Recent comments

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Palindromedary ~ Again, thanks for the education. You were right! Type "Operation" into the browser and up pops Operation Northwood like a Rattle Snake in a pile of wood. One nice thing about all this Revelation is that this problem existed before I was born--probably cultivated by Vice President Nixon and not Eisenhower if you ask me. At least I feel less complicit in the American nightmare. October Surprise indeed. Thank you so much for answering my questions so well. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Gives a lot of credence to that old Ozzie Osbourne song, "War Pigs."

    I wonder what Ken Ware would say about Operation Northwood? Or, about nano-thermite chips in the dust at the WTC? He's been very quiet since that little post, hasn't he? As for me, I want the truth! I don't care what the truth is, just give me the truth!

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    There you go again KEND with those half truths!!! Talking to you Kend is like listening to Fox, CNN, MSNBC, etc...basically all the mainstream commercial news networks...noth'in but half truths and lies to support, and push the agenda of the Corporate Government.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    NAFTA really helped Mexico. I don't think we faired that well though. 50 million unemployed there is only 33 million in Canada. Why are you considering immigration reform with that high of unemployment. Shut the borders and start looking after yourself. You can't help anyone in less your healthy first. Anyone who has been in a plane knows that.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Wow I agree with almost everything you said. Where you dipping into some Canadian rye whiskey. CC, Segrams maybe. if what you say is true, and I respectfully disagree, 50% of your budget goes to military spending no wonder your in so much trouble there. In our provincal (state) budget about 60% of it is health care. The Feds don't have much to do with it any more. It is true Germany has expanded there wind and solar and shut down there coal bu?T it is a false front. They are buying tons of energy from Eastern European coal generated power plants now. Great political move you bought it.

    I am not a big fan of wind power about 30,000 birds a year die here in southern Alberta to them. The coyotes are getting fat though. Maybe we can get that Mayor from New York to come up with something to help them.

  • Will history be kind to George W. Bush?   12 years 4 weeks ago

    the village idiot now has a library?? WOW

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Net Worth of Our Politicians.
    2011 Personal Financial Disclosures

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtkPHD2bTUzbdGpUQUY0aGVoQ3d...

    I got this from this link from this web site:
    http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/01/new-congress-new-and-more-wealth...

    Very interesting to learn that some politicians aren't as wealthy as we may have thought...in fact, some are in debt for millions of dollars. Others are quite well off. In fact, 25 members of congress have a negative net worth. A Democrat, John Dulaney, has something like $139 million..just behind McCaul, Issa and Democratic Senators Jared Polis, John Kerry, and Mark Warner.

    The most popular investment of congress critters is GE. And it looks like they are all dumping financial stocks like Bank of America....hummm, I wonder why!

    A Republican from California, David Valadao, is in the red by $15.6 million. Farms are expensive to run, it seems. Several other politicians also have farms that also puts them into the red.

    Here's another link relating to the others:
    http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/index.php

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Blowing the Whistle on Obama's America

    "On the campaign trail four years ago, US presidential candidate Barack Obama shared his views on whistleblowers. He said: "Often the best source of information about waste, fraud and abuse in government is a government employee committed to public integrity, willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism ... should be encouraged rather than stifled."

    As president, the reality has been very different. During his first term in office, six whistleblowers have been charged under the Espionage Act for allegedly mishandling classified information. That is twice as many as all previous presidents combined. "

    Watch the video here:

    http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/listeningpost/2012/06/20126816273761...

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    KEND once again you speculate and much too broadly. To say tha the U.S. is a big country and that there must be some companies that treat their employees well, is not entirely wrong, but nor is it entirely true. In fact most companies that were the major contributors to a strong and robust middle class are all gone, thanks in large part to NAFTA.
    KEND there are more than 50 million people who are unemployed and double that when it comes to people who work fulltime jobs that still must apply for Government assistance. You blame the Government for not creating a Jobs Bill, as do I, but I also know that if all the BIG TransGlobal Corporations were to take the iniative and increase their employees wages to a wage that was much more in sync with the cost of living (currently any family of 3 or more making less than $15 per hour per full time worker cannot affoard to; A)Keep up with the cost of living. and B)Have to apply for government assistance.
    Again I applaude you for being realistic; I commend you for taking the initiative to be an employer that offers an opportunity to earn a true living, one that encourages and enables a person a fruitful future.
    Now can you share with me why companies such as Wal Mart claim that they cannot afford to double the wages of the majority of employes who make 8.50 per hour, and offer ALL full time employes bennefits and incentives?
    The truth is if today Wal Mart were to double that $8.50 per hour and give their employees full health care, the intrest that Wal Mart makes on their profits alone would cover the wage increase and full health care cost.
    Shame shame shame that they don't!!!

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    You know Kend I would not mind paying taxes...most people feel the same way, however, its how my taxes are spent and my voice is ignored that irks me...50% of every tax dollar goes to the War Budget to pay past and present wars. How lovely is that???The U.S. hasn't even payed for past wars and the government wants to start up a few more. Sounds ALOT irresponsable and smells ALOT fishey!
    I'd much rather have 50% of every tax dollar go towards Health Care and Education. I'd much rather see us improve those two areas than continue to pay for unnecessary and illegal wars...Wars that slaughtering innocent lives, Wars that rob us of our Rights and Freedoms; Wars that cause greater problems and fuel the flames of hate and violence on all sides.
    Now as for your Oil jobs...No thank you. Don't get me wrong I am not silly enough to think that oil is passé. There is no doubt that modern life is addicted to patrolium. Just looking around my office I can touch more than a dozen items that are patrolium byproducts.
    That being said though it is time the U.S. got serious and established a strong and fruitful Green Energy Policy. Now I know you are against such clean energy like solar and wind, so save your snarky comments...I've already heard them! The fact of the matter is Solar works, and works really well, so well that when a person installs PV panels and a domestic solar hot water panel on their roof, the up front cost is paid off with in the first 3 to 7 years. Other than occasionally needing some maintanence, (currently most systems installed here in the U.S. are under full warentee for 5 years and limmited for 5 years after, however in countries like Germany and China, whoes Solar Energy policies are far superior to the U.S., offer better insentives to encourage and help people to get off the grid.
    I don't see Solar and or Wind wiping out the oil industry; but I do see it as the next step in a world that is realizing* we can't keep relying on a wasteful and limited resource such as oil.

    *Several countries have been developing and expanding their Green Energy Policies; Germany has done so well with their Solar Power Policy that they just recently announced that there original goal to be off line from nuclear power by 2030 is looking like it will be about 10 years sooner.
    What is sad when it comes to Solar and Wind Power is that the U.S. could have gotten on board back in the early 80's...The technology was there...The U.S. just needed to invest in it. But instead 'Ol Ronnie Regain torn down the solar panels that Carter had installed when he was in office...Guess Ol Ronnie and his rich Oil and Wall St. friends weren't on board with a sound and peaceful means towards reducing waste, and creating in the long run "free" energy for everyone.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Please be at least a little on the right. Mored. Please.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Hi, Mored...welcome! Come back and contribute your ideas and thoughts...the national security state is also interested in what we all have to say.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    I've been reading the posts here for some time but thought I'd drop in and say hi! Very interesting stuff. Ill be back soon!

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    nachos I was just kidding I am fine with all the jabs. But let me be clear about something. The government Kinda pitches in, the employer pays the government then the government redistributes it through maternity leave, imployment insurance etc. Simply replace the word government with tax payer and you get the truth. America is a big country I am sure there is a lot of places there that treat there employees just fine. The best way to get good employers is to create low unemployment. Something your current Government is not doing very well at. I have mentioned many times we re looking for workers here desperately. It is the big bad oil companies though. They pay great and have great benefits. They are fast tracking all work visa,s for trades right now I heard. It is easy to make over a $100,000 a year here if you dont mind working in a work camp in the middle of no where. Maybe it is time to make a change. The land of milk and honey. Oh Canada.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    DAnnemarc: pleasant dreams...but don't dream of snakes!

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    2950-10K: You don't really believe that the Democrats really want total transparency...do you? Certainly not Obama...as I've shown before..He, and the rest of the Democrats are just as interested in keeping corporate donations secret. The Democrats are just playing politics and know that more people are apt to believe that it is only the Republicans who don't want transparency...so they'll play that one up until they vote on it (just enough Democrats will vote on it to make it look like the Democrats are for transparency..with, of course, the bad old blue dogs shifting the decision over to the Republicans). How many times do they have to play that game before people catch on?

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Palindromedary ~ All I can say is thank you and Good Night. I have a lot of Home Work to do. LOL OMG!!!

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    DAnnemarc: Yes, I have listened to several excerpts and the full 20 minute speech...with captions even. JFK sounded like he was trying to tell us about a world-wide conspiracy (and it sure didn't sound like he was referring to communism..even though he did lead out with a joke about Lennin). I just wish he could have been more explicit as to what exactly he was trying to say. I don't know, man, was JFK a conspiracy theorist? ;-} And then "they" shot him! I guess "they" didn't have a Rachel Maddow around to ridicule conspiracy theory nuts! (see my last comment on 911..yesterday). And although they may not have thought about doing a false flag like running airplanes into tall buildings...but wait ...there was Operation Northwoods:

    "Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.

    The idea may actually have originated with President Eisenhower in the last days of his administration."

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html

    You can actually read the copies of some of the actual documents of Operation Northwoods at this web site.

    And people have a problem believing our government would do such a thing as carry out a false flag operation by crashing planes into buildings?

    You know...Operation Northwoods must be a very popular topic because all you have to do is type in "Operation" in Google search and the very first thing it pulls up is "Operation Northwoods".

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    It seems to me that the Teapublican push to make disclosure of corp. political contributions illegal, is an acknowledgment that their party has categorically no interest in the democratic representation of at least 99% of us. Obviously the donor info would show this to be fact.

    I'm sure the headlines will read, "Republican public servants push for concealment of corp. donor Info, while Democratic Lawmakers seek transparency."

    Apparently one party is embarrassingly bought off $$$$$$ more than the other.They're bought off by donors who profit from warfare, profit from collapsing the global economy, and profit from pushing products that will eventually destroy life as we know it, and much sooner than most want to admit.

    All good reasons for Republicans to keep the contributions hidden from 99% of us.

  • Will history be kind to George W. Bush?   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Watching Georgie and Cheney on display this week made me feel ill. GWB and his adherents are clearly deluded about his legacy. I have come to believe that he was the Manchurian Candidate and like that template the conditioning failed in the end as evidenced by his falling out with the Dick. The mind control research carried out in the fifties and sixties yielded ultimately flawed results--the conditioning always deteriorated and failed to accomplish its full promise. (see 1976 congressional testimony hearings on the secret experimentation carried out in the cold war by intelligence agencies) and work of Colin Ross, M.D. GWB's refusal to pardon Scooter (he 'only' commuted his sentence) was the death knell of the Cheney/Bush alliance. In the beginning I believed GWB was himself evil but upon further reflection and as more has come out about his administration I think that honor must go to Cheney.

  • Will history be kind to George W. Bush?   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Unless there is some real investigation, the majority of the truth will never come out. So a lot of the history will continue to be white washed.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Palindromedary ~ Thanks for that WTC response yesterday. Not to change the subject again; BUT, let me change the subject again. Have you ever heard this speech about Secret Societies by JFK?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces

    His words not only ring truer today than ever; but, explain everything going on in the world today--including 9/11. Yet somehow this brilliant and brave soul expresses the resolved belief in this speech that We the American People can defeat this "unwanted influence" in the world today. I'd like to believe him.

    Shame he didn't do what Eisenhower did and save this speech for the farewell address of his second term. I wonder why he didn't wait for the end of his term? Can all this evil be simply the doing of human beings. I've heard it suggested that extraterrestrials might be involved. Ancient civilizations and Angels and Demons have also been suggested. Who knows? At this point I wouldn't be surprised to hear the Flying Spaghetti Monster blamed. Do you believe that all this evil is simply the dark side of human nature and nothing else?

    And, of course, if there is more to it than meets the eye, what might that be?

  • We can't give in to the Republican list of demands.   12 years 4 weeks ago

    chuckle8: Ok, I found the transcript and skimmed it...finding the parts about Popular Mechanics. It sure looks to me like Rachel Maddow, whom I had once enjoyed listening to...but haven't in quite a while because I no longer get MSNBC, is doing the same kind of things that propagandists do when they want to discredit something. Just mix and mingle all the really crazy theories in with the credible ones and you can, most likely, end up getting a lot of people to write off all of them and go back to the craziest one of all..the official conspiracy theory. But since it is put out by our own government authorities, people will not think critically about all of the glaring holes in it.

    I believe that the government has known, for a long time now, how to cover up things they don't want the masses to know about. They have manufactured lots of really crazy "conspiracy theories" to do just that...make them all look like crazy conspiracy theories.

    It is often very difficult to know who is being used as a propaganda tool for the government. And for that matter...just who is the government?...it is certainly not the people anymore.

    Yes, I've heard many, what I would consider very crazy conspiracy theories about 911...space based particle beam weapons that "melted" the WTC buildings, small nuclear bombs in the basements of the WTC buildings...but the information you get at Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and a number of other similar sites are not dealing in crazy theories. They have the "smoking gun" evidence that has been scientifically analyzed and the results published in a peer-review scientific journal. They don't rely on far-fetched conspiracy theories...they don't get into who or blame any particular groups of people. All they have is cold hard evidence, and logical sense and facts based upon many years of engineering (yes, and even "civil" engineering) and architectural education and experience that debunks the official conspiracy theory. And there are thousands of "geeks" (as Rachel Maddow put it) that have analyzed the data themselves..and have already embarrassed NIST by catching them in their lies and obfuscations. They have gotten NIST to back down and change their stories a few times.

    None of these architects and engineers are saying that space-based particle beam weapons or nukes were used. None of them are saying aliens did it. What they are saying is very doable and makes the most sense. All the clues are falling into place.

    The people at A&E for 911 Truth are not of the same ilk as someone like any of the talk show hosts or radio personalities. They have many professionals that explain why they believe the way they do based upon their education and years of experience. But Rachel just throws them all together tainting everyone who believe they have sufficient evidence to refute the official government conspiracy theory.

    What they want is to have an unbiased investigation...a real one this time...not with an overseer that was a friend and co-writer of Condoleeza Rice. Not with blowhard, lying, washed up politicians but panels of real scientists and engineers who are not being blackmailed by whether or not they will have employment for the rest of their lives..people that know and understand science. And have it completely open to the public. That is something you didn't get with the official 911 Panel. It was a whitewash! They ignored one hell of a lot of evidence and they picked and chose the evidence they wanted to ensure that the official government conspiracy would not be proven false. They even let that scoundrel, Bush, testify without taking an oath and with Cheney there to steer him.

    And the 911 Commission book was the first book that Rachel mentioned as being worthwhile to read. To give that book some credibility was not surprising that she soon mentioned the Popular Mechanics piece of trash.

    But notice how Rachel tied all of the conspiracy theories together tainting even the one that is the most doable.

    I don't know how many, or who among them, are being used as useful idiots for those who have a big stake in getting people to believe in the official conspiracy theory...and who are spreading all of these other really crazy, far-fetched, conspiracy theories. The question is do they truly believe what they are saying? Are they being paid to cover for the government? Or maybe, they just don't understand physics or science!

    You have to remember that some of these personalities that we all know as being Democrat, or liberal mouth-pieces are usually just trying to spread the word of the Democrat party and coming down on the Republican party. They are only interested in ensuring the Democrats are in "The Cat Bird's Seat". When you consider that both parties are really not truly representing the people and are really traitors to them, selling them out, then you have to start wondering if they are not just spreading propaganda that serves the overall illusion of democracy...ie: working to delude the people for those that rule over us.

  • We must defend civil rights... even for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.   12 years 4 weeks ago

    I commented on this today on the Big Picture. With Louise a.k.a Thom I am concerned with the Civil rights of Dzhokar indeed while I think his act is reprehensible now that I understand the ostensible reason of why he did what he did, its surprising its very surpirsing more acts are not done every day in the U.S. like the Marathon Bombing. While frequent violence and killing relatively commonplace in the US., we have had Sandy Hook, Colombine, Aurora, Tucson, Dzhokhar's action is a textbook case of Blowback (as coined by Chalmers Johnson) (loosely interpreted), because the American Violence in Afghanistan and Iraq is known. This violence is an example of an individual who identifies with the plight of people our people though our government as irdered by our military inflicts violence on, ostensibly to fight an enemy. In the process there is large amounts of "collateral damage", innocents killed to further our governments ends.

    It is not surprising that some idealistic individual who identifies with these people would want to give some American's a taste of their own medicine: i.e. the killing of innocents. The hope is that the people of the U.S. would think a little more before they inflicted violence on others. There are many reasons to condemn such idealism however, one might call it reprehensible, or foolish or even immoral but not stupid or cowardly. The largely immoral U.S. government may seek the death penalty against Dzhokhar which tio my way of thinking is at least as immoral as murder by individuals. I realize this above is not mainstream opinion.

    This is not my main point however. In a land where murder by immigrants in particular muslims is viewed as terrorism, the far worse industrial accident in Texas is treated as a ho hum thing. If Dzokhar is a terrorist, isn't the C.E.O of West Fertilizer an industrial terrorist. If the government seeks the death penalty by reason of assault with a weapon of mass destruction, doesn't the ignition and explosion of thousands of gallons of anhydrous ammonia fit the bill as a weapon of Mass Destruction.

    In addition, I would argue with Tom that we should go back to the 1890's and enforce the Death Penalty for West Fertilzer. The company should be nationalized its assets sold by the state its workers from its President on Down be fired. The funds which result from this sale should be used as a fund for the victims. The salutory effect of forced liquidation of this company is to hold accountable the prepetetrators and the people who profited from this enterprise. It would lead to less destructive passing on the negative extrernalities of negligent homicide to the rest fo society and would compensate as best as possible with minimal cost to the state the victims of this disaster. This is especially timely in view of Citizens United, if corporations are people then they should be subject to "execution" if they commit particularly heinous crimes. While I personally am not for the dealth penalty in general if we have it it should apply to corporate people as well as individuals. Equal protection under the laws demands an approach like this if Dzhokhar is subject to the death penalty then the Death Penalty for the CEO of West Fertilizer and his company.

  • Republicans don't want to give up corporate cash!   12 years 4 weeks ago

    C'mon KEND...Keep your chin up! I don't mean to be hurtful...Just giv'en ya a jab...Nor hard feel'ins mate! ;)

    If what you say is true about your company, and how you run it and take care of your employees...I stand and applaude you. You and your company should be used as a model...You do 10x more for your employees then that of Wal Mart and they're a multi-multi billion dollar a year company!
    I also like how your Government pitches in. Is that how it is for all of Canada.
    Kend I want you to know I am not "anti" capitalism...More so I am anti Feudalism; There is a fine, though be it definite, line between the two.
    What truely bothers/scares me with what is happening socially; is how divided as a culture we are becoming...I wonder if the U.S. will ever divide into seperate nations. Why not??? I say Divided N.W to S.W. for no other reason than it hasn't been done.

  • We are governed by those who refuse to represent us.   12 years 4 weeks ago

    Palindromedary - My bumper sticker is mostly meant for people like Bernie Sanders and Obama. I would hope that the part that says reduce the debt would hardly lead anyone to call me a commie. However, to avoid that possibility I probably should put a couple of American flags on it.

    Currently, I think the ruling elite is using the deficit argument to slaughter the 99%.

ADHD: Hunter in a Farmer's World

Thom Hartmann has written a dozen books covering ADD / ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder.

Join Thom for his new twice-weekly email newsletters on ADHD, whether it affects you or a member of your family.

Thom's Blog Is On the Move

Hello All

Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.

Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.