I ran across of this quote by Bertrand Russell that seems particularly relevant today: "If there were in the world today any large number of people who desired their own happiness more than they desired the unhappiness of others, we could have paradise in a few years."
Well maybe 75% of the oil is gone, but 25% of the largest spill in the Gulf is still a sh!t load of oil right.
Of course I ain't buying the oil has pretty much disappeared BS anyway. Republican or Democratic, Government officials prefer to lie instead of talking about an awful truth.
President Obama is the last Reagan Republican in Washington, D.C. and not a NAZI. I know it may be difficult to distinguish between the two at times . . .
There is something wrong with the numbers here. We all know that Reagan rewrote the formula for 'percent unemployed' as an attempt to deceive people. We always hear discussion of the unemployment % like this -- "We are at X% unemployed, but the real number is more like...". If real income has risen and we are worse off, we need a different measurement or set of numbers set as standards for expressing how well off Americans are.
The motivation is not to limit discussion of a complex economy to a few very simple numbers, but to start reading them off repeatedly until they become commonplace so that at least we don't end up flipping channels 10 years from now just to hear "Well real income is up but in order to get the correct calculation for real income you need to...". Also, the number(s) should give a clearer picture.
What numbers do you think would paint a clearer picture of the real financial situation that most Americans find themselves in?
@harry ashburn, I do not know how to answer. I remember hearing and seeing seven and one half hours of progressive shows for five days. I could not keep pace with those numbers and have a fully functioning brain. I found myself in a numb nut progressive state. Here was my schedule - Thom, three hours, Ed Shultz, two and one half hours (one and one half hours radio and one hour television), Keith, one hour TV, and Rachel, one hour TV. I am down to Thom for three hours.
It was a great slogan for a transformative company that was telling the world that it could make lots of money while still being an honest broker.
But as it turns out, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) may not be different from any other large corporation that cares only about its bottom line. Like other corporate giants, Google does not have a problem with pressuring the government to pass policies that reward big business at the expense of the public.
According to news stories, Google has reached an agreement with Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) that would allow the companies to orchestrate a corporate takeover of the Internet. They want to create a tiered Internet with fast lanes for content produced by big companies and slow lanes for content produced by everyone else.
The deal would effectively spell the end of network neutrality, the principle that enabled Google to exist in the first place.
Now that Google has benefited from policies that allowed a startup to become one of the most successful companies in the country, it is now seeking to protect its online dominance by shutting the door on the open Internet to prevent competition and to maximize profits.
The irony is that, while Google is colluding with Verizon on a deal that would allow for corporate censorship on the Internet, it is also working the State Department to pressure foreign countries to open up their markets to prevent government censorship abroad.
What makes this deal so problematic is that a federal court ruled in April that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) did not have the authority to regulate the broadband industry. The decision threw out the legal framework adopted by the Bush administration to deregulate the broadband industry, a framework that has resulted in a broadband market dominated by companies like Verizon, Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK), and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T).
At this moment, the FCC does not have the authority to prevent companies like Verizon from engaging in online corporate censorship by blocking or discriminating against certain content online. The FCC, however, can reestablish its authority to reregulate the broadband industry and protect the public from discriminatory business practices.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has faced relentless pressure from the phone and cable companies to stop the FCC from moving forward. Instead of standing up for the public, his office has held closed-door meetings with Google, AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon, allowing these companies the opportunity to write their own rules that would restrict our free speech rights online.
The chairman announced last week that his office will end the backroom negotiations. But no matter how the chairman tries to put a positive spin on what went on at these meetings, we all know nothing good comes from federal agencies allowing themselves to be captured by industry.
If we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the open Internet as we know it, Chairman Genachowski wouldn’t be the only one who deserves blame.
While the news media have been obsessed by the lack of bipartisanship in Washington, one story they have missed is how corporate campaign contributions have united both Democrats and Republicans to work together to kill an open Internet. Close to 80 Democrats have formed an alliance with House Republicans to kill net neutrality. They have written to the FCC, urging the Commission not to move forward with protecting an open Internet.
Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas), who has led the effort among Democrats in the House to undermine the FCC, and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) just introduced bipartisan legislation that would prevent the commission from acting to protect the public.
President Obama campaigned on a promise to take a “back seat to no one” in his support of network neutrality, a position he restated earlier this year. There’s worry the White House now might retreat from that position since it wants the phone and cable companies to continue writing checks to Democrats during this midterm election.
So while many Americans were angered last week by the actions of a company that tried to sell the public that it was honest about its “Don’t Be Evil” corporate philosophy, many are also losing confidence in the promises made by the FCC chairman and President Obama to protect an open Internet by passing strong net neutrality rules that would prevent discrimination online.
Don’t Be Evil? Change We Can Believe In?
Actions still speak louder than words.
— Joseph Torres is the Senior Advisor, Government and External Affairs, for Free Press.
It's interesting to see how many people want us to be like other countries without actually visiting them to see how they live. The world needs a middle class, period. In countries where this is no middle class the poor are not even close to the poor in our country. I mean it is downright horrible. Why does our government want us to be like them? Control? casino en ligne ~ Poker, slots and Keno can all be found at this casino en ligne and in fact so can all the other casino games you love to play.
Does anyone doubt that once a society ceases to be able to afford schools, public transit, paved roads, libraries and street lights -- or once it chooses not to be able to afford those things in pursuit of imperial priorities and the maintenance of a vast Surveillance and National Security State -- that a very serious problem has arisen, that things have gone seriously awry, that imperial collapse, by definition, is an imminent inevitability?
We need nuclear disarmament. These words are smoke and mirrors as well as bait and switch tactics. We hear that America has reached accord with Russia on arms reduction. Yet, our nuclear arsenal grows daily. I am tired of the rhetoric on this subject.
@n8chz, Thom has very good substitutes for his show. I have good days for commenting and bad days for commenting. As an American I find that surviving in this numb nuts country very difficult. I will also find myself emotional drained from all the nonsense we hear as news. People will also need a respite from commenting. There is also need for recuperation from all the jackboots stomping on my face.
Progressive Punch rating was mentioned by one of your callers the other day and you didn't know what he meant. This website used to advertise on AAR's website. It's a handy way of keeping tabs on voting records as well as being a rating system. Al Franken rates the most liberal Senator. Horay for Al! I might not have ever heard of Thom Hartmann if you hadn't replaced him.
I ran across of this quote by Bertrand Russell that seems particularly relevant today: "If there were in the world today any large number of people who desired their own happiness more than they desired the unhappiness of others, we could have paradise in a few years."
Well maybe 75% of the oil is gone, but 25% of the largest spill in the Gulf is still a sh!t load of oil right.
Of course I ain't buying the oil has pretty much disappeared BS anyway. Republican or Democratic, Government officials prefer to lie instead of talking about an awful truth.
N
President Obama is the last Reagan Republican in Washington, D.C. and not a NAZI. I know it may be difficult to distinguish between the two at times . . .
There is something wrong with the numbers here. We all know that Reagan rewrote the formula for 'percent unemployed' as an attempt to deceive people. We always hear discussion of the unemployment % like this -- "We are at X% unemployed, but the real number is more like...". If real income has risen and we are worse off, we need a different measurement or set of numbers set as standards for expressing how well off Americans are.
The motivation is not to limit discussion of a complex economy to a few very simple numbers, but to start reading them off repeatedly until they become commonplace so that at least we don't end up flipping channels 10 years from now just to hear "Well real income is up but in order to get the correct calculation for real income you need to...". Also, the number(s) should give a clearer picture.
What numbers do you think would paint a clearer picture of the real financial situation that most Americans find themselves in?
@harry ashburn, I do not know how to answer. I remember hearing and seeing seven and one half hours of progressive shows for five days. I could not keep pace with those numbers and have a fully functioning brain. I found myself in a numb nut progressive state. Here was my schedule - Thom, three hours, Ed Shultz, two and one half hours (one and one half hours radio and one hour television), Keith, one hour TV, and Rachel, one hour TV. I am down to Thom for three hours.
Dear Gerald: your first post said: " I have good days for commenting and bad days for commenting."
um.....which , do you consider, is today?
White House Could Abet Google's Anti-Neutrality Moves Written by Joseph Torres 8/9/2010 8 comments
DISCUSS // Digg Del.icio.us Reddit Email This TWEET THIS
Don’t Be Evil.
It was a great slogan for a transformative company that was telling the world that it could make lots of money while still being an honest broker.
But as it turns out, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) may not be different from any other large corporation that cares only about its bottom line. Like other corporate giants, Google does not have a problem with pressuring the government to pass policies that reward big business at the expense of the public.
According to news stories, Google has reached an agreement with Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) that would allow the companies to orchestrate a corporate takeover of the Internet. They want to create a tiered Internet with fast lanes for content produced by big companies and slow lanes for content produced by everyone else.
The deal would effectively spell the end of network neutrality, the principle that enabled Google to exist in the first place.
Now that Google has benefited from policies that allowed a startup to become one of the most successful companies in the country, it is now seeking to protect its online dominance by shutting the door on the open Internet to prevent competition and to maximize profits.
The irony is that, while Google is colluding with Verizon on a deal that would allow for corporate censorship on the Internet, it is also working the State Department to pressure foreign countries to open up their markets to prevent government censorship abroad.
What makes this deal so problematic is that a federal court ruled in April that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) did not have the authority to regulate the broadband industry. The decision threw out the legal framework adopted by the Bush administration to deregulate the broadband industry, a framework that has resulted in a broadband market dominated by companies like Verizon, Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK), and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T).
At this moment, the FCC does not have the authority to prevent companies like Verizon from engaging in online corporate censorship by blocking or discriminating against certain content online. The FCC, however, can reestablish its authority to reregulate the broadband industry and protect the public from discriminatory business practices.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has faced relentless pressure from the phone and cable companies to stop the FCC from moving forward. Instead of standing up for the public, his office has held closed-door meetings with Google, AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon, allowing these companies the opportunity to write their own rules that would restrict our free speech rights online.
The chairman announced last week that his office will end the backroom negotiations. But no matter how the chairman tries to put a positive spin on what went on at these meetings, we all know nothing good comes from federal agencies allowing themselves to be captured by industry.
If we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the open Internet as we know it, Chairman Genachowski wouldn’t be the only one who deserves blame.
While the news media have been obsessed by the lack of bipartisanship in Washington, one story they have missed is how corporate campaign contributions have united both Democrats and Republicans to work together to kill an open Internet. Close to 80 Democrats have formed an alliance with House Republicans to kill net neutrality. They have written to the FCC, urging the Commission not to move forward with protecting an open Internet.
Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas), who has led the effort among Democrats in the House to undermine the FCC, and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) just introduced bipartisan legislation that would prevent the commission from acting to protect the public.
President Obama campaigned on a promise to take a “back seat to no one” in his support of network neutrality, a position he restated earlier this year. There’s worry the White House now might retreat from that position since it wants the phone and cable companies to continue writing checks to Democrats during this midterm election.
So while many Americans were angered last week by the actions of a company that tried to sell the public that it was honest about its “Don’t Be Evil” corporate philosophy, many are also losing confidence in the promises made by the FCC chairman and President Obama to protect an open Internet by passing strong net neutrality rules that would prevent discrimination online.
Don’t Be Evil? Change We Can Believe In?
Actions still speak louder than words.
— Joseph Torres is the Senior Advisor, Government and External Affairs, for Free Press.
Americans are held prisoners in their own country.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Political-Prisoners-in-Ame-by-Stephen-Lendman-100809-70.html
It's interesting to see how many people want us to be like other countries without actually visiting them to see how they live. The world needs a middle class, period. In countries where this is no middle class the poor are not even close to the poor in our country. I mean it is downright horrible. Why does our government want us to be like them? Control? casino en ligne ~ Poker, slots and Keno can all be found at this casino en ligne and in fact so can all the other casino games you love to play.
More wars please!!!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/one-more-war-please_b_674357.html
Dropping like flies!!!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/As-The-Economic-Team-Bails-by-Danny-Schechter-100809-274.html
Does anyone doubt that once a society ceases to be able to afford schools, public transit, paved roads, libraries and street lights -- or once it chooses not to be able to afford those things in pursuit of imperial priorities and the maintenance of a vast Surveillance and National Security State -- that a very serious problem has arisen, that things have gone seriously awry, that imperial collapse, by definition, is an imminent inevitability?
The collapsing American empire!!!
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/08/06/collapse&source=newsletter&utm_source=contactology&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Salon_Daily%20Newsletter%20%28Not%20Premium%29_7_30_110
Yah KPOJ is an excellent stable of substitute teachers, as is the greater Portland area as a whole, I'm sure.
A scorned American hero!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Bradley-Manning-An-Americ-by-Stephen-Lendman-100807-572.html
Lancing the boil!!!
http://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2010/08/08/lancing-the-boil/
We need nuclear disarmament. These words are smoke and mirrors as well as bait and switch tactics. We hear that America has reached accord with Russia on arms reduction. Yet, our nuclear arsenal grows daily. I am tired of the rhetoric on this subject.
@n8chz, Thom has very good substitutes for his show. I have good days for commenting and bad days for commenting. As an American I find that surviving in this numb nuts country very difficult. I will also find myself emotional drained from all the nonsense we hear as news. People will also need a respite from commenting. There is also need for recuperation from all the jackboots stomping on my face.
1:18 into the show and still no comments? Is it because we have a substitute teacher?
Tzedakah is more than charity; it is justice.
Progressive Punch rating was mentioned by one of your callers the other day and you didn't know what he meant. This website used to advertise on AAR's website. It's a handy way of keeping tabs on voting records as well as being a rating system. Al Franken rates the most liberal Senator. Horay for Al! I might not have ever heard of Thom Hartmann if you hadn't replaced him.
http://progressivepunch.org/
http://progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?member=NY5&search=selectScore&chamber=Senate&zip=&x=29&y=8
A death blow for Americans - unemployment!!!
http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/07/14/when_will_the_fed_come_to_the_rescue/index.html
A one and one half dip toward the Great Depression!!!
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2010/07/21/robert_reich_one_and_a_half_dip_recession/index.html
Working longer hours per week for less salary!!!
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/13/reich_economic_anger/index.html
The Great Depression is here!!!
http://www.salon.com/news/great_recession/index.html?story=/news/feature/2010/08/06/reich_unemployment_hole&source=newsletter&utm_source=contactology&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Salon_Daily%20Newsletter%20%28Not%20Premium%29_7_30_110