There can on no account be a bona-fide right-wing cheap sesame street live tickets populist movement of the people. It is philosophically untenable. cheap war horse tickets All those who said the TP was "astroturf" were accurate.
Actually the latest effort by the billionaire koch brothers founders and key funders of Americans for prosperity,and their corporate and political allies to hijack the democracy and pillage the economy. It's their attempt to perpetuate an American nightmare of continued income inequality and a government held hostage to the whims of elites. It is thus a perfect target for the latest Occupy-style protest.It is time for us to declare that we are the real Americans for prosperity, those of us who believe that workers should receive a fair wage for a fair day's work and be treated with dignity; that companies should be accountable for the harm that they do to people and the environment; that health care is a basic right for every person; that the education of our children shouldn't be turned into yet another corporate profit center; that government can and should work for all of the people, not the privileged few; that our democracy is the property of the people and cannot be owned by those with the most money.
"Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job."
"He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT."
Ewww! And now they are trying to scare us with what we say on the internet....although some people should be more careful and try not to make anything that could be interpreted as a threat to anyone. The current news propaganda is that Google is now under court order to have ip addresses checked for who ever made a blog against that Sheriff down in Arizona. Of course, none of us have ever made such expressions on blog sites but even if you never have..doesn't it still tend to make you want to watch very carefully what you say in a blog?
I'm not sure about that. When some college, known as Rairly Ridiculus in the 60's, noted that Fox viewers were the lowest of all in information, Thom used their findings as a talking point. It was, that Fox viewers, didn't think the Arab spring brought democracy to Egypt with the down fall of Murbarak. Of course, Fox viewers were more aware of the power of the Egyptian military throughout their recent history. Infact, Fox viewers didn't think Murbarak was in his position without military support. Suddenly, the Fox viewers looked pretty good, with the recent military action in Egypt.
Good for the President. The XL Pipeline is a diaster waiting to happen and one that could cause untold harm to our environment. Tar sands are many times more abrasive than sandpaper. I imagine that a project of this magnitude could be seen from the International Space Station and even Mars. Why not build refineries closer to the source of supply rather than risk polluting a huge swath of our country? That's a rhetorical question in case you haven't guessed. We know that the Texas oil monopoly has it greasy, dirty hands on the refinery business. It's one of the ways they practice their price controls. I think the government should build refineries if the monopoly hogs won't.
YES there will be a pipe line. Why? just because! its all about the money, MAN! Its all about the "gotta have it now attitude" we have brought to festeration in our society! Forget the notion that while building the thing it would put a bunch of people to work, "temporarily" instead of ,say, taking the money and fixing the rail ways or upgrading the high way and just putting a bunch rail workers and truckers to work premanantly! oh yeah! thats right. they'll screw the land owners to buy the right of way and move thier liquid gold much faster and more efficiently and in the long run it won't really cost a dime? hmmmm, more potential jobs gone, poof, up in smoke. think about it. we have become a society of automation. I go to the market now and half the cashiers that for 20 years i've seen are gone! poof! the replacement? Self check out? Yup! my wife says lets use the self check out. I say lets keep someone employed. she looks at me like I'm a nut. But maybe she'd get it if she happened to be one of those cashiers that l;ost thier job to..."auto-frikin-mation!!!! MEANWHILE....THE RICH ARE STILL GETTING RICHER AND RICHER AND RICHER AND RICHER. Boy i wish i had been a little more like some of my past employers!
Fracking, no not Phracking, Fracking is more dangerous to our immediate environment than any XL pipeline would have been. It has been going on for some years now and many people can even set flame to their drinking water. And it is nearly everywhere. The Oil and Gas companies are poisoning us.
But I guess the next four years will again be occupied by the Devil...you know the one who pretends to be your friend and then stabs you in the back...XL pipelines not withstanding. As we all imagined..we'll now be safer at the lack of pollution this thing was said to have caused but many of us will not be around to care one way or the other because the greatly corrupted Obama Health Care bill, that will force us all to deplete our savings in a forced payment plan to the HealthScare monger insurance companies...and we'll starve to death.
But even if after complying with the government enforced mandate of participating in the corrupt insurance companies, and shelling out your money, despite the touted advantage of insurance companies not being able to prevent you from getting insurance because of a pre-existing condition...they can still greatly raise their rates so you cannot afford their insurance anyway. This was a give-a-way to the insurance companies and is really unconstitutional.
So, Obama helped defeat the XL pipeline, got Obama Care, Pulled out of Iraq (sort of...but we're still everywhere else), and murdered Osama bin Laden (maybe--how do we really know--they dumped the evidence in the ocean--how convenient for them--and Osama bin Laden was not the mastermind of 911 anyway..being an inside job).
These are all very incidental, or even not important, in our survival in this wicked and selfish country. I am not very good at drawing cartoons or illustrations but I have pictured in my mind: a big masked criminal labeled "healthScare insurance companies" holding a gun labeled "US Government" to the little people's heads...and the caption is: "Your money or your life!!"
And when you think about it...it is the whole medical and pharmaceutical racket that keeps us from getting the medicines we know we need for things like high blood pressure or asthma unless we pay the exorbitant prices of the doctors, insurance companies, and drug companies.
The government is the enforcer of the criminal enterprise that lets these criminals get away with "your money or your life". If people know what medicines they need, taking them on a regular basis, why do they need to keep getting their "prescriptions" filled after having paid the exorbitant prices to all of the above?
In Mexico, you can just walk into a drug store and, without a prescription, buy the drugs you need at a very cheap price. The US gov and their puppet masters, try to get you to believe that those drugs may be tainted or will not work...but, in fact, many of the drugs we get in the US drug stores are made overseas as well. It is just propaganda scare tactics to keep your money going into their pockets.
Which reminds me of when I lived and worked in Saudi Arabia for a few years....where the Saudi censors even
took magazines and catalogs and used magic markers to black out those revealing body parts of women...like
legs and breasts...even though the breasts were fully clothed...and the dresses were not quite long enough
to hide the ankles. Often, they would just rip out the pages. Then they could sell the magazines...but not
until the censors did their jobs. Allah Akbar! Huh?
But then they use a lustful device of telling the young men that if they are good little jihadis and die for Allah they will be able to release all of their pent up lustful imaginings for "real" in heaven where they will be able to ravage a whole flock of young virgins.
The Christians (the "Christ is money" or "Jesus was a capitalist" crowds anyway..you know..the Republicans
and their lot) try to entice you into giving up all your worldly goods (give it all to them) for the prospect of "streets paved with gold" and "pearly gates" and angelic haloed and winged creatures wearing white robes...with impeccably stacked bodies and to-die-for facial features...something they may not have been able to attain in the real world of the living (except for pla$tic $urgery and lipo$uction...maybe).
Just heard that Rick Perry (Dopey) has stepped down and that Newt Grinch's former wife said he was pressing her for an "open marriage". Newt Grinch in the White House would make Bill Clinton look like a saint. I'd suspect that he would have many more Monicas visiting him in the Oval OhhFist.
And Mitt Rummy would stake the country's future on his spooky ritual of staring into a dark top hat he places over his face; or, perhaps rubbing his "magic underwear" while uttering strange and guttural noises. What's that? Do the noises sound something like "Oh, Monica!"? There is a stark difference, of course, between "real" and "imagined". But I guess one good thing is that imagined won't give you aids...might make you go a little crazy over time...or blind. But if some ostensibly prurient politicians have their way and trash the internet we will all have little to assist us in "tweaking" our imaginations. Back to the dark ages. What was that story that Julia Sweeney told us in one of her monologues (I think it was "Letting Go of God")? Where in her sexually repressed Catholic school she would "get off" on that picture of that handsome Jesus? Yup, I guess it is back to the Sears and Roebucks catalog.
In response to a caller in Thom's 2nd hour, SS is taxable after a certain amount of other income is added to it. Computed by taking 1/2 of SS plus all other earned income. If you;re single, and under this formula you brought in over $25K, then you'd be taxed on 50% of the amount exceeding $25K. So if you had $26K, you'd be taxed on $500.00 of your SS, which is 1/2 of the $1K over. Also, SS takes back something like $1 for every $2 earned when you start drawing at age 62. I think that once you reach 63 or so, that drops to $1 for every $3 earned. The closer you get to full retirement benefit age, the greater your benefit is. All this is right on the www.ss.gov website for anyone to look up. I happen to be a tax preparer so see this in higher income retirees, of which we have many where I live. You can make as much as you want once you reach full benefit age, which is no longer 65. I think the last generation where it was 65 were born in 1935-36. I am 71 this year and mine was 65 & 8 mos, at which point I received a letter from SS telling me I could now earn as much as I wanted with penalty. Of course that's SS, not the IRS who wants to tax it if you earn over certain amounts determined if you're single or married. I'm single and I can tell you that the amount of $25K for single filers has not changed in 5 years.
Interestingly, proportional representation would necessitate that party-central method of funding that DWS thinks would be a problem. Of course, I would rather have a district-by-district proportionality that uses individuals instead of parties.
On last week's episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, David Frum said the parties should go back to taking care of funding campaigns so that the politicians don't have to beg for money constantly. Unfortunately, Debbie Wasserman Schultz disagreed. She thought it would hinder the people's ability to choose the candidate they want (over what the party might decide in a secret backroom meeting).
I disagree with DWS. So long ordinary people have a way to get on the ballot, the people will be able to choose their representatives.
George Romneytried to run for President, but didn't get very far because he wasn't a natural-born citizen, or at least no one was sure he was a natural-born citizen.
Rick Perry has suspended his campaign, making, as he says, a "strategic retreat", which I thought Republicans had renamed "cutting and running". But he said it's okay if Sam Houston did it.
Of course, I'm sure Perry only ran in the first place because he thought "chief executive" meant he got to execute more people than anyone else.
Sometimes I have dreams, literally (as when I am sleeping) that I am living in Sweden. The I wake up...look out my window....and remember where I really am.... This country is at such a significant crossroads right now it is almost impossible to over-state it...are we going to move forward or are we going to degenerate back towards the Dark Ages....If were to bet I'd say it's at best 50/50 we will love forward...I hope I am wrong
68% of Republicans pick Fox as their most trusted source
PPP's 3rd annual TV news trust poll (2011 version here, 2010 version here) finds that Fox News tops the list for both the source Americans trust the most and the one they trust the least.
Fox is the most trusted TV news source for 34% of voters, followed by PBS at 17%, CNN at 12%, ABC News at 11%, CBS News at 8%, MSNBC at 5%, and Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%.
There can on no account be a bona-fide right-wing cheap sesame street live tickets populist movement of the people. It is philosophically untenable. cheap war horse tickets All those who said the TP was "astroturf" were accurate.
Actually the latest effort by the billionaire koch brothers founders and key funders of Americans for prosperity,and their corporate and political allies to hijack the democracy and pillage the economy. It's their attempt to perpetuate an American nightmare of continued income inequality and a government held hostage to the whims of elites. It is thus a perfect target for the latest Occupy-style protest.It is time for us to declare that we are the real Americans for prosperity, those of us who believe that workers should receive a fair wage for a fair day's work and be treated with dignity; that companies should be accountable for the harm that they do to people and the environment; that health care is a basic right for every person; that the education of our children shouldn't be turned into yet another corporate profit center; that government can and should work for all of the people, not the privileged few; that our democracy is the property of the people and cannot be owned by those with the most money.
venta por internet
*When it HURTS to look back, and you're SCARED to look ahead,you can look beside you and your BEST FRIEND will be there*
Wow, This article is very interesting and useful for all, shakopee real estate .
From a May 4, 2011 interview of Dr. Pieczenik:
"Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job."
"He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/top-us-government-insider-bin-laden-died-in-...
Ewww! And now they are trying to scare us with what we say on the internet....although some people should be more careful and try not to make anything that could be interpreted as a threat to anyone. The current news propaganda is that Google is now under court order to have ip addresses checked for who ever made a blog against that Sheriff down in Arizona. Of course, none of us have ever made such expressions on blog sites but even if you never have..doesn't it still tend to make you want to watch very carefully what you say in a blog?
Democrats are the ones pushing web censorship
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/democrats-are-the-ones-pushing-we...
I'm not sure about that. When some college, known as Rairly Ridiculus in the 60's, noted that Fox viewers were the lowest of all in information, Thom used their findings as a talking point. It was, that Fox viewers, didn't think the Arab spring brought democracy to Egypt with the down fall of Murbarak. Of course, Fox viewers were more aware of the power of the Egyptian military throughout their recent history. Infact, Fox viewers didn't think Murbarak was in his position without military support. Suddenly, the Fox viewers looked pretty good, with the recent military action in Egypt.
Good for the President. The XL Pipeline is a diaster waiting to happen and one that could cause untold harm to our environment. Tar sands are many times more abrasive than sandpaper. I imagine that a project of this magnitude could be seen from the International Space Station and even Mars. Why not build refineries closer to the source of supply rather than risk polluting a huge swath of our country? That's a rhetorical question in case you haven't guessed. We know that the Texas oil monopoly has it greasy, dirty hands on the refinery business. It's one of the ways they practice their price controls. I think the government should build refineries if the monopoly hogs won't.
Keystone XL pipeline= Candan gets the jobs, Chinese get the oil and Americans get the shaft- in the fom of toxic clean-up bills!
YES there will be a pipe line. Why? just because! its all about the money, MAN! Its all about the "gotta have it now attitude" we have brought to festeration in our society! Forget the notion that while building the thing it would put a bunch of people to work, "temporarily" instead of ,say, taking the money and fixing the rail ways or upgrading the high way and just putting a bunch rail workers and truckers to work premanantly! oh yeah! thats right. they'll screw the land owners to buy the right of way and move thier liquid gold much faster and more efficiently and in the long run it won't really cost a dime? hmmmm, more potential jobs gone, poof, up in smoke. think about it. we have become a society of automation. I go to the market now and half the cashiers that for 20 years i've seen are gone! poof! the replacement? Self check out? Yup! my wife says lets use the self check out. I say lets keep someone employed. she looks at me like I'm a nut. But maybe she'd get it if she happened to be one of those cashiers that l;ost thier job to..."auto-frikin-mation!!!! MEANWHILE....THE RICH ARE STILL GETTING RICHER AND RICHER AND RICHER AND RICHER. Boy i wish i had been a little more like some of my past employers!
The Socialists are the GOOD guys!!!
Remember FDR??? HE was called a Socialist...
The Republicans GOT us in this mess!!
The Democrats are Republicans in sheep's clothing!!
VOTE STRAIGHT SOCIALIST NOVEMBER 2012!!!
fact check...Scott Walker, not Rick Scott
Fracking, no not Phracking, Fracking is more dangerous to our immediate environment than any XL pipeline would have been. It has been going on for some years now and many people can even set flame to their drinking water. And it is nearly everywhere. The Oil and Gas companies are poisoning us.
But I guess the next four years will again be occupied by the Devil...you know the one who pretends to be your friend and then stabs you in the back...XL pipelines not withstanding. As we all imagined..we'll now be safer at the lack of pollution this thing was said to have caused but many of us will not be around to care one way or the other because the greatly corrupted Obama Health Care bill, that will force us all to deplete our savings in a forced payment plan to the HealthScare monger insurance companies...and we'll starve to death.
But even if after complying with the government enforced mandate of participating in the corrupt insurance companies, and shelling out your money, despite the touted advantage of insurance companies not being able to prevent you from getting insurance because of a pre-existing condition...they can still greatly raise their rates so you cannot afford their insurance anyway. This was a give-a-way to the insurance companies and is really unconstitutional.
So, Obama helped defeat the XL pipeline, got Obama Care, Pulled out of Iraq (sort of...but we're still everywhere else), and murdered Osama bin Laden (maybe--how do we really know--they dumped the evidence in the ocean--how convenient for them--and Osama bin Laden was not the mastermind of 911 anyway..being an inside job).
These are all very incidental, or even not important, in our survival in this wicked and selfish country. I am not very good at drawing cartoons or illustrations but I have pictured in my mind: a big masked criminal labeled "healthScare insurance companies" holding a gun labeled "US Government" to the little people's heads...and the caption is: "Your money or your life!!"
And when you think about it...it is the whole medical and pharmaceutical racket that keeps us from getting the medicines we know we need for things like high blood pressure or asthma unless we pay the exorbitant prices of the doctors, insurance companies, and drug companies.
The government is the enforcer of the criminal enterprise that lets these criminals get away with "your money or your life". If people know what medicines they need, taking them on a regular basis, why do they need to keep getting their "prescriptions" filled after having paid the exorbitant prices to all of the above?
In Mexico, you can just walk into a drug store and, without a prescription, buy the drugs you need at a very cheap price. The US gov and their puppet masters, try to get you to believe that those drugs may be tainted or will not work...but, in fact, many of the drugs we get in the US drug stores are made overseas as well. It is just propaganda scare tactics to keep your money going into their pockets.
Which reminds me of when I lived and worked in Saudi Arabia for a few years....where the Saudi censors even
took magazines and catalogs and used magic markers to black out those revealing body parts of women...like
legs and breasts...even though the breasts were fully clothed...and the dresses were not quite long enough
to hide the ankles. Often, they would just rip out the pages. Then they could sell the magazines...but not
until the censors did their jobs. Allah Akbar! Huh?
But then they use a lustful device of telling the young men that if they are good little jihadis and die for Allah they will be able to release all of their pent up lustful imaginings for "real" in heaven where they will be able to ravage a whole flock of young virgins.
The Christians (the "Christ is money" or "Jesus was a capitalist" crowds anyway..you know..the Republicans
and their lot) try to entice you into giving up all your worldly goods (give it all to them) for the prospect of "streets paved with gold" and "pearly gates" and angelic haloed and winged creatures wearing white robes...with impeccably stacked bodies and to-die-for facial features...something they may not have been able to attain in the real world of the living (except for pla$tic $urgery and lipo$uction...maybe).
Just heard that Rick Perry (Dopey) has stepped down and that Newt Grinch's former wife said he was pressing her for an "open marriage". Newt Grinch in the White House would make Bill Clinton look like a saint. I'd suspect that he would have many more Monicas visiting him in the Oval OhhFist.
And Mitt Rummy would stake the country's future on his spooky ritual of staring into a dark top hat he places over his face; or, perhaps rubbing his "magic underwear" while uttering strange and guttural noises. What's that? Do the noises sound something like "Oh, Monica!"? There is a stark difference, of course, between "real" and "imagined". But I guess one good thing is that imagined won't give you aids...might make you go a little crazy over time...or blind. But if some ostensibly prurient politicians have their way and trash the internet we will all have little to assist us in "tweaking" our imaginations. Back to the dark ages. What was that story that Julia Sweeney told us in one of her monologues (I think it was "Letting Go of God")? Where in her sexually repressed Catholic school she would "get off" on that picture of that handsome Jesus? Yup, I guess it is back to the Sears and Roebucks catalog.
Wow...that's about 24 million ppl that are misinformed !
In response to a caller in Thom's 2nd hour, SS is taxable after a certain amount of other income is added to it. Computed by taking 1/2 of SS plus all other earned income. If you;re single, and under this formula you brought in over $25K, then you'd be taxed on 50% of the amount exceeding $25K. So if you had $26K, you'd be taxed on $500.00 of your SS, which is 1/2 of the $1K over. Also, SS takes back something like $1 for every $2 earned when you start drawing at age 62. I think that once you reach 63 or so, that drops to $1 for every $3 earned. The closer you get to full retirement benefit age, the greater your benefit is. All this is right on the www.ss.gov website for anyone to look up. I happen to be a tax preparer so see this in higher income retirees, of which we have many where I live. You can make as much as you want once you reach full benefit age, which is no longer 65. I think the last generation where it was 65 were born in 1935-36. I am 71 this year and mine was 65 & 8 mos, at which point I received a letter from SS telling me I could now earn as much as I wanted with penalty. Of course that's SS, not the IRS who wants to tax it if you earn over certain amounts determined if you're single or married. I'm single and I can tell you that the amount of $25K for single filers has not changed in 5 years.
Interestingly, proportional representation would necessitate that party-central method of funding that DWS thinks would be a problem. Of course, I would rather have a district-by-district proportionality that uses individuals instead of parties.
On last week's episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, David Frum said the parties should go back to taking care of funding campaigns so that the politicians don't have to beg for money constantly. Unfortunately, Debbie Wasserman Schultz disagreed. She thought it would hinder the people's ability to choose the candidate they want (over what the party might decide in a secret backroom meeting).
I disagree with DWS. So long ordinary people have a way to get on the ballot, the people will be able to choose their representatives.
George Romney tried to run for President, but didn't get very far because he wasn't a natural-born citizen, or at least no one was sure he was a natural-born citizen.
Rick Perry has suspended his campaign, making, as he says, a "strategic retreat", which I thought Republicans had renamed "cutting and running". But he said it's okay if Sam Houston did it.
Of course, I'm sure Perry only ran in the first place because he thought "chief executive" meant he got to execute more people than anyone else.
I agree
Sometimes I have dreams, literally (as when I am sleeping) that I am living in Sweden. The I wake up...look out my window....and remember where I really am.... This country is at such a significant crossroads right now it is almost impossible to over-state it...are we going to move forward or are we going to degenerate back towards the Dark Ages....If were to bet I'd say it's at best 50/50 we will love forward...I hope I am wrong
68% of Republicans pick Fox as their most trusted source
PPP's 3rd annual TV news trust poll (2011 version here, 2010 version here) finds that Fox News tops the list for both the source Americans trust the most and the one they trust the least.
Fox is the most trusted TV news source for 34% of voters, followed by PBS at 17%, CNN at 12%, ABC News at 11%, CBS News at 8%, MSNBC at 5%, and Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/01/3rd-annual-tv-news-trust...