with his bare hands. Several police tackled him and he threw them all off like dolls. He broke one officers nose and another officers arm. Finally, after waiting for backup to arrive, 10 officers managed to subdue him and place him in custody. He was rushed to a psychic ward for evaluation. He survived the encounter, unlike Mr. Brown and Mr. Garner, despite having putting up a much greater fight, and posing a much greater threat. One difference in the two cases however, he was not a black man.
As it turned out my friend was a pre diagnosed schizophrenic. After several months in the psychic ward and several attempts at medication they finally stabilized him. He has lived a normal and productive life ever since. I cannot help but think that if he were black, he would never have survived the encounter and his life would have ended before his 20th birthday.
If it is possible for the police to subdue even a very large, dangerous, strong, and violent mentally ill young man they certainly could have subdued Mr. Brown and Mr. Garner without ending their lives. That is exactly what they train to do. That is what we as a society are paying them to do--to protect us--every single one of us. Thom is absolutely right on this one! Our society and more notably, our police, simply do not value the lives of black men. That has got to change.
Unfortunately, many police agency's have developed a "Shoot first and don"t answer questions later" attitude; and that's fueling the hatred toward cops, which, in turn, is further increasing the "shoot first..." attitude.
All police agency's need to have a civillian oversite committee, and all members of that committee would have term limits and be elected, NOT APPOINTED. It's the only way we're going to return sanity and civility to the law enforcement profession.
I think the monied elites have been more successful than not in their efforts to publically discredit those who support climate change, or at the very least, to create enough doubt in the mind of the public that there isn't sufficent pressure being brought to bear to make any real change. Facts matter little in today's political world---be the economy, foreign policy, or climate change. What matters is preception and who is able to convince the public to buy into its version.
There is without a doubt an increase in protests and civil activism, both on the Left and on the Right. However, we are also seeing an attempt by the corporate media to exploit events and the protesters, and on occassion, to try and manufacture events. The corporate media has been very careful not to cover protests and other events which would reflect negatively on its agenda. Accordingly, protestors and organziers must make better use of social media outlets to make sure their message gets out so that more people become aware of what's actually going on and not what the corporate media wants us to believe is going on, if anything.
One thing global warming has done is raise the average global humidty, by about 2% over the last few years. Higher humidty can cause respiratory problems for animals and humans; and increase the growth rates for molds and fungii. As someone who is allergic to mold, I've experienced the effects of higher humidty and mold growths, with more and severer bouts of bronchitis. My employer had a cat that was having respiratory problems as well; turns out, it, too, was allergic to mold. Poor kitty, it didn't survive.
Global warming suks!
Tom I love you, but the miltiarization of the police goes much farther back than 911. And I mean much farther back, like you can tenously place it anywhere between WATS and war on drugs. Experts on this will qubble as to exactly where it started. Suffice it to say, Daryl Gates truly is the gift that keeps on giving.
Regardless, the legal background for a lot of this goes also much father back than 911, like to the early years of the Warren court.
911 is the day that many people finally noticed, but seriously, I would expect you to know that this goes much father back.
Can it be reversed? Yes, and I think we are starting to see signs that peopel both within and outside law enforcement realize change is needed. There will be a lot of resistance too, but the kinds of changes needed will be rather scary. The first step is truly learning how miltitarized the police has become, and it is not just the MRAPs, though the local one meant for a school district, was returend after we broke how miltiarized the local police was.
http://reportingsandiego.com/2014/08/27/how-militarized-are-san-diego-po...
We could not find where the MRAP went to, local public station did, and they were forced to give it back.
Nadin
editor reportingsandiego.com
From the BBC in the 70s....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVCFF6NUq2U#t=10
I long for days when policemen were professional, like Sargeant Friday and his various partners. The would get a report of something or other, get to scene of the crime and investigate, ask questions, check out what happened "The facts ma'am, just the facts", after a half an hour of good police work, the thief, or the murderer, or whatever was supposed to have occurred, was solved.
Today, in order to take down one criminal it requires a truckful of "men in black", their faces covered over with ski masks running about the scene like... (the name of those things that they look like escapes me). It's not clear what sort of crimes will be treated this way in the wake of the legalization of pot--nobody to raid. If the accounts I see in the social media, the search for the "250" by the NYPD on the streets of that city as resulted in more violations of human rights that the prevention of crime, or promoting the "rule of law". The demonstators of the Occupy Movement know all too well how, when they wanted to speak freely, they were bullied by NY's finest into submitting to their authorities, some of them were even placed in jail, for "resisting arrest".
If that weren't enough the social media has revealed how plain ordinary citizens that live along state borders in the Southwest, discover a officer of the border patrol stopping to ask them all sorts of "questions", and if the answer is "there is a sale on household appliances in the mall across the state line" is not enough. They are required to stop and be investigated for something or other. For the record, many places of business along the state borders, and up close to them have experienced downtown in their business activity,the result of road blocks. People are not driving along those roads from fear of being "stopped and frisked".
There is something very wrong with the United States of America. Heck, in Tel Aviv, two summers ago, people that were dissatified with the lack of affordable housing took to the parks, and "camped out". Some of them were removed, but only after quite a while--the mayor didn't "send the cops" to remove them. In fact across from the Central Railroad Station, the people that camped out two years ago, are still there, and likely there are other places in Tel Aviv, where people continue to "camp out". No police, no violence, in the "troublesome Middle East", while people in the Big Apple risk being greeted by policemen, being told to "get out their cars", or "on their knees", for not showing them the respect they deserve, or something like that.
Yeah I wonder what Jack Webb, or his alter ego Sargeant Friday would say if they were brought down from Heaven, reincarnated as policemen. Would they understand all the loss of life and limb that goes on today? I think not.
eatraum, I agree with some of what you've written, but CHOKING ERIC GARNER until he was UNCONCIOUS and then NOT DOING CPR (or letting bystanders do it) is pretty cold & unforgiveable. Or, did we all miss something?
And, I GENERALLY ADMIRE & RESPECT COPS, honest cops that is.
But, we all know that cops are using TASERS and PEPPER SPRAY on OLD LADIES now. So, if a TRUST has been BROKEN, just WHO BROKE IT?
And yes, cops have "chosen" their careers. They also choose to be in UNIONS. And, then choose to keep other unions, the working poor, and the middle class in their place.
They choose to blindly enforce laws that CORPORATIONS (and their LOBBYISTS) have BRIBED obviously CORRUPT POLITICIANS to pass.
And, when the CORPORATE CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT that you mention occurs, just WHO WILL MAKE IT ALL POSSIBLE? WHO WILL BE THE "STORM TROOPERS" OF CORPORATE AMERICA?
Who indeed.
But, CORPORATE CONTROL of our "democracy" IS ALREADY HERE. They own the Supreme Court and most of our politicians. And, corporate lawyers are literally writing the bills that politicians introduce.
Corporate operatives "lead" the government agencies that are supposed to protect us.
Corporations and their employees spy on us on behalf of the government, and in their own interest.
Corporations build electronic voting machines and design the rigged "proprietary" software they run on.
And, corporations own the "mainstream" news media which parrot GOP talking points and knowingly lie to us on a regular basis.
So, in 2014, most eligible Americans were apparently either too stupid or lazy to vote.
Or, perhaps they've peeked behind the curtain and finally decided (in exhaustion) to stop participating in such a rigged game.
TPP will be the last straw.
Then, it's Game Over.
No, people shouldn't stop protesting because of the two cops having been shot. However, they should be aware of this and show a little sensitivty towards the police. They are obviously---and rightly so---going to be on edge.
I agree with Ms. Necker in that neither police officer was white. Perhaps given the light and angle at which the shooter saw the two officers, they appeared white to him. Then again, he not have cared and just wanted to murder a couple of cops. Who knows what path logic takes through a twisted mind?
Thanks for mentioning that docs can kill people with their mistakes. People also die despite our best efforts as well. As a doc and as someone who has had patients die under my care, you ALWAYS second guess yourself. Imagine my disgust when I hear cops who've killed in the line of duty proclaim they have no regrets and "would do it again"....I think, in many cases, THAT is what the protestors are protesting and, until everyone understands that, we aren't going to have the conversation we need to have as a society. Heck, even Frank Sinatra has regrets....
I have enjoyed reading most of what Thom Hartmann has proposed and elaborated upon in the past even though I have disagreed with some of it but this is a poorly directed and shallow document. Thom and most responders who have agreed with this premise have failed to recognize the complexity of the issue.
Yes, police officers can be heavy handed and their should be public input into the regulation of their behavior and practice. However, there has been no mention of the difficulties faced by police officers nor an exploration of the differences between big city officers and small town officers. There has been no recognition of the heroism that officers display every day for the public.
They do a job that none of the responders (nor Thom) have have chosen to do. At least, none have stated it as their profession. Therefore, none have any idea what it is like to be charged with enforcing law that the public has chosen to legislate through the electoral process. Worse, none of the responders sound as thought they have experience with street combat, which is what officers face every day. Most people turn their backs and run (wisely) in the face of aggression. Police officers do not have that luxury. Furthermore, none appear to have any experience with combat (armed or unarmed) and the celerity with which it occurs nor with the speed with which a blow to the head can change your life.
I state this because it is obvious that Thom and his supporters are sitting upon some very high horses. You are failing to recognize the changes that come to one's mind and body when facing these situations. There is no way to avoid these changes and the only way to adapt to them is to require counseling for the officers and ongoing training. Granted, this is a tough thing to require in their culture but, require it non the less.
But, back to the idea of heroism. I have personally seen police officers reach into burning cars to pull out children still strapped into car seats after a crash. I have seen them come out of burning buildings before we firefighters run in with all our fire gear. I have seen them beaten up and bloodied after fighhting and subduing a drug induced psychotic black man who was threatening the public (they did not shoot him).
They have a different mentality than most of the general population and they live by a VERY different code than the vast majority of us. Do we need to continue with the efforts to deepen civilian control over the putative emergence of a police state? YES.
But to naively state that police should not be seen as heros is shallow and, quite honestly, weak.
They do a job that Thom has opted NOT to do. More importantly, we all benefit from the fulfillment of their duties and we need to show them respect and appreciation for that daily. After my time in the Peace Corps I can say with confidence that, without their efforts and blood, our country would be no better than any other third world country with its concomittant chaos and corruption. If you really want to fight against oppression then fight agains corporate control of government because THAT is the most corrosive agent of democracy. That is the coming oppressor of your freedoms.
A New York City Police Union opportunist is trying to blame PEACEFUL PROSTESTORS exercising their rights to FREE SPEECH (and the NYC MAYOR) for the recent tragic murders of TWO COPS.
And, I'm pretty sure that FOX NEWS is doing it too, but that would be neither FAIR nor BALANCED.
It would probably be more accurate to blame the NRA, the GOP, and their TEA PARTY FRINGE for the brutal executions of those TWO LAS VEGAS COPS.
But I would never do that. Or would I?
To say "why is no one protesting the cop murders?" is racist and stupid. Who would be the target of the protest? The killer? He's dead. If there had been vidio and then he had been caught and then not charged by a grand jury, that would be a reason for a protest. Then the protesters would likely be made up of cops and mostly white citizens. That would never happen because the cops likely would have murdered the shooter so he could not go to trial and plead insanity even if he tried to surrender. The cops would have their stories (lies) together. The protesters are not to blame. The media is not to blame. Let's put blame where where it belongs. First the lone shooter is to blame. Second is our supreme court who interprets the second amendment, that was designed to protect our country from a foreign invasion with the help of a citizen army, by saying that it says that everyone can carry guns, nevermind the part about a "WELL REGULATED MALITA". Has it occured to anyone in our government that this amendment is obsolete and should be changed because now we spend billions of dollars every year on a standing military to protect us and now there's no chance a private citizen is going to be called upon to protect this country with his HUNTING RIFEL? Third is our system of how we police the police, When a police officer stands accused of violating a citizens rights, HIS FRIENDS, the prossicutor and fellow officers most often will make sure the officer will not be charged with any crime, no matter what the officer has done or who the officer has murdered unless it's another cop. Cops harrass and illeagaly search people every day, not all cops, not all police forces, but in some places it's routine, usually where there are a lot of black targets to choose from. This has to stop. Cops trying to find reasons to arrest people for the sake of getting a big number of arrests on their record has to stop too. Most cops are very good people but in some police forces they need to do a better job of acting like their job is to protect everyone, even the people they must arrest. The fourth reason the two cops were murdered is OUTRAGE caused by a rash of vidios of cops shooting and killing people when they didn't have to.
You have no way of knowing this, but I come from a family of police and firemen. I never remember Sheriffs or police (or firefighters!) ever shooting anyone just for suspicion... The only things they shot when I was young were helpless o'possums trying to safely transporting their young, clinging to their bodies, trying to safely cross a road... THAT really pissed me off. For them, it was just "fun target shooting" to a defenseless animal who never wanted to harm anyone. I detested that kind of behavior, and I still do. When did they go from shooting defenseless wildlife for sport, to shooting people out of fear? There'ssomething entirely wrong with this kind of behavior. I'm so glad I never followed in the steps of my uncles, cousins, and friends...
POLICE used to take oaths to "Protect and Serve the masses." Now it has become "Enforce the Law and save yourself when you have an inkling that you might be in danger." Black people and people with darker skin are more likely to be mistaken as someone likely to be carrying a weapon, but sadly most are not held responsible for being afraid for their lives. We seem to be training a bunch of wussies, instead of training Law Officers to stay strong, wear their vests, and not shoot people you only suspect of having a weapon. A lot more of us will die because of fear from those who are supposed to be well-trained. America is going nuts. Where on earth are the brave officers who take more than 3 seconds to make a wise decision?!
One thing is for sure, and that is that the unconstitutional drug war is the main thing that puts our country in danger where the dangers of our society becoming an authoritarian police state is concerned. It's the main reason that our police have become so militaryised, and so abusive toward average citizens. The drug war has led to the abuse of powers and why so many black people and also people of other races are in prison. Richard Nixon was a criminal, and there is no reason why we as Americans should still be under the thumb of laws that were created by criminals like Nixon. There is no doubt in my mind that if we do away with the drug war now, most of the societal problems we are facing today will automatically disappear. The rich fat cat monopoly loving corporations are at fault for all these problems, and one way or another, we as citizens must do something about their tyranny that they have established over us.
It is a sad day when I agree with Mike Barnacle and Rudy Guiliani and disagree with Thom. My mother and father were police officers so I take it personally when police officers are killed. I will always support the police.
It's odd that neither of the slain police officers were white. Might they just be an attemt to stir the pot of unrest even further than it has been of late?
Who's to say it wasn't yet another agent provocateur attack. Also if the elite really wanted gun control, they would simply stop manufacturing the weapons
People like Giuliani say it is the fault of Obama, Democrats, protesters of police brutality, etc., that the two cops were murdered. I ask, how is it that somebody with a history like that of the killer was able to get a gun? I blame the NRA for the murder of the two cops, and thousands of other deaths per year.
Mr. Barnicle's article is one more example of the asinine false equivalency being propagated by the Right, and also one more attempt to make a partisan black/white liberal/conservative issue out of this, when police brutality should be everyone's concern. By all accounts this shooter was mentally unstable and acted alone. The suggestion that people should organize a protest against the actions of this killer is simply ludicrous. What would that accomplish? How many violent acts are committed every day by people with mental problems? Mr. Barnicle is really attempting to link the shooting to the protests against police brutality when there is none.
Police are not the only people who can kill somebody when they make a 'bad mistake.' The same can be said for doctors. That is why governments issues licenses and hold the profession of medical doctors to certain standards. If some demographics start dying at bizarrely high rates while under a doctor's care then it is realistic to expect an investigation. Police, as professionals, must also be held to standards, although the guidelines are usually inconsistent, in fact it is usually up to the community and not the state to issue guidelines for behavior and training. The people have a right to expect that their police forces, being a so-called professional organization, should be held to some sort of standards. This is a responsibility that any police officer should assume when he or she puts on the badge. Any profession must shoulder expectations from the public for it's behavior and skill. We have expectations of the police that we do not have of the average 'civilian' and for good reason. When an organization fails those expectations we the public have a right to ask why.
Think of what you are saying. Since a consequence of protesting police violence may be the heightened chance of acts of violence being committed against police, then People shouldn’t protest police violence.
I know part of you talking heads jobs is to help the Democrats keep the People in line, but I’m not sure such thinking as you indicated above would make for good social engineering. The killer committed the murders in response to the deaths of Eric and Michael, not because of the protests.
Violence begets violence. Protests are in response to violence. My condolences to the families of the two police officers who were slain.
One distinction that gets lost is that the protests were about the lack of an arrest and trial for the killers of the young black men. You can bet that if the killer of the policemen had not taken his own life, he would have been immediately arrested, tried for murder and executed.
All killings are tragic. The justice system handles kilings of policemen, but not killings by policemen. That's why there are protests about one kind of killing and not the other.
I have had several conversations with friends about the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner and they all basically say the same thing, "Good riddance. One less thug in the world."
Though none of them like to hear it that statement reeks of racism of the lowest order. Despite the fact that Mr. Brown was caught on tape roughing up a store clerk and Mr. Garner was caught resisting arrest, the people I have spoken to know nothing about these two men other than the fact they are black. Everything implied in these statements indicate that they don't need to know anything else.
About 30 years ago a brother of a good friend of mine had a rather spectacular encounter with the local police. It made the local TV and paper news. At first, the police thought he was crazy or on PCP. He smashed a storefront window and started destroying private property with his bare hands. Several police tackled him and he threw them all off like dolls. He broke one officers nose and another officers arm. Finally, after waiting for backup to arrive, 10 officers managed to subdue him and place him in custody. He was rushed to a psychic ward for evaluation. He survived the encounter, unlike Mr. Brown and Mr. Garner, despite having putting up a much greater fight, and posing a much greater threat. One difference in the two cases however, he was not a black man.
As it turned out my friend was a pre diagnosed schizophrenic. After several months in the psychic ward and several attempts at medication they finally stabilized him. He has lived a normal and productive life ever since. I cannot help but think that if he were black, he would never have survived the encounter and his life would have ended before his 20th birthday.
If it is possible for the police to subdue even a very large, dangerous, strong, and violent mentally ill young man they certainly could have subdued Mr. Brown and Mr. Garner without ending their lives. That is exactly what they train to do. That is what we as a society are paying them to do--to protect us--every single one of us. Thom is absolutely right on this one! Our society and more notably, our police, simply do not value the lives of black men. That has got to change.
Unfortunately, many police agency's have developed a "Shoot first and don"t answer questions later" attitude; and that's fueling the hatred toward cops, which, in turn, is further increasing the "shoot first..." attitude.
All police agency's need to have a civillian oversite committee, and all members of that committee would have term limits and be elected, NOT APPOINTED. It's the only way we're going to return sanity and civility to the law enforcement profession.
Why does anyone pay any attention to Bill O'Reilly? There are more erudite blowhards in most neighborhood bars in America.
Roland