I think President Obama ought to do what Bush did: use signing statements. Why not? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Bush did it, and he got everything he wanted, whether Congress wanted it or not. I'd like to see the President start kicking some serious bootie - Republican bootie, that is. Enough of this stupid pointless useless bi-partisanship. Bi-partisanship only works if both sides are adult about things. When you have one side that is acting like so many spoiled bratty children throwing temper tantrums- as the Republicans are - bi-partisanship is a total waste of time.
Oliver Stone and American University Professor and Historian, Peter Kuznik were on RT "Breaking the Set" with Abby Martin. They talked about Oliver Stone's and Peter Kusnik's new book and Showtime documentary series "The Untold History of the United States" which is a 10 part series which is up to #6 this week. #7 should be shown starting next Monday. I am really enjoying watching this series as it shows just how much propaganda Americans have been exposed to over the decades and the real reasons behind historical events. This is stuff you just didn't learn in school...
I am so weary of the unrelenting attacks on workers in this country. I'm afraid that, even with President Obama in office for a second term, nothing will improve because there are still too many Republicans in power. I'm fed up with the childish vendettas the Republicans are waging because they lost the election. When will they grow up and start caring about the country, instead of their egos and their power trips? Most likely never. Until Tea Party types and Neocons are voted out of office, this country will never improve. Let's face it: we don't stand a chance against the big money guns the Republicans are wielding. It may take the country completely collapsing before stupid voters wake up and stop putting Tea Partiers and Neocons in office. Until that happens, I don't think anything will get better.
THIS is THE problem we have with government. MEDICARE drastically needs reform (I am 72, using it). However, in our dysfunctional divided government it is part of a game of words. It's all or nothing, fought tooth and nail -- I assume by people who have no idea how it is implemented in practice. It's a concept (or 2 self-serving concepts), neither of which have anything to do with reality, Medicare in practice. Meanwhile, healthcare distribution is a mess, financing is worse.
One tribe wants singlepayer, the other tribe (per their patrons propaganda) wants it privatized. Meanwhile we have the worst convoluted mish-mash of a camel-istic system designed by a long-series of committees (half adding poison-pills to sabatage it, others compromizing just to get anything). It's the worst "system" I could possibly imagine.
My complaint: despite a tone of bureaucratic paperwork, it is almost impossible for the ultimate consumer (the patient) to understand much less have any affect on cost-control. Invoices if available are unintelligible, with gorsely inflated prices denied, retracted, paid -- always with some left for me to pay (on top of my Medicare contribution, my "advantage" supplement and my Copay. It's a mess and the overall healthcare system "In accordance with Medicare requirements ..." is utterly beyond reason and control.
Don't get me wrong, I think Social Security works great (Money in; 3% Admin, Money out). Exceptionally clean and simple. It works great. Fine-tuning, can easilly account for demographic ebbs and flows, without destroying everything. I'd have no problem with increases or cutbacks -- based on receipts and disbursements -- as long as the safety-net is still there. Get real.
However, Medicare and the US Healthcare Finance/Delivery Systems are a horrible mess. Quality-of-care can be excellent (IF you have coverage, or use the Emergency Room access); however, the Financial Admin Management side of healthcare is insane. Pricing and reimbursement are beyond any words I can muster. Medicare's botched-up cost control totally messes the whole system.
So, when I hear utterly silly simplistic slogans like: "Medicare on the table" and "Medicare off the table" -- I just shake my head wondering if there is any hope for EVER cleaning up the mess, getting anything resembling a rational US Healthcare System.
Unfortunately, not in this civil-class-war climate, not in my lifetime, I fear.
It's pretty clear that a few billionaires using tools like Snyder and the rest of the Teapublican Party are hellbent on taking us back to a time and place much like the one portrayed in the novel, The Grapes of Wrath....and for what....a few more billion in an offshore bank account? Think of the misery these guys create while feeding their unchecked madness. This country needs leadership more than ever right now. It might do the President some good to give Steinbecks novel another read before meeting with any of the Teapublican monkeys again.
"Fear the time when the strikes stop while the great owners live- for every little beaten strike is proof that the step is being taken......fear the time when manself will not suffer and die for a concept, for this one quality is man, distinctive in the universe."
My hope is to work well past 65 (hopefully to 85 or older) so as to not need to take my Social Security benefits. But, I like knowing that they will be there in full at 65 just in case I can not is very comforting. Nevertheless, I am looking forward to receiving my Medicare benefits at age 65 (8.5 years from now) so that I can stop being gouged by the private health insurance companies. For Social Security just end the cap of just over $100,000 and tax every dollar of earned income. Let Medicare get Rx at cheaper prices. Perhaps even lessening the time protection for patents on new drugs to make generics available at an earlier stage would be worthwhile. Perhaps a complete overhaul on the way medical services are billed would make sense to allow doctors to bill for their time instead of just things done or other ways that would be fair to the health services professions and providers.
Raising the Medicare age as part of the deal would be certain political suicide for Obama and the Democrats. Hasn't the middle class been ripped off enough thanks to a lack of fair representation in Washington? Out of control Military spending and the outrageously idiotic lack of a single payer system accounts for much of the spending problem, both Republican in nature.
I think President Obama needs to consider the following from "Strengthen Social Security"...."Rep. Paul Ryan has buried in the FY 2013 budget resolution a radical proposal to raise the medicare eligibility age from 65 to the age of 67. Undoubtedly worried about the unpopularity of this proposal, Rep. Ryan did not include raising the age in the GOP's FY 2013 budget proposal. Instead, he slipped the proposal into instuctions to the Congressional Budget office, hoping the American people would not find it."
So in other words, this proposal is so toxic that even Paul Ryan was trying to hide from it. There has to be lots of mocking laughter behind the right wing curtains given that Obama is even willing to put this on the table. In my opinion raising the age would be one of the biggest political blunders in history.
The GOP is Playing hard ball Chicken with the 98%, again. GOP Leaders act as if the election did not change anything. They fail to examine more carefully the total votes of all third Party candidates, who showed well. The numbers change dramatically whey examined with Democratic vs Republican and primarily Republicans numbers drop greatly. Democrats whold their own. But it also shows how right wing has lost substantial credibility with its base. As you compare total number that went out to vote.
It is high time that we begin to talk seriously. Any Changes to Medicare should be to lower the age for eligibility a couple of years to allow those close to retirement to take their benefits without penalty and leave work space for younger people.
THe same goes with Social Security's Eligibility age. In the same vein, any discussion of cutting benefits should be out of the discussion as this is a stand on it's own merits. IF anything, the ceiling that caps who pays into Social Security should change with all persons with earning, and income paying a percentage. instead of the cap at the top at $100,000.
Talks of ending the 2006 "Drain on Postal Services profits by funding the Retirement 75 years in advance should be terminated. A portion of that money should go back to restoring the black line on the balance sheet and the plans for converting the fleet into an electric/solar energy fleet implemented. with no further closing of Postal Offices. This helps greatly as it would guarantee that Services and jobs are preseved.
Defense budget must be discussed as it is the major cause of the Debt. Starting with subcontracting of services to Para-military entities. Especially, in the case of helping to rebuild after desasters such as Katrina. Return this work to the Services of the Coast Guard and regualr Services. Who are paid at a more reasonable rate. The Rich must pay their fair share and we must allow the top 2% to end their gauging of the wealth created by workers that they hord in other parts of the world. Only those who have a proven plan written which brings jobs and factory work back to the states should receive a one-time reduction in taxes for reinvesting money that ws stored in foreign banks.
We campaigned against Gov. Snyder for the recall on the Emergency Manager Law, and we will continue to campaign for a recall of Gov. Snyder on this Right To Work For Less Law. Let us remember that to be a Republican today, one must be Rich, Cruel, or Politically Ingnorant, and they are not mutually exclusive... The thrust of the Republican agenda is driven by Hate!
The same people that agree with the Supreme Courts ruling that Corporations are a People and money is its voice are anti-union and want to abolish collective bargaining.
Absolutely NOT! Everyone needs to be on Medicare from 99 seconds to 99 years. We can pay for this and more if we tax those in the higher income brackets at 1970's tax rates, stop subsidizing big oil, big gas and big banks, charge a transaction fee for all stock exchanges transactions in the USA, eliminate this countries over-reactive security agencies and slash the military budget by at least 70%. And we can still be the biggest, badest, bad-ass in town.
My thoughts about the unions; Early on in life my feelings were a mix of emotions. Some good, some not good. Now, rereading the Bill of rights in the First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. Intrinsically holds all the elements that we the people should really care about and how this amendment is connected to an assembly of an elected body called a union. The irony is that the overall disrespect we the people have for the unions are parallel to effect of what is in our government representatives. The people’s attitude sucks. The reason why unions have slide in support.
Yes, the amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, thereby making it feel a lot out of place to call someone brethren, or brother, with such a feeling as to be religious. Perhaps those are the individuals who are really masquerading as a union official. But really not. We know in our hearts that there are plenty of representatives in unions that don’t give a shit! The types you talk to about in issues that breach a local contract. The hypocrisy is staggering, where we know the running front union official my very well end up in management. Think about it if the company can find a person to make the worker happy and in line chances are they found a person for their first line management team. Ah La congressional or senate representative quits to think tanks for political or becomes a lobbyist.
Also, abridging the freedom of speech, to reduce the length, to cut short; to curtail, to omit. As Omit Romney, for laughs just had to throw that in. Even in assemblies on the streets is it not a curiosity that a public emissary is not sent out to meet for free speech and air grievances. But a Journalist, a corporate journalist, devoted to a six figure salary schmoozing on the air waves, actually intimidating crowds all the while watching we the people as unionized police beat assemblies, or occupies movements in the street over their heads with batons and spray with pepper spray. We the people get slap around or torture in the streets while the corporate media get profits in commercial ads. Perhaps in the law we the people should make a coral where the media should be. An extraordinary screwed up system with total disrespect for those core elements of the constitution. The new media knows it, but asks why the country is so upset. Why are people taking of lives for stupid reasons?
Then, infringing on the freedom of the press, where Fox news owned a huge amount by the Wahhabi Arabs highly and likely influence the programming of news to fill the hate mongers besides Rush Limbaugh or Dennis Miller or other hate radio specialist that lie, or are outright antithetical to the constitution, meaning they are obstructionist that work in the system of the constitution itself. The current Republicans need the constitution as it stands, and the Democrats the way they are. Just think about it otherwise how could they become billionaires by any other means. Its delightfully simple when you think about it. Republicans need sappy dumb Democrats to be rich. There are millions out there and they know it!!! That’s why we need unions.
My thoughts about the unions; Early on in life my feelings were a mix of emotions. Some good, some not good. Now, rereading the Bill of rights in the First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. Intrinsically holds all the elements that we the people should really care about and how this amendment is connected to an assembly of an elected body called a union. The irony is that the overall disrespect we the people have for the unions are parallel to effect of what is in our government representatives. The people’s attitude sucks. The reason why unions have slide in support.
Yes, the amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, thereby making it feel a lot out of place to call someone brethren, or brother, with such a feeling as to be religious. Perhaps those are the individuals who are really masquerading as a union official. But really not. We know in our hearts that there are plenty of representatives in unions that don’t give a shit! The types you talk to about in issues that breach a local contract. The hypocrisy is staggering, where we know the running front union official my very well end up in management. Think about it if the company can find a person to make the worker happy and in line chances are they found a person for their first line management team. Ah La congressional or senate representative quits and goes to think tanks for political or becomes a lobbyist.
Also, abridging the freedom of speech, to reduce the length, to cut short; to curtail, to omit. As Omit Romney, for laughs just had to throw that in. Even in assemblies on the streets is it not a curiosity that a public emissary is not sent out to meet for free speech and air grievances. But a Journalist, a corporate journalist, devoted to a six figure salary schmoozing on the air waves all the while watching we the people as unionized police beat assemblies, or occupies movements in the street over their heads with batons and spray with pepper spray. We the people get slap around or torture in the streets while the corporate media get profits in commercial ads. An extraordinary screwed up system with total disrespect for those core elements of the constitution. The "new media" (not miss spelled), knows it, but asks why the country is so upset. Why are people taking of lives for stupid reasons?
Then, infringing on the freedom of the press, where Fox news owned a huge amount by the Wahhabi Arabs highly and likely influence the programming of news to fill the hate mongers besides Rush Limbaugh or Dennis Miller or other hate radio specialist that lie, or outright antithetical to the constitution, meaning they are obstructionist that work in the system of the constitution itself. The current Republicans need the constitution as it stands, and the Democrats the way they are. Just think about it otherwise how could they become billionaires by any other means. Its delightfully simple when you think about it. Republicans need sappy dumb Democrats to be rich. There are millions out there and they know it!!! That’s why we need unions.
Perhaps if I watch Hartmann's show tonight I might have a better understanding of how this Union and non-Union employees works. So if the company wants non-Union employees in a union shop, can they simply start a program of attrition where they fire Union workers and hire non-Union workers to replace the union workers. It appears to me that the game of having workers that do not have to pay Union dues is an attempt to slowly starve the Unions of funds and thus they would hurt the chances of Democrats winning an election due to less funding from the union. Am I missing something here? And why would a worker choose not to support a Union when it is the Unions that have had the most luck in getting fair wages and benefits? Although I have seen where the large food chains here in California were able to get a two tier wage and benefits contract from the Union. This is where the new employees are usually hired part time and receive about $9 hr., about half of what they would receive without the two tier wage agreement. If I am missing something here, I would appreciate it if someone could explain to me exactly what the right to work law does to the Unions!
am4dms12 I don't know if what you say is true or not, but if it is that is a management/quality control problem that you describe. It is the responsibility of the plant management to put out a good product. Management has to make sure they put the right person in the right place and train them to do the job they are being paid to do. If they can't get enough quality people to do the work, that will force them to offer more money to their new hires in an effort to get better quality employees. Then everyone's boat gets lifted in the rising tide.
Unfortunately in most businesses lately it has been a falling tide. I've been caught in both rising and falling tides, and those of us in the energy business right now are in a rising tide. But it has not always been that way, believe me.
No compromise is necessary to raise taxes on the wealthy. Simply allow the Bush tax cuts to expire. After the last 4 years, I don't believe there is anything a Republican has to offer worth listening to. They will always have their agenda in mind. Even if it sounds good, there will be a catch and a payment to either corporations or the wealthy. We need to stick together and implement what we know is right.
That's true, Ken, there would likely not be any more jobs anywhere else either.
I just watched an interview of Michael Hudson, the economist, on the Max Keiser show. Very scary!
Michael Hudson, the economist, says that we have a "fiction economy" that has no real collateral to back up our savings in the banks. The government and the banks believe that all they have to do is make the public believe that the "fiction economy" is not fiction and that it is necessary to pay down the debt by sacrificing social programs, breaking labor unions, increasing taxes on consumers, and canceling the pension fund debt, etc., in order to save the system. But, in reality, what they are doing is transferring large funds from the 99% to the 1%. It's "the greatest rip off in history all wrapped in the fiction that the debt can be paid." The debt cannot be paid and it won't be paid. But they are using that as an excuse to rob the 99%. The government will end up saying only the bottom 99% will have to pay the debt but the top 1% won't have to pay any of the debt.
The Obama administration's plan is to cut worker's wages by 30%, take away social security, medicare, and other social programs and cancel pension fund debt. The reason why the Obama administration has been able to raise so much money from major financial criminals....Eric Holder has promised that no rich campaign contributors will go to jail..no banker will go to jail..only the small fry will. William Black has said that the only criminals arrested was when Bernie Madoff walked into the police headquarters with his hands up and said "I surrender".
It's already easy to see where a car comes from (union plant versus non union plant ) just do a sight inspection of the vehicles that you know are made in non union companys and that will tell the story rite of way. most of the plants in the lower states that have opened to take work from the union plants produce junk compared to the union shops. and the whereabouts of their origin is somewhat hidden for that reason. ? would you have wanted to be in a high rise building in A/C or new york during huricane sandy , that was built by non union workers ???
so right, and after all of the benefits that the non union workers will recieve without paying dues, they will still bad talk the unions (thinking that the company is actually willing to pay these higher wages and benefits without the union involvement) well what their not seeing is that if the corporations sucseed in ridding their company of the unions, THERE GOES ALL OF THOSE HIGHER WAGES AND BENEFITS that they thought were willfully given.
You've said it so well . but lets see what tricks the opposing teams have up their sleeves ,we all know the good that the unions have done for the labor force in this country but, somehow they've turned things around and now the general labor keeps hearing the lies and untruths and somehow they believe it .
I'm sure you can find stories of both union members and non-union members doing underhanded things to one another but one thing you will never find is union members raiding the homes of wealthy industrialists and murdering the occupants...they have never slit the throats of industrialists or management using hired bully boys...they have never opened fire with machine guns on families of wealthy industrialists or forced them out of their homes and into the streets. But the wealthy industrialists have done all those things, and much more, to union members and their families. When non-union workers agree to work outside of a union they are, in effect, agreeing to everything the employers dictate..including low wages, longer and unpaid work hours, and sacrifice of benefits. But, if it wasn't for the fear, by the employer, that the company would go totally 100% union, if they didn't have that pressure on them, they wouldn't give their non-union employees as much as they have. In other words, even the non-union employees are taking advantage of the union....all without having to pay dues. The non-union slackers, or freeloaders, like scabs are a weakness to the overall goals of making the employers pay decent wages, etc.
I am not sure there would be enough jobs in other states to accommodate a mass exodus or workers. And as we have seen in the shale oil boom in the northern states that there is not enough infrastructure to support an exodus of workers. The housing, schools and local police and fire department had difficulty keeping up with new workers entering their area. As far as non-union workers getting along with union members, we have seen how union members see non-union employees as scab workers out to lower their standard of living. How about the Unions work for a better wage and benefits package for their due paying members and let the non-union workers negotiate on their own with the corporations. That could end up with workers lining up to stay in the union and pay their union dues to get representation. I know from personal experience that those of us in the union viewed non-union workers with distain and loathing. It will be interesting to see these two groups of workers get along in the workplace. I realize everyone has the right not to pay union dues in these right to work (for less) states, but I wonder how well these two groups will actually work together. This whole situation might just blow up in the face of the corporations and states that have passed these laws, especially when it comes to the quality of work these two groups will produce. Personally, my experience has been the Unions have always helped to provide security and a better standard of living for their members.
I think President Obama ought to do what Bush did: use signing statements. Why not? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Bush did it, and he got everything he wanted, whether Congress wanted it or not. I'd like to see the President start kicking some serious bootie - Republican bootie, that is. Enough of this stupid pointless useless bi-partisanship. Bi-partisanship only works if both sides are adult about things. When you have one side that is acting like so many spoiled bratty children throwing temper tantrums- as the Republicans are - bi-partisanship is a total waste of time.
Oliver Stone and American University Professor and Historian, Peter Kuznik were on RT "Breaking the Set" with Abby Martin. They talked about Oliver Stone's and Peter Kusnik's new book and Showtime documentary series "The Untold History of the United States" which is a 10 part series which is up to #6 this week. #7 should be shown starting next Monday. I am really enjoying watching this series as it shows just how much propaganda Americans have been exposed to over the decades and the real reasons behind historical events. This is stuff you just didn't learn in school...
Actually, Norske wrote about it and tells it better than I have...
http://m.thomhartmann.com/forum/2012/11/about-untold-history-united-stat...
I am so weary of the unrelenting attacks on workers in this country. I'm afraid that, even with President Obama in office for a second term, nothing will improve because there are still too many Republicans in power. I'm fed up with the childish vendettas the Republicans are waging because they lost the election. When will they grow up and start caring about the country, instead of their egos and their power trips? Most likely never. Until Tea Party types and Neocons are voted out of office, this country will never improve. Let's face it: we don't stand a chance against the big money guns the Republicans are wielding. It may take the country completely collapsing before stupid voters wake up and stop putting Tea Partiers and Neocons in office. Until that happens, I don't think anything will get better.
i dont care for democrats but i REALLY hate these SCREWBALL REPUBLICANS
THIS is THE problem we have with government. MEDICARE drastically needs reform (I am 72, using it). However, in our dysfunctional divided government it is part of a game of words. It's all or nothing, fought tooth and nail -- I assume by people who have no idea how it is implemented in practice. It's a concept (or 2 self-serving concepts), neither of which have anything to do with reality, Medicare in practice. Meanwhile, healthcare distribution is a mess, financing is worse.
One tribe wants singlepayer, the other tribe (per their patrons propaganda) wants it privatized. Meanwhile we have the worst convoluted mish-mash of a camel-istic system designed by a long-series of committees (half adding poison-pills to sabatage it, others compromizing just to get anything). It's the worst "system" I could possibly imagine.
My complaint: despite a tone of bureaucratic paperwork, it is almost impossible for the ultimate consumer (the patient) to understand much less have any affect on cost-control. Invoices if available are unintelligible, with gorsely inflated prices denied, retracted, paid -- always with some left for me to pay (on top of my Medicare contribution, my "advantage" supplement and my Copay. It's a mess and the overall healthcare system "In accordance with Medicare requirements ..." is utterly beyond reason and control.
Don't get me wrong, I think Social Security works great (Money in; 3% Admin, Money out). Exceptionally clean and simple. It works great. Fine-tuning, can easilly account for demographic ebbs and flows, without destroying everything. I'd have no problem with increases or cutbacks -- based on receipts and disbursements -- as long as the safety-net is still there. Get real.
However, Medicare and the US Healthcare Finance/Delivery Systems are a horrible mess. Quality-of-care can be excellent (IF you have coverage, or use the Emergency Room access); however, the Financial Admin Management side of healthcare is insane. Pricing and reimbursement are beyond any words I can muster. Medicare's botched-up cost control totally messes the whole system.
So, when I hear utterly silly simplistic slogans like: "Medicare on the table" and "Medicare off the table" -- I just shake my head wondering if there is any hope for EVER cleaning up the mess, getting anything resembling a rational US Healthcare System.
Unfortunately, not in this civil-class-war climate, not in my lifetime, I fear.
It's pretty clear that a few billionaires using tools like Snyder and the rest of the Teapublican Party are hellbent on taking us back to a time and place much like the one portrayed in the novel, The Grapes of Wrath....and for what....a few more billion in an offshore bank account? Think of the misery these guys create while feeding their unchecked madness. This country needs leadership more than ever right now. It might do the President some good to give Steinbecks novel another read before meeting with any of the Teapublican monkeys again.
"Fear the time when the strikes stop while the great owners live- for every little beaten strike is proof that the step is being taken......fear the time when manself will not suffer and die for a concept, for this one quality is man, distinctive in the universe."
Chapter 14, The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck
My hope is to work well past 65 (hopefully to 85 or older) so as to not need to take my Social Security benefits. But, I like knowing that they will be there in full at 65 just in case I can not is very comforting. Nevertheless, I am looking forward to receiving my Medicare benefits at age 65 (8.5 years from now) so that I can stop being gouged by the private health insurance companies. For Social Security just end the cap of just over $100,000 and tax every dollar of earned income. Let Medicare get Rx at cheaper prices. Perhaps even lessening the time protection for patents on new drugs to make generics available at an earlier stage would be worthwhile. Perhaps a complete overhaul on the way medical services are billed would make sense to allow doctors to bill for their time instead of just things done or other ways that would be fair to the health services professions and providers.
Raising the Medicare age as part of the deal would be certain political suicide for Obama and the Democrats. Hasn't the middle class been ripped off enough thanks to a lack of fair representation in Washington? Out of control Military spending and the outrageously idiotic lack of a single payer system accounts for much of the spending problem, both Republican in nature.
I think President Obama needs to consider the following from "Strengthen Social Security"...."Rep. Paul Ryan has buried in the FY 2013 budget resolution a radical proposal to raise the medicare eligibility age from 65 to the age of 67. Undoubtedly worried about the unpopularity of this proposal, Rep. Ryan did not include raising the age in the GOP's FY 2013 budget proposal. Instead, he slipped the proposal into instuctions to the Congressional Budget office, hoping the American people would not find it."
So in other words, this proposal is so toxic that even Paul Ryan was trying to hide from it. There has to be lots of mocking laughter behind the right wing curtains given that Obama is even willing to put this on the table. In my opinion raising the age would be one of the biggest political blunders in history.
The GOP is Playing hard ball Chicken with the 98%, again. GOP Leaders act as if the election did not change anything. They fail to examine more carefully the total votes of all third Party candidates, who showed well. The numbers change dramatically whey examined with Democratic vs Republican and primarily Republicans numbers drop greatly. Democrats whold their own. But it also shows how right wing has lost substantial credibility with its base. As you compare total number that went out to vote.
It is high time that we begin to talk seriously. Any Changes to Medicare should be to lower the age for eligibility a couple of years to allow those close to retirement to take their benefits without penalty and leave work space for younger people.
THe same goes with Social Security's Eligibility age. In the same vein, any discussion of cutting benefits should be out of the discussion as this is a stand on it's own merits. IF anything, the ceiling that caps who pays into Social Security should change with all persons with earning, and income paying a percentage. instead of the cap at the top at $100,000.
Talks of ending the 2006 "Drain on Postal Services profits by funding the Retirement 75 years in advance should be terminated. A portion of that money should go back to restoring the black line on the balance sheet and the plans for converting the fleet into an electric/solar energy fleet implemented. with no further closing of Postal Offices. This helps greatly as it would guarantee that Services and jobs are preseved.
Defense budget must be discussed as it is the major cause of the Debt. Starting with subcontracting of services to Para-military entities. Especially, in the case of helping to rebuild after desasters such as Katrina. Return this work to the Services of the Coast Guard and regualr Services. Who are paid at a more reasonable rate. The Rich must pay their fair share and we must allow the top 2% to end their gauging of the wealth created by workers that they hord in other parts of the world. Only those who have a proven plan written which brings jobs and factory work back to the states should receive a one-time reduction in taxes for reinvesting money that ws stored in foreign banks.
We campaigned against Gov. Snyder for the recall on the Emergency Manager Law, and we will continue to campaign for a recall of Gov. Snyder on this Right To Work For Less Law. Let us remember that to be a Republican today, one must be Rich, Cruel, or Politically Ingnorant, and they are not mutually exclusive... The thrust of the Republican agenda is driven by Hate!
It strikes me as funny...
The same people that agree with the Supreme Courts ruling that Corporations are a People and money is its voice are anti-union and want to abolish collective bargaining.
Hhhhmmmmmm...something strange go'en on here!?
Absolutely NOT! Everyone needs to be on Medicare from 99 seconds to 99 years. We can pay for this and more if we tax those in the higher income brackets at 1970's tax rates, stop subsidizing big oil, big gas and big banks, charge a transaction fee for all stock exchanges transactions in the USA, eliminate this countries over-reactive security agencies and slash the military budget by at least 70%. And we can still be the biggest, badest, bad-ass in town.
Detroit, 34.5% on Food Stamps, 45.7% not in labor force. Is this not a "Wasteland"?
My thoughts about the unions; Early on in life my feelings were a mix of emotions. Some good, some not good. Now, rereading the Bill of rights in the First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. Intrinsically holds all the elements that we the people should really care about and how this amendment is connected to an assembly of an elected body called a union. The irony is that the overall disrespect we the people have for the unions are parallel to effect of what is in our government representatives. The people’s attitude sucks. The reason why unions have slide in support.
Yes, the amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, thereby making it feel a lot out of place to call someone brethren, or brother, with such a feeling as to be religious. Perhaps those are the individuals who are really masquerading as a union official. But really not. We know in our hearts that there are plenty of representatives in unions that don’t give a shit! The types you talk to about in issues that breach a local contract. The hypocrisy is staggering, where we know the running front union official my very well end up in management. Think about it if the company can find a person to make the worker happy and in line chances are they found a person for their first line management team. Ah La congressional or senate representative quits to think tanks for political or becomes a lobbyist.
Also, abridging the freedom of speech, to reduce the length, to cut short; to curtail, to omit. As Omit Romney, for laughs just had to throw that in. Even in assemblies on the streets is it not a curiosity that a public emissary is not sent out to meet for free speech and air grievances. But a Journalist, a corporate journalist, devoted to a six figure salary schmoozing on the air waves, actually intimidating crowds all the while watching we the people as unionized police beat assemblies, or occupies movements in the street over their heads with batons and spray with pepper spray. We the people get slap around or torture in the streets while the corporate media get profits in commercial ads. Perhaps in the law we the people should make a coral where the media should be. An extraordinary screwed up system with total disrespect for those core elements of the constitution. The new media knows it, but asks why the country is so upset. Why are people taking of lives for stupid reasons?
Then, infringing on the freedom of the press, where Fox news owned a huge amount by the Wahhabi Arabs highly and likely influence the programming of news to fill the hate mongers besides Rush Limbaugh or Dennis Miller or other hate radio specialist that lie, or are outright antithetical to the constitution, meaning they are obstructionist that work in the system of the constitution itself. The current Republicans need the constitution as it stands, and the Democrats the way they are. Just think about it otherwise how could they become billionaires by any other means. Its delightfully simple when you think about it. Republicans need sappy dumb Democrats to be rich. There are millions out there and they know it!!! That’s why we need unions.
My thoughts about the unions; Early on in life my feelings were a mix of emotions. Some good, some not good. Now, rereading the Bill of rights in the First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. Intrinsically holds all the elements that we the people should really care about and how this amendment is connected to an assembly of an elected body called a union. The irony is that the overall disrespect we the people have for the unions are parallel to effect of what is in our government representatives. The people’s attitude sucks. The reason why unions have slide in support.
Yes, the amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, thereby making it feel a lot out of place to call someone brethren, or brother, with such a feeling as to be religious. Perhaps those are the individuals who are really masquerading as a union official. But really not. We know in our hearts that there are plenty of representatives in unions that don’t give a shit! The types you talk to about in issues that breach a local contract. The hypocrisy is staggering, where we know the running front union official my very well end up in management. Think about it if the company can find a person to make the worker happy and in line chances are they found a person for their first line management team. Ah La congressional or senate representative quits and goes to think tanks for political or becomes a lobbyist.
Also, abridging the freedom of speech, to reduce the length, to cut short; to curtail, to omit. As Omit Romney, for laughs just had to throw that in. Even in assemblies on the streets is it not a curiosity that a public emissary is not sent out to meet for free speech and air grievances. But a Journalist, a corporate journalist, devoted to a six figure salary schmoozing on the air waves all the while watching we the people as unionized police beat assemblies, or occupies movements in the street over their heads with batons and spray with pepper spray. We the people get slap around or torture in the streets while the corporate media get profits in commercial ads. An extraordinary screwed up system with total disrespect for those core elements of the constitution. The "new media" (not miss spelled), knows it, but asks why the country is so upset. Why are people taking of lives for stupid reasons?
Then, infringing on the freedom of the press, where Fox news owned a huge amount by the Wahhabi Arabs highly and likely influence the programming of news to fill the hate mongers besides Rush Limbaugh or Dennis Miller or other hate radio specialist that lie, or outright antithetical to the constitution, meaning they are obstructionist that work in the system of the constitution itself. The current Republicans need the constitution as it stands, and the Democrats the way they are. Just think about it otherwise how could they become billionaires by any other means. Its delightfully simple when you think about it. Republicans need sappy dumb Democrats to be rich. There are millions out there and they know it!!! That’s why we need unions.
Perhaps if I watch Hartmann's show tonight I might have a better understanding of how this Union and non-Union employees works. So if the company wants non-Union employees in a union shop, can they simply start a program of attrition where they fire Union workers and hire non-Union workers to replace the union workers. It appears to me that the game of having workers that do not have to pay Union dues is an attempt to slowly starve the Unions of funds and thus they would hurt the chances of Democrats winning an election due to less funding from the union. Am I missing something here? And why would a worker choose not to support a Union when it is the Unions that have had the most luck in getting fair wages and benefits? Although I have seen where the large food chains here in California were able to get a two tier wage and benefits contract from the Union. This is where the new employees are usually hired part time and receive about $9 hr., about half of what they would receive without the two tier wage agreement. If I am missing something here, I would appreciate it if someone could explain to me exactly what the right to work law does to the Unions!
am4dms12 I don't know if what you say is true or not, but if it is that is a management/quality control problem that you describe. It is the responsibility of the plant management to put out a good product. Management has to make sure they put the right person in the right place and train them to do the job they are being paid to do. If they can't get enough quality people to do the work, that will force them to offer more money to their new hires in an effort to get better quality employees. Then everyone's boat gets lifted in the rising tide.
Unfortunately in most businesses lately it has been a falling tide. I've been caught in both rising and falling tides, and those of us in the energy business right now are in a rising tide. But it has not always been that way, believe me.
No compromise is necessary to raise taxes on the wealthy. Simply allow the Bush tax cuts to expire. After the last 4 years, I don't believe there is anything a Republican has to offer worth listening to. They will always have their agenda in mind. Even if it sounds good, there will be a catch and a payment to either corporations or the wealthy. We need to stick together and implement what we know is right.
That's true, Ken, there would likely not be any more jobs anywhere else either.
I just watched an interview of Michael Hudson, the economist, on the Max Keiser show. Very scary!
Michael Hudson, the economist, says that we have a "fiction economy" that has no real collateral to back up our savings in the banks. The government and the banks believe that all they have to do is make the public believe that the "fiction economy" is not fiction and that it is necessary to pay down the debt by sacrificing social programs, breaking labor unions, increasing taxes on consumers, and canceling the pension fund debt, etc., in order to save the system. But, in reality, what they are doing is transferring large funds from the 99% to the 1%. It's "the greatest rip off in history all wrapped in the fiction that the debt can be paid." The debt cannot be paid and it won't be paid. But they are using that as an excuse to rob the 99%. The government will end up saying only the bottom 99% will have to pay the debt but the top 1% won't have to pay any of the debt.
The Obama administration's plan is to cut worker's wages by 30%, take away social security, medicare, and other social programs and cancel pension fund debt. The reason why the Obama administration has been able to raise so much money from major financial criminals....Eric Holder has promised that no rich campaign contributors will go to jail..no banker will go to jail..only the small fry will. William Black has said that the only criminals arrested was when Bernie Madoff walked into the police headquarters with his hands up and said "I surrender".
http://michael-hudson.com/2012/07/beyond-fictitious-capital/
It's already easy to see where a car comes from (union plant versus non union plant ) just do a sight inspection of the vehicles that you know are made in non union companys and that will tell the story rite of way. most of the plants in the lower states that have opened to take work from the union plants produce junk compared to the union shops. and the whereabouts of their origin is somewhat hidden for that reason. ? would you have wanted to be in a high rise building in A/C or new york during huricane sandy , that was built by non union workers ???
The giant sucking sound you now hear in that part of the country are all the jobs moving from Ohio and Ilinois to Michigan and Indiana.
so right, and after all of the benefits that the non union workers will recieve without paying dues, they will still bad talk the unions (thinking that the company is actually willing to pay these higher wages and benefits without the union involvement) well what their not seeing is that if the corporations sucseed in ridding their company of the unions, THERE GOES ALL OF THOSE HIGHER WAGES AND BENEFITS that they thought were willfully given.
You've said it so well . but lets see what tricks the opposing teams have up their sleeves ,we all know the good that the unions have done for the labor force in this country but, somehow they've turned things around and now the general labor keeps hearing the lies and untruths and somehow they believe it .
I'm sure you can find stories of both union members and non-union members doing underhanded things to one another but one thing you will never find is union members raiding the homes of wealthy industrialists and murdering the occupants...they have never slit the throats of industrialists or management using hired bully boys...they have never opened fire with machine guns on families of wealthy industrialists or forced them out of their homes and into the streets. But the wealthy industrialists have done all those things, and much more, to union members and their families. When non-union workers agree to work outside of a union they are, in effect, agreeing to everything the employers dictate..including low wages, longer and unpaid work hours, and sacrifice of benefits. But, if it wasn't for the fear, by the employer, that the company would go totally 100% union, if they didn't have that pressure on them, they wouldn't give their non-union employees as much as they have. In other words, even the non-union employees are taking advantage of the union....all without having to pay dues. The non-union slackers, or freeloaders, like scabs are a weakness to the overall goals of making the employers pay decent wages, etc.
I am not sure there would be enough jobs in other states to accommodate a mass exodus or workers. And as we have seen in the shale oil boom in the northern states that there is not enough infrastructure to support an exodus of workers. The housing, schools and local police and fire department had difficulty keeping up with new workers entering their area. As far as non-union workers getting along with union members, we have seen how union members see non-union employees as scab workers out to lower their standard of living. How about the Unions work for a better wage and benefits package for their due paying members and let the non-union workers negotiate on their own with the corporations. That could end up with workers lining up to stay in the union and pay their union dues to get representation. I know from personal experience that those of us in the union viewed non-union workers with distain and loathing. It will be interesting to see these two groups of workers get along in the workplace. I realize everyone has the right not to pay union dues in these right to work (for less) states, but I wonder how well these two groups will actually work together. This whole situation might just blow up in the face of the corporations and states that have passed these laws, especially when it comes to the quality of work these two groups will produce. Personally, my experience has been the Unions have always helped to provide security and a better standard of living for their members.